/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q206SE Space shuttle disaster. On Janua... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Space shuttle disaster. On January 28, 1986, the space shuttle Challenger exploded, killing all seven astronauts aboard. An investigation concluded that the explosion was caused by the failure of the O ring seal in the joint between the two lower segments of the right solid rocket booster. In a report made 1 year prior to the catastrophe, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) claimed that the probability of such a failure was about 1/ 60,000, or about once in every 60,000 flights. But a risk-assessment study conducted for the Air Force at about the same time assessed the probability to be 1/35, or about once in every 35 missions. (Note: The shuttle had flown 24 successful missions prior to the disaster.) Given the events of January 28, 1986, which risk assessment鈥擭ASA's or the Air Force's鈥攁ppears more appropriate?

Short Answer

Expert verified

It can conclude that the air force risk assessment report is more appropriate than the NASA report.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

In a report one year before the catastrophe, NASA claimed that the probability of space shuttle challenger failure was 1/60,000about one in every 60,000 flights. At the same time,the air force study assessed the probability of beinga failure 1/35or about one in every 35 missions since the shuttle had followed 24 successful missions before the disaster.

02

Explanation

We choose geometric distribution since it is observable from the provided information.

The probability function of the geometric is defined as,

PX=x=qxpx=0,1,2,...0p10otherwise

It follows a lack of memory. It means the event has not occurred before k. Let

Thus, Y is the additional time needed for the event's occurrence.

Then,

PY=x|Xk=PX=k=qxp

The probability of NASA's assessment of the failure of the space shuttle is,

PX=24=599960,00024.160,000=1.66710-5

The probability of air force assessment of the failure of the space shuttle is,

PX=24=q24p=343524135=1.424910-2

Since air force risk assessed probability 1.424910-2is much higher than NASA risk assessed probability1.66710-5

Thus, it can conclude that the air force risk assessment report is more appropriate than the NASA report.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

4.131 Chemical composition of gold artifacts. The Journal of Open Archaeology Data(Vol. 1, 2012) provided data onthe chemical composition of more than 200 pre-Columbiangold and gold-alloy artifacts recovered in the archaeologicalregion inhabited by the Muisca of Colombia (a.d.600鈥1800). One of many variables measured was the percentageof copper present in the gold artifacts. Summary statisticsfor this variable follow: mean = 29.94%, median = 19.75%,standard deviation = 28.37%. Demonstrate why the probabilitydistribution for the percentage of copper in thesegold artifacts cannot be normally distributed.

Suppose x is a binomial random variable with n = 3 and p = .3.

  1. Calculate the value of p(x),role="math" localid="1653657859012" x=0,1,2,3,using the formula for a binomial probability distribution.
  2. Using your answers to part a, give the probability distribution for x in tabular form.

Apps not working on smartphones. In a Pew Research Center survey titled U.S. Smartphone Use in 2015, more than 2,000 smartphone users were asked how often the applications (apps) they downloaded on their cell phones were not working correctly. Responses were recorded as follows: 1 = Frequently, 2 = Occasionally, 3 = Rarely, and 4 = Never. The probability distribution for the numerical response, x, is provided in the table.

  1. Verify that the properties of a probability distribution for a discrete random variable are satisfied.
  2. Find P(x>2)
  3. Find E(x). Interpret this value practically.

Investment risk analysis. The risk of a portfolio of financial assets is sometimes called investment risk. In general, investment risk is typically measured by computing the variance or standard deviation of the probability distribution that describes the decision maker鈥檚 potential outcomes (gains or losses). The greater the variation in potential outcomes, the greater the uncertainty faced by the decision maker; the smaller the variation in potential outcomes, the more predictable the decision maker鈥檚 gains or losses. The two discrete probability distributions given in the next table were developed from historical data. They describe the potential total physical damage losses next year to the fleets of delivery trucks of two different firms.

Firm A




Firm B



Loss Next Year

Probabiity


Loss Next Year

Probability

0

0.01



0

0


500

0.01



200

0.01


1000

0.01



700

0.02


1500

0.02



1200

0.02


2000

0.35



1700

0.15


2500

0.3



2200

0.3


3000

0.25



2700

0.3


3500

0.02



3200

0.15


4000

0.01



3700

0.02


4500

0.01



4200

0.02


5000

0.01



4700

0.01


a. Verify that both firms have the same expected total physical damage loss.

b. Compute the standard deviation of each probability distribution and determine which firm faces the greater risk of physical damage to its fleet next year.

Hotels鈥 use of ecolabels. Refer to the Journal of Vacation Marketing (January 2016) study of travelers鈥 familiarity with ecolabels used by hotels, Exercise 2.64 (p. 104). Recall that adult travelers were shown a list of 6 different ecolabels, and asked, 鈥淪uppose the response is measured on a continuous scale from 10 (not familiar at all) to 50 (very familiar).鈥 The mean and standard deviation for the Energy Star ecolabel are 44 and 1.5, respectively. Assume the distribution of the responses is approximately normally distributed.

a. Find the probability that a response to Energy Star exceeds 43.

b. Find the probability that a response to Energy Star falls between 42 and 45.

c. If you observe a response of 35 to an ecolabel, do you think it is likely that the ecolabel was Energy Star? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.