/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 84 Twins and breast cancer \(\quad\... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Twins and breast cancer \(\quad\) Excessive cumulative exposure to ovarian hormones is believed to cause breast cancer. A study (New England J. Medic. 2003; 348: \(2313-2322\) ) used information from 1811 pairs of female twins, one or both of whom had breast cancer. Paired twins were compared with respect to age at puberty, when breast cancer was first diagnosed, and other factors. Their survey did not show an association between hereditary breast cancer and hormone exposure. a. What type of observational study was used by the researchers? b. Why do you think the researchers used this design instead of a randomized experiment?

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. Cross-sectional study. b. Ethical limitations prevent hormone exposure manipulation.

Step by step solution

01

Determine the Observational Study Type

An observational study where researchers compare outcomes between groups that naturally occur is typically divided into cohort studies, case-control studies, or cross-sectional studies. In this case, where twin pairs are compared with a focus on when breast cancer was first diagnosed and hormone exposure, this is indicative of a cross-sectional study. This type of study measures exposure and outcome simultaneously.
02

Explain the Study Design Decision

The researchers likely used a cross-sectional study because it is impractical or unethical to manipulate hormone exposure levels in humans. Twin studies are especially powerful because identical twins share the same genetic material, allowing researchers to better isolate the impact of environmental or lifestyle factors such as hormone exposure on breast cancer outcomes. A randomized experiment would involve unethical manipulation of potentially harmful conditions.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Cross-Sectional Study
In research, a cross-sectional study is a type of observational study design that allows researchers to analyze data from a population at one specific point in time. This approach is particularly useful when trying to find correlations between variables. By collecting information about both exposure (like hormone levels) and outcome (such as breast cancer) simultaneously, researchers can quickly assess potential associations.
For instance, in the study of breast cancer among twins, researchers looked at how factors like age at puberty and hormone exposure were related to the diagnosis of breast cancer. Because this was a cross-sectional study, they gathered data from the twins at the same time, rather than following them over many years.
This method is advantageous when immediate data collection is needed, but it also has limitations. You cannot definitively determine cause-and-effect relationships with cross-sectional studies since they capture a single snapshot in time.
Twin Studies
Twin studies are a fascinating type of research that involves studying twins to understand the balance between genetic and environmental factors. There are two types of twins studied: identical (monozygotic) and fraternal (dizygotic). Identical twins have the same genetic makeup, while fraternal twins do not, making them like typical siblings.
This similarity in genetics makes identical twins an ideal group for researchers to study environmental influences, like hormone exposure, without genetic differences interfering with the results. In the case of breast cancer research, studying twins helps researchers isolate the impact of non-genetic factors.
Particularly, if one twin develops breast cancer and the other does not, researchers might look at what different exposures or experiences they had to explain these outcomes. Twin studies can provide insights into how much of a role environment and lifestyle choices play in disease development.
Hormone Exposure
When we talk about hormone exposure in medical research, we're often focused on how certain hormones might influence the development of diseases, like breast cancer. Hormones like estrogen and progesterone, which are produced by the ovaries, have been at the center of many studies due to their effects on breast tissue.
Excessive lifetime exposure to these hormones, due to factors like early puberty or late menopause, is believed to increase the risk of developing breast cancer. In the context of the observational study on twins, researchers assessed whether the variation in hormone exposure between the twins contributed to differences in breast cancer incidence.
Understanding hormone exposure is crucial because it helps in identifying prevention strategies. While we can't change our genetic makeup, being aware of hormone-related risk factors could guide lifestyle choices and medical interventions to manage exposure.
Breast Cancer Research
Breast cancer research is a vast field focused on understanding the causes, biology, and treatment options for breast cancer. Researchers study genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors that may contribute to the development of the disease.
Studies like the twin research study published in the New England Journal of Medicine help scientists and medical professionals gain insights into the complex interplay of genetics and environment. By examining cases where one twin develops breast cancer, but the other does not, researchers can tease apart genetic predispositions and actual exposure scenarios, like hormone levels.
Continued research in these areas is crucial, as breast cancer remains one of the most common cancers worldwide. Through studies, we can strive to improve early detection, develop new treatments, and ultimately work toward prevention strategies.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Sampling your fellow students You are assigned to direct a study on your campus to discover factors that are associated with strong academic performance. You decide to identify 20 students who have perfect GPAs of 4.0 , and then measure explanatory variables for them that you think may be important, such as high school GPA and average amount of time spent studying per day. a. Explain what is wrong with this study design. b. Describe a study design that would provide more useful information.

Multiple choice: What's a simple random sample? simple random sample of size \(n\) is one in which a. Every \(n\) th member is selected from the population. b. Each possible sample of size \(n\) has the same chance of being selected. c. There is exactly the same proportion of women in the sample as is in the population. d. You keep sampling until you have a fixed number of people having various characteristics (e.g., males, females).

Multiple choice: Emotional health survey \(\quad\) An Internet poll conducted in the United Kingdom by Netdoctor. co.uk asked individuals to respond to an "emotional health survey" (see www.hfienberg.com/clips/pollspiked. htm). There were 400 volunteer respondents. Based on the results, the British Broadcasting Corporation \((\mathrm{BBC})\) reported that "Britons are miserable-it's official." This conclusion reflected the poll responses, of which one quarter feared a "hopeless future," one in three felt "downright miserable," and nearly one in ten thought "their death would make things better for others." Which of the following is not correct about why these results may be misleading? a. Many people who access a medical Web site and are willing to take the time to answer this questionnaire may be having emotional health problems. b. Some respondents may not have been truthful or may have been Internet surfers who take pleasure in filling out a questionnaire multiple times with extreme answers. c. The sample is a volunteer sample rather than a random sample. d. It's impossible to learn useful results about a population from a sample of only 400 people.

"What rots beneath" This was the headline of a New York Times article (May 19,2003 ) about the Gowanus Canal in Brooklyn, which had become infamous for its contamination from sewage and industrial waste. Scientists and Army Corps of Engineers technicians used augurs, drills, and a split-spoon, which sucks up the muck of the canal bottom, to analyze what is "living" in the canal. a. Describe the population under study. b. Explain why a census is not practical for this study. What advantages does sampling offer?

Comparing polls The following table shows the result of the 2008 presidential election along with the vote predicted by several organizations in the days before the election. The sample sizes were typically about 1000 to 2000 people. The percentages for each poll do not sum to 100 because of voters who indicated they were undecided or preferred another candidate. a. Treating the sample sizes as 1000 each, find the approximate margin of error. b. Do most of the predictions fall within the margin of error of the actual vote percentages? \(\quad\) Considering the relative sizes of the sample and the population and the undecided factor, would you say that these polls had good accuracy? $$ \begin{array}{lcc} \hline \text { Predicted Vote } & & \\ \hline \text { Poll } & \text { Obama } & \text { McCain } \\ \hline \text { Gallup/USA Today } & 55 & 44 \\ \text { Harris } & 52 & 44 \\ \text { ABC/Wash Post } & 53 & 44 \\ \text { CBS } & 51 & 42 \\ \text { NBC/WSJ } & 51 & 43 \\ \text { Pew Research } & 52 & 46 \\ \text { Actual vote } & 52.7 & 46.0 \end{array} $$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.