/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q85E Fingerprint expertise.聽A study ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Fingerprint expertise.A study published in PsychologicalScience(August 2011) tested the accuracy of experts andnovices in identifying fingerprints. Participants were presentedpairs of fingerprints and asked to judge whetherthe prints in each pair matched. The pairs were presentedunder three different conditions: prints from the same individual (match condition), non-matching but similar prints (similar distracter condition), and nonmatching and very dissimilar prints (non-similar distracter condition). The percentages of correct decisions made by the two groups under each of the three conditions are listed in the table.

Conditions

Fingerprints expert

Novices

Match similar

92.12%

74.55%

Distracter

99.32%

44.82%

Non-similar distracter

100%

77.03%

a.Given a pair of matched prints, what is the probability that an expert failed to identify the match?

b. Given a pair of matched prints, what is the probabilitythat a novice failed to identify the match?

c. Assume the study included 10 participants, 5 experts and 5 novices. Suppose that a pair of matched prints was presented to a randomly selected study participant and the participant failed to identify the match. Is the participant more likely to be an expert or a novice?

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) The probability is 0.079.

(b) The probability is 0.2545.

(c) The participant more likely to be novice.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The data is provided in the table,

Let

P-The professional to make the best decision

B-The beginner to make the right decision

C-The condition that is connected or matched

S-The same distracter condition

N-The non-similar distracter.

02

The probability that an expert failed to identify the match.

PPcC=1-PPC=1-0.9212=0.079

So, the probability is 0.079.

03

The probability that a novice failed to identify the match

PScC=1-PSC=1-0.7455=0.2545

Hence, the probability is 0.2545.

04

Is the participant more likely to be an expert or a novice.

From the results of part (a) and (b), its clear that the participant more likely to be a novice.

Therefore, the contestant is more likely to be inexperienced.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Redeeming tickets from textbook dispatches. Numerous companies now use textbook messaging on cell phones to sell their products. One way to do this is to shoot repairable reduction pasteboard (called an m- pasteboard) via a textbook. The redemption rate of m- tickets 鈥 the proportion of tickets redeemed 鈥 was the subject of a composition in the Journal of Marketing Research (October 2015). In a two-time study, over boardwalk shoppers shared by subscribing up to admit m-voucher. The experimenters were interested in comparing the redemption rates of m- tickets for different products in a sample of m- tickets for products vended at a milk-shake. Store, 79 were redeemed; in a sample of m- tickets for products vended at a donut store, 72 were redeemed.

a. Cipher the redemption rate for the sample of milk-shake m- tickets.

b. Cipher the redemption rate for the sample of donut m- tickets.

c. Give a point estimate for the difference between the actual redemption rates.

d. Form a 90 confidence interval for the difference between the actual redemption rates. Give a practical interpretation of the output.

e. Explain the meaning of the expression 鈥90 confident鈥 in your answer to part d.

f. Grounded on the interval, part d, is there a 鈥 statistically.鈥 A significant difference between the redemption rates? (Recall that a result is 鈥 statistically鈥 significant if there is substantiation to show that the true difference in proportions isn't 0.)

g. Assume the true difference between redemption rates must exceed.01 ( i.e., 1) for the experimenters to consider the difference 鈥 virtually鈥 significant. Based on the interval, part c, is there a 鈥渧irtually鈥 significant difference between the redemption rates?

Corporate sustainability of CPA firms. Refer to the Business and Society (March 2011) study on the sustainability behaviors of CPA corporations, Exercise 2.23 (p. 83). Recall that the level of support for corporate sustainability (measured on a quantitative scale ranging from 0 to 160 points) was obtained for each of 992 senior managers at CPA firms. The accompanying Minitab printout gives the mean and standard deviation for the level of support variable. It can be shown that level of support is approximately normally distributed.

a. Find the probability that the level of support for corporate sustainability of a randomly selected senior manager is less than 40 points.

b. Find the probability that the level of support for corporate sustainability of a randomly selected senior manager is between 40 and 120 points.

c. Find the probability that the level of support for corporate sustainability of a randomly selected senior manager is greater than 120 points.

d. One-fourth of the 992 senior managers indicated a level of support for corporate sustainability below what value?

Descriptive Statistics: Support

Variables

N

Mean

StDev

Variance

Minimum

Maximum

Range

Support

992

67.755

26.871

722.036

0.000

155.000

155.000

Homework assistance for accounting students. How much assistance should accounting professors provide students for completing homework? Is too much assistance counterproductive? These were some of the questions of interest in a Journal of Accounting Education (Vol. 25, 2007) article. A total of 75 junior-level accounting majors who were enrolled in Intermediate Financial Accounting participated in an experiment. All students took a pretest on a topic not covered in class; then, each was given a homework problem to solve on the same topic. However, the students were randomly assigned different levels of assistance on the homework. Some (20 students) were given the completed solution, some (25 students) were given check figures at various steps of the solution, and the rest (30 students) were given no help. After finishing the homework, each student was given a posttest on the subject. One of the variables of interest to the researchers was the knowledge gain (or test score improvement), measured as the difference between the posttest and pretest scores. The sample means knowledge gains for the three groups of students are provided in the table.

a. The researchers theorized that as the level of homework assistance increased, the test score improvement from pretest to post test would decrease. Do the sample means reported in the table support this theory?

b. What is the problem with using only the sample means to make inferences about the population mean knowledge gains for the three groups of students?

c. The researchers conducted a statistical test of the Hypothesis to compare the mean knowledge gain of students in the "no solutions" group with the mean knowledge gain of students in the "check figures" group. Based on the theory, part a sets up the null and alternative hypotheses for the test.

d. The observed significance level of the t-test of the partc was reported as8248 Using =.05, interpret this result.

e. The researchers conducted a statistical test of the hypothesis to compare the mean knowledge gain of students in the "completed solutions" group with the mean knowledge gain of students in the "check figures" group. Based on the theory, part a sets up the null and alternative hypotheses for the test.

f. The observed significance level of the role="math" localid="1652694732458" t-test of part e was reported as 1849. Using =.05, interpret this result.

g. The researchers conducted a statistical test of the Hypothesis to compare the mean knowledge gain of students in the "no solutions" group with the mean knowledge gain of students in the "completed solutions" group. Based on the theory, part a sets up the null and alternative hypotheses for the test.

h. The observed significance level of the t-test of the part wasg reported as2726. Using role="math" localid="1652694677616" =.05, interpret this result.

A random sample of size n = 121 yielded p^ = .88.

a. Is the sample size large enough to use the methods of this section to construct a confidence interval for p? Explain.

b. Construct a 90% confidence interval for p.

c. What assumption is necessary to ensure the validity of this confidence interval?

Question: Find the following probabilities for the standard normal random variable z:

a.P(z>1.46)b.P(z<-1.56)c.P(.67z<2.41)d.P(-1.96z-.33)e.P(Z0)f.P(-2.33<z<1.50)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.