/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 15 To illustrate the effects of dri... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

To illustrate the effects of driving under the influence (DUI) of alcohol, a police officer brought a DUI simulator to a local high school. Student reaction time in an emergency was measured with unimpaired vision and also while wearing a pair of special goggles to simulate the effects of alcohol on vision. For a random sample of nine teenagers, the time (in seconds) required to bring the vehicle to a stop from a speed of 60 miles per hour was recorded. $$ \begin{array}{lccccccccc} \text { Subject } & \mathbf{1} & \mathbf{2} & \mathbf{3} & \mathbf{4} & \mathbf{5} & \mathbf{6} & \mathbf{7} & \mathbf{8} & \mathbf{9} \\ \hline \text { Normal, } X_{i} & 4.47 & 4.24 & 4.58 & 4.65 & 4.31 & 4.80 & 4.55 & 5.00 & 4.79 \\ \hline \text { Impaired, } Y_{i} & 5.77 & 5.67 & 5.51 & 5.32 & 5.83 & 5.49 & 5.23 & 5.61 & 5.63 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) Whether the student had unimpaired vision or wore goggles first was randomly selected. Why is this a good idea in designing the experiment? (b) Use a \(95 \%\) confidence interval to test if there is a difference in braking time with impaired vision and normal vision where the differences are computed as "impaired minus normal." Note: A normal probability plot and boxplot of the data indicate that the differences are approximately normally distributed with no outliers.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Random selection reduces biases. The 95% confidence interval (0.694, 1.206) indicates impaired vision significantly increases braking time.

Step by step solution

01

Understand Random Selection

Randomly selecting whether students had unimpaired vision or wore goggles first is important because it helps eliminate biases. This randomization ensures that the order in which the conditions are presented does not systematically favor one condition over the other, thus reducing potential confounding variables.
02

Calculate the Differences

To assess the impacts of impaired vision, calculate the differences between the impaired and normal braking times for each subject. Let the differences be denoted as: \[ D_i = Y_i - X_i \] The differences are: \[ 5.77-4.47, 5.67-4.24, 5.51-4.58, 5.32-4.65, 5.83-4.31, 5.49-4.80, 5.23-4.55, 5.61-5.00, 5.63-4.79 \] This simplifies to: \[ 1.30, 1.43, 0.93, 0.67, 1.52, 0.69, 0.68, 0.61, 0.84 \]
03

Find the Mean and Standard Deviation of Differences

Now, compute the mean \( \bar{D} \) and the standard deviation \( s_D \) of the differences: \[ \bar{D} = \frac{\sum_{i=1}^{n} D_i}{n} = \frac{1.30 + 1.43 + 0.93 + 0.67 + 1.52 + 0.69 + 0.68 + 0.61 + 0.84}{9} \] \[ \bar{D} = 0.95 \] The standard deviation is given by: \[ s_D = \sqrt{\frac{\sum_{i=1}^{n} (D_i - \bar{D})^2}{n-1}} = 0.332 \]
04

Compute the Confidence Interval

Use the formula for the 95% confidence interval for the mean difference: \[ \bar{D} \pm t_{\alpha/2, n-1} \left( \frac{s_D}{\sqrt{n}}\right) \] \( t_{\alpha/2, n-1} \) is the t-value corresponding to a 95% confidence level with 8 degrees of freedom (which is approximately 2.306). Calculate the standard error: \[ SE = \frac{s_D}{\sqrt{n}} = \frac{0.332}{\sqrt{9}} = 0.111 \] Hence, the confidence interval is: \[ 0.95 \pm 2.306 \cdot 0.111 \] \[ 0.95 \pm 0.256 \] \[ (0.694, 1.206) \]
05

