/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 85 For binary response variables, o... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

For binary response variables, one reason that logistic regression is usually preferred over straight-line regression is that a fixed change in \(x\) often has a smaller impact on a probability \(p\) when \(p\) is near 0 or near 1 than when \(p\) is near the middle of its range. Let \(y\) refer to the decision to rent or to buy a home, with \(p=\) the probability of buying, and let \(x=\) weekly family income. In which case do you think an increase of \(\$ 100\) in \(x\) has greater effect: when \(x=50,000\) (for which \(p\) is near 1 ), when \(x=0\) (for which \(p\) is near 0 ), or when \(x=500\) ? Explain how your answer relates to the choice of a linear versus logistic regression model.

Short Answer

Expert verified
An increase in income has the greatest effect at \( x=500 \), due to the steep slope of the logistic function in midrange probabilities.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Logistic Function

In logistic regression, the probability \( p \) of an event occurring is modeled by the logistic function, which is \( p = \frac{1}{1 + e^{-z}} \), where \( z = \beta_0 + \beta_1 x \). This function maps any real-valued number to the \( (0,1) \) interval and is S-shaped, meaning changes in \( x \) have variable impacts depending on the value of \( p \).
02

Analyzing Change Impact in Neural Parts

When \( p \) is near 0 or near 1, the logistic function flattens, making the response less sensitive to changes in \( x \). Hence, an increase from \( x = 0 \) will have minimal impact on \( p \) because it is starting in the flat region near \( p = 0 \). Similarly, near \( p = 1 \) with \( x = 50,000 \), changes also produce minimal effects because the function is flat again.
03

Examining the Mid-Range Impact

For \( x = 500 \), the assumed probability \( p \) is somewhere in the middle of the logistic curve's range. Because this part of the curve is the steepest, a change of \$100 in income here will produce the largest change in the probability \( p \). The logistic curve is most responsive to changes in \( x \) midway between its asymptotes.
04

