/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 79 Explain why failing to reject th... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Explain why failing to reject the null hypothesis in a hypoth- b. esis test does not mean there is convincing evidence that the null hypothesis is true.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Failing to reject the null hypothesis simply indicates that there is not enough evidence in the sample data to support the alternative hypothesis. It does not mean that the null hypothesis is true. This is because hypothesis testing is not designed to determine the truth of the null hypothesis, but rather, it is designed to test the credibility of the alternative hypothesis with reference to data. Empirical evidence not being strong enough against the null hypothesis does not imply evidence in favor of the null.

Step by step solution

01

Definition of Null Hypothesis

In hypothesis testing, the null hypothesis (denoted by \(H_0\)) is a statement about the population that will be tested. The null hypothesis is an assumption that the parameter of the population is equal to a specified value. It's important to understand that the null hypothesis is assumed true until statistical evidence in the form of a hypothesis test indicates otherwise.
02

Understanding the Result of the Test

When we say 'failing to reject the null hypothesis', it means that the sample data falls into the 'fail to reject the null hypothesis' region in the sampling distribution. This means that the sample data is not unusual under the assumption that the null hypothesis is true.
03

The Null Hypothesis and Lack of Evidence

However, failing to reject the null does not mean that there's convincing evidence that the null is true. It simply means there's insufficient evidence to support the alternative hypothesis. If the evidence is not strong enough to reject the null hypothesis, it doesn't imply that null hypothesis is correct. In other words, lack of evidence against \(H_0\) does not mean the presence of evidence for \(H_0\). It could be also due to inadequate sample size or variability in the data.
04

Distinguishing between Absence of Evidence and Evidence of Absence

It's crucial to understand the difference between 'absence of evidence' (i.e., lack of statistical power to reveal an effect that is actually present) and 'evidence of absence' (i.e., statistical evidence supporting a null effect). Failing to reject the null hypothesis is typically evidence of the former, not the latter.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding Hypothesis Tests
In scientific research and many real-world applications, hypothesis tests serve as a fundamental statistical tool for making decisions or assertions about population parameters based on sample data. The essence of a hypothesis test involves making a claim about a population parameter—such as the mean or proportion—and then determining whether the observed sample data provide enough statistical evidence to support or reject that claim.

Here's a simple way to understand this: Imagine you claim that a coin is fair, so it has an equal chance of landing heads or tails. To test your claim (the null hypothesis), you flip the coin several times. If you observe an unusual pattern, such as a significant majority of heads or tails, you might question the fairness of the coin. The hypothesis test enables you to assess if the pattern you observe is statistically significant or if it could have occurred simply by random chance.
The Nature of Statistical Evidence
Statistical evidence is not about proving or disproving a hypothesis with absolute certainty; it's about evaluating the strength of the evidence against the null hypothesis. When we observe sample data, we are peering through a window into the population parameter in question. But this view is not always crystal clear—it can be blurred by sample variability and other sources of uncertainty.

Think of statistical evidence as pieces of a puzzle. A single piece may not give you the full picture, but each piece can help guide you toward a more informed conclusion. Strong statistical evidence against the null hypothesis occurs when we have a collection of puzzle pieces that consistently points away from what the null hypothesis would suggest. This alignment provides a more persuasive argument to reject the null hypothesis, while a lack of alignment suggests we cannot confidently reject it.
Sampling Distribution: A Key Concept in Hypothesis Testing
Imagine you're an archer aiming at a target, which represents the true population parameter. Every arrow you shoot represents a sample from the population, and where they land gives you an idea of the sampling distribution—a statistical term that represents the range of values that a sample statistic (like the sample mean) can take.

A sampling distribution is essential for hypothesis testing because it provides a reference for comparing the observed sample statistic. If your observed sample mean lands far from the target where the null hypothesis 'expects' it to be, you start to doubt the null hypothesis. The arrows (samples) provide evidence, but they are influenced by many factors such as sample size and variability, which impact where they land and the inference you can draw from them.
Statistical Power: The Opportunity to Discover the Truth
Statistical power is the probability that a hypothesis test will correctly reject a false null hypothesis. In other words, it's the test's ability to detect an effect when there is one. Low statistical power means there's a higher risk of missing the effect, like searching for treasure with a weak metal detector. You might walk right over it and never know it's there.

Inadequate Sample Size

One common reason for low statistical power is having a sample size that's too small. The smaller your sample, the less likely you are to detect a meaningful effect, even if one exists.

Variability in Data

High variability within your sample can also mask the presence of an effect and lower the power of your test. It's like trying to hear a quiet song in a noisy room; the effect is there, but it's drowned out by the background noise.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Medical personnel are required to report suspected cases of child abuse. Because some diseases have symptoms that are similar to those of child abuse, doctors who see a child with these symptoms must decide between two competing hypotheses: \(H_{0}:\) symptoms are due to child abuse \(H_{a}:\) symptoms are not due to child abuse (Although these are not hypotheses about a population characteristic, this exercise illustrates the definitions of Type I and Type II errors.) The article "Blurred Line Between IIIness, Abuse Creates Problem for Authorities" (Macon Telegraph, February 28,2000 ) included the following quote from a doctor in Atlanta regarding the consequences of making an incorrect decision: "If it's disease, the worst you have is an angry family. If it is abuse, the other kids (in the family) are in deadly danger." a. For the given hypotheses, describe Type I and Type II errors. b. Based on the quote regarding consequences of the two kinds of error, which type of error is considered more serious by the doctor quoted? Explain.

Suppose that for a particular hypothesis test, the consequences of a Type I error are very serious. Would you want to carry out the test using a small significance level \(\alpha\) (such as 0.01 ) or a larger significance level (such as 0.10 )? Explain the reason for your choice.

The authors of the article "Perceived Risks of Heart Disease and Cancer Among Cigarette Smokers" (Journal of the American Medical Association [1999]: \(1019-1021\) ) expressed the concern that a majority of smokers do not view themselves as being at increased risk of heart disease or cancer. A study of 737 current smokers found that only 295 believe they have a higher than average risk of cancer. Do these data suggest that \(p,\) the proportion of all smokers who view themselves as being at increased risk of cancer, is less than \(0.5,\) as claimed by the authors of the paper? For purposes of this exercise, assume that this sample is representative of the population of smokers. Test the relevant hypotheses using \(\alpha=0.05\)

Suppose that for a particular hypothesis test, the consequences of a Type I error are not very serious, but there are serious consequences associated with making a Type II error. Would you want to carry out the test using a small significance level \(\alpha\) (such as 0.01 ) or a larger significance level (such as 0.10 )? Explain the reason for your choice.

Let \(p\) denote the proportion of students at a large university who plan to purchase a campus meal plan in the next academic year. For a large-sample \(z\) test of \(H_{0}: p=0.20\) versus \(H: p<0.20,\) find the \(P\) -value associated with each of the following values of the \(z\) test statistic. (Hint: See pages \(442-443)\) a. -0.55 b. -0.92 c. -1.99 d. -2.24 e. 1.40

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.