/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 26 Gun control More than \(75 \%\) ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Gun control More than \(75 \%\) of Americans answer yes when asked, "Do you favor cracking down against illegal gun sales?" but more than \(75 \%\) say no when asked, "Would you favor a law giving police the power to decide who may own a firearm?" a. Which statistic would someone who opposes gun control prefer to quote? b. Explain what is wrong with the wording of each of these statements.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. Opponents of gun control prefer the second statistic. b. Both questions have biased wording that influences responses.

Step by step solution

01

Identify Preference Against Gun Control

To find which statistic someone who opposes gun control would prefer to quote, we need to understand the implications of each statistic. The first statement indicates a high percentage supporting a crackdown on illegal gun sales, while the second reveals a high percentage against giving police the power to decide gun ownership. Since opponents of gun control typically argue against restrictive measures, they would likely quote the second statistic, highlighting resistance to increased police power over firearm ownership.
02

Analyze the Wording of "Crack Down on Illegal Gun Sales"

The wording of the first question assumes broad support for its aim by framing it as targeting 'illegal' activities, which are generally frowned upon. This creates an impression that the question is about enforcing the law rather than implementing new restrictions, leading to potentially biased responses that don't truly reflect opinions on gun control as a broader topic.
03

Analyze the Wording of "Police Power to Decide Firearm Ownership"

The second question has a loaded phrasing by suggesting that police have the power to decide ownership, which can evoke negative connotations of excessive control and violation of personal rights. This kind of wording may lead respondents to resist the idea due to the implication of giving authorities too much power, without addressing the nuances of responsible regulation.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Question Wording Effect
The way a question is worded can have a significant effect on the responses it elicits. This is known as the "Question Wording Effect." People often react to certain words or phrases more emotionally, leading to biased answers.
For example, when a survey asks about cracking down on "illegal" gun sales, the word "illegal" already carries a negative connotation that most people would disapprove of. It presents the scenario as combating unlawful activities rather than imposing restrictions, which may skew the respondents to answer "yes," even if they generally do not support stricter gun controls.
Similarly, when people are asked if police should be given power over firearm ownership, the wording suggests potential overreach. It implies that authority figures could have arbitrary control, which could frighten individuals who value personal freedoms, prompting them to respond "no."
In essence, even small changes in phrasing can dramatically change the outcomes of survey results, so it's crucial to present questions as neutrally as possible to get a true reading of public opinion.
Public Opinion Polls
Public opinion polls are a common way to gauge what a large group of people think about a certain issue. They aim to capture the mood, preferences, or opinions by sampling a portion of the population.
These polls can be powerful tools for policymakers, media outlets, and organizations to understand public sentiment. However, the reliability of these polls heavily depends on the methodology used, especially the wording of questions.
An effective public opinion poll should use clear and neutral language that does not sway participants towards a desired answer. It is important to ensure that respondents understand the questions posed without any leading statements or loaded phrases.
Ultimately, well-designed polls can offer valuable insights, but they can also mislead if biased wording or poor sampling methods are involved. Always critically examine the questions and how the data was collected before trusting poll results.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis is the science of collecting, exploring, and interpreting large amounts of data to discover underlying patterns or trends. It plays a crucial role in understanding survey results but is particularly sensitive to biases introduced by question wording.
When analyzing survey data, researchers apply statistical methods to draw conclusions, make predictions, and make decisions. For instance, in the exercise, the two questions on gun control would require careful analysis to extract meaningful insights.
If the data is tainted by biased questions, the statistical analysis might reveal misleading conclusions about public opinion, which could affect decision-making processes. Careful statistical techniques and controls can help identify and correct biases, ensuring that the analysis is reliable.
In conclusion, while statistical analysis can provide robust insights, it's important to acknowledge the influence of how data is collected and framed. Only by ensuring that surveys are designed free from biases can statistical analysis provide accurate representations of reality.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Sampling your fellow students You are assigned to direct a study on your campus to discover factors that are associated with strong academic performance. You decide to identify 20 students who have perfect GPAs of 4.0 , and then measure explanatory variables for them that you think may be important, such as high school GPA and average amount of time spent studying per day. a. Explain what is wrong with this study design. b. Describe a study design that would provide more useful information.

Job market for MBA students A February \(2,2003,\) Atlanta Journal Constitution article about the bleak job market for graduating MBA students described an opinion survey conducted by a graduate student at a major state university. The student polled 1500 executive recruiters, asking their opinions on the industries most likely to hire. He received back questionnaires from 97 recruiters, of whom 54 indicated that health care was the industry most likely to see job growth. a. What is the population for this survey? b. What was the intended sample size? What was the sample size actually observed? What was the percentage of nonresponse? c. Describe two potential sources of bias with this survey.

Multistage health survey \(\quad\) A researcher wants to study regional differences in dental care. He takes a multistage sample by dividing the United States into four regions, taking a simple random sample of ten schools in each region, randomly sampling three classrooms in each school, and interviewing all students in those classrooms about whether they've been to a dentist in the previous year. Identify each stage of this sampling design, indicating whether it involves stratification or clustering.

Colds and vitamin \(\mathbf{C}\) For some time there has been debate about whether regular large doses of vitamin \(\mathrm{C}\) reduce the chance of getting a common cold. a. Explain how you could design an experiment to test this. Describe all parts of the experiment, including (i) what the treatments are, (ii) how you assign subjects to the treatments, and (iii) how you could make the study double-blind. b. An observational study indicates that people who take vitamin \(\mathrm{C}\) regularly get fewer colds, on the average. Explain why these results could be misleading.

Internet poll Find an example of results of an Internet poll. Do you trust the results of the poll? If not, explain why not.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.