/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 13 The data in the table represent ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The data in the table represent the number of corn plants in randomly sampled rows (a 17 -foot by 5 -inch strip ) for various types of plot. An agricultural researcher wants to know whether the mean number of plants for each plot type are equal. $$\begin{array}{lcccccc}\text { Plot Type } & {\text { Number of Plants }} \\\\\hline \text { Sludge plot } & 25 & 27 & 33 & 30 & 28 & 27 \\\\\hline \text { Spring disc } & 32 & 30 & 33 & 35 & 34 & 34 \\\\\hline \text { No till } & 30 & 26 & 29 & 32 & 25 & 29\end{array}$$ (a) Write the null and alternative hypotheses. (b) State the requirements that must be satisfied to use the oneway ANOVA procedure. (c) Use the following partial Minitab output to test the hypothesis of equal means at the \(\alpha=0.05\) level of significance $$\begin{aligned}&\text { One-way ANOVA: Sludge Plot, Spring Disc, No Till }\\\&\begin{array}{lrrrrr}\text { Source } & \text { df } & \text { SS } & \text { MS } & F & P \\\\\text { Factor } & 2 & 84.11 & 42.06 & 7.10 & 0.007 \\\\\text { Error } & 15 & 88.83 & 5.92 & & \\\\\text { Total } & 17 & 172.94 & & &\end{array}\end{aligned}$$ (d) Shown are side-by-side boxplots of each type of plot. Do these boxplots support the results obtained in part (c)? (e) Verify that the \(F\) -test statistic is 7.10 . (f) Verify the residuals are normally distributed.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Reject the null hypothesis, as p-value < 0.05. The F-test statistic is verified to be 7.10. Boxplots and normality of residuals should support this conclusion.

Step by step solution

01

Write the null and alternative hypotheses

State the null and alternative hypotheses. The null hypothesis (H_0) states that the mean number of corn plants is equal for all plot types. The alternative hypothesis (H_a) states that at least one plot type has a different mean number of corn plants.Pref H_0: μ_1 = μ_2 = μ_3Pref H_a: At least one mean is different
02

State the requirements for ANOVA

List the assumptions for using ANOVA. The requirements are: 1. The populations from which the samples are drawn should be normally distributed.2. The populations should have equal variances.3. The samples should be independent.
03

Test the hypothesis

Use the provided Minitab output to test the hypothesis at α = 0.05. The given p-value is 0.007. Since 0.007 < 0.05, reject the null hypothesis.This means there is enough statistical evidence to say that not all plot types have the same mean number of corn plants.
04

Analyze boxplots

Inspect the side-by-side boxplots. If the boxplots show significant differences in medians and interquartile ranges, it supports the results in part (c). Variability or visible differences in medians indicate that the mean plant numbers are likely not equal.
05

Verify F-test statistic

Calculate the F-test statistic using the ANOVA summary.F =MS_Factor / MS_Error= 42.06 / 5.92= 7.10This verifies the given F-test statistic value is correct.
06

Verify normality of residuals

Examine residual plots or normality tests for the residuals. A normal probability plot or tests like Shapiro-Wilk can be used to confirm normal distribution of residuals.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

