/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 60 Diabetes and breast cancer In \(... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Diabetes and breast cancer In \(2015,\) an article published in the journal Breast Cancer Research and Treatment examined the impact of diabetes on the stages of breast cancer. The study concluded that diabetes is associated with advanced stages of breast cancer in patients and this could be a reason behind higher mortality rates. The researchers suggested looking at the possibility of race/ethnicity being a possible confounder. a. Explain what the last sentence means and how race/ ethnicity could potentially explain the association between diabetes and breast cancer. b. If race/ethnicity was not measured in the study and the researchers failed to consider its effects, could it be a confounding variable or a lurking variable? Explain the difference between a lurking variable and a confounding variable.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Race/ethnicity could confound the results by affecting both diabetes and breast cancer. Without measurement, it's a lurking variable.

Step by step solution

01

Define the Key Terms

Understand the key terms mentioned in the task: diabetes, breast cancer, and race/ethnicity. Diabetes is a metabolic disease characterized by high blood sugar levels, and breast cancer is a condition where breast cells grow out of control. Race/ethnicity refers to social group categories based on shared characteristics.
02

Interpret the Sentence About Confounding

The sentence suggests that race/ethnicity could be a confounding variable. This means it could influence both the likelihood of having diabetes and the progression of breast cancer, thereby possibly explaining part of the association observed between diabetes and advanced stages of breast cancer.
03

Explain Confounding Variables

A confounding variable is an outside influence that changes the effect of a dependent and an independent variable. In this context, race/ethnicity could affect both the prevalence of diabetes and the stage of breast cancer, thus confounding the analysis.
04

Define Lurking Variables

A lurking variable is a hidden variable that was not considered in the analysis, which affects the variables being studied. While similar to a confounding variable, lurking variables are not accounted for in the study design and analysis.
05

Determine if Race/Ethnicity is Confounding or Lurking

Since the researchers did not measure race/ethnicity, it acts as a lurking variable because it wasn't controlled or accounted for directly in their study. If it had been measured and included in analysis without proper control, it could be considered a confounding variable.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Diabetes and Breast Cancer
Diabetes and breast cancer are two significant health conditions that have been extensively studied in the field of public health and medicine. Recent research indicates that there might be a link between diabetes and more advanced stages of breast cancer. This association is critical as it could potentially explain why mortality rates are higher among breast cancer patients with diabetes.

Diabetes is a chronic condition characterized by high levels of blood sugar stemming from the body's inability to produce or effectively use insulin. Breast cancer, on the other hand, involves the rapid and uncontrolled growth of breast cells, which can lead to malignant tumors. The interaction between these two conditions may be influenced by various biological mechanisms, such as insulin resistance or hormonal changes, although the precise connection is still under investigation.

This observation has prompted researchers to explore whether factors like race or ethnicity might further complicate this association. Understanding the influence of such variables is crucial to developing comprehensive treatment plans and ensuring better health outcomes for patients.
Race and Ethnicity in Research
Race and ethnicity are crucial factors in epidemiological research. In studies investigating health conditions like diabetes and breast cancer, these elements could potentially serve as confounding variables, influencing the observed outcomes.

- **Race** commonly refers to the classification of human groups based on physical and social qualities. - **Ethnicity** often pertains to cultural factors, including nationality, culture, ancestry, and language.

When a study overlooks these facets, it risks attributing an effect to a variable that might actually be due to another underlying factor related to race or ethnicity. For instance, disparities in healthcare access, genetic predispositions, and lifestyle factors across different racial and ethnic groups can significantly impact the prevalence and progression of diseases. If not properly accounted for, these disparities can obscure the true nature of associations observed in health studies.

For meaningful insights, it is essential to measure and analyze race and ethnicity adequately in health studies to avoid misleading conclusions.
Statistical Analysis in Health Studies
Statistical analysis is the backbone of health studies, providing the foundation upon which conclusions about relationships between variables are built. In the case of the diabetes and breast cancer study, statistical tools are used to discern the potential influence of extraneous variables, like race and ethnicity, on the outcomes observed.

