/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 9 The Insurance Institute for High... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety regularly tests cars for various safety factors. In one such test, the institute tests the bumpers in 5 -mile per hour (mph) crashes. The following data represent the cost of repairs (in dollars) after four different 5 -mph crashes on small utility vehicles. The institute blocks by location of crash, and the treatment is car model. $$ \begin{array}{lcccc} & \text { Jeep } & \text { Saturn } & \text { Toyota } & \text { Hyundai } \\ & \text { Cherokee } & \text { VUE } & \text { RAV4 } & \text { Santa Fe } \\ \hline \text { Front into } & 652 & 416 & 489 & 539 \\ \text { flat barrier } & & & & \\ \hline \begin{array}{l} \text { Rear into } \\ \text { flat barrier } \end{array} & 824 & 556 & 1897 & 1504 \\ \hline \begin{array}{l} \text { Front into } \\ \text { angle barrier } \end{array} & 1448 & 1179 & 1151 & 1578 \\ \hline \text { Rear into pole } & 1553 & 1335 & 2377 & 1988 \end{array} $$ (a) Normal probability plots for each treatment indicate that the requirement of normality is satisfied. Verify that the requirement of equal population variances for each treatment is satisfied. (b) Is there sufficient evidence that the mean cost of repairs is different among the four SUVs at the \(\alpha=0.05\) level of significance? (c) If the null hypothesis from part (b) was rejected, use Tukey's test to determine which pairwise means differ using a familywise error rate of \(\alpha=0.05 .\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
Calculate means and variances to check for equal population variances. Perform ANOVA to see if repair costs differ among SUVs. If ANOVA rejects null, use Tukey's Test for pairwise comparison.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the Mean and Variance

Calculate the mean and variance of repair costs for each car model (Jeep Cherokee, Saturn VUE, Toyota RAV4, and Hyundai Santa Fe) to verify the requirement of equal population variances. Formulas to use:Mean: \[ \bar{x} = \frac{\text{sum of all values}}{\text{number of values}} \]Variance: \[ s^2 = \frac{\text{sum of } (x_i - \bar{x})^2}{n-1} \]Use the given data to calculate:
02

Jeep Cherokee Calculations

Repair Costs for Jeep Cherokee: 652, 824, 1448, 1553Mean: \[ \bar{x}_{Jeep} = \frac{652 + 824 + 1448 + 1553}{4} = 1119.25 \] Variance: \[ s^2_{Jeep} = \frac{(652 - 1119.25)^2 + (824 - 1119.25)^2 + (1448 - 1119.25)^2 + (1553 - 1119.25)^2}{3} = 160230.92 \]
03

Saturn VUE Calculations

Repair Costs for Saturn VUE: 416, 556, 1179, 1335Mean: \[ \bar{x}_{Saturn} = \frac{416 + 556 + 1179 + 1335}{4} = 871.5 \] Variance: \[ s^2_{Saturn} = \frac{(416 - 871.5)^2 + (556 - 871.5)^2 + (1179 - 871.5)^2 + (1335 - 871.5)^2}{3} = 196254.33 \]
04

Toyota RAV4 Calculations

Repair Costs for Toyota RAV4: 489, 1897, 1151, 2377Mean: \[ \bar{x}_{Toyota} = \frac{489 + 1897 + 1151 + 2377}{4} = 1478.5 \] Variance: \[ s^2_{Toyota} = \frac{(489 - 1478.5)^2 + (1897 - 1478.5)^2 + (1151 - 1478.5)^2 + (2377 - 1478.5)^2}{3} = 609237.67 \]
05

Hyundai Santa Fe Calculations

Repair Costs for Hyundai Santa Fe: 539, 1504, 1578, 1988Mean: \[ \bar{x}_{Hyundai} = \frac{539 + 1504 + 1578 + 1988}{4} = 1402.25 \] Variance: \[ s^2_{Hyundai} = \frac{(539 - 1402.25)^2 + (1504 - 1402.25)^2 + (1578 - 1402.25)^2 + (1988 - 1402.25)^2}{3} = 399637.58 \]
06

Verify Equal Population Variances

Compare the variances calculated in Step 1. If the variances are approximately equal, the requirement for equal population variances is satisfied.Variances:Jeep Cherokee: 160230.92Saturn VUE: 196254.33Toyota RAV4: 609237.67Hyundai Santa Fe: 399637.58
07

ANOVA Test

Use ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) to determine if there is a significant difference in the mean repair costs among the four SUVs. The null hypothesis is that all means are equal, and the alternative hypothesis is that at least one mean is different. Use a significance level of \( \alpha = 0.05 \). Check the ANOVA table for the F-value and p-value.
08

