/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 34 The article "Most Customers OK w... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The article "Most Customers OK with New Bulbs" (USA TODAY, February 18,2011 ) describes a survey of 1016 randomly selected adult Americans. Each person in the sample was asked if they have replaced standard light bulbs in their home with the more energy efficient compact fluorescent (CFL) bulbs. Suppose you want to use the survey data to determine if there is evidence that more than \(70 \%\) of adult Americans have replaced standard bulbs with CFL bulbs. Let \(p\) denote the population proportion of all adult Americans who have replaced standard bulbs with CFL bulbs. a. Describe the shape, center, and variability of the sampling distribution of \(\hat{p}\) for random samples of size 1016 if the null hypothesis \(H_{0}: p=0.70\) is true. b. Would you be surprised to observe a sample proportion as large as \(\hat{p}=0.72\) for a sample of size 1016 if the null hypothesis \(H_{0}: p=0.70\) were true? Explain why or why not. c. Would you be surprised to observe a sample proportion as large as \(\hat{p}=0.75\) for a sample of size 1016 if the null hypothesis \(H_{0}: p=0.70\) were true? Explain why or why not. d. The actual sample proportion observed in the study was \(\hat{p}=0.71 .\) Based on this sample proportion, is there convincing evidence that more than \(70 \%\) have replaced standard bulbs with CFL bulbs, or is this sample proportion consistent with what you would expect to see when the null hypothesis is true? Support your answer with a probability calculation.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The sampling distribution of \(\hat{p}\) is approximately normal with a mean of \(0.70\) and a standard deviation of \(0.0146\). Evaluating the given sample proportions, we find that a sample proportion of \(\hat{p}=0.72\) would not be surprising if the null hypothesis is true (z-score = 1.37). However, a sample proportion of \(\hat{p}=0.75\) would be surprising (z-score = 3.42). The actual observed sample proportion of \(\hat{p}=0.71\) (z-score = 0.68) is consistent with the null hypothesis, and we don't have convincing evidence that more than \(70\%\) of adult Americans have replaced standard bulbs with CFL bulbs.

Step by step solution

01

Shape, center, and variability of the sampling distribution

Assuming the null hypothesis \(H_{0}: p=0.70\) is true, the sampling distribution of \(\hat{p}\) should follow a normal distribution because we have a sufficiently large sample size (1016). The center of the distribution is the mean, which is equal to the population proportion of the null hypothesis, \(p=0.70\). The variability of the sampling distribution can be measured by the standard deviation, which can be calculated as: \[\sigma_{\hat{p}} = \sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}}\] where \(n\) is the sample size and \(p\) is the proportion assumed in the null hypothesis. Substitute the values \(p=0.70\) and \(n=1016\): \[\sigma_{\hat{p}} = \sqrt{\frac{(0.70)(1-0.70)}{1016}} \approx 0.0146\] So, the sampling distribution of \(\hat{p}\) is approximately normal with a mean of \(0.70\) and a standard deviation of \(0.0146\).
02

Evaluate the sample proportion of 0.72

Now, let's compare the given sample proportion of \(\hat{p} = 0.72\) with the mean of the null hypothesis, \(p=0.70\). First, find the z-score: \[z = \frac{\hat{p} - p}{\sigma_{\hat{p}}}\] Substitute the values: \[z = \frac{0.72 - 0.70}{0.0146} \approx 1.37\] Since the z-score is 1.37, which falls within the range of typical values (between -1.96 and 1.96) for a 95% confidence interval, we would not be surprised if the sample proportion is 0.72 given that the null hypothesis is true.
03

Evaluate the sample proportion of 0.75

Similarly, let's find the z-score for the sample proportion of \(\hat{p} = 0.75\): \[z = \frac{0.75 - 0.70}{0.0146} \approx 3.42\] The z-score 3.42 falls outside the range of typical values for a 95% confidence interval. We would be surprised to see a sample proportion of 0.75 if the null hypothesis were true. In this case, we might consider rejecting the null hypothesis.
04

Evaluate the observed sample proportion of 0.71

Finally, let's find the z-score for the actual observed sample proportion of \(\hat{p} = 0.71\): \[z = \frac{0.71 - 0.70}{0.0146} \approx 0.68\] The z-score of 0.68 falls within the range of typical values for a 95% confidence interval. Based on this sample proportion (0.71), the observed value is consistent with the null hypothesis and we don't have convincing evidence that more than \(70\%\) of the adult American population have replaced standard bulbs with CFL bulbs.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis, often denoted as \(H_0\), is a foundational concept in statistical hypothesis testing. It represents a statement or idea that there is no effect or no difference, and it serves as a starting point for statistical analysis. In the context of our exercise, the null hypothesis \(H_0: p=0.70\) suggests that the true proportion of adult Americans who have switched from standard light bulbs to CFL bulbs is exactly 70%.