null hypothesis
In statistical testing, the null hypothesis is a crucial concept. For the given problem, the null hypothesis (H_0) asserts that the mean number of corn plants is the same across all plot types. This means that any observed differences in the sample means are due to random variation and not due to any actual difference in plot types.
Formally, if we denote the population means of the plot types as μ_1,μ_2, and μ_3, then, the null hypothesis can be stated as:
H_0: μ_1 = μ_2 = μ_3
In simpler terms, it suggests no statistical significance or effect exists between the means of the different plot types. It's the default assumption that an experiment seeks to challenge.
alternative hypothesis
The alternative hypothesis is complementary to the null hypothesis. It proposes that there is a significant difference between the means of the plot types. In the context of the given problem, the alternative hypothesis (H_a) posits that at least one plot type has a different mean number of corn plants. This can formally be written as:
H_a: At least one mean (μ) is different.
This hypothesis is what researchers aim to prove. It's an assertion that there's a statistical effect present, indicated in this case by the mean number of corn plants differing for at least one type of plot.
F-test
An F-test evaluates the null hypothesis by comparing the variances between groups relative to the variances within the groups. Specifically, in ANOVA (Analysis of Variance), we use the F-test to determine if the group means are statistically different:
Formally, the F-statistic is given by:\[ F = \frac{MS_{Between}}{MS_{Within}} \]
Where MS_{Between} is the mean square between groups and MS_{Within} is the mean square within groups.
In this exercise, the F-statistic is calculated as: F = 42.06 / 5.92 = 7.10. The critical value of F is compared to the F-distribution with the appropriate degrees of freedom. If the calculated F is greater than the critical value, we reject the null hypothesis. The given calculation shows an F-value of 7.10, which supports rejecting the null hypothesis at the 0.05 level of significance.
normal distribution
A key assumption of ANOVA is that the populations from which the samples are taken are normally distributed. This means the distribution of the number of corn plants in each type of plot should be bell-shaped and symmetric.
Normality can be assessed using:
  • Visual methods like Q-Q plots or histograms
  • Statistical tests like the Shapiro-Wilk test

In this scenario, one way to check is by analyzing the residuals (the differences between observed and predicted values). A normality plot or a histogram of residuals that approximately forms a bell shape can confirm the assumption of normality. If the residuals follow a normal distribution, the application of ANOVA is justified.
boxplots
Boxplots offer a graphical representation of the data, showing the median, quartiles, and potential outliers. They provide a useful summary of the dataset's variability and central tendency.
For different plot types in this exercise, side-by-side boxplots can visualize differences in plant numbers:
  • Medians: Represented by the line inside the box
  • Interquartile ranges (IQR): Represented by the height of the box
  • Outliers: Points outside the 'whiskers' or the range of the boxplot

If there are visible differences in medians or the lengths of the boxes among plot types, this provides visual evidence that the means may not be equal. These differences can complement the F-test results, indicating significant variance between the plot types.
independent samples
Another essential assumption for ANOVA is having independent samples. This means that the sample data from one group should not influence another group.
In the given problem, the numbers of corn plants for 'Sludge plot', 'Spring disc', and 'No till' should be collected independently. This ensures that any observed differences in mean plant numbers are due to the plot treatment effects and not because of dependencies within the sampling process.
Independence can be ensured by:
  • Random sampling techniques
  • Ensuring no overlap or repeated measures among the groups

The validity of the ANOVA results hinges on this independence, as non-independent samples can lead to incorrect conclusions about the differences in group means.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Got Milk? Researchers Sharon Peterson and Madeleine Sigman-Grant wanted to compare the overall nutrient intake of American children (ages 2 to 19 ) who exclusively use skim milk instead of \(1 \%, 2 \%,\) or whole milk. The researchers combined children who consumed \(1 \%\) or \(2 \%\) milk into a "mixed milk" category. The following data represent the daily calcium intake (in \(\mathrm{mg}\) ) for a random sample of eight children in each category and are based on the results presented in their article "Impact of Adopting Lower-Fat Food Choices on Nutrient Intake of American Children," Pediatrics, Vol. \(100,\) No. \(3 .\) $$ \begin{array}{ccc} \text { Skim Milk } & \text { Mixed Milk } & \text { Whole Milk } \\ \hline 916 & 1024 & 870 \\ \hline 886 & 1013 & 874 \\ \hline 854 & 1065 & 881 \\ \hline 856 & 1002 & 836 \\ \hline 857 & 1006 & 879 \\ \hline 853 & 991 & 938 \\ \hline 865 & 1015 & 841 \\ \hline 904 & 1035 & 818 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) Is there sufficient evidence to support the belief that at least one of the means is different from the others at the \(\alpha=0.05\) level of significance? Note: The requirements for a one-way ANOVA are satisfied. (b) If the null hypothesis is rejected in part (a), use Tukey's test to determine which pairwise means differ using a familywise error rate of \(\alpha=0.05 .\) (c) Draw boxplots of the three categories to support the analytic results obtained in parts (a) and (b).