Tukey's Test (If Necessary)

If the null hypothesis is rejected in the ANOVA test, apply Tukey's Test to determine which pairs of means are significantly different. Use a familywise error rate of \( \alpha = 0.05 \). Calculate the Tukey HSD (Honestly Significant Difference) and compare pairwise mean differences to this value.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Mean and Variance Calculations
Understanding mean and variance calculations is fundamental in statistics, especially for ANOVA analysis. The mean is simply the average value, calculated by summing all data points and dividing by the number of points. The formula for the mean (\bar{x}) is
\(\bar{x} = \frac{\text{sum of all values}}{\text{number of values}}\).

Variance measures how spread out the data points are around the mean. A higher variance indicates more spread. The variance formula is
\[ s^2 = \frac{\text{sum of } (x_i - \bar{x})^2}{n-1} \].

Let's consider the repair costs for the Jeep Cherokee:
Mean: \(\bar{x}_{Jeep} = \frac{652 + 824 + 1448 + 1553}{4} = 1119.25\)
Variance: \(\frac{(652 - 1119.25)^2 + (824 - 1119.25)^2 + (1448 - 1119.25)^2 + (1553 - 1119.25)^2}{3} = 160230.92\).

Similar steps are followed for Saturn VUE, Toyota RAV4, and Hyundai Santa Fe to find their respective means and variances. Comparing these variances helps verify the assumption of equal variances for ANOVA.
Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing in ANOVA helps determine if there are any statistically significant differences among the means of different groups. The null hypothesis (H0) states that all group means are equal. The alternative hypothesis (H1) suggests that at least one mean is different.

In this problem, we want to know if the mean repair costs among the four SUVs are different. We set our significance level (\alpha) at 0.05. Using the ANOVA table, we calculate the F-value and p-value. ANOVA works by comparing the variation between group means to the variation within the groups. If the p-value is less than \(\alpha = 0.05\), we reject the null hypothesis, indicating a significant difference among the means.

The ANOVA formula involves dividing the Mean Square Between (MSB) by the Mean Square Within (MSW): \[\text{F} = \frac{\text{MSB}}{\text{MSW}}\]. You can check the F-distribution tables or software outputs for the critical value. Rejecting H0 leads us to conduct further analysis with post-hoc tests.
Tukey's Test
Tukey's Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) test is a post-hoc analysis used to discover which specific means are different after an ANOVA indicates significant differences. It compares all possible pairs of means while controlling the familywise error rate to \(\alpha = 0.05\).

The formula for Tukey's HSD is: \[ HSD = q \sqrt{\frac{MSW}{n}} \],
where q is the studentized range statistic, MSW is the Mean Square Within groups, and n is the number of observations per group. This test helps identify where the significant differences lie among paired group means.

For our SUV repair costs, if ANOVA results reject the null hypothesis, Tukey's test will reveal which specific SUV pairs have significantly different repair costs. This helps in pinpointing the exact differences, ensuring detailed and specific insights into the cost variances among the models evaluated in the crash tests.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

An environmentalist wanted to determine if the mean acidity of rain differed among Alaska, Florida, and Texas. He randomly selected six rain dates at each of the three locations and obtained the following data:$$\begin{array}{ccc}\text { Alaska } & \text { Florida } & \text { Texas } \\\\\hline 5.41 & 4.87 & 5.46 \\\\\hline 5.39 & 5.18 & 5.89 \\\\\hline 4.90 & 4.52 & 5.57 \\\\\hline 5.14 & 5.12 & 5.15 \\\\\hline 4.80 & 4.89 & 5.45 \\\\\hline 5.24 & 5.06 &5.30\end{array}$$ (a) State the null and alternative hypotheses. (b) Verify that the requirements to use the one-way ANOVA procedure are satisfied. Normal probability plots indicate that the sample data come from a normal population. (c) Test the hypothesis that the mean pHs in the rainwater are the same at the \(\alpha=0.05\) level of significance. (d) Draw boxplots of the \(\mathrm{pH}\) in rain for the three states to support the results obtained in part (c)

Given the following ANOVA output, answer the questions that follow. \(\begin{array}{lrrrrr}\text { Source } & \text { df } & \text { SS } & \text { MS } & F & P \\ \text { Factor A } & 2 & 2269.8 & 1134.9 & 35.63 & 0.000 \\\ \text { Factor B } & 2 & 115.2 & 57.6 & 1.81 & 0.183 \\ \text { Interaction } & 4 & 1694.8 & 423.7 & 13.30 & 0.000 \\ \text { Error } & 27 & 860.0 & 31.9 & & \\ \text { Total } & 35 & 4939.8 & & & \end{array}\) (a) Is there evidence of an interaction effect? Why or why not? (b) Based on the \(P\) -value, is there evidence of a difference in the means from factor A? Based on the \(P\) -value, is there evidence of a difference in the means from factor \(\mathrm{B}\) ? (c) What is the mean square error?

