Using the Explore Coverage web app, let's check that the large-sample
confidence interval for a proportion may work poorly with small samples. In
the app, set \(p=0.30\), \(n=10\) and leave the confidence level at \(95 \% .\)
Select to draw 100 random samples of size \(n\) and then click on Draw
Sample(s).
a. How many of the intervals you generated with the app fail to contain the
true value, \(p=0.30 ?\)
b. How many would you expect not to contain the true value? What does this
suggest?
c. To see that this is not a fluke, now take 1000 samples and see what
percentage of \(95 \%\) confidence intervals contain \(0.30 .\) (Note: For every
interval formed, the number of successes is smaller than \(15,\) so the large-
sample formula is not adequate.)
d. Using the Sampling Distribution for a Sample Proportion web app, generate
10,000 random samples of size 10 when \(p=0.30\). The app will plot the
simulated sampling distribution of the sample proportion values. Is it bell
shaped? Use this to help you explain why the large-sample confidence interval
performs poorly in this case. (This exercise illustrates that assumptions for
statistical methods are important, because the methods may perform poorly if
we use them when the assumptions are violated.)