In Problems 5 and \(6,\) assume that the data come from populations that are normally distributed with the same variance $$ \begin{array}{cccc} \text { Block } & \text { Treatment 1 } & \text { Treatment 2 } & \text { Treatment 3 } \\ \hline \mathbf{1} & 15.8 & 15.0 & 15.3 \\ \hline \mathbf{2} & 16.0 & 15.8 & 17.2 \\ \hline \mathbf{3} & 21.6 & 18.3 & 21.5 \\ \hline \mathbf{4} & 21.6 & 20.8 & 21.3 \\ \hline \mathbf{5} & 22.5 & 21.5 & 23.5 \\ \hline \mathbf{6} & 17.5 & 16.2 & 16.8 \end{array} $$ (a) Test \(H_{0}: \mu_{1}=\mu_{2}=\mu_{3}\) against \(H_{1}:\) at least one of the means is different, where \(\mu_{1}\) is the mean for treatment \(1,\) and so on, at the \(\alpha=0.05\) level of significance. (b) If the null hypothesis from part (a) was rejected, use Tukey's test to determine which pairwise means differ using a familywise error rate of \(\alpha=0.05 .\) (c) Draw boxplots of the data for each treatment using the same scale to support the analytical results obtained in parts (a) and (b).

The following data represent the number of fish species living in various Andirondack Lakes and the \(\mathrm{pH}\) of the lakes. From chemistry, we know \(\mathrm{pH}\) is a measure of the acidity or basicity of a solution. Solutions with \(\mathrm{pH}\) less than 7 are said to be acidic. As pH increases, the solution is said to be less acidic. $$\begin{array}{lc|lc}\text { pH } & \text { Species } & \text { pH } & \text { Species } \\\\\hline 4.6 & 0 & 5.8 & 8 \\\\\hline 4.7 & 0 & 6 & 3 \\\\\hline 4.8 & 0 & 6.1 & 4 \\\\\hline 5 & 0 & 6.2 & 9 \\\\\hline 5 & 2 & 6.25 & 9 \\\\\hline 5.2 & 2 & 6.3 & 2 \\\\\hline 5.2 & 1 & 6.3 & 4 \\\\\hline 5.25 & 0 & 6.3 & 9 \\\\\hline 5.3 & 1 & 6.4 & 5 \\\\\hline 5.35 & 1 & 6.7 & 6 \\\\\hline 5.5 & 5 & 6.7 & 8 \\\\\hline 5.7 & 4 & 6.7 & 8 \\\\\hline 5.75 & 3 & 6.8 & 10\end{array}$$ (a) Draw a scatter diagram of the data treating \(\mathrm{pH}\) as the explanatory variable. (b) Determine the linear correlation coefficient between \(\mathrm{pH}\) and number of fish species. (c) Does a linear relation exist between \(\mathrm{pH}\) and number of fish species? (d) Find the least-squares regression line treating \(\mathrm{pH}\) as the explanatory variable. (e) Interpret the slope. (f) Is it reasonable to interpret the intercept? Explain. (g) What proportion of the variability in number of fish species is explained by \(\mathrm{pH} ?\) (h) Is the number of fish species in the lake whose \(\mathrm{pH}\) is 5.5 above or below average? Explain. (i) In part (g), you found the proportion of variability in number of fish species that is explained by the variability in \(\mathrm{pH}\). Can you think of other variables that might also explain the variability in the number of fish species?

