To illustrate the effects of driving under the influence (DUI) of alcohol, a
police officer brought a DUI simulator to a local high school. Student
reaction time in an emergency was measured with unimpaired vision and also
while wearing a pair of special goggles to simulate the effects of alcohol on
vision. For a random sample of nine teenagers, the time (in seconds) required
to bring the vehicle to a stop from a speed of 60 miles per hour was recorded.
$$
\begin{array}{lccccccccc}
\text { Subject } & \mathbf{1} & \mathbf{2} & \mathbf{3} & \mathbf{4} &
\mathbf{5} & \mathbf{6} & \mathbf{7} & \mathbf{8} & \mathbf{9} \\
\hline \text { Normal, } X_{i} & 4.47 & 4.24 & 4.58 & 4.65 & 4.31 & 4.80 &
4.55 & 5.00 & 4.79 \\
\hline \text { Impaired, } Y_{i} & 5.77 & 5.67 & 5.51 & 5.32 & 5.83 & 5.49 &
5.23 & 5.61 & 5.63 \\
\hline
\end{array}
$$
(a) Whether the student had unimpaired vision or wore goggles first was
randomly selected. Why is this a good idea in designing the experiment?
(b) Use a \(95 \%\) confidence interval to test if there is a difference in
braking time with impaired vision and normal vision where the differences are
computed as "impaired minus normal." Note: A normal probability plot and
boxplot of the data indicate that the differences are approximately normally
distributed with no outliers.