/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 14 The same article referenced in E... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The same article referenced in Exercise 1.13 also described a study which concluded that people tend to respond differently to the following questions: Question 1: Would you rather have $$\$ 50$$ today or $$\$ 52$$ in a week? Question 2 : Imagine that you could have $$\$ 52$$ in a week. Would you rather have $$\$ 50$$& now? The article attributes this to the question wording: the second question is worded in a way that makes you feel that you are "losing" $$\$ 2$$ if you take the money now. Do you think that the study which led to the conclusion that people respond differently to these two questions was an observational study or an experiment? Explain why you think this.

Short Answer

Expert verified
This study is considered an experiment because the researcher is manipulating the words in the questions and observing the effect it has on the participants' responses. The change in question phrasing is a controlled factor, and the study's objective is to see its impact on people's reactions, which is a characteristic of an experiment, as opposed to an observational study where variables are not manipulated.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the difference between an observational study and an experiment

An observational study involves collecting data without interfering with the subjects or environment, while an experiment requires the researcher to manipulate or control certain factors to observe their effects on the variable of interest.
02

Analyze the study and questions

In this study, the researcher presents two different questions but with the same choices to the subjects. They observe the responses to identify the differences in reactions depending on the question's phrasing.
03

Determine the type of study

Since the researcher modifies the phrasing of the questions and observes the subjects' reactions, we can classify this study as an experiment. The change in the question's wording is a controlled factor, and the study's objective is to see its effect on the participants' responses.
04

Explain the reasoning

This study is considered an experiment because the researcher is manipulating the questions' wording to observe its effect on the participants' responses. The researcher is actively intervening and modifying a factor (question phrasing) to test its impact on the outcome (responses), which is a characteristic of an experiment. On the other hand, an observational study would involve monitoring subjects without intervention or manipulation of variables.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Observational Study
In the realm of inferential statistics, an observational study plays a key role in understanding how subjects naturally behave without any interference. Think of an observational study as a spectator's sport—you watch and record what happens as it naturally unfolds. The researcher does not impose any special conditions or manipulations that could alter the subjects' behaviors.

Observational studies are often used in fields where manipulation might be unethical or impractical, such as in medicine or social sciences. For example, observing the dietary habits of individuals over time to explore correlations without altering their diets is a classic application. These studies help in:
  • Describing natural occurrences
  • Finding correlations between variables
  • Generating hypotheses for further experimental research
Remember, while observational studies provide valuable insights, they do not establish cause-and-effect relationships because of the lack of controlled environments.
Experiment
Unlike observational studies, experiments are all about creating controlled conditions to test a hypothesis. The researcher actively manipulates one or more variables to observe the effects of these changes on certain outcomes. If observational studies are like simply watching a play, experiments allow the researcher to modify the script to see how the actors will react.

Experiments often involve the following steps:
  • Manipulating independent variables (the factors you change)
  • Observing the effects on dependent variables (the outcomes you measure)
  • Ensuring other variables are controlled to avoid confounding effects
By establishing a cause-and-effect relationship, experiments help in drawing clearer conclusions about how certain variables influence outcomes. In the provided example, changing the phrasing of questions is a form of manipulation—thus making it an experiment. This is because the researcher alters the wording explicitly to test its influence on participants' choices.
Data Collection
Data collection is the backbone of both observational studies and experiments. It involves systematically gathering information about variables of interest. The quality and reliability of data collected greatly affect the validity of the study's findings.

Proper data collection methods include:
  • Surveys and questionnaires
  • Interviews and focus groups
  • Observational techniques
  • Existing records and databases
Each method suits different types of research and questions. Surveys might be employed to gather data on personal preferences, as seen in the exercise. Employing rigorous and validated data collection methods ensures that the conclusions drawn from a study are accurate and replicable.
Variable Manipulation
In controlled experiments, variable manipulation is a critical process. It involves changing one or more factors in a study to examine if and how these changes affect the outcomes. This manipulation allows the researcher to pinpoint causal relationships between variables.

For instance, in the given exercise, the key variable manipulated was the phrasing of the questions. Manipulation involves:
  • Identifying variables to change (independent variables)
  • Keeping all other variables constant to ensure observed effects are due to manipulation
  • Recording any impact these changes have on the dependent variable, in this case, participants’ responses
This precise control and alteration is what turns a simple observation into a powerful experimental tool, helping researchers deduce clearer insights from their data. Variable manipulation clarifies whether changes in one aspect lead to modifications in another, thereby strengthening the reliability of experimental outcomes.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

For each of the statistical studies described, indicate whether the study is an observational study or an experiment. Give a brief explanation for your choice. USA TODAY (August 25,2015 ) reported that "American women favor Kate Middleton as a shopping buddy over Michelle Obama by 10 percentage points." This statement was based on a study in which 1001 adults were surveyed about their shopping preferences.

The article "Doctor Dogs Diagnose Cancer by Sniffing It Out" (Knight Ridder Newspapers, January 9, 2006) refers to an experiment described in the journal Integrative Cancer Therapies. In this experiment, dogs were trained to distinguish between people with breast and lung cancer and people without cancer by sniffing exhaled breath. Dogs were trained to lie down if they detected cancer in a breath sample. After training, the dogs' ability to detect cancer was tested using breath samples from people whose breath had not been used in training the dogs. The paper states, "The researchers blinded both the dog handlers and the experimental observers to the identity of the breath samples." Explain why this blinding is an important aspect of the design of this experiment.

According to the article "Effect of Preparation Methods on Total Fat Content, Moisture Content, and Sensory Characteristics of Breaded Chicken Nuggets and Beef Steak Fingers" (Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal [1999]: 18-27), sensory tests were conducted using 40 college student volunteers at Texas Women's University. Give three reasons, other than the relatively small sample size, why it would not be a good idea to generalize any study results to the population of all college students.

1.50 A survey of affluent Americans (those with incomes of $$\$ 75,000\( or more) indicated that \)57 \%$$ would rather have more time than more money (USA TODAY, January 29, 2003). a. What condition on how the data were collected would make it reasonable to generalize this result to the population of affluent Americans? b. Would it be reasonable to generalize this result to the population of \(a l l\) Americans? Explain why or why not.

A building contractor has a chance to buy an odd lot of 5000 used bricks at an auction. She is interested in determining the proportion of bricks in the lot that are cracked and therefore unusable for her current project, but she does not have enough time to inspect all 5000 bricks. Instead, she checks 100 bricks to determine whether each is cracked. Describe the population and the sample for this problem.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.