/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 52 Women's role A recent GSS presen... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Women's role A recent GSS presented the statement, "Women should take care of running their homes and leave running the country up to men," and \(14.8 \%\) of the male respondents agreed. Of the female respondents, \(15.9 \%\) agreed. Of respondents having less than a high school education, \(39.0 \%\) agreed. Of respondents having at least a high school education, \(11.7 \%\) agreed. a. Report the difference between the proportion of males and the proportion of females who agree. b. Report the difference between the proportion at the low education level and the proportion at the high education level who agree. c. Which variable, gender or educational level, seems to have the stronger association with opinion? Explain your reasoning.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The gender difference is -1.1%, the education level difference is 27.3%, and education level has a stronger association.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate Proportion Difference by Gender

To find the difference between the proportion of males and females who agree, subtract the proportion of females who agree from the proportion of males who agree: \[ 14.8\% - 15.9\% = -1.1\% \] This indicates that 1.1% more females agree with the statement than males.
02

Calculate Proportion Difference by Education Level

Next, determine the difference between the agreement proportions at different educational levels by subtracting the proportion of high education respondents from the low education respondents: \[ 39.0\% - 11.7\% = 27.3\% \] This means there is a 27.3% higher agreement among those with less than a high school education compared to those with higher education.
03

Compare Strength of Association

To assess which variable has a stronger association with the opinion, compare the magnitude of the differences calculated in previous steps. The difference by gender is \(-1.1\%\) while the difference by education level is \(27.3\%\). The larger difference suggests that educational level has a stronger association with the opinion regarding the statement.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Proportion Difference
The concept of proportion difference is central to understanding how certain opinions or beliefs vary across different groups. A proportion is simply the percentage or fraction of a total that shares a specific characteristic. To find the difference in proportions between two groups, subtract one group's proportion from the other group's proportion. For example, if 14.8% of males agree with a statement and 15.9% of females agree, the difference in proportion is calculated as follows:

\[ 14.8\% - 15.9\% = -1.1\% \]

This shows that a slightly higher percentage of females agree compared to males. Understanding these differences can help identify trends or patterns in opinion across different demographic factors. Here are a few points to remember:
  • A positive difference indicates group A has a higher proportion than group B.
  • A negative difference indicates group B has a higher proportion than group A.
Recognizing and interpreting these differences enables deeper insights into how different groups may respond to specific topics or statements.
Gender Comparison
When analyzing opinions based on gender, researchers seek to uncover whether males and females hold different views on certain issues. This can be important in social studies and behavioral research. By comparing the proportions of males and females who share a particular opinion, we can highlight potential gender influences on beliefs and attitudes.

In the provided example, males and females were asked about their agreement with a specific statement. The male agreement was at 14.8%, while the female agreement was slightly higher at 15.9%. Calculating the difference:

\[ 14.8\% - 15.9\% = -1.1\% \]

This tells us that 1.1% more females agreed with the statement than males. Here are key points about gender comparison in statistical analysis:
  • Gender comparison can reveal social and cultural trends.
  • A close percentage indicates minimal gender difference, while a larger gap suggests more significant divergence in opinion.
Understanding gender differences in opinion can guide policy-making, marketing strategies, and educational programs by tailoring approaches that resonate with specific genders.
Educational Level Comparison
Educational level comparison involves analyzing how opinions vary according to the education attained by respondents. This is crucial in assessing how education impacts beliefs, knowledge, and attitudes. Statistically, this involves comparing the proportion of individuals with different levels of education who agree with a particular statement.

Let's say we have two educational groups: those with less than high school education and those with at least high school education. If 39.0% of the less-educated group agree with a statement compared to only 11.7% of the more-educated group, the calculation for the proportion difference is:

\[ 39.0\% - 11.7\% = 27.3\% \]

This indicates a strong association between educational level and opinion, with the less-educated group being more likely to agree. Key elements include:
  • A large proportion difference, like 27.3%, suggests significant educational influence on opinion.
  • Understanding these differences helps design educational programs and informs policy development.
By focusing on educational comparisons, we can tailor interventions and educational materials to address specific beliefs associated with varying education levels.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

True or false: Group 1 becomes Group 2 Interchanging two rows or interchanging two columns in a contingency table has no effect on the value of the \(X^{2}\) statistic.

Happiness and sex \(\quad\) A contingency table from the 2008 GSS relating happiness to number of sex partners in the previous year \((0,1,\) at least 2\()\) had standardized residuals as shown in the table. Interpret the highlighted standardized residuals. $$ \begin{aligned} &\text { Results on Happiness and Sex }\\\ &\begin{array}{lccc} \text { Rows: } & \text { partners } & \text { Columns: happy } & \\ & \text { not } & \text { pretty } & \text { very } \\ 0 & 84 & 235 & 95 \\ & (3.1) & (0.7) & (-3.3) \\ 1 & 130 & 578 & 381 \\ & (-5.2) & (-2.3) & (6.6) \\ 2 & 58 & 160 & 41 \\ & (3.4) & (2.3) & (-5.2) \end{array} \end{aligned} $$

Prison and gender \(\quad\) According to the U.S. Department of Justice, in 2009 the incarceration rate in the nation's prisons was 949 per 100,000 male residents, and 67 per 100,000 female residents. a. Find the relative risk of being incarcerated, comparing males to females. Interpret. b. Find the difference of proportions of being incarcerated. Interpret. c. Which measure do you think is more appropriate for these data? Why?

Basketball shots independent? In pro basketball games during \(1980-1982,\) when Larry Bird of the Boston Celtic: missed his first free throw, 48 out of 53 times he made th second one, and when he made his first free throw, 251 out of 285 times he made the second one. a. Form a \(2 \times 2\) contingency table that cross-tabulates the outcome of the first free throw (with categories made and missed) and the outcome of the second fre throw (made and missed). b. When we use MINITAB to analyze the contingency table, we get the result $$ \begin{aligned} \text { Pearson Chi-Square } &=0.273, \mathrm{DF}=1, \\ \mathrm{P} \text { -Value } &=0.602 \end{aligned} $$ Does it seem as if his success on the second shot depends on whether he made the first? Explain how to interpret the result of the chi-squared test.

Checking a roulette wheel \(\quad\) Karl Pearson devised the chisquared goodness-of-fit test partly to analyze data from an experiment to analyze whether a particular roulette wheel in Monte Carlo was fair, in the sense that each outcome was equally likely in a spin of the wheel. For a given European roulette wheel with 37 pockets (with numbers \(0,1,2, \ldots, 36\) ), consider the null hypothesis that the wheel is fair. a. For the null hypothesis, what is the probability for each pocket? b. For an experiment with 3700 spins of the roulette wheel, find the expected number of times each pocket is selected. c. In the experiment, the 0 pocket occurred 110 times. Show the contribution to the \(X^{2}\) statistic of the results for this pocket. d. Comparing the observed and expected counts for all 37 pockets, we get \(X^{2}=34.4\) Specify the \(d f\) value, and indicate whether there is strong evidence that the roulette wheel is not balanced. (Hint: Recall that the \(d f\) value is the mean of the distribution.)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.