/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 4 Given the following ANOVA output... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Given the following ANOVA output, answer the questions that follow: $$ \begin{aligned} &\text { Analysis of Variance for Response }\\\ &\begin{array}{lrrrrr} \text { Source } & \text { df } & \text { SS } & \text { MS } & F & P \\ \text { Block } & 6 & 1712.37 & 285.39 & 134.20 & 0.000 \\ \text { Treatment } & 3 & 2.27 & 0.76 & 0.36 & 0.786 \\ \text { Error } & 18 & 38.28 & 2.13 & & \\ \text { Total } & 27 & 1752.91 & & & \end{array} \end{aligned} $$ (a) The researcher wants to test \(H_{0}: \mu_{1}=\mu_{2}=\mu_{3}=\mu_{4}\) against \(H_{1}:\) at least one of the means is different. Based on the ANOVA table, what should the researcher conclude? (b) What is the mean square due to error? (c) Explain why it is not necessary to use Tukey's test on these data.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Fail to reject the null hypothesis. MSE = 2.13. Tukey's test is not necessary.

Step by step solution

01

- Determine the F-ratio for the treatment

Look at the row labeled 'Treatment' in the ANOVA table. The F-ratio for the treatment is given as 0.36.
02

- Compare the F-ratio with the critical value

Use the significance level (usually 0.05) and the degrees of freedom for the numerator (df for treatment = 3) and the denominator (df for error = 18) to find the critical value from the F-distribution table. Note that P value for treatment is 0.786, which is greater than 0.05, indicating that the treatment is not significant.
03

- Conclusion for hypothesis test

Since the P value (0.786) is greater than the significance level (0.05), we fail to reject the null hypothesis. This means there is no significant evidence to suggest that the means are different.
04

- Find the Mean Square Error (MSE)

Locate the Mean Square (MS) value in the row labeled 'Error.' The MS for error is 2.13.
05

- Determine the necessity of Tukey's test

Tukey's test is used to find which specific means are different after finding a significant F-ratio. Since we did not find a significant difference (failed to reject the null hypothesis), it is unnecessary to perform Tukey's test.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

F-ratio
The F-ratio in ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) is a key statistic used to compare the variances between different groups. It is calculated by dividing the Mean Square Treatment by the Mean Square Error. This ratio helps to determine whether the variability between group means is significant.

The formula for F-ratio is:
\[ F = \frac{MS_{treatment}}{MS_{error}} \]

In our exercise, the F-ratio for the treatment is calculated as 0.36. This low F-ratio suggests that the variation among the group means is not significant compared to the variation within the groups. The F-ratio is then compared to a critical value from the F-distribution table to draw conclusions about our hypothesis. If the F-ratio is greater than the critical value, we reject the null hypothesis; otherwise, we fail to reject it.
Mean Square Error
Mean Square Error (MSE) is an essential component in ANOVA that measures the average variability within the groups. It helps to assess the extent to which individual observations deviate from the group means.

To calculate the MSE, we use the following formula:
\[ MS_{error} = \frac{SS_{error}}{df_{error}} \]

Where 'SS_{error}' is the Sum of Squares for error, and 'df_{error}' is the degrees of freedom for error. In the provided ANOVA table, we observe that:
  • SS_{error} = 38.28
  • df_{error} = 18

The MSE is therefore calculated as follows:
\[ MS_{error} = \frac{38.28}{18} = 2.13 \]

This value of 2.13 indicates the average squared difference between the observed and predicted values within the groups.
Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental aspect of statistical analysis used to determine whether there is enough evidence to reject a null hypothesis. In the context of ANOVA, we typically test the null hypothesis that all group means are equal against the alternative hypothesis that at least one group mean is different.

