/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 1 Write down the linear model corr... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Write down the linear model corresponding to a simple random sample \(y_{1}, \ldots, y_{n}\) from the \(N\left(\mu, \sigma^{2}\right)\) distribution, and find the design matrix. Verify that $$ \widehat{\mu}=\left(X^{\mathrm{T}} X\right)^{-1} X^{\mathrm{T}} y=\bar{y}, \quad s^{2}=S S(\widehat{\beta}) /(n-p)=(n-1)^{-1} \sum\left(y_{j}-\bar{y}\right)^{2} $$

Short Answer

Expert verified
The design matrix \( X \) is an \( n \times 1 \) vector of ones; \( \widehat{\mu} = \bar{y} \) and \( s^2 = (n-1)^{-1} \sum (y_j - \bar{y})^2 \).

Step by step solution

01

Define the Linear Model

For a simple random sample \( y_1, y_2, \ldots, y_n \) from a normal distribution \( N(\mu, \sigma^2) \), the linear model can be expressed as: \[ y_i = \mu + \epsilon_i \] where \( \epsilon_i \sim N(0, \sigma^2) \) for \( i = 1, 2, \ldots, n \).
02

Express in Matrix Form

The vector form of this model is given by \[ y = X \beta + \epsilon \] where \( y = \begin{bmatrix} y_1 \ y_2 \ \vdots \ y_n \end{bmatrix}, \ X = \begin{bmatrix} 1 \ 1 \ \vdots \ 1 \end{bmatrix}, \ \beta = \mu, \ \text{and} \ \epsilon = \begin{bmatrix} \epsilon_1 \ \epsilon_2 \ \vdots \ \epsilon_n \end{bmatrix}. \) This simplifies to \[ y = \mu X + \epsilon. \]
03

Determine the Design Matrix

The design matrix \( X \) for this model is simply a column vector of ones of size \( n \times 1 \): \[ X = \begin{bmatrix} 1 \ 1 \ \vdots \ 1 \end{bmatrix}_{n \times 1}. \]
04

Calculate Estimator \( \widehat{\mu} \)

The least squares estimator \( \widehat{\mu} \) is given by: \[ \widehat{\mu} = (X^T X)^{-1} X^T y. \] Evaluate \( X^T X \) and \( X^T y \): \[ X^T X = \begin{bmatrix} n \end{bmatrix}, \quad X^T y = \begin{bmatrix} \sum y_i \end{bmatrix}. \] Thus: \[ \widehat{\mu} = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^{n} y_i = \bar{y}. \]
05

Verify the Variance of Estimates

The estimate of variance is given as:\[ s^2 = \frac{SS(\widehat{\beta})}{n-p} = \frac{1}{n-1} \sum_{j=1}^{n} \left( y_{j} - \bar{y} \right)^{2}. \] Here, \( p = 1 \) since we are estimating one parameter \( \mu \), so \( n - p = n - 1 \). This matches the formula for variance of the estimates.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Design Matrix
In linear regression, the design matrix, commonly denoted by \( X \), plays an essential role. It organizes the input data into a structured format that allows operations like multiplication and transposition necessary for further calculations. For the simplest form of linear regression, like when estimating the mean \( \mu \) as presented in the exercise, the design matrix is a column vector filled with ones.
  • For \( n \) observations, the design matrix is a vector of size \( n \times 1 \).
  • This vector enables us to multiply the "constant" parameter \( \mu \) for each observation.
  • The form simplifies many calculations when dealing with linear equations.
For instance, given \( y = X \mu + \epsilon \), the matrix \( X \) simply holds the ones to allow multiplication by \( \mu \), aligning each observed outcome \( y_i \) with \( \mu \). This is why it's vital in expressing models in matrix terms, preparing them for further statistical analysis.
Least Squares Estimation
The least squares estimation method is a cornerstone in data analysis. It’s a statistical method used to find the parameter estimates that minimize the difference between observed and predicted values. In linear regression, this means finding the line of best fit.
  • The least squares estimator \( \widehat{\mu} \) is given by \( (X^T X)^{-1} X^T y \).
  • For our exercise, this simplifies to the mean \( \bar{y} \), showing how much least squares can simplify estimations.
  • This approach ensures that the sum of the squared differences between observed and predicted values is as small as possible.
You can think of it as finding the "average" position of the data, which is why, in simple cases like this, it corresponds precisely to the arithmetic mean. The elegance of least squares is in its ability to extend to more complex models while maintaining simplicity and comprehensibility.
Normal Distribution
The normal distribution is a fundamental concept in statistics, often described by its bell-shaped curve. It's characterized by two parameters: the mean \( \mu \) and the variance \( \sigma^2 \). In the context of this exercise, assuming that the data comes from a normal distribution implies the following:
  • The outcomes \( y_1, y_2, \ldots, y_n \) are centered around a true mean \( \mu \).
  • Each outcome deviates from \( \mu \) based on a normal distribution with variance \( \sigma^2 \).
  • The errors or disturbances \( \epsilon_i \) are normally distributed, \( \epsilon_i \sim N(0, \sigma^2) \).
This distribution assumption allows us to apply various statistical methodologies, like the calculation of \( \widehat{\mu} \) and variance, by leveraging properties of the normal distribution, such as symmetrical tails and defined sample behavior around the mean. In practical terms, assuming normality provides a basis for developing robust statistical inferences.
Sample Variance
Sample variance is a measure of how data points differ from the mean. It gives insights into the spread and variability of the data. In the context of this exercise, the sample variance \( s^2 \) describes how the observed values \( y_j \) deviate from their average \( \bar{y} \).
  • Mathematically, it is calculated as \( \frac{1}{n-1} \sum_{j=1}^{n} (y_{j} - \bar{y})^{2} \).
  • The term \( n-1 \) is used to provide an unbiased estimate of the population variance, commonly referred to as "degrees of freedom."
  • This variance estimate helps to assess how well the calculated mean represents the data.
Understanding sample variance is crucial because it affects how we interpret the precision of \( \widehat{\mu} \), which is pivotal when making inferences about the entire population based on the sample data. Hence, sample variance provides a powerful tool for quantifying uncertainty.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose that the straight-line regression model \(y=\beta_{0}+\beta_{1} x+\varepsilon\) is fitted to data in which \(x_{1}=\cdots=x_{n-1}=-a\) and \(x_{n}=(n-1) a\), for some positive \(a .\) Show that although \(y_{n}\) completely determines the estimate of \(\beta_{1}, C_{n}=0 .\) Is Cook's distance an effective measure of influence in this situation?

