/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 23 Comparing tans Examples 1 and 2 ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Comparing tans Examples 1 and 2 compared two methods of getting a tan. Suppose Allison conducted an expanded experiment in which nine participants were randomly assigned to one of two brands of tanning lotion or to the tanning studio, three participants to each treatment. The nine were ranked on the quality of tan. a. Which nonparametric test could be used to compare the three treatments? b. Give an example of ranks for the three treatments that would have the largest possible test statistic value and the smallest possible \(\mathrm{P}\) -value for this experiment. (Hint: What allocation of ranks would have the greatest between-groups variation in the mean ranks?)

Short Answer

Expert verified
Use the Kruskal-Wallis H-test; ranks 1-3, 4-6, 7-9 split between treatments for maximum test statistic.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Scenario

We have nine participants ranked based on their tan quality, randomly assigned to three groups: two tanning lotions and one tanning studio, three participants each. We need to compare the ranks across these groups using a nonparametric test.
02

Choosing the Right Test

When comparing more than two independent groups based on ranks, we use the Kruskal-Wallis H-test. This test is the nonparametric equivalent of the one-way ANOVA.
03

Setting up Extreme Rank Situations

To achieve the largest possible test statistic value, the ranks should be completely segregated by treatment. Suppose the tanning studio consistently produced the best tans, it would get the highest ranks: 7, 8, and 9. One lotion could be worse: ranks 1, 2, and 3, and the other mediocre: 4, 5, and 6.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Kruskal-Wallis H-test
The Kruskal-Wallis H-test is a powerful nonparametric method used to compare three or more independent groups based on their ranks, rather than their original numerical values. This test is particularly useful when the data does not meet the assumptions required for a traditional ANOVA, such as normality. Instead of comparing means, the Kruskal-Wallis test compares the medians of the groups by analyzing the distribution of ranks.

To conduct the test, each data point across the groups is ranked in order from smallest to largest, irrespective of the group it belongs to. These ranks are then compared across groups to determine if there are statistically significant differences.
  • It asks whether the distribution of ranks differs significantly across groups.
  • The test statistic, referred to as the "H statistic," helps identify differences among the groups.
  • A significant result suggests that at least one group differs significantly from the others, but it doesn't specify which groups are different. Follow-up tests are needed for those insights.
Rank Comparison
Rank Comparison is essential in nonparametric statistics and is used to reduce data to a comparable scale, particularly useful in the Kruskal-Wallis H-test. In the context of an experiment like Allison's tanning study, suppose that the participants are ranked from 1 to 9 based on tan quality.

When comparing different treatments, it is crucial to convert these raw scores into ranks. By using the ranks, researchers avoid the influence of skewed or non-normal distributions that can skew results in parametric tests.
  • Ranks help to normalize data across different groups in the absence of normal distribution.
  • They focus on the order of data rather than their numerical differences.
  • Comparison through ranks can provide a clear picture of how groups compare relative to each other in terms of quality or effectiveness.
Ranks need careful assignment to ensure that extreme values do not distort comparisons. As in the exercise, assigning high ranks to one group and low ranks to another highlights potential disparities in treatment efficiency.
Nonparametric Statistics
Nonparametric Statistics refer to techniques used when data doesn’t fit the assumptions of parametric tests, such as normal distribution or equal variance. These statistical methods are less sensitive to outliers and skewed data.

They are invaluable in research scenarios where data is ordinal, categorical, or noticeably non-normal. This makes them adaptable and robust for a wide range of applications like comparing treatments in small groups, such as the tanning lotion test conducted by Allison. Some key characteristics include:
  • They rely on fewer assumptions about data distribution.
  • They are effective with ordinal data, where only the ranking or order is meaningful.
  • Nonparametric methods like the Kruskal-Wallis H-test often require converting data to ranks, simplifying analysis.
In Allison's experiment, these methods allow a straightforward comparison of groups without needing the complex requirements of parametric tests, ensuring valid results without heavy assumptions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What's the best way to learn French? Exercise 14.3 gave the data in the table for scores on the first quiz for ninthgrade students in an introductory-level French course. The instructor grouped the students in the course as follows: Group 1: Never studied foreign language before, but have good English skills Group 2: Never studied foreign language before; have poor English skills Group 3: Studied at least one other foreign language The table also shows results of using MINITAB to perform the Kruskal-Wallis test. a. Find the rank associated with each observation and show how to find the mean rank for Group \(1 .\) b. Report and interpret the P-value for the test. $$ \begin{array}{ccc} \hline \text { Scores on the quiz } & & \\ \hline \text { Group 1 } & \text { Group 2 } & \text { Group 3 } \\ \hline 4 & 1 & 9 \\ 6 & 5 & 10 \\ 8 & & 5 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