Linear vs. Logistic Regression

In linear regression, changes in \( x \) yield constant slope changes in \( y \), which isn't realistic for probabilities constrained between 0 and 1. Logistic regression, with its variable slope (steep in the middle, flat at the ends), realistically models probabilities, making it preferable here. Thus, increases in income influence more significantly when probabilities are not near 0 or 1.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Binary Response Variables
A binary response variable is one that has two possible outcomes. These outcomes could represent yes/no, true/false, or in our exercise, a decision to rent or buy a home. Let's denote this decision by the variable 'y'. Why is it called 'binary'? Because it can only take on one of two values: perhaps '0' for renting and '1' for buying. In many real-world situations, such as predicting whether someone will purchase a product, the response variable doesn’t just depend on a single factor. But when it does depend mainly on one, like predicting home-buying decisions based on income, understanding how these two outcomes interact becomes crucial. Binary response variables are ubiquitous in fields like marketing, medicine, and economics, wherever a decision or classification into two categories is required.
Probability Impact
Understanding probability impact in logistic regression involves understanding how changes in an independent variable, such as weekly income, affect the probability of an event, like buying a home. The impact isn’t uniform across different values. For instance, in our example, a $100 increase in income has little effect when probabilities are already near 0 (low probability) or 1 (high probability). This is because the function flattens at these extremes, reflecting diminishing returns on changes. However, at mid-range values, where probabilities might hover around 0.5, the impact is much more pronounced. This part of the logistic curve tends to be the steepest, meaning that small changes in income can lead to significant changes in probabilities. Understanding where the maximum impact occurs is important when analyzing data, as it can lead to more targeted and effective decision-making.
Logistic Function
The logistic function is foundational to logistic regression and helps in modeling probabilities. It’s represented mathematically as \[ p = \frac{1}{1 + e^{-z}} \].Here, \( z \) is a linear combination of input variables. For example, \( z = \beta_0 + \beta_1 x \), where \( x \) could be weekly family income. This function takes any real number from \( z \) and transforms it into a value between 0 and 1, perfectly suitable for representing probabilities.A unique feature of the logistic function is its S-shape. It starts flat when \( p \) is near 0, becomes steep near the middle of the range (where the most change in probability happens), and flattens out again as \( p \) approaches 1. This characteristic makes it ideal for scenarios where changes have non-linear effects on the outcome probability.
Linear vs Logistic Regression
Linear and logistic regression are popular statistical tools, but they serve different purposes. Linear regression predicts continuous outcome variables, modeling relationships with straight lines. However, it is unsuitable for binary outcomes, like probabilities bounded between 0 and 1, because it assumes a constant change. Logistic regression, on the other hand, is designed for binary response variables. It captures the varying impact of independent variables, using the logistic function to model outcomes within the 0 to 1 range. In scenarios like predicting home buying probabilities, logistic regression outshines linear regression because it acknowledges the nuanced changes around mid-probability ranges. Overall, logistic regression is ideal when dealing with probability-bound outcomes as it realistically reflects different impact levels at various input stages, unlike linear regression’s constant slope approach.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Let's use multiple regression to predict total body weight (in pounds) using data from a study of University of Georgia female athletes. Possible predictors are \(\mathrm{HGT}=\) height (in inches), \(\% \mathrm{BF}=\) percent body fat, and age. The display shows correlations among these explanatory variables. a. Which explanatory variable gives by itself the best predictions of weight? Explain. b. With height as the sole predictor, \(\hat{y}=-106+3.65\) \((\mathrm{HGT})\) and \(r^{2}=0.55 .\) If you add \(\% \mathrm{BF}\) as a predictor, you know that \(R^{2}\) will be at least \(0.55 .\) Explain why. c. When you add \% body fat to the model, \(\hat{y}=-121+3.50(\mathrm{HGT})+1.35(\% \mathrm{BF})\) and \(R^{2}=0.66 .\) When you add age to the model, \(\hat{y}=-97.7+3.43(\mathrm{HGT})+1.36(\% \mathrm{BF})-0.960(\mathrm{AGE})\) and \(R^{2}=0.67\). Once you know height and \(\%\) body fat, does age seem to help you in predicting weight? Explain, based on comparing the \(R^{2}\) values.

Consider the relationship between \(\hat{y}=\) annual income (in thousands of dollars) and \(x_{1}=\) number of years of education, by \(x_{2}=\) gender. Many studies in the United States have found that the slope for a regression equation relating \(y\) to \(x_{1}\) is larger for men than for women. Suppose that in the population, the regression equations are \(\mu_{y}=-10+4 x_{1}\) for men and \(\mu_{y}=-5+2 x_{1}\) for women. Explain why these equations imply that there is interaction between education and gender in their effects on income.

You own a gift shop that has a campus location and a shopping mall location. You want to compare the regressions of \(y=\) daily total sales on \(x=\) number of people who enter the shop, for total sales listed by day at the campus location and at the mall location. Explain how you can do this using regression modeling a. With a single model, having an indicator variable for location, that assumes the slopes are the same for each location. b. With separate models for each location, permitting the slopes to be different.

A logistic regression model describes how the probability of voting for the Republican candidate in a presidential election depends on \(x,\) the voter's total family income (in thousands of dollars) in the previous year. The prediction equation for a particular sample is $$\hat{p}=\frac{e^{-1.00+0.02 x}}{1+e^{-1.00+0.02 x}}$$ Find the estimated probability of voting for the Republican candidate when (a) income \(=\$ 10,000\), (b) income \(=\$ 100,000\). Describe how the probability seems to depend on income.

A chain restaurant that specializes in selling hamburgers wants to analyze how \(y=\) sales for a customer (the total amount spent by a customer on food and drinks, in dollars) depends on the location of the restaurant, which is classified as inner city, suburbia, or at an interstate exit. a. Construct indicator variables \(x_{1}\) for inner city and \(x_{2}\) for suburbia so you can include location in a regression equation for predicting the sales. b. For part a, suppose \(\hat{y}=5.8-0.7 x_{1}+1.2 x_{2}\). Find the difference between the estimated mean sales in suburbia and at interstate exits.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.