Over a period of 90 days a study was carried out on 1500 women. Its purpose was to investigate the relation between obstetrical practices and the time spent in the delivery suite by women giving birth. One thing that greatly affects this time is whether or not a woman has previously given birth. Unfortunately this vital information was lost, giving the researchers three options: (a) abandon the study; (b) go back to the medical records and find which women had previously given birth (very time-consuming); or (c) for each day check how many women had previously given birth (relatively quick). The statistical question arising was whether (c) would recover enough information about the parameter of interest. Suppose that a linear model is appropriate for log time in delivery suite, and that the log time for a first delivery is normally distributed with mean \(\mu+\alpha\) and variance \(\sigma^{2}\), whereas for subsequent deliveries the mean time is \(\mu\). Suppose that the times for all the women are independent, and that for each there is a probability \(\pi\) that the labour is her first, independent of the others. Further suppose that the women are divided into \(k\) groups corresponding to days and that each group has size \(m\); the overall number is \(n=m k\). Under (c), show that the average log time on day \(j, Z_{j}\), is normally distributed with mean \(\mu+R_{j} \alpha / m\) and variance \(\sigma^{2} / m\), where \(R_{j}\) is binomial with probability \(\pi\) and denominator \(m\). Hence show that the overall log likelihood is $$ \ell(\mu, \alpha)=-\frac{1}{2} k \log \left(2 \pi \sigma^{2} / m\right)-\frac{m}{2 \sigma^{2}} \sum_{j=1}^{k}\left(z_{j}-\mu-r_{j} \alpha / m\right)^{2} $$ where \(z_{j}\) and \(r_{j}\) are the observed values of \(Z_{j}\) and \(R_{j}\) and we take \(\pi\) and \(\sigma^{2}\) to be known. If \(R_{j}\) has mean \(m \pi\) and variance \(m \tau^{2}\), show that the inverse expected information matrix is $$ I(\mu, \alpha)^{-1}=\frac{\sigma^{2}}{n \tau^{2}}\left(\begin{array}{cc} m \pi^{2}+\tau^{2} & -m \pi \\ -m \pi & m \end{array}\right) $$ (i) If \(m=1, \tau^{2}=\pi(1-\pi)\), and \(\pi=n_{1} / n\), where \(n=n_{0}+n_{1}\), show that \(I(\mu, \alpha)^{-1}\) equals the variance matrix for the two-sample regression model. Explain why. (ii) If \(\tau^{2}=0\), show that neither \(\mu\) nor \(\alpha\) is estimable; explain why. (iii) If \(\tau^{2}=\pi(1-\pi)\), show that \(\mu\) is not estimable when \(\pi=1\), and that \(\alpha\) is not estimable when \(\pi=0\) or \(\pi=1\). Explain why the conditions for these two parameters to be estimable differ in form. (iv) Show that the effect of grouping, \((m>1)\), is that \(\operatorname{var}(\widehat{\alpha})\) is increased by a factor \(m\) regardless of \(\pi\) and \(\sigma^{2}\) (v) It was known that \(\sigma^{2} \doteq 0.2, m \doteq 1500 / 90, \pi \doteq 0.3\). Calculate the standard error for \(\widehat{\alpha}\). It was known from other studies that first deliveries are typically 20-25\% longer than subsequent ones. Show that an effect of size \(\alpha=\log (1.25)\) would be very likely to be detected based on the grouped data, but that an effect of size \(\alpha=\log (1.20)\) would be less certain to be detected, and discuss the implications.