Interpret the Results

The 95% confidence interval for the mean difference in braking time (impaired minus normal) is (0.694, 1.206). Since this interval does not contain 0, it indicates that there is a statistically significant difference in braking times, with impaired vision increasing the braking time.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Randomization in Experiments
In experiments, randomization is crucial for ensuring unbiased results. When it comes to studying the effects of different conditions on a variable, randomizing the order of these conditions can help eliminate biases.
For instance, in this exercise, randomly selecting whether students had unimpaired vision or wore goggles first helps ensure that the order does not systematically favor one condition over the other. This is important because factors like learning effects or fatigue could otherwise skew the results.
By randomizing the order, we reduce the influence of confounding variables, making sure the results reflect the true impact of the conditions being tested.
Mean and Standard Deviation
Mean and standard deviation are fundamental concepts in statistics that help us understand and summarize data. The mean (or average) gives us a central value, while the standard deviation tells us how spread out the values are around the mean.
In this exercise, we calculate the differences between braking times under impaired and normal vision for each subject. To compute the mean difference \(\bar{D}\), we sum up all the differences and divide by the number of observations:\
\[ \bar{D} = \frac{\sum_{i=1}^{n}{D_i}}{n} = \frac{0.95}{9} = 0.95 \]
Similarly, the standard deviation of the differences \(s_D\) is calculated to see the variability in the differences:\
\[ s_D = \sqrt{\frac{\sum_{i=1}^{n} (D_i - \bar{D})^2}{n-1}} = 0.332 \]
Understanding both the mean and standard deviation helps us not only to gauge the central tendency of the differences but also how much these differences vary among subjects.
Statistical Significance
Statistical significance helps us determine if the observed results are likely due to chance or if they reflect a true difference between groups. In this context, we use a 95% confidence interval to assess the mean difference in braking times between impaired and normal vision.
The confidence interval is computed using the formula:
\[ \bar{D} \pm t_{\alpha/2, n-1} \left( \frac{s_D}{\sqrt{n}} \right) \]
For a 95% confidence level with 8 degrees of freedom, the critical t-value is approximately 2.306. Therefore, the confidence interval is:\
\[ 0.95 \pm 2.306 \cdot 0.111 \]
Resulting in:\
\[ (0.694, 1.206) \]
Since this interval does not include 0, it indicates a statistically significant difference in braking times, implying that impaired vision likely increases the time to stop. This means the difference is unlikely to be due to random chance, but instead, it genuinely reflects the impact of impaired vision.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In October 1947, the Gallup organization surveyed 1100 adult Americans and asked, 鈥淎re you a total abstainer from, or do you on occasion consume, alcoholic beverages?鈥 Of the 1100 adults surveyed, 407 indicated that they were total abstainers. In a recent survey, the same question was asked of 1100 adult Americans and 333 indicated that they were total abstainers. Has the proportion of adult Americans who totally abstain from alcohol changed? Use the a = 0.05 level of significance.

Explain the difference between an independent and dependent sample.

Walking in the Airport, Part II Do business travelers walk at a different pace than leisure travelers? Researcher Seth B. Young measured the walking speed of business and leisure travelers in San Francisco International Airport and Cleveland Hopkins International Airport. His findings are summarized in the table. $$ \begin{array}{lcc} \text { Type of Traveler } & \text { Business } & \text { Leisure } \\ \hline \text { Mean speed (feet per minute) } & 272 & 261 \\ \hline \begin{array}{l} \text { Standard deviation (feet per } \\ \text { minute) } \end{array} & 43 & 47 \\ \hline \text { Sample size } & 20 & 20 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) Is this an observational study or a designed experiment? Why? (b) What must be true regarding the populations to use Welch's \(t\) -test to compare the means? (c) Assuming that the requirements listed in part (b) are satisfied, determine whether business travelers walk at a different speed from leisure travelers at the \(\alpha=0.05\) level of significance.

The following data represent the muzzle velocity (in feet per second) of rounds fired from a 155 -mm gun. For each round, two measurements of the velocity were recorded using two different measuring devices, with the following data obtained: $$ \begin{array}{ccccccc} \text { Observation } & \mathbf{1} & \mathbf{2} & \mathbf{3} & \mathbf{4} & \mathbf{5} & \mathbf{6} \\ \hline \mathbf{A} & 793.8 & 793.1 & 792.4 & 794.0 & 791.4 & 792.4 \\ \hline \mathbf{B} & 793.2 & 793.3 & 792.6 & 793.8 & 791.6 & 791.6 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ $$ \begin{array}{ccccccc} \text { Observation } & 7 & 8 & 9 & 10 & 11 & 12 \\ \hline \text { A } & 791.7 & 792.3 & 789.6 & 794.4 & 790.9 & 793.5 \\ \hline \text { B } & 791.6 & 792.4 & 788.5 & 794.7 & 791.3 & 793.5 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) Why are these matched-pairs data? (b) Is there a difference in the measurement of the muzzle velocity between device \(A\) and device \(B\) at the \(\alpha=0.01\) level of significance? Note: A normal probability plot and boxplot of the data indicate that the differences are approximately normally distributed with no outliers. (c) Construct a \(99 \%\) confidence interval about the population mean difference. Interpret your results. (d) Draw a boxplot of the differenced data. Does this visual evidence support the results obtained in part (b)?

On April \(12,1955,\) Dr. Jonas Salk released the results of clinical trials for his vaccine to prevent polio. In these clinical trials, 400,000 children were randomly divided in two groups. The subjects in group 1 (the experimental group) were given the vaccine, while the subjects in group 2 (the control group) were given a placebo. Of the 200,000 children in the experimental group, 33 developed polio. Of the 200,000 children in the control group, 115 developed polio. (a) What type of experimental design is this? (b) What is the response variable? (c) What are the treatments? (d) What is a placebo? (e) Why is such a large number of subjects needed for this study? (f) Does it appear to be the case that the vaccine was effective?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.