/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 14 Provide an intuitive explanation... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Log out

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 15: Problem 14

Provide an intuitive explanation of how the Spearman rank correlation measures association.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Spearman rank correlation measures how consistently the ranks of two variables increase or decrease together.

Step by step solution

01

Title - Understand Rank Correlation

Spearman rank correlation measures the strength and direction of the relationship between two ranked variables. It evaluates how well the relationship between two variables can be described using a monotonic function.
02

Title - Assign Ranks

Rank each of the values in the two variables independently. For instance, if the variables are heights and weights of students, rank all the heights and all the weights separately from smallest to largest.
03

Title - Calculate Rank Differences

For each pair of values, calculate the difference between their ranks. For example, if rank 1 for height is 3 and rank 1 for weight is 5, the difference is 5 - 3 = 2.
04

Title - Square the Differences

Square each rank difference calculated in the previous step. This removes negative differences and emphasizes larger differences.
05

Title - Sum of Squared Differences

Sum all the squared rank differences obtained in Step 4. This sum will be used in the correlation formula.
06

Title - Spearman Rank Correlation Formula

Use the formula for Spearman's rank correlation coefficient: \[ r_s = 1 - \frac{6 \times \sum d_i^2}{n(n^2-1)} \] where \( d_i \) is the difference between ranks of each pair and \( n \) is the number of observations.
07

Title - Interpretation

Interpret the value of \( r_s \). A value close to 1 indicates a strong positive correlation, close to -1 indicates a strong negative correlation, and around 0 indicates no correlation.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Rank Correlation
Spearman rank correlation is a statistical measure that evaluates the strength and direction of the relationship between two ranked variables. Unlike other correlation coefficients, it relies solely on the ranks of data rather than their raw values. This makes it particularly useful when data do not meet criteria for other correlations.
For example, if you are investigating the relationship between the ranks of students' heights and their weights, you don't look at the actual height and weight measurements. Instead, you rank these measurements for each student separately. By evaluating the ranks, Spearman鈥檚 method provides insights into the monotonic relationships between variables, even when the data are not linearly related.
Difference of Ranks
The difference of ranks is a crucial step in calculating Spearman's rank correlation. Once you have the ranked data for your two variables, you need to find the difference between the ranks for each pair of observations.
For instance, suppose a student鈥檚 height is ranked 3rd and their weight is ranked 5th among their peers. The rank difference for this student would be 5 - 3 = 2. Calculating these differences for all pairs in your data set is essential for understanding the discrepancies between the rankings. These discrepancies, when squared and summed, lay the groundwork for deriving the Spearman rank correlation coefficient.
Monotonic Relationship
A monotonic relationship means that as one variable increases, the other variable tends to increase (or decrease) as well, but not necessarily at a constant rate. Spearman's rank correlation measures how well the relationship between two variables can be described by a monotonic function.
If the relationship is perfectly monotonic, the rank correlation coefficient will be 1 or -1. For example, imagine the relationship between the number of hours studied and the test scores among students. Even if the increase in test scores is not linear, if longer study hours always correlate with higher scores, the relationship is considered monotonic.
This ability to handle non-linear relationships while still providing meaningful results is a big advantage of using Spearman's rank correlation.
Correlation Coefficient
Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, denoted as \( r_s \), quantifies the degree of association between two ranked variables. Its formula is given by: \[ r_s = 1 - \frac{6 \times \sum d_i^2}{n(n^2-1)} \] where \( d_i \) represents the difference between the ranks of each pair and \( n \) is the number of observations.
The value of \( r_s \) ranges between -1 and 1. A value close to 1 indicates a strong positive correlation鈥攎eaning that higher ranks in one variable correspond to higher ranks in the other. Conversely, a value close to -1 indicates a strong negative correlation鈥攚here higher ranks in one variable correspond to lower ranks in the other. A coefficient close to 0 suggests no correlation, meaning the ranks do not follow a monotonic trend.
Interpreting \( r_s \) helps in understanding the strength and direction of the relationship, offering valuable insights into the data's behavior.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Secchi Disk A Secchi disk is an 8-inch-diameter weighted disk painted black and white and attached to a rope. The disk is lowered into water, and the depth (in inches) at which it is no longer visible is recorded. The measurement is an indication of water clarity. An environmental biologist interested in discovering whether the water clarity of the lake at Joliet Junior College is improving takes measurements at the same location during the course of a year and repeats the measurements on the same dates five years later. She obtains the results shown. Do you believe that the clarity of the lake is improving? Use the \(\alpha=0.05\) level of significance. $$ \begin{array}{cccc} \text { Observation } & \text { Date } & \text { Initial Depth } & \text { Depth 5 Years Later } \\ \hline 1 & 5 / 11 & 38 & 52 \\ \hline 2 & 6 / 7 & 58 & 60 \\ \hline 3 & 6 / 24 & 65 & 72 \\ \hline 4 & 7 / 8 & 74 & 72 \\ \hline 5 & 7 / 27 & 56 & 54 \\ \hline 6 & 8 / 31 & 36 & 48 \\ \hline 7 & 9 / 30 & 56 & 58 \\ \hline 8 & 10 / 12 & 52 & 60 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

