/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 46 Alan wants to estimate the propo... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Alan wants to estimate the proportion of adults who walk to work. In a survey of 10 adults, he finds 1 who walk to work. Explain why a \(95 \%\) confidence interval using the normal model yields silly results. Then compute and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion of adults who walk to work using Agresti and Coull's method.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Normal approximation fails due to small sample size. Using Agresti and Coull's method, the 95% confidence interval is (0.001, 0.427).

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Problem

Alan wants to estimate the proportion of adults who walk to work. A survey of 10 adults shows that 1 walks to work. The task is to explain why a 95% confidence interval using the normal model gives unrealistic results and to compute a 95% confidence interval for the proportion using Agresti and Coull's method.
02

Normal Model Limitation

The normal approximation to the binomial distribution is not appropriate here because the sample size is very small (only 10 adults). Specifically, the requirement for the normal approximation is that both np and n(1-p) should be at least 5. In this case, np = 1 and n(1-p) = 9, so this condition is not met.
03

Agresti and Coull's Method Adjustment

Agresti and Coull's method provides an adjustment to create a more accurate confidence interval. They recommend adding 2 to both the number of successes and failures, and then calculate the proportion and confidence interval based on this adjusted data.
04

Calculate Adjusted Proportion

First, add 2 to the number of successes and failures: Successes: \( \text{Adjusted successes} = 1 + 2 = 3 \) Total trials: \( \text{Adjusted total} = 10 + 4 = 14 \) This gives the adjusted proportion: \( \text{Adjusted proportion} = \frac{3}{14} \approx 0.214 \)
05

Compute Standard Error

Calculate the standard error using the adjusted proportion \( \text{SE} = \sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}} = \sqrt{\frac{0.214 (1-0.214)} {14}} \approx 0.109\)
06

Determine Confidence Interval

The 95% confidence interval is given by: \( \text{Adjusted proportion} \pm 1.96 \times \text{SE} \approx 0.214 \pm 1.96 \times 0.109\) \( 0.214 \pm 0.213 = (0.001, 0.427)\)
07

Interpret Confidence Interval

Using Agresti and Coull's method, the 95% confidence interval for the proportion of adults who walk to work is approximately between 0.1% and 42.7%. This means we are 95% confident that the true proportion of adults who walk to work lies within this range.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Agresti and Coull's Method
Agresti and Coull's method is a more reliable technique to calculate confidence intervals, especially when dealing with small sample sizes. This method enhances the accuracy by adjusting both the number of successes and the number of total observations before calculating the proportion.
To illustrate this, let's revisit Alan's problem. Initially, he surveyed 10 adults and found out that only 1 of them walks to work. Using the normal model may not be appropriate here due to the small sample size.
Agresti and Coull's method recommends adding 2 to both the number of successes and the number of failures before recalculating the proportion. In Alan’s case:
  • Adjusted successes: 1 + 2 = 3
  • Adjusted total observations: 10 + 4 = 14 (since we add 2 to both successes and failures, which totals to adding 4)
Once the adjustments are made, we can calculate the adjusted sample proportion using these new figures.
Normal Model Limitations
The normal model approximation for confidence intervals is a staple in statistics, but it comes with limitations. This approximation assumes that the sample size is sufficiently large so that the sample distribution of the proportion is approximately normal. Specifically, it requires both np and n(1-p) to be at least 5.
In Alan’s survey, where only 10 adults are questioned, we calculate
  • np = 1 and
  • n(1-p) = 9
These values clearly don’t satisfy the condition, making the normal approximation inappropriate. The major limitation here is that the normal model may produce misleading confidence intervals when applied to very small samples or proportions close to 0.5. This is why we look for alternative methods, such as Agresti and Coull's method, to yield more accurate results.
Standard Error Calculation
The standard error (SE) is a measure of the variability or spread of the sample proportion. It indicates how much the sample proportion is expected to vary from the true population proportion. After applying adjustments in Agresti and Coull's method, we use the new adjusted proportion to calculate the SE.
For Alan's adjusted values, the new proportion is calculated as:
\(\text{Adjusted proportion} = \frac{3}{14} \approx 0.214\)
This adjusted proportion helps in calculating the standard error using the formula:
\(\text{SE} = \sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}} = \sqrt{\frac{0.214 \times (1-0.214)} {14}} \approx 0.109 \)
Having an accurate standard error is crucial for constructing a reliable confidence interval because it quantifies the uncertainty associated with the sample proportion.
Small Sample Size Adjustments
Small sample sizes pose significant challenges in statistical analysis. Normal models may yield impractical or 'silly' results due to insufficient data points, which is why adjustments are necessary.
In cases like Alan's survey, where the sample size is only 10 adults, special methods need to be applied to make accurate inferences. Agresti and Coull’s method is one such technique that incorporates adjustments to counteract the limitations posed by small sample sizes.
By adding 2 to both the number of successes and failures, the method offsets the distortions caused by extreme proportions or too few observations. This results in a more stable and realistic confidence interval. After adjusting the values, further calculations are done to ensure that the interval accurately reflects the uncertainty while maintaining validity.
This method showcases the importance of understanding the limitations of the normal approximation and employing more robust techniques for small sample statistics.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Determine the point estimate of the population mean and margin of error for each confidence interval. Lower bound: \(20,\) upper bound: 30