The null hypothesis is crucial because it provides a benchmark against which we can compare our sample data. When analyzing data, we often aim to either reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis based on statistical evidence. This process is vital in determining whether the trends or differences observed in your data are statistically significant or whether they could have occurred due to random chance. By assuming \(H_0\) to be true, statisticians can apply appropriate statistical tests to ascertain the validity of their observed findings.
Population Proportion
Population proportion refers to the ratio or fraction of individuals in the entire population that possess a particular characteristic or trait. In this exercise, the population proportion \(p\) corresponds to the percentage of all adult Americans who have swapped out their standard light bulbs for CFL ones.

This parameter is important in statistics because it helps researchers understand the underlying preferences or behaviors within the whole population. However, as it might be impractical to collect data from every member of the population, researchers use sample proportions (represented as \(\hat{p}\)) to make inferences about the population proportion. The closer the sample proportion \(\hat{p}\) is to the population proportion \(p\), the more reliable the inferences are likely to be.

In hypothesis testing, the given value of the population proportion under the null hypothesis (\(p_0\)) serves as a reference value for evaluating the sample data. In our scenario, the null hypothesis proposes that the population proportion \(p\) is 0.70, meaning 70% of adult Americans use CFL bulbs.
Z-score
A Z-score is a statistical measurement that describes a value's relation to the mean of a group of values. It is measured in terms of standard deviations from the mean. A Z-score enables researchers to determine how unusual or typical a particular sample observation is relative to the assumed population mean.

In our example, when checking if \(\hat{p} = 0.72\) or \(\hat{p} = 0.75\) is significant, we used the formula:

\[ z = \frac{\hat{p} - p}{\sigma_{\hat{p}}} \]

This formula helps calculate the Z-score by subtracting the hypothesized population proportion \(p\) from the sample proportion \(\hat{p}\), then dividing the result by the standard deviation of the sample proportion \(\sigma_{\hat{p}}\).

By assessing the Z-score, we can determine how extreme the sample result is, which assists in making decisions about the null hypothesis. Typically, a Z-score within the range of around -1.96 to 1.96 (for a 95% confidence interval) suggests the sample result is not statistically significant, thus supporting the null hypothesis.
Normal Distribution
Normal distribution, also known as a Gaussian distribution, is a type of continuous probability distribution for a real-valued random variable. It is one of the most vital concepts in statistics due to its unique properties and prevalence across various natural phenomena.

The classic bell-shaped curve illustrates normal distribution. It is symmetrically centered around the mean, which represents the peak of the curve. A fundamental property of normal distribution is that approximately 68% of data falls within one standard deviation from the mean, 95% within two standard deviations, and 99.7% within three standard deviations.

In our exercise, we assume that the sampling distribution of the sample proportion \(\hat{p}\) follows a normal distribution because of the large sample size (1016). When sample sizes are large, the distribution of sample means behaves in a way that closely approximates normal distribution, regardless of the shape of the population distribution. This property is known as the Central Limit Theorem. Here, the normal distribution provides a basis for conducting statistical tests, such as calculating Z-scores to evaluate the null hypothesis.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Researchers at the University of Washington and Harvard University analyzed records of breast cancer screening and diagnostic evaluations ("Mammogram Cancer Scares More Frequent Than Thought," USA TODAY, April 16,1998 ). Discussing the benefits and downsides of the screening process, the article states that although the rate of falsepositives is higher than previously thought, if radiologists were less aggressive in following up on suspicious tests, the rate of false-positives would fall, but the rate of missed cancers would rise. Suppose that such a screening test is used to decide between a null hypothesis of \(H_{0}:\) no cancer is present and an alternative hypothesis of \(H_{a}:\) cancer is present. (Although these are not hypotheses about a population characteristic, this exercise illustrates the definitions of Type I and Type II errors.) a. Would a false-positive (thinking that cancer is present when in fact it is not) be a Type I error or a Type II error? b. Describe a Type I error in the context of this problem, and discuss the consequences of making a Type I error. c. Describe a Type II error in the context of this problem, and discuss the consequences of making a Type II error. d. Recall the statement in the article that if radiologists were less aggressive in following up on suspicious tests, the rate of false-positives would fall but the rate of missed cancers would rise. What aspect of the relationship between the probability of a Type I error and the probability of a Type II error is being described here?