An automotive engineer wanted to determine whether the octane of gasoline used in a car increases gas mileage. Recognizing that car and driver are variables that affect gas mileage, he selected six different brands of car and assigned a driver to each car, so he blocked by car type and driver. For each car (and driver), the researcher randomly selected a number from 1 to 3 , with 1 representing 87 -octane gasoline, 2 representing 89 -octane gasoline, and 3 representing 92 -octane gasoline. Then 5 gallons of the gasoline selected was placed in the car. The car was driven around a closed track at 40 miles per hour until the car ran out of gas. The number of miles driven was recorded and then divided by 5 to obtain the miles per gallon. He obtained the following results: $$ \begin{array}{lccc} & \mathbf{8 7} \text { Octane } & \mathbf{8 9} \text { Octane } & \mathbf{9 2} \text { Octane } \\ \hline \text { Chevrolet Impala } & 28.3 & 28.4 & 28.7 \\ \hline \text { Chrysler } \mathbf{3 0 0 M} & 27.1 & 26.9 & 27.2 \\ \hline \text { Ford Taurus } & 26.4 & 26.1 & 26.8 \\ \hline \text { Lincoln LS } & 26.1 & 26.4 & 27.3 \\ \hline \text { Toyota Camry } & 28.4 & 28.9 & 29.1 \\ \hline \text { Volvo S60 } & 25.3 & 25.1 & 25.8 \end{array} $$ (a) Normal probability plots for each treatment indicate that the requirement of normality is satisfied. Verify that the requirement of equal population variances for each treatment is satisfied. (b) Explain the role blocking plays in reducing the variability of gas mileage. (c) Is there sufficient evidence that the mean miles per gallon are different among the three octane levels at the \(\alpha=0.05\) level of significance? (d) If the null hypothesis from part (c) was rejected, use Tukey's test to determine which pairwise means differ using a familywise error rate of \(\alpha=0.05\)

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety conducts experiments in which cars are crashed into a fixed barrier at \(40 \mathrm{mph}\). The barrier's deformable face is made of aluminum honeycomb, which makes the forces in the test similar to those involved in a frontal offset crash between two vehicles of the same weight, each going just less than \(40 \mathrm{mph}\). Suppose you want to know if the mean head injury resulting from this offset crash is the same for large family cars, passenger vans, and midsize utility vehicles. The researcher wants to determine if the means for head injury for each class of vehicle are different. The following data were collected from the institute's study. $$\begin{array}{lc}\text { Large Family Cars } & \text { Head Injury (hic) } \\\ \hline \text { Hyundai XG300 } & 264 \\\\\hline \text { Ford Taurus } & 134 \\\\\hline \text { Buick LeSabre } & 409 \\\\\hline \text { Chevrolet Impala } & 530 \\\\\hline \text { Chrysler 300 } & 149 \\\\\hline \text { Pontiac Grand Prix } & 627 \\\\\hline \text { Toyota Avalon } & 166 \\\\\text { Passenger Vans } & \text { Head Injury (hic) } \\\\\hline \text { Toyota Sienna } & 148 \\\\\hline \text { Honda Odyssey } & 238 \\\\\hline \text { Ford Freestar } & 340 \\\\\hline \text { Mazda MPV } & 693 \\\\\hline \text { Chevrolet Uplander } & 550 \\\\\hline \text { Nissan Quest } & 470 \\\\\hline \text { Kia Sedona } & 322\end{array}$$ $$\begin{array}{lc}\hline \text { Midsize Utility Vehicles } & \text { Head Injury (hic) } \\\\\hline \text { Honda Pilot } & 225 \\\\\hline \text { Toyota 4Runner } & 216 \\\\\hline \text { Mitsubishi Endeavor } & 186 \\\\\hline \text { Nissan Murano } & 307 \\\\\hline \text { Ford Explorer } & 353 \\\\\hline \text { Kia Sorento } & 552 \\\\\hline \text { Chevy Trailblazer } & 397 \\\\\hline\end{array}$$ (a) State the null and alternative hypotheses. (b) Verify that the requirements to use the one-way ANOVA procedure are satisfied. Normal probability plots indicate that the sample data come from normal populations. (c) Test the hypothesis that the mean head injury for each vehicle type is the same at the \(\alpha=0.01\) level of significance. (d) Draw boxplots of the three vehicle types to support the analytic results obtained in part(c).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.