/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 13 A quality-control manager at an ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A quality-control manager at an amusement park feels that the amount of time that people spend waiting in line for the American Eagle roller coaster is too long. To determine if a new loading/unloading procedure is effective in reducing wait time in line, he measures the amount of time (in minutes) people are waiting in line for seven days. After implementing the new procedure, he again measures the amount of time (in minutes) people are waiting in line for seven days and obtains the data on the next page. To make a reasonable comparison, he chooses days when weather conditions are alike. Treat each day as a block and the wait times before and after the procedure as the treatment. $$ \begin{array}{lccccccc} \text { Day } & \text { Mon } & \text { Tues } & \text { Wed } & \text { Thurs } & \text { Fri } & \text { Sat } & \text { Sun } \\ \hline \begin{array}{l} \text { Wait time before } \\ \text { new procedure } \end{array} & 11.6 & 25.9 & 20.0 & 38.2 & 57.3 & 32.1 & 81.8 \\ \hline \begin{array}{l} \text { Wait time after } \\ \text { new procedure } \end{array} & 10.7 & 28.3 & 19.2 & 35.9 & 59.2 & 31.8 & 75.3 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) Using the methods introduced in this section, determine whether there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the two loading procedures are resulting in different measurements of the wait time at the \(\alpha=0.05\) level of significance. (b) Using the methods introduced in Section \(11.2,\) determine whether there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the two loading procedures are resulting in different measurements of the wait time at the \(\alpha=0.05\) level of significance. (c) Compare the \(P\) -values of both approaches. Can you conclude that the method presented in this section is a generalization of the matched-pairs \(t\) -test?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Perform a matched-pairs t-test and ANOVA. Compare critical values and P-values at \(\alpha = 0.05\) for decision.

Step by step solution

01

State the Hypotheses

For both parts (a) and (b), we need to state the null and alternative hypotheses.For part (a):- Null Hypothesis (H_{0}): The amount of wait time before and after the new procedure is the same.- Alternative Hypothesis (H_{1}): The amount of wait time before and after the new procedure is different.For part (b):- Null Hypothesis (H_{0}): The mean difference in wait times before and after the new procedure is zero.- Alternative Hypothesis (H_{1}): The mean difference in wait times before and after the new procedure is not zero.
02

Calculate the Differences (Part a)

Calculate the differences between the wait times before and after the new procedure for each day.\[\begin{array}{lccccccc} \text { Day } & \text { Mon } & \text { Tues } & \text { Wed } & \text { Thurs } & \text { Fri } & \text { Sat } & \text { Sun } \ \hline \text { Difference } & 0.9 & -2.4 & 0.8 & 2.3 & -1.9 & 0.3 & 6.5 \ \end{array} \]
03

Conduct the Matched-Pairs t-Test (Part a)

Compute the mean (\overline{d}), standard deviation (\sigma_{d}) of the differences, and the test statistic. Mean difference (\overline{d}):\[\overline{d} = \frac{0.9 + -2.4 + 0.8 + 2.3 + -1.9 + 0.3 + 6.5}{7} = 0.7857\]Standard deviation of the differences (\sigma_{d}):Use the formula \(\sigma_{d} = \sqrt{\frac{\sum (x - \overline{d})^{2}}{n - 1}}\)Test statistic (t):\[t = \frac{\overline{d}}{\sigma_{d}/\sqrt{n}}\]
04

Compute the Test Statistic (Part b)

Using ANOVA for blocked designs, we need to calculate the test statistic. First compute the sum of squares for treatments (SST), the sum of squares for blocks (SSB), and the sum of squares for error (SSE). Use the test statistic:\[F = \frac{MS_{T}}{MS_{E}}\]Where \(MS_{T}\) is the mean square for treatments, and \(MS_{E}\) is the mean square for error.
05

Determine the Critical Values and Make Decisions

For both parts, compare the calculated test statistics to their respective critical values from t-distribution and F-distribution tables at \(\alpha = 0.05\). If the test statistic falls in the rejection region, reject the null hypothesis.
06

Compare P-values

Calculate the P-values for both tests. If the P-values are less than \(\alpha = 0.05\), the null hypothesis is rejected.Compare the P-values of both approaches to determine if ANOVA is a generalization of the matched-pairs t-test.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

P-Values Comparison
P-values tell us the probability of obtaining the observed data, or something even more extreme, if the null hypothesis is true. Comparing p-values from different statistical tests helps understand their strengths and limitations.