Smartphone sales \(\quad\) A smartphone retailer wants to compare the sales of smartphones with and without offering a discount. She wanted to see if the sales increased or not. In an experimental study over 6 days, she offered a discount on 3 days while no discount was offered on the other 3 days. The final sales are in the table.$$ \begin{array}{cc} \hline \text { Sales with discount } & \text { Sales without discount } \\ \hline 21 & 11 \\ 25 & 13 \\ 23 & 14 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Find the ranks and the mean rank for sales with and without discount. b. Show that there are 20 possible allocations of ranks for smartphone sales with and without discount. c. Explain why the observed ranks for the two groups are one of the two most extreme ways the two groups can differ, for the 20 possible allocations of the ranks. d. Explain why the P-value for the two-sided test equals 0.10

Comparing clinical therapies A clinical psychologist wants to choose between two therapies for treating severe mental depression. She selects six patients who are similar in their depressive symptoms and overall quality of health. She randomly selects three patients to receive Therapy \(1 .\) The other three receive Therapy 2 . After one month of treatment, the improvement in each patient is measured by the change in a score for measuring severity of mental depression - the higher the change score, the better. The improvement scores are Therapy 1: 25,40,45 Therapy 2: 10,20,30 a. Show all possible ways the ranks from 1 to 6 could be distributed between the two treatments. (Hint: There are 20 allocations.) b. For each possible allocation of ranks, find the mean rank for each treatment and the difference between the mean ranks. c. Consider the null hypothesis of identical response distributions for the two treatments. Presuming \(\mathrm{H}_{0}\) is true, construct the sampling distribution of the difference between the sample mean ranks for the two treatments. d. For the actual data shown above, find and interpret the P-value for the alternative hypothesis that the two treatments have different effects. (You can check your answers by entering the data in the Permutation Test for Means web app, selecting Wilcoxon rank sum as the test statistic, and selecting the option for generating all possible permutations.)

How long do you tolerate being put on hold? Examples \(1-4\) and 7 in Chapter 14 referred to the following randomized experiment: An airline analyzed whether telephone callers to their reservations office would remain on hold longer, on average, if they heard (a) an advertisement about the airline, (b) Muzak, or (c) classical music. For 15 callers randomly assigned to these three conditions, the table shows the data. It also shows the ranks for the 15 observations as well as the mean rank for each group and some results from using MINITAB to conduct the KruskalWallis test. a. State the null and alternative hypotheses for the Kruskal-Wallis test. b. Identify the value of the test statistic for the KruskalWallis test and state its approximate sampling distribution, presuming \(\mathrm{H}_{0}\) is true. c. Report and interpret the P-value shown for the Kruskal-Wallis test. d. To find out which pairs of groups significantly differ, how could you follow up the Kruskal-Wallis test? $$ \begin{array}{lllr} \hline \text { Telephone holding times by type of recorded message } & \\ \hline \begin{array}{l} \text { Recorded } \\ \text { Message } \end{array} & \begin{array}{l} \text { Holding Time } \\ \text { Observations } \end{array} & \text { Ranks } & \text { Mean Rank } \\ \hline \text { Muzak } & 0,1,3,4,6 & 1,2.5,5,6,8 & 4.5 \\ \text { Advertisement } & 1,2,5,8,11 & 2.5,4,7,10.5,13 & 7.4 \\ \text { Classical } & 7,8,9,13,15 & 9,10.5,12,14,15 & 12.1 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

Complete the analogy The \(t\) test for comparing two means is to the one-way ANOVA \(F\) test as the Wilcoxon test is to the ______ test.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.