/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 73 The table shows results of fitti... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The table shows results of fitting a regression model to data on Oklahoma State University salaries (in dollars) of 675 full-time college professors of different disciplines with at least two years of instructional employment. All of the predictors are categorical (binary), except for years as professor, merit ranking, and market influence. The market factor represents the ratio of the average salary at comparable institutions for the corresponding academic field and rank to the actual salary at OSU. Prepare a summary of the results in a couple of paragraphs, interpreting the effects of the predictors. The levels of ranking for professors are assistant, associate, and full professor from low to high. An instructor ranking is nontenure track. Gender and race predictors were not significant in this study.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Faculty rank and continuous factors like years as a professor and market influence are key salary determinants. Gender and race do not significantly affect salaries.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Model Context

The regression model aims to analyze the effects of various predictors on the salaries of full-time professors at Oklahoma State University. The predictors include both categorical and continuous variables. Important continuous predictors include years as a professor, merit ranking, and market influence. The categorical predictors include faculty ranking levels like assistant, associate, full professor, and instructor, which represent different academic and career stages.
02

Categorical Predictors Analysis

Faculty rank significantly impacts salary, with full professors likely earning more than associate and assistant professors. Instructor, a nontenure track rank, is expected to have a lower salary compared to tenure-track positions. This hierarchy implies that promotions and tenure significantly affect salary increases.
03

Continuous Predictors Analysis

The years as a professor likely positively correlate with salary, rewarding experience and tenure. Merit ranking probably represents performance-based salary adjustments, with higher merit leading to higher salaries. The market influence considers external market forces, and a higher market factor suggests that comparable institutions pay more, potentially exerting pressure on OSU to increase salaries to remain competitive.
04

Insignificant Predictors

Gender and race were found insignificant in this model, indicating that these variables do not statistically affect the salary predictions in this context. This suggests that salaries for professors at OSU are not currently influenced by these demographic characteristics.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Predictor Variables
Predictor variables are essential components in regression analysis. In the context of the OSU salary study, predictor variables significantly influence the outcome, which in this case is the salary of full-time professors.
Predictors can either be things we can measure (continuous) or things we can categorize (categorical). They help us estimate the relationship between the predictor and outcome.

For example, predicting the salary of professors involves understanding which factors boost or reduce income. Within the model used in the exercise, various predictor variables like years of experience and merit ranking were analyzed for their impact. Categorical predictors, such as faculty ranks, help identify differences across different groups.
In other words, predictor variables offer insights into how certain changes relate to salary outcomes.
Categorical Variables
Categorical variables are types of predictor variables that represent distinct categories or groups. They are often non-numerical and sort data into specific labels, such as faculty ranks in the OSU salary study.
  • Examples include academic titles like assistant, associate, and full professor.
  • Each category shows a different level of achievement or status.
  • In the study, these distinctions impact salaries as they show differences tied to career progression.
The study clearly demonstrates that roles with tenure or higher ranks command higher salaries, reflecting the value placed on advanced roles.
Understanding categorical variables is crucial as they organize data into groups, making it easier to analyze and interpret.
When applied correctly, they clarify how group membership influences outcomes, such as salary in our example.
Continuous Variables
Continuous variables are numerical variables that can take any value within a range, enabling detailed measurement. In the context of the study on professor salaries, continuous variables play a vital role in predicting outcomes due to their precise and comprehensive nature.
  • Examples include the number of years as a professor or the merit ranking.
  • Continuous variables show gradual influences on salary, such as the way accumulated tenure increases earnings.
  • Market influence is another continuous variable, showcasing salary expectations based on external comparisons.
Continuous predictors like these help to capture subtle shifts in salary, representing incremental changes rather than broad categories.
Understanding the data set in terms of continuous variables allows for a more nuanced interpretation of how certain factors affect professors' pay.
Knowing the trends and patterns in these variables can aid in making informed predictions and decisions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

You want to include religious affiliation as a predictor in a regression model, using the categories Protestant, Catholic, Jewish, Other. You set up a variable \(x_{1}\) that equals 1 for Protestants, 2 for Catholics, 3 for Jewish, and 4 for Other, using the model \(\mu_{y}=\alpha+\beta x_{1}\). Explain why this is inappropriate.

The least squares prediction equation provides predicted values \(\hat{y}\) with the strongest possible correlation with \(y,\) out of all possible prediction equations of that form. Based on this property, explain why the multiple correlation \(R\) cannot decrease when you add a variable to a multiple regression model.

At the \(x\) value where the probability of success is some value \(p,\) the line drawn tangent to the logistic regression curve has slope \(\beta p(1-p)\). a. Explain why the slope is \(\beta / 4\) when \(p=0.5\). b. Show that the slope is weaker at other \(p\) values by evaluating this at \(p=0.1,0.3,0.7,\) and \(0.9 .\) What does the slope approach as \(p\) gets closer and closer to 0 or \(1 ?\) Sketch a curve to illustrate.

Suppose you fit a straight-line regression model to \(x=\) age of subjects and \(y=\) driving accident rate. Sketch what you would expect to observe for (a) the scatterplot of \(x\) and \(y\) and (b) a plot of the residuals against the values of age.

Consider the relationship between \(\hat{y}=\) annual income (in thousands of dollars) and \(x_{1}=\) number of years of education, by \(x_{2}=\) gender. Many studies in the United States have found that the slope for a regression equation relating \(y\) to \(x_{1}\) is larger for men than for women. Suppose that in the population, the regression equations are \(\mu_{y}=-10+4 x_{1}\) for men and \(\mu_{y}=-5+2 x_{1}\) for women. Explain why these equations imply that there is interaction between education and gender in their effects on income.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.