For both the matched-pairs t-test and the ANOVA for blocked designs, once we calculate the test statistics, we determine their p-values:
  • For the t-test, we use the t-distribution to find the p-value corresponding to the calculated t-statistic.
  • For ANOVA, we use the F-distribution to find the p-value associated with the computed F-statistic.
If the p-values are less than 0.05 (our significance level), we reject the null hypothesis, indicating that the new procedure has significantly different wait times.

By comparing p-values from both methods, you can see whether ANOVA, using more comprehensive calculations accounting for blocks, agrees with the simpler matched-pairs t-test. Typically, if ANOVA shows significant results, the t-test result is a specific case, implying that ANOVA generalizes the matched-pairs method.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The following data represent the number of fish species living in various Andirondack Lakes and the \(\mathrm{pH}\) of the lakes. From chemistry, we know \(\mathrm{pH}\) is a measure of the acidity or basicity of a solution. Solutions with \(\mathrm{pH}\) less than 7 are said to be acidic. As pH increases, the solution is said to be less acidic. $$\begin{array}{lc|lc}\text { pH } & \text { Species } & \text { pH } & \text { Species } \\\\\hline 4.6 & 0 & 5.8 & 8 \\\\\hline 4.7 & 0 & 6 & 3 \\\\\hline 4.8 & 0 & 6.1 & 4 \\\\\hline 5 & 0 & 6.2 & 9 \\\\\hline 5 & 2 & 6.25 & 9 \\\\\hline 5.2 & 2 & 6.3 & 2 \\\\\hline 5.2 & 1 & 6.3 & 4 \\\\\hline 5.25 & 0 & 6.3 & 9 \\\\\hline 5.3 & 1 & 6.4 & 5 \\\\\hline 5.35 & 1 & 6.7 & 6 \\\\\hline 5.5 & 5 & 6.7 & 8 \\\\\hline 5.7 & 4 & 6.7 & 8 \\\\\hline 5.75 & 3 & 6.8 & 10\end{array}$$ (a) Draw a scatter diagram of the data treating \(\mathrm{pH}\) as the explanatory variable. (b) Determine the linear correlation coefficient between \(\mathrm{pH}\) and number of fish species. (c) Does a linear relation exist between \(\mathrm{pH}\) and number of fish species? (d) Find the least-squares regression line treating \(\mathrm{pH}\) as the explanatory variable. (e) Interpret the slope. (f) Is it reasonable to interpret the intercept? Explain. (g) What proportion of the variability in number of fish species is explained by \(\mathrm{pH} ?\) (h) Is the number of fish species in the lake whose \(\mathrm{pH}\) is 5.5 above or below average? Explain. (i) In part (g), you found the proportion of variability in number of fish species that is explained by the variability in \(\mathrm{pH}\). Can you think of other variables that might also explain the variability in the number of fish species?

A medical researcher wanted to determine the effectiveness of coagulants on the healing rate of a razor cut on lab mice. Because healing rates of mice vary from mouse to mouse, the researcher decided to block by mouse. First, the researcher gave each mouse a local anesthesia and then made a 5 -mm incision that was \(2 \mathrm{~mm}\) deep on each mouse. He randomly selected one of the three treatments and recorded the time it took for the wound to stop bleeding (in minutes). He repeated this process two more times on each mouse and obtained the results shown. $$ \begin{array}{cccc} \text { Mouse } & \text { No Drug } & \begin{array}{l} \text { Experimental } \\ \text { Drug 1 } \end{array} & \begin{array}{l} \text { Experimental } \\ \text { Drug 2 } \end{array} \\ \hline \mathbf{1} & 3.2 & 3.4 & 3.4 \\ \hline \mathbf{2} & 4.8 & 4.4 & 3.4 \\ \hline \mathbf{3} & 6.6 & 5.9 & 5.4 \\ \hline \mathbf{4} & 6.5 & 6.3 & 5.2 \\ \hline \mathbf{5} & 6.4 & 6.3 & 6.1 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) Explain how each mouse forms a block. Explain how blocking might reduce variability of time to heal. (b) Normal probability plots for each treatment indicate that the requirement of normality is satisfied. Verify that the requirement of equal population variances for each treatment is satisfied. (c) Is there sufficient evidence that the mean healing time is different among the three treatments at the \(\alpha=0.05\) level of significance? (d) If the null hypothesis from part (c) was rejected, use Tukey's test to determine which pairwise means differ using a familywise error rate of \(\alpha=0.05 .\) (e) Based on your results for part (d), what do you conclude?

