/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 81 Hazing Hazing within college fra... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Hazing Hazing within college fraternities is a continuing concern. Before a national meeting of college presidents, a polling organization is retained to conduct a survey among fraternities on college campuses, gathering information on hazing for the meeting. The investigators from the polling organization realize that it is not possible to find a reliable sampling frame of all fraternities. Using a list of all college institutions, they randomly sample 30 of them, and then interview the officers of each fraternity at each of these institutions that has fraternities. Would you describe this as a simple random sample, cluster random sample, or stratified random sample of the fraternities? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
This is a cluster random sample because entire institutions (clusters) were randomly selected, and all fraternities within them were surveyed.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Sampling Techniques

To solve this problem, we need to identify the type of sampling method used. Simple random sampling involves selecting individuals randomly from the entire population. Cluster random sampling divides a population into clusters, randomly selects some clusters, and then every member from the selected clusters is surveyed. Stratified random sampling involves dividing the population into strata based on certain characteristics and then randomly sampling from each stratum.
02

Identify the Sampling Method in Use

In this scenario, investigators first select a random sample of 30 college institutions (which can be viewed as 'clusters'). Then, they interview every fraternity officer at each of these selected institutions. This means that after selecting the institutions, investigators survey all fraternities within those institutions.
03

Classify the Sampling Method

Since the investigators have selected entire clusters of institutions and then surveyed every fraternity within those clusters, this method aligns with the characteristics of cluster random sampling. In cluster sampling, entire groups are randomly selected, and all individuals within those groups are surveyed.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Cluster Sampling
Cluster sampling is an efficient way of collecting data when dealing with large populations that are challenging to list entirely. In this method, a population is divided into separate groups, known as clusters. Instead of sampling individuals from the entire population, researchers randomly select some clusters and include every member of these clusters in the sample. This approach can save time and resources when it's difficult or impossible to obtain a comprehensive sampling frame for the whole population.

In the example given, investigators identified entire college institutions as clusters. Instead of individual fraternities, they chose 30 institutions and then gathered data from all fraternities within those colleges. This is a classic case of cluster sampling. This technique is particularly useful when similar data can be gathered from closely-knit units like college campuses, towns, or neighborhoods.
  • Efficient for large, dispersed populations.
  • Cost-effective as it requires only slicing some sections of the population.
  • Potential risk of increased sampling error if clusters are not homogenous.
Simple Random Sampling
Simple Random Sampling (SRS) is one of the fundamental sampling methods where each individual in the population has an equal chance of being selected. This method ensures that every possible sample combination has the same likelihood of being chosen, making it a fair and unbiased representation of the whole. However, SRS requires a complete list or frame of the entire population to randomly pick individuals. Such a list can be time-consuming to obtain, especially with groups like fraternities scattered across many institutions. In our original exercise, choosing individual fraternities across all colleges would have been challenging with this method due to the lack of a detailed list covering all possible candidates. Despite these constraints, the simplicity of SRS offers distinct advantages:
  • Provides a good basis for generating unbiased results.
  • Easy to analyze due to the random nature of the sample selection.
  • Can be difficult to implement without a complete sampling frame.
Stratified Sampling
Stratified sampling involves dividing a population into distinct subgroups or strata based on shared attributes or characteristics. Samples are then taken from each stratum, usually proportionate to the subgroup's size relative to the entire population. This technique can increase the precision of the sample by ensuring that key segments of the population are adequately represented. If this method were applied to the fraternities, investigators would first categorize the population by relevant characteristics—like college size or regional location—before randomly selecting fraternity members from each subgroup. This ensures diversity and representation across the sample, but requires more upfront knowledge about the population's attributes. Stratified sampling can offer significant benefits when population heterogeneity needs careful representation:
  • Increases representation across diverse population groups.
  • Reduces sampling error compared to simple random sampling when stratification is done effectively.
  • Works well when population subgroups are difficult to access uniformly.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Mean family size You'd like to estimate the mean size of families in your community. Explain why you'll tend to get a smaller sample mean if you sample \(n\) families than if you sample \(n\) individuals (asking them to report their family size). (Hint: When you sample individuals, explain why you are more likely to sample a large family than a small family. To think of this, it may help to consider the case \(n=1\) with a population of two families, one with 10 people and one with only 2 people.)

Fear of asbestos Your friend reads about a study in an epidemiology journal that estimates that the chance is 15 out of 1 million that a teacher who works for 30 years in a school with typical asbestos levels gets cancer from asbestos. However, she also knows about a teacher who died recently who may have had asbestos exposure. In deciding whether to leave teaching, should she give more weight to the study or to the story she heard about the teacher who died? Why?

Hairdressers at risk \(\quad\) In a study by Swedish researchers (Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2002,\(59: 517-\) 522), 2410 women who had worked as hairdressers and given birth to children were compared to 3462 women from the general population who had given birth. The hairdressers had a slightly higher percentage of infants with a birth defect. a. Identify the response variable and the explanatory variable. b. Is this study an observational study or an experiment? Explain. c. Can we conclude that there's something connected with being a hairdresser that causes higher rates of birth defects? Explain.

Comparing female and male students You plan to sample from the 3500 undergraduate students who are enrolled at the University of Rochester to compare the proportions of female and male students who would like to see the United States have a female president. a. Describe the steps for how you would proceed, if you plan a simple random sample of 80 students. Illustrate, by picking the first three students for the sample. b. Suppose that you use random numbers to select students, but stop selecting females as soon as you have \(40,\) and you stop selecting males as soon as you have \(40 .\) Is the resulting sample a simple random sample? Why or why not? c. What type of sample is the sample in part b? What advantage might it have over a simple random sample?

Marijuana and schizophrenia, continued Many research studies such as the one discussed in Exercise 4.82 focus on a link between marijuana use and psychotic disorders such as schizophrenia. Studies have found that people with schizophrenia are twice as likely to smoke marijuana as those without the disorder. Data also suggest that individuals who smoke marijuana are twice as likely to develop schizophrenia as those who do not use the drug. Contributing to the apparent relationship, a comprehensive review done in 2007 of the existing research reported that individuals who merely try marijuana increase their risk of developing schizophrenia by \(40 \%\). Meanwhile, the percentage of the population who has tried marijuana has increased dramatically in the United States over the past 50 years, whereas the percentage of the population affected by schizophrenia has remained constant at about \(1 \% .\) What might explain this puzzling result?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.