The steps involved in hypothesis testing using ANOVA are:

  • Formulate the null hypothesis ( \[H_{0} \]) and the alternative hypothesis ( \[H_{1} \])
  • Calculate the test statistic (F-ratio)
  • Find the critical value from the F-distribution table based on the significance level and degrees of freedom
  • Compare the F-ratio with the critical value
  • Make a decision to reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis

In our exercise, the null hypothesis was: \[ H_{0}: \mu_{1}=\mu_{2}=\mu_{3}=\mu_{4} \]
The alternative hypothesis was: \[ H_{1}: \text{at least one of the means is different} \]
Given that the P-value for the treatment is 0.786, which is greater than the significance level of 0.05, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. Thus, we conclude that there is no significant evidence to suggest that the means are different.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The data in the table represent the number of corn plants in randomly sampled rows (a 17 -foot by 5 -inch strip ) for various types of plot. An agricultural researcher wants to know whether the mean number of plants for each plot type are equal. $$\begin{array}{lcccccc}\text { Plot Type } & {\text { Number of Plants }} \\\\\hline \text { Sludge plot } & 25 & 27 & 33 & 30 & 28 & 27 \\\\\hline \text { Spring disc } & 32 & 30 & 33 & 35 & 34 & 34 \\\\\hline \text { No till } & 30 & 26 & 29 & 32 & 25 & 29\end{array}$$ (a) Write the null and alternative hypotheses. (b) State the requirements that must be satisfied to use the oneway ANOVA procedure. (c) Use the following partial Minitab output to test the hypothesis of equal means at the \(\alpha=0.05\) level of significance $$\begin{aligned}&\text { One-way ANOVA: Sludge Plot, Spring Disc, No Till }\\\&\begin{array}{lrrrrr}\text { Source } & \text { df } & \text { SS } & \text { MS } & F & P \\\\\text { Factor } & 2 & 84.11 & 42.06 & 7.10 & 0.007 \\\\\text { Error } & 15 & 88.83 & 5.92 & & \\\\\text { Total } & 17 & 172.94 & & &\end{array}\end{aligned}$$ (d) Shown are side-by-side boxplots of each type of plot. Do these boxplots support the results obtained in part (c)? (e) Verify that the \(F\) -test statistic is 7.10 . (f) Verify the residuals are normally distributed.

Do gender and seating arrangement in college classrooms affect student attitude? In a study at a large public university in the United States, researchers surveyed students to measure their level of feeling at ease in the classroom. Participants were shown different classroom layouts and asked questions regarding their attitude toward each layout. The following data represent feeling-at-ease scores for a random sample of 32 students (four students for each possible treatment). $$ \begin{array}{lcc|cc|cc|cc} \hline && {\text { Tablet-Arm Chairs }} && {\text { U-Shaped }} & {\text { Clusters }} & & {\text { Tables with Chairs }} \\ \hline \text { Female } & 19.8 & 18.4 & 19.2 & 19.2 & 18.1 & 17.5 & 17.3 & 17.1 \\ \hline & 18.1 & 18.5 & 18.6 & 18.7 & 17.8 & 18.3 & 17.7 & 17.6 \\ \hline \text { Male } & 18.8 & 18.2 & 20.6 & 19.2 & 18.4 & 17.7 & 17.7 & 16.9 \\\ \hline & 18.9 & 18.9 & 19.8 & 19.7 & 17.1 & 18.2 & 17.8 & 17.5 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) What is the population of interest? (b) Is this study an experiment or an observational study? Which type? (c) What are the response and explanatory variables? Identify each as qualitative or quantitative. (d) Compute the mean and standard deviation for the scores in the male/U-shaped cell. (e) Assuming that feeling-at-ease scores for males on the U-shaped layout are normally distributed with \(\mu=19.1\) and \(\sigma=0.8,\) what is the probability that you would observe a sample mean as large or larger than actually observed? Would this be unusual? (f) Determine whether the mean feeling-at-ease score is different for males than females using a two-sample \(t\) -test for independent samples. Use the \(\alpha=0.05\) level of significance. (g) Determine whether the mean feeling-at-ease scores for the classroom layouts are different using one-way ANOVA. Use the \(\alpha=0.05\) level of significance. (h) Determine if there is an interaction effect between the two factors. If not, determine if either main effect is significant. (i) Draw an interaction plot of the data. Does the plot support your conclusions in part (h)? (j) In the original study, the researchers sent out e-mails to a random sample of 100 professors at the university asking permission to survey students in their class. Only 32 respondents agreed to allow their students to be surveyed. What type of nonsampling error is this? How might this affect the results of the study?

