Chapter 10: Problem 46
Explain why you would not reject the null hypothesis if the \(P\) -value were 0.37 .
Short Answer
Step by step solution
Key Concepts
These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.
/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none}
Learning Materials
Features
Discover
Chapter 10: Problem 46
Explain why you would not reject the null hypothesis if the \(P\) -value were 0.37 .
These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for free
For which of the following combinations of \(P\) -value and significance level would the null hypothesis be rejected? a. \(P\) -value \(=0.426 \quad \alpha=0.05\) b. \(P\) -value \(=0.033 \quad \alpha=0.01\) c. \(P\) -value \(=0.046 \quad \alpha=0.10\) d. \(P\) -value \(=0.026 \quad \alpha=0.05\) e. \(P\) -value \(=0.004 \quad \alpha=0.01\)
According to a Washington Post-ABC News poll, 331 of 502 randomly selected American adults said they would not be bothered if the National Security Agency collected records of personal telephone calls. The data were used to test \(H_{0}: p=0.5\) versus \(H_{a}: p>0.5,\) and the null hypothesis was rejected. a. Based on the hypothesis test, what can you conclude about the proportion of American adults who would not be bothered if the National Security Agency collected records of personal telephone calls? b. Is it reasonable to say that the data provide strong support for the alternative hypothesis? c. Is it reasonable to say that the data provide strong evidence against the null hypothesis?
In a survey of 1,000 women ages 22 to 35 who work full-time, 540 indicated that they would be willing to give up some personal time in order to make more money (USA Today, March 4, 2010). The sample was selected to be representative of women in the targeted age group. a. Do the sample data provide convincing evidence that a majority of women ages 22 to 35 who work fulltime would be willing to give up some personal time for more money? Test the relevant hypotheses using \(\alpha=0.01\) b. Would it be reasonable to generalize the conclusion from Part (a) to all working women? Explain why or why not.
Explain why a \(P\) -value of 0.0002 would be interpreted as strong evidence against the null hypothesis.
The article "Poll Finds Most Oppose Return to Draft, Wouldn't Encourage Children to Enlist" (Associated Press, December 18,2005 ) reports that in a random sample of 1,000 American adults, 700 indicated that they oppose the reinstatement of a military draft. Suppose you want to use this information to decide if there is convincing evidence that the proportion of American adults who oppose reinstatement of the draft is greater than two-thirds. a. What hypotheses should be tested in order to answer this question? b. The \(P\) -value for this test is \(0.013 .\) What conclusion would you reach if \(\alpha=0.05 ?\)
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.