In the report "Healthy People 2020 Objectives for the Nation," The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) set a goal of 0.341 for the proportion of mothers who will still be breastfeeding their babies one year after birth (www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding/policy /hp2020.htm, April 11, 2016, retrieved November 28, 2016). The CDC also estimated the proportion who were still being breastfed one year after birth to be 0.307 for babies born in 2013 (www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding /pdf/2016breastfeedingreportcard.pdf, retrieved November 28,2016) . This estimate was based on a survey of women who had given birth in 2013 . Suppose that the survey used a random sample of 1000 mothers and that you want to use the survey data to decide if there is evidence that the goal is not being met. Let \(p\) denote the population proportion of all mothers of babies born in 2013 who were still breast-feeding at 12 months. (Hint: See Example \(10.10 .)\) a. Describe the shape, center, and variability of the sampling distribution of \(\hat{p}\) for random samples of size 1000 if the null hypothesis \(H_{0}: p=0.341\) is true. b. Would you be surprised to observe a sample proportion as small as \(\hat{p}=0.333\) for a sample of size 1000 if the null hypothesis \(H_{0}: p=0.341\) were true? Explain why or why not. c. Would you be surprised to observe a sample proportion as small as \(\hat{p}=0.310\) for a sample of size 1000 if the null hypothesis \(H_{0}: p=0.341\) were true? Explain why or why not. d. The actual sample proportion observed in the study was \(p=0.307\). Based on this sample proportion, is there convincing evidence that the goal is not being met, or is the observed sample proportion consistent with what you would expect to see when the null hypothesis is true? Support your answer with a probability calculation.

A study of treatment of hospitalized patients who develop pneumonia reported that 1 in \(5(20 \%)\) are readmitted to the hospital within 30 days after discharge ("Comparison of Therapist-Directed and Physician-Directed Respiratory Care in COPD Subjects with Acute Pneumonia," Respiratory Care \([2015]: 151-154)\) The study reported that 15 out of \(n=162\) hospital patients who had been treated for pneumonia using a respiratory therapist protocol were readmitted to the hospital within 30 days after discharge. You would like to use this sample data to decide if the proportion readmitted is less than 0.20 . a. What hypotheses should be tested? b. Discuss whether the conditions necessary for a largesample hypothesis test for one proportion are satisfied. c. The exact binomial test can be used even in cases when the sample size condition for the large-sample test is met.

In 2016 , the National Foundation for Credit Counseling released a report titled "The 2016 Consumer \(\begin{array}{lll}\text { Financial Literacy } & \text { Survey" } & \text { (www.nfcc.org, retrieved }\end{array}\) December 1,2016\() .\) In a nationally representative sample of 1668 adult Americans, 965 indicated that they had checked their credit score within the last 12 months. Is there convincing evidence that a majority of adult Americans have checked their credit scores within the last 12 months? Test the relevant hypotheses using \(\alpha=0.05\).

The paper "Debt Literacy, Financial Experiences and Over-Indebtedness" (Social Science Research Network, Working paper W14808, 2008) included data from a survey of 1000 Americans. One question on the survey was: "You owe \(\$ 3000\) on your credit card. You pay a minimum payment of \(\$ 30\) each month. At an Annual Percentage Rate of \(12 \%\) (or \(1 \%\) per month), how many years would it take to eliminate your credit card debt if you made no additional charges?" Answer options for this question were: (a) less than 5 years; (b) between 5 and 10 years: (c) between 10 and 15 years; (d) never-you will continue to be in debt; (e) don't know; and (f) prefer not to answer. a. Only 354 of the 1000 respondents chose the correct answer of "never." Assume that the sample is representative of adult Americans. Is there convincing evidence that the proportion of adult Americans who can answer this question correctly is less than 0.40 (40\%)? Use the five-step process for hypothesis testing (HMC \(^{3}\) ) described in this section and \(\alpha=0.05\) to test the appropriate hypotheses. (Hint: See Example \(10.13 .)\) b. The paper also reported that \(37.8 \%\) of those in the sample chose one of the wrong answers \((a, b,\) or c) as their response to this question. Is it reasonable to conclude that more than one-third of adult Americans would select a wrong answer to this question? Use \(\alpha=0.05\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.