Researchers (Brian G. Feagan et al. "Erythropoietin with Iron Supplementation to Prevent Allogeneic Blood Transfusion in Total Hip Joint Arthroplasty," Annals of Internal Medicine, Vol. \(133,\) No. 11 ) wanted to determine whether epoetin alfa was effective in increasing the hemoglobin concentration in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty. A complete medical history and physical of the patients was performed for screening purposes and eligible patients were identified. The researchers used a computergenerated schedule to assign the patients to the high-dose epoetin group, low-dose epoetin group, or placebo group. The study was double-blind. Based on ANOVA, it was determined that there were significant differences in the increase in hemoglobin concentration in the three groups with a \(P\) -value less than 0.001 . The mean increase in hemoglobin in the high-dose epoetin group was 19.5 grams per liter \((\mathrm{g} / \mathrm{L}),\) the mean increase in hemoglobin in the low-dose epoetin group was \(17.2 \mathrm{~g} / \mathrm{L},\) and mean increase in hemoglobin in the placebo group was \(1.2 \mathrm{~g} / \mathrm{L}\). (a) Why do you think it was necessary to screen patients for eligibility? (b) Why was a computer-generated schedule used to assign patients to the various treatment groups? (c) What does it mean for a study to be double-blind? Why do you think the researchers desired a double-blind study? (d) Interpret the reported \(P\) -value.

The following data are taken from four different populations that are known to be normally distributed, with equal population variances based on independent simple random samples. $$ \begin{array}{cccc} \text { Sample 1 } & \text { Sample 2 } & \text { Sample 3 } & \text { Sample 4 } \\ \hline 110 & 138 & 98 & 130 \\ \hline 85 & 140 & 100 & 116 \\ \hline 83 & 130 & 94 & 157 \\ \hline 95 & 115 & 110 & 137 \\ \hline 103 & 101 & 104 & 144 \\ \hline 105 & 130 & 118 & 124 \\ \hline 107 & 123 & 102 & 139 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) Test the hypothesis that each sample comes from a population with the same mean at the \(\alpha=0.05\) level of significance. That is, test \(H_{0}: \mu_{1}=\mu_{2}=\mu_{3}=\mu_{4}\). (b) If you rejected the null hypothesis in part (a), use Tukey's test to determine which pairwise means differ using a familywise error rate of \(\alpha=0.05\). (c) Draw boxplots of each set of sample data to support your results from parts (a) and (b).

Researchers wanted to determine if the psychological profile of healthy children was different than for children suffering from recurrent abdominal pain (RAP) or recurring headaches. A total of 210 children and adolescents were studied and their psychological profiles were graded according to the Child Behavior Checklist \(4-18\) (CBCL). Children were stratified in two age groups: 4 to 11 years and 12 to 18 years. The results of the study are summarized in the following table: $$\begin{array}{lccc} & n & \text { Sample Mean } & \text { Sample Variance } \\\\\hline \text { Control group } & 70 & 11.7 & 21.6 \\\\\hline \text { RAP } & 70 & 9.0 & 13.0 \\\\\hline \text { Headache } & 70 & 12.4 & 8.4\end{array}$$ (a) Compute the sample standard deviations for each group. (b) What sampling method was used for each treatment group? Why? (c) Use a two sample \(t\) -test for independent samples to determine if there is a significant difference in mean \(\mathrm{CBCL}\) scores between the control group and the RAP group (assume that both samples are simple random samples). (d) Is it necessary to check the normality assumption to answer part (c)? Explain. (e) Use the one-way ANOVA procedure with \(\alpha=0.05\) to determine if the mean CBCL scores are different for the three treatment groups. (f) Based on your results from parts (c) and (e), can you determine if there is a significant difference between the mean scores of the RAP group and the headache group? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.