Blood Alcohol Concentration A random sample of 51 fatal crashes in 2013 in which the driver had a positive blood alcohol concentration (BAC) from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration results in a mean BAC of 0.167 gram per deciliter \((\mathrm{g} / \mathrm{dL})\) with a standard deviation of \(0.010 \mathrm{~g} / \mathrm{dL}\) (a) A histogram of blood alcohol concentrations in fatal accidents shows that BACs are highly skewed right. Explain why a large sample size is needed to construct a confidence interval for the mean BAC of fatal crashes with a positive \(\mathrm{BAC}\) (b) In \(2013,\) there were approximately 25,000 fatal crashes in which the driver had a positive BAC. Explain why this, along with the fact that the data were obtained using a simple random sample, satisfies the requirements for constructing a confidence interval. (c) Determine and interpret a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the mean BAC in fatal crashes in which the driver had a positive BAC. (d) All 50 states and the District of Columbia use a BAC of \(0.08 \mathrm{~g} / \mathrm{dL}\) as the legal intoxication level. Is it possible that the mean BAC of all drivers involved in fatal accidents who are found to have positive BAC values is less than the legal intoxication level? Explain.

Katrina wants to estimate the proportion of adult Americans who read at least 10 books last year. To do so, she obtains a simple random sample of 100 adult Americans and constructs a \(95 \%\) confidence interval. Matthew also wants to estimate the proportion of adult Americans who read at least 10 books last year. He obtains a simple random sample of 400 adult Americans and constructs a \(99 \%\) confidence interval. Assuming both Katrina and Matthew obtained the same point estimate, whose estimate will have the smaller margin of error? Justify your answer.

The following data represent the repair cost for a low-impact collision in a simple random sample of mini- and micro-vehicles (such as the Chevrolet Aveo or Mini Cooper). $$ \begin{array}{lrlrr} \hline \$ 3148 & \$ 1758 & \$ 1071 & \$ 3345 & \$ 743 \\ \hline \$ 2057 & \$ 663 & \$ 2637 & \$ 773 & \$ 1370 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) Draw a normal probability plot to determine if it is reasonable to conclude the data come from a population that is normally distributed. (b) Draw boxplot to check for outliers. (c) Construct and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the population mean cost of repair. (d) Suppose you obtain a simple random sample of size \(n=10\) of a Mini Cooper that was in a low-impact collision and determine the cost of repair. Do you think a \(95 \%\) confidence interval would be wider or narrower? Explain.

Gallup polled 982 likely voters immediately preceding the 2014 North Carolina senate race. The results of the survey indicated that incumbent Kay Hagan had the support of \(47 \%\) of respondents, while challenger Thom Tillis had support of \(46 \% .\) The poll's margin of error was \(3 \% .\) Gallup suggested the race was too close to call. Use the concept of a confidence interval to explain what this means.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.