Over a period of \(2 m+1\) years the quarterly gas consumption of a particular household may be represented by the model $$ Y_{i j}=\beta_{i}+\gamma j+\varepsilon_{i j}, \quad i=1, \ldots, 4, j=-m,-m+1, \ldots, m-1, m $$ where the parameters \(\beta_{i}\) and \(\gamma\) are unknown, and \(\varepsilon_{i j} \stackrel{\text { iid }}{\sim} N\left(0, \sigma^{2}\right) .\) Find the least squares estimators and show that they are independent with variances \((2 m+1)^{-1} \sigma^{2}\) and \(\sigma^{2} /\left(8 \sum_{i=1}^{m} i^{2}\right)\) Show also that $$ (8 m-1)^{-1}\left[\sum_{i=1}^{4} \sum_{j=-m}^{m} Y_{i j}^{2}-(2 m+1) \sum_{i=1}^{4} \bar{Y}_{i}^{2}-\frac{2 \sum_{j=-m}^{m} j \bar{Y}_{. j}^{2}}{\sum_{i=1}^{m} i^{2}}\right] $$ is unbiased for \(\sigma^{2}\), where \(\bar{Y}_{i}=(2 m+1)^{-1} \sum_{j=-m}^{m} Y_{i j}\) and \(\bar{Y}_{. j}=\frac{1}{4} \sum_{i=1}^{4} Y_{i j}\).

Suppose that we wish to construct the likelihood ratio statistic for comparison of the two linear models \(y=X_{1} \beta_{1}+\varepsilon\) and \(y=X_{1} \beta_{1}+X_{2} \beta_{2}+\varepsilon\), where the components of \(\varepsilon\) are independent normal variables with mean zero and variance \(\sigma^{2} ;\) call the corresponding residual sums of squares \(S S_{1}\) and \(S S\) on \(v_{1}\) and \(v\) degrees of freedom. (a) Show that the maximum value of the log likelihood is \(-\frac{1}{2} n(\log S S+1-\log n)\) for a model whose residual sum of squares is \(S S\), and deduce that the likelihood ratio statistic for comparison of the models above is \(W=n \log \left(S S_{1} / S S\right)\). (b) By writing \(S S_{1}=S S+\left(S S_{1}-S S\right)\), show that \(W\) is a monotonic function of the \(F\) statistic for comparison of the models. (c) Show that \(W \doteq\left(v_{1}-v\right) F\) when \(n\) is large and \(v\) is close to \(n\), and say why \(F\) would usually be preferred to \(W\).

In the normal straight-line regression model it is thought that a power transformation of the covariate may be needed, that is, the model $$ y=\beta_{0}+\beta_{1} x^{(\lambda)}+\varepsilon $$ may be suitable, where \(x^{(\lambda)}\) is the power transformation $$ x^{(\lambda)}= \begin{cases}\frac{x^{\lambda}-1}{\lambda}, & \lambda \neq 0 \\\ \log x, & \lambda=0\end{cases} $$ (a) Show by Taylor series expansion of \(x^{(\lambda)}\) at \(\lambda=1\) that a test for power transformation can be based on the reduction in sum of squares when the constructed variable \(x \log x\) is added to the model with linear predictor \(\beta_{0}+\beta_{1} x\). (b) Show that the profile log likelihood for \(\lambda\) is equivalent to \(\ell_{\mathrm{p}}(\lambda) \equiv-\frac{n}{2} \log \operatorname{SS}\left(\widehat{\beta}_{\lambda}\right)\), where \(S S\left(\widehat{\beta}_{\lambda}\right)\) is the residual sum of squares for regression of \(y\) on the \(n \times 2\) design matrix with a column of ones and the column consisting of the \(x_{j}^{(\lambda)}\). Why is a Jacobian for the transformation not needed in this case, unlike in Example \(8.23 ?\) (Box and Tidwell, 1962 )

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.