/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 19 A social scientist in a less dev... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A social scientist in a less developed country studied the effect of the gender of the interviewer in a survey administrated to male respondents. The survey addressed the question of women's participation in politics. Half the subjects were surveyed by males and the remaining half by females. Results showed of the respondents surveyed by males, about \(37 \%\) favored active participation of women in politics in their country while of the respondents surveyed by females, \(67 \%\) favored the active participation of women in politics. Which type of bias does this illustrate: sampling bias, nonresponse bias, or response bias? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The bias illustrated is response bias due to the interviewer's gender affecting responses.

Step by step solution

01

Understand Bias Types

Start by understanding the different types of bias: Sampling bias occurs when the sample is not representative of the population; nonresponse bias arises when those who do not respond differ in important ways from those who do; response bias happens when respondents provide inaccurate answers due to the phrasing of questions or social desirability.
02

Analyze the Survey Conditions

In this study, different responses were obtained based on whether the survey was conducted by male or female interviewers. Males were less likely to favor women's participation when interviewed by males, while the opposite was true for female interviewers.
03

Identify the Bias Type

This discrepancy is a result of the influence exerted by the interviewer's gender on the responses, which aligns closely with response bias. Respondents may adjust their answers based on social desirability or perceived pressure from the interviewer's gender.
04

Confirm Response Bias

Since the respondents changed their answers based on who was conducting the interview, this indicates that the responses were influenced by external social factors rather than reflecting true opinions. This is a typical example of response bias.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Survey Methodology
Survey methodology involves the systematic collection of data from subjects to gather insights or acquire information. Crafting a survey involves various stages, from designing the questionnaire efficiently to selecting the right group of people to target as respondents. The methodology centers around ensuring the survey is both reliable and valid. This means the same results would ideally be obtained if the survey was repeated, and that the survey truly measures what it intends to measure.

A good survey methodology considers how to reach a representative sample of the population, how questions are framed, and how responses will be collected. Missteps in these areas can lead to different types of biases, which can skew the results and lead to incorrect conclusions. It's essential for survey methodology to address potential sources of bias so that the surveyed data is true to reality.
Social Desirability
Social desirability is a type of response bias in surveys, where respondents might answer questions in a way that aligns with societal norms or expectations rather than giving their true opinions. This is often because they want to be viewed favorably by others and avoid any negative judgments.

Social desirability can lead participants to underreport behaviors seen as undesirable or overreport socially approved behaviors. It becomes particularly apparent in sensitive topics, such as politics, religion, or health, where respondents might feel their genuine answers could be judged.

To mitigate this, researchers might use techniques like anonymity or phrase questions in neutral, non-leading ways. Ensuring that participants feel comfortable and unjudged ensures more honest and reflective responses in line with their true beliefs.
Gender Influence on Surveys
Gender influence on surveys refers to how the gender of respondents or interviewers might impact the responses received. As seen in the example, the gender of the interviewer affected the male respondents' answers on a political issue. Male respondents were more likely to support women's political participation when surveyed by women than by men.

This indicates that respondents might adjust their answers based on who is asking, potentially to align with perceived expectations of the interviewer. This influence ties into the broader concept of social desirability. Gender dynamics in survey administration highlight the nuances of response bias and the importance of researcher considerations to minimize its influence.
  • Ensuring diverse interviewer representation can help counteract potential biases.
  • Embedding checks like randomized interviewer assignment can also aid in achieving more genuine results.
Understanding these factors is crucial for designing surveys that genuinely capture the required insights without extraneous influences.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In \(2015,\) the National Drowning Report published in Australia shows a drowning rate of 0.26 per 100,000 people in the Australian Capital Territory \((\mathrm{ACT})\). A few days ago, you read about a teenager who drowned in the middle of the sea in the \(\mathrm{ACT}\). In deciding whether to go to the \(\mathrm{ACT}\) for a beach holiday with your best friends, should you give more weight to the study or to the news you have recently read about a teenager who drowned? Why?

Mean family size You'd like to estimate the mean size of families in your community. Explain why you'll tend to get a smaller sample mean if you sample \(n\) families than if you sample \(n\) individuals (asking them to report their family size). (Hint: When you sample individuals, explain why you are more likely to sample a large family than a small family. To think of this, it may help to consider the case \(n=1\) with a population of two families, one with 10 people and one with only 2 people.)

A study published in 2010 in the New England Journal of Medicine discusses a breast-cancer screening program that began in Norway in 1996 and was expanded geographically through \(2005 .\) Women in the study were offered mammography screening every two years. The goal of the study was to compare incidence- based rates of death from breast cancer across four groups: 1\. Women who from 1996 through 2005 were living in countries with screening. 2\. Women who from 1996 through 2005 were living in countries without screening. 3\. A historical-comparison group who lived in screening countries from 1986 through 1995 . 4\. A historical-comparison group who lived in nonscreening countries from 1986 through \(1995 .\) Data were analyzed for 40,075 women. Rates of death were reduced in the screening group as compared to the historical screening group and in the nonscreening group as compared to the historical nonscreening group. a. Is this an observational or experimental study? b. Identify the explanatory and response variable(s). c. Does the study prove that being offered mammography screening causes a reduction in death rates associated with breast cancer? Why or why not?

Issues in clinical trials A randomized clinical trial is planned for AIDS patients to investigate whether a new treatment provides improved survival over the current standard treatment. It is not known whether it will be better or worse. a. Why do researchers use randomization in such experiments rather than letting the subjects choose which treatment they will receive? b. When patients enrolling in the study are told the purpose of the study, explain why they may be reluctant to be randomly assigned to one of the treatments. c. If a researcher planning the study thinks the new treatment is likely to be better, explain why he or she may have an ethical dilemma in proceeding with the study.

In a follow-up study, 103 patients in the Netherlands having warts were randomly assigned to use duct tape or a placebo, which was a ring covered by tape so that the wart itself was kept clear \((\) Arch. Pediat. Adoles. Med. \(2006 ; 160: 1121-1125)\) a. Identify the response variable, the explanatory variable, the experimental units, and the treatments. b. After six weeks, the warts had disappeared for \(16 \%\) of the duct tape group and \(6 \%\) of the placebo group. However, the difference was declared to be "not statistically significant." Explain what this means.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.