The following data represent the arrival status of American Airlines Flight 0715 from Washington DC's Ronald Reagan Airport to Chicago's O'Hare International Airport for 15 consecutive flights. $$ \mathrm{L} \mathrm{O} \mathrm{O} \mathrm{O} \mathrm{O} \mathrm{O} \mathrm{O} \mathrm{L} \mathrm{L} \mathrm{L} \mathrm{O} \mathrm{L} \mathrm{O} \mathrm{O} \mathrm{O} $$ Status is indicated as on time (O) or late (L), defined as more than 10 minutes after the scheduled arrival. What can you conclude about the randomness of the arrival status at the \(\alpha=0.05\) level of significance?

In a least-squares regression model. the residuals are assumed to be random. The following data represent the life expectancy of a female born in the given year. $$ \begin{array}{lc|cc} \text { Year, } x & \text { Life Expectancy, } y & \text { Year, } x & \text { Life Expectancy, } y \\ \hline 1999 & 79.4 & 2005 & 79.9 \\ \hline 2000 & 79.3 & 2006 & 80.2 \\ \hline 2001 & 79.4 & 2007 & 80.4 \\ \hline 2002 & 79.5 & 2008 & 80.6 \\ \hline 2003 & 79.6 & 2009 & 80.9 \\ \hline 2004 & 79.9 & 2010 & 81.0 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ The least-squares regression equation treating the year as the independent variable is \(\hat{y}=0.1633 x-247.2999 .\) The residuals from left to right are $$ \begin{array}{rrrrrr} \hline 0.290 & 0.026 & -0.037 & -0.100 & -0.163 & -0.027 \\ \hline-0.190 & -0.053 & -0.017 & 0.020 & 0.157 & 0.094 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) Denote residuals above 0 with an \(A\) and those below 0 with a \(\mathrm{B}\) to form a sequence. (b) Test the assumption that the residuals are random at the \(\alpha=0.05\) level of significance.

The quality-control manager of a bottling company wants to discover whether a filling machine overor underfills 16 -ounce bottles randomly. The following data represent the filling status of 20 consecutive bottles: \(A A A A A A A R R R R A A A A A A A R R\) A bottle is rejected (R) if it is either overfilled or underfilled and accepted (A) if it is filled according to specification. Test the randomness of the filling machine in the way that it overor underfills at the \(\alpha=0.05\) level of significance.

Problems 17 and 18 illustrate the use of the sign test to test hypotheses regarding a population proportion. The only requirement for the sign test is that our sample be obtained randomly. When dealing with nominal data, we can identify a characteristic of interest and then determine whether each individual in the sample possesses this characteristic. Under the null hypothesis in the sign test, we expect that half of the data will result in minus signs and half in plus signs. If we let a plus sign indicate the presence of the characteristic (and a minus sign indicate the absence), we expect half of our sample to possess the characteristic while the other half will not. Letting \(p\) represent the proportion of the population that possesses the characteristic, our null hypothesis will be \(H_{0}: p=0.5 .\) Use the sign test for Problems 17 and 18 , following the sign convention indicated previously. Trusting the Press In a study of 2302 U.S. adults surveyed online by Harris Interactive 1243 respondents indicated that they tend to not trust the press. Using an \(\alpha=0.05\) level of significance, does this indicate that more than half of U.S. adults tend to not trust the press?
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

Probability and Statistics

Read Explanation

Decision Maths

Read Explanation

Geometry

Read Explanation

Logic and Functions

Read Explanation

Calculus

Read Explanation

Mechanics Maths

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.