In analyzing such studies, researchers use statistical techniques to control for confounding variables. This involves:
  • Identifying potential confounders during the study design.
  • Including these variables in the analysis model to adjust their effects.
  • Employing methods such as stratification or multivariate analysis to isolate true associations.

A confounding variable is one that correlates with both the independent and dependent variables, potentially skewing results if not controlled. For example, if race/ethnicity wasn't taken into account as a potential confounder in the diabetes and breast cancer study, the conclusions could have been misleading.

Effective statistical analysis ensures that researchers can confidently differentiate between causation and mere correlation, leading to more accurate and reliable outcomes that help in forming better preventive and treatment strategies.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

For the 100 cars on the lot of a used-car dealership, would you expect a positive association, negative association, or no association between each of the following pairs of variables? Explain why. a. The age of the car and the number of miles on the odometer b. The age of the car and the resale value c. The age of the car and the total amount that has been spent on repairs d. The weight of the car and the number of miles it travels on a gallon of gas e. The weight of the car and the number of liters it uses per \(100 \mathrm{~km}\).

For the following pairs of variables, which more naturally is the response variable and which is the explanatory variable? a. Carat ( \(=\) weight ) and price of a diamond b. Dosage (low/medium/high) and severity of adverse event (mild/moderate/strong/serious) of a drug c. Top speed and construction type (wood or steel) of a roller coaster d. Type of college (private/public) and graduation rate

A study conducted among sophomores at Fairfield University showed a correlation of -0.69 between the number of hours spent watching TV and GPA. It was found that for each additional hour a week you spent watching \(\mathrm{TV}\), you could expect on average to see a drop of \(.0452,\) on a 4.0 scale, in your GPA. a. Is there a causal relationship, whereby watching more TV decreases your GPA? b. Explain how a student's intelligence, measured by her/ his IQ score, could be a lurking variable that might be responsible for this association, having a common correlation with both GPA and TV-watching hours.

Oil and GDP An article in the September \(16,2006,\) issue of The Economist showed a scatterplot for many nations relating the response variable annual oil \(y=\) consumption per person (in barrels) and the explanatory variable \(x=\) gross domestic product (GDP, per person, in thousands of dollars). The values shown on the plot were approximately as shown in the table. a. Create a data file and use it to construct a scatterplot. Interpret. b. Find and interpret the prediction equation. c. Find and interpret the correlation. d. Find and interpret the residual for Canada. \begin{tabular}{lcc} \hline Nation & GDP & Oil Consumption \\ \hline India & 3 & 1 \\ China & 8 & 2 \\ Brazil & 9 & 4 \\ Mexico & 10 & 7 \\ Russia & 11 & 8 \\ S. Korea & 20 & 18 \\ Italy & 29 & 12 \\ France & 30 & 13 \\ Britain & 31 & 11 \\ Germany & 31 & 12 \\ Japan & 31 & 16 \\ Canada & 34 & 26 \\ U.S. & 41 & 26 \\ \hline \end{tabular}

NAEP scores In 2015 , eighth-grade math scores on the National Assessment of Educational Progress had a mean of 283.56 in Maryland compared to a mean of 284.37 in Connecticut (Source: http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/ naepdata/dataset.aspx). a. Identify the response variable and the explanatory variable. b. The means in Maryland were respectively \(274,284,285,\) 291 and 294 for people who reported the number of pages read in school and for homework, respectively as \(0-5,6-10,11-15,15-20\) and 20 or more. These means were 270,281,284,289 and 293 in Connecticut. Identify the third variable given here. Explain how it is possible for Maryland to have the higher mean for each class, yet for Connecticut to have the higher mean when the data are combined. (This is a case of Simpson's paradox for a quantitative response.)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.