/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 29 Suppose that you were interested... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Suppose that you were interested in investigating the effect of a drug that is to be used in the treatment of patients who have glaucoma in both eyes. A comparison between the mean reduction in eye pressure for this drug and for a standard treatment is desired. Both treatments are applied directly to the eye. a. Describe how you would go about collecting data for your investigation. b. Does your method result in paired data? c. Can you think of a reasonable method of collecting data that would result in independent samples? Would such an experiment be as informative as a paired experiment? Comment.

Short Answer

Expert verified
To collect data for the investigation, each patient's one eye can receive the new drug and the other the standard treatment, and the reduction in eye pressure can be measured in each eye. This method results in paired data. An alternative method to yield independent samples would be having two separate groups of patients for two treatments, but it might be less informative due to potential patient-related variables.

Step by step solution

01

Data collection for investigation

Firstly, collect a sample of patients who have glaucoma in both eyes. Since both treatments are applied directly to the eye, each patient can be treated with the new drug in one eye and with the standard treatment in the other eye, alternating which eye receives what treatment to avoid any possible 'eye effect'. This allows you to directly compare the effect of the new drug against the standard treatment within the same patient.
02

Determination if the data is paired

The data would be considered paired, because the measurements (reduction in eye pressure) are taken from the same subject (a patient's two eyes) under two different conditions (new drug and standard treatment). The response from one eye is naturally paired with the response from the other eye of the same patient.
03

Alternative data collection method yielding independent samples & its informativeness

An alternative method to collect independent samples would be to have two separate groups of patients - one group receives the new drug and the other receives the standard treatment. However, this method may not be as informative. Paired design using a single group of patients receiving both treatments allows for control of extraneous patient-related variables that could affect eye pressure (like age, overall health, severity of the glaucoma, etc.).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Paired Data
When conducting experiments, researchers often seek to minimize the effects of external variables that could influence results. One powerful method is using paired data, where two related observations are collected from the same subject or closely matched subjects. In the context of the exercise on glaucoma drug testing, paired data involves treating the two eyes of the same patient differently - one with the new drug and the other with the standard treatment.

This approach naturally controls for variables that are inherent to the individual, such as genetic predispositions or health conditions, making it easier to observe the direct effects of the treatment. Each person serves as their own control, ensuring that differences are due to the treatments rather than between-subject variability.

The main benefit of paired data is it reduces random noise and increases the power of statistical tests. As a result, researchers can be more confident that observed changes are truly due to the treatment.
Independent Samples
Independent samples are another method for gathering data in experimental design. This approach entails collecting data from different groups that are not related or matched. For the glaucoma study, obtaining independent samples would mean treating one set of patients with the new drug and another distinct set with the standard treatment.

The main characteristic is that the groups are independent of each other, meaning differences observed can be attributable to differences between groups rather than within them. However, this method comes with potential pitfalls, as it can introduce variability from external factors associated with different patients.

While independent samples are useful, especially when paired design is impossible, they often require larger sample sizes to achieve the same level of statistical power. It’s essential in such cases to ensure that groups are as balanced as possible to minimize confounding factors.
Data Collection Methods
Effective data collection is critical in ensuring the validity and reliability of experimental results. When deciding on a data collection strategy, it's important to align the method with the objectives of your study.

In the glaucoma drug example, data collection involves measuring the change in eye pressure after applying treatments. For paired data, this involves treating one eye with the new medication and the other with the standard, within the same patient. This design is efficient and controls patient-related variability.

Alternatively, the independent samples approach could involve assigning patients randomly to two different groups, each receiving one treatment. While less efficient in controlling variability, this approach is simpler to implement when comparing entirely different populations.

Selecting the right data collection method depends on the specific research question, available resources, and the need to control for individual variability. Balancing these factors is key to achieving insightful and accurate results.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider two populations for which \(\mu_{1}=30, \sigma_{1}=2\), \(\mu_{2}=25\), and \(\sigma_{2}=3\). Suppose that two independent random samples of sizes \(n_{1}=40\) and \(n_{2}=50\) are selected. Describe the approximate sampling distribution of \(\bar{x}_{1}-\bar{x}_{2}\) (center, spread, and shape).

Are college students who take a freshman orientation course more or less likely to stay in college than those who do not take such a course? The article "A Longitudinal Study of the Retention and Academic Performance of Participants in Freshmen Orientation Courses" (Journal of College Student Development [1994]: 444 - 449) reported that 50 of 94 randomly selected students who did not participate in an orientation course returned for a second year. Of 94 randomly selected students who did take the orientation course, 56 returned for a second year. Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for \(\pi_{1}-\pi_{2}\), the difference in the proportion returning for students who do not take an orientation course and those who do. Give an interpretation of this interval.

Are very young infants more likely to imitate actions that are modeled by a person or simulated by an object? This question was the basis of a research study summarized in the article "The Role of Person and Object in Eliciting Early Imitation" (Journal of Experimental Child Psychology [1991]: 423-433). One action examined was mouth opening. This action was modeled repeatedly by either a person or a doll, and the number of times that the infant imitated the behavior was recorded. Twentyseven infants participated, with 12 exposed to a human model and 15 exposed to the doll. Summary values are given here. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean number of imitations is higher for infants who watch a human model than for infants who watch a doll? Test the relevant hypotheses using a .01 significance level.

In December 2001, the Department of Veterans Affairs announced that it would begin paying benefits to soldiers suffering from Lou Gehrig's disease who had served in the Gulf War (The New York Times, December 11,2001 ). This decision was based on an analysis in which the Lou Gehrig's disease incidence rate (the proportion developing the disease) for the approximately 700,000 soldiers sent to the Gulf between August 1990 and July 1991 was compared to the incidence rate for the approximately \(1.8\) million other soldiers who were not in the Gulf during this time period. Based on these data, explain why it is not appropriate to perform a formal inference procedure (such as the two-sample \(z\) test) and yet it is still reasonable to conclude that the incidence rate is higher for Gulf War veterans than for those who did not serve in the Gulf War.

Women diagnosed with breast cancer whose tumors have not spread may be faced with a decision between two surgical treatments -mastectomy (removal of the breast) or lumpectomy (only the tumor is removed). In a longterm study of the effectiveness of these two treatments. 701 women with breast cancer were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. One group received mastec- tomies and the other group received lumpectomies and radiation. Both groups were followed for 20 years after surgery. It was reported that there was no statistically significant difference in the proportion surviving for 20 years for the two treatments (Associated Press, October 17,2002 ). What hypotheses do you think the researchers tested in order to reach the given conclusion? Did the researchers reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.