Determine the F-test statistic based on the given summary statistics. $$ \begin{array}{cccc} \text { Population } & \text { Sample Size } & \text { Sample Mean } & \text { Sample Variance } \\ \hline 1 & 10 & 40 & 48 \\ \hline 2 & 10 & 42 & 31 \\ \hline 3 & 10 & 44 & 25 \end{array} $$

Researchers (Brian G. Feagan et al. "Erythropoietin with Iron Supplementation to Prevent Allogeneic Blood Transfusion in Total Hip Joint Arthroplasty," Annals of Internal Medicine, Vol. \(133,\) No. 11 ) wanted to determine whether epoetin alfa was effective in increasing the hemoglobin concentration in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty. A complete medical history and physical of the patients was performed for screening purposes and eligible patients were identified. The researchers used a computergenerated schedule to assign the patients to the high-dose epoetin group, low-dose epoetin group, or placebo group. The study was double-blind. Based on ANOVA, it was determined that there were significant differences in the increase in hemoglobin concentration in the three groups with a \(P\) -value less than 0.001 . The mean increase in hemoglobin in the high-dose epoetin group was 19.5 grams per liter \((\mathrm{g} / \mathrm{L}),\) the mean increase in hemoglobin in the low-dose epoetin group was \(17.2 \mathrm{~g} / \mathrm{L},\) and mean increase in hemoglobin in the placebo group was \(1.2 \mathrm{~g} / \mathrm{L}\). (a) Why do you think it was necessary to screen patients for eligibility? (b) Why was a computer-generated schedule used to assign patients to the various treatment groups? (c) What does it mean for a study to be double-blind? Why do you think the researchers desired a double-blind study? (d) Interpret the reported \(P\) -value.

Do gender and seating arrangement in college classrooms affect student attitude? In a study at a large public university in the United States, researchers surveyed students to measure their level of feeling at ease in the classroom. Participants were shown different classroom layouts and asked questions regarding their attitude toward each layout. The following data represent feeling-at-ease scores for a random sample of 32 students (four students for each possible treatment). $$ \begin{array}{lcc|cc|cc|cc} \hline && {\text { Tablet-Arm Chairs }} && {\text { U-Shaped }} & {\text { Clusters }} & & {\text { Tables with Chairs }} \\ \hline \text { Female } & 19.8 & 18.4 & 19.2 & 19.2 & 18.1 & 17.5 & 17.3 & 17.1 \\ \hline & 18.1 & 18.5 & 18.6 & 18.7 & 17.8 & 18.3 & 17.7 & 17.6 \\ \hline \text { Male } & 18.8 & 18.2 & 20.6 & 19.2 & 18.4 & 17.7 & 17.7 & 16.9 \\\ \hline & 18.9 & 18.9 & 19.8 & 19.7 & 17.1 & 18.2 & 17.8 & 17.5 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) What is the population of interest? (b) Is this study an experiment or an observational study? Which type? (c) What are the response and explanatory variables? Identify each as qualitative or quantitative. (d) Compute the mean and standard deviation for the scores in the male/U-shaped cell. (e) Assuming that feeling-at-ease scores for males on the U-shaped layout are normally distributed with \(\mu=19.1\) and \(\sigma=0.8,\) what is the probability that you would observe a sample mean as large or larger than actually observed? Would this be unusual? (f) Determine whether the mean feeling-at-ease score is different for males than females using a two-sample \(t\) -test for independent samples. Use the \(\alpha=0.05\) level of significance. (g) Determine whether the mean feeling-at-ease scores for the classroom layouts are different using one-way ANOVA. Use the \(\alpha=0.05\) level of significance. (h) Determine if there is an interaction effect between the two factors. If not, determine if either main effect is significant. (i) Draw an interaction plot of the data. Does the plot support your conclusions in part (h)? (j) In the original study, the researchers sent out e-mails to a random sample of 100 professors at the university asking permission to survey students in their class. Only 32 respondents agreed to allow their students to be surveyed. What type of nonsampling error is this? How might this affect the results of the study?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.