Putting It Together: Time to Complete a Degree A researcher wanted to determine if the mean time to complete a bachelor's degree was different depending on the selectivity of the first institution of higher education that was attended. The following data represent a random sample of 12 th-graders who earned their degree within eight years. Probability plots indicate that the data for each treatment level are normally distributed. $$ \begin{array}{ccccc} \text { Highly } & & & \text { Not } \\ \text { Selective } & \text { Selective } & \text { Nonselective } & \text { Open-door } & \text { Rated } \\ \hline 2.5 & 4.6 & 4.7 & 5.9 & 5.1 \\ \hline 5.1 & 4.3 & 2.3 & 4.2 & 4.3 \\ \hline 4.3 & 4.4 & 4.3 & 6.4 & 4.4 \\ \hline 4.8 & 4.0 & 4.2 & 5.6 & 3.8 \\ \hline 5.5 & 4.1 & 5.1 & 6.0 & 4.7 \\ \hline 2.6 & 3.1 & 4.7 & 5.0 & 4.5 \\ \hline 4.1 & 3.8 & 4.2 & 7.3 & 5.5 \\ \hline 3.4 & 5.2 & 5.7 & 5.6 & 5.5 \\ \hline 4.3 & 4.5 & 2.3 & 6.9 & 4.6 \\ \hline 3.9 & 4.0 & 4.5 & 5.1 & 4.1 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) What type of observational study was conducted? What is the response variable? (b) Find the sample mean for each treatment level. (c) Find the sample standard deviation for each treatment level. Using the general rule presented in this chapter, does it appear that the population variances are the same? (d) Use the time to degree completion for students first attending highly selective institutions to construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval estimate for the population mean. (e) How many pairwise comparisons are possible among the treatment levels? (f) Consider the null hypothesis \(H_{0}: \mu_{1}=\mu_{2}=\mu_{3}=\mu_{4}=\mu_{5}\). If we test this hypothesis using \(t\) -tests for each pair of treatments, use your answer from part (e) to compute the probability of making a Type I error, assuming that each test uses an \(\alpha=0.05\) level of significance. (g) Use the one-way ANOVA procedure to determine if there is a difference in the mean time to degree completion for the different types of initial institutions. If the null hypothesis is rejected, use Tukey's test to determine which pairwise differences are significant using a familywise error rate of \(\alpha=0.05\)

Researchers (Brian G. Feagan et al. "Erythropoietin with Iron Supplementation to Prevent Allogeneic Blood Transfusion in Total Hip Joint Arthroplasty," Annals of Internal Medicine, Vol. \(133,\) No. 11 ) wanted to determine whether epoetin alfa was effective in increasing the hemoglobin concentration in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty. A complete medical history and physical of the patients was performed for screening purposes and eligible patients were identified. The researchers used a computergenerated schedule to assign the patients to the high-dose epoetin group, low-dose epoetin group, or placebo group. The study was double-blind. Based on ANOVA, it was determined that there were significant differences in the increase in hemoglobin concentration in the three groups with a \(P\) -value less than 0.001 . The mean increase in hemoglobin in the high-dose epoetin group was 19.5 grams per liter \((\mathrm{g} / \mathrm{L}),\) the mean increase in hemoglobin in the low-dose epoetin group was \(17.2 \mathrm{~g} / \mathrm{L},\) and mean increase in hemoglobin in the placebo group was \(1.2 \mathrm{~g} / \mathrm{L}\). (a) Why do you think it was necessary to screen patients for eligibility? (b) Why was a computer-generated schedule used to assign patients to the various treatment groups? (c) What does it mean for a study to be double-blind? Why do you think the researchers desired a double-blind study? (d) Interpret the reported \(P\) -value.

The following data represent a simple random sample of \(n=5\) from three populations that are known to be normally distributed. Verify that the \(F\) -test statistic is \(2.599 .\) $$ \begin{array}{ccc} \text { Sample 1 } & \text { Sample 2 } & \text { Sample 3 } \\ \hline 73 & 67 & 72 \\ \hline 82 & 77 & 80 \\ \hline 82 & 66 & 87 \\ \hline 81 & 67 & 77 \\ \hline 97 & 83 & 96 \end{array} $$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.