/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 2 Explain which of the following m... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Explain which of the following more closely describes what it means to say that the probability of a tossed coin landing with heads up is \(1 / 2:\) Explanation 1: After more and more tosses, the fraction of heads will get closer and closer to \(1 / 2\) Explanation 2: The number of heads will always be about half the number of tosses.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Explanation 1 is more accurate due to the Law of Large Numbers.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Problem

We need to evaluate two different explanations to determine which one more accurately describes the statistical concept known as the 'Law of Large Numbers' in regard to the probability of a fair coin toss resulting in heads, which is \( \frac{1}{2} \). Explanation 1 suggests that as you toss the coin more times, the fraction of heads will approach \( \frac{1}{2} \). Explanation 2 suggests that the number of heads will always be roughly half of the total tosses.
02

Analyzing Explanation 1

Explanation 1 refers to the Law of Large Numbers, which states that as the number of trials (in this case, coin tosses) increases, the experimental probability (fraction of heads) will converge to the theoretical probability (\( \frac{1}{2} \)). If you toss a fair coin many times, the relative frequency of heads will get closer and closer to \( 0.5 \), but not necessarily be exactly \( 0.5 \) after a finite number of tosses.
03

Analyzing Explanation 2

Explanation 2 suggests that the absolute number of heads will always be about half the number of tosses. While it may seem reasonable, this explanation disregards the concept of variability in smaller sample sizes. In small numbers of tosses, the number of heads may not be close to half the number of tosses due to random chance. As tosses increase, the proportion, not necessarily the count, approaches \( \frac{1}{2} \).
04

Concluding Which Explanation is More Accurate

Explanation 1 is more accurate because it correctly describes how the probability behaves according to the Law of Large Numbers. It recognizes that only as the number of tosses becomes large does the fraction of heads approach \( \frac{1}{2} \). Explanation 2's emphasis on the absolute number of heads being about half is misleading, especially in smaller samples.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Probability Theory
Probability theory is a fundamental branch of mathematics that deals with the likelihood of events occurring. It helps us to understand and predict the patterns and behaviors in random activities, such as tossing a coin.
At its core, probability theory provides a framework to measure the chance of different outcomes. This chance is expressed as a number between 0 and 1, where 0 indicates impossibility and 1 indicates certainty. So when we say the probability of tossing a coin and getting heads is \( \frac{1}{2} \), we mean there is an equal likelihood of the coin landing on heads or tails.
Important concepts within probability theory include:
  • ***Probability space**: A theoretical framework consisting of three components - a sample space, a set of events, and a probability function.
  • ***Random variables**: They assign numerical outcomes to the results of random processes or phenomena.
  • ***Expected value**: This is the average result you'd expect from a random process over the long term.
These principles allow us to quantify uncertainties, making informed predictions and decisions in both academic and practical disciplines, from science to finance.
Experimental Probability
Experimental probability is about using data from actual experiments or trials to determine the likelihood of an event. When you toss a coin several times and record the outcomes, you are exploring experimental probability.
It is calculated by taking the number of times an event occurs and dividing it by the total number of trials. For example, if you flip a coin 100 times and get heads 48 times, the experimental probability of landing heads is \( \frac{48}{100} = 0.48 \).
Experimental probability is particularly useful because:
  • ***Real-world application**: It provides tangible evidence based on real outcomes rather than theoretical predictions.
  • ***Approximating theoretical probability**: When the number of trials is large, experimental probability can give an excellent approximation of theoretical probability, as highlighted by the Law of Large Numbers.
In experimental settings, it's important to conduct a sufficient number of trials to minimize the effect of random chance and obtain a reliable estimate of probability.
Theoretical Probability
Theoretical probability is calculated based on all the possible outcomes, assuming each outcome is equally likely. This form of probability doesn't require running an actual experiment, but instead, relies on logical conclusions based on known data.
For a fair coin, the theoretical probability of getting heads can be determined straightforwardly since there are two possible outcomes, each equally likely. Thus, the probability is \( \frac{1}{2} \) for both heads and tails.
Theoretical probability is useful because:
  • ***Simplicity**: It often requires fewer resources and time than conducting experiments.
  • ***Predictive power**: It allows us to make predictions about the probability of future events under known conditions without empirical trials.
Like experimental probability, theoretical probability allows us to analyze and understand the behavior of systems driven by chance, from natural phenomena to strategic decision-making processes. The difference lies in the absence of empirical data, relying instead on logical reasoning and existing assumptions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

You cross a train track on your drive to work or school. If you get stopped by a train you are late. a. Are the events "stopped by train" and "late for work or school" independent events? Explain. b. Are the events "stopped by train" and "late for work or school" mutually exclusive events? Explain.

A restaurant server knows that the probability that a customer will order coffee is .30, the probability that a customer will order a diet soda is. \(40,\) and the probability that a customer will request a glass of water is \(.70 .\) Explain what is wrong with his reasoning in each of the following. a. Using Rule 2 , he concludes that the probability that a customer will order either coffee or request a glass of water is \(.30+.70=1.0\) b. Using Rule 3, he concludes that the probability that a customer will order coffee and a diet soda is \((.30)(.40)=.12\)

According to Krantz (1992, p. 161), the probability of being injured by lightning in any given year is \(1 / 685,000 .\) Assume that the probability remains the same from year to year and that avoiding a strike in one year doesn't change your probability in the next year. a. What is the probability that someone who lives 80 years will never be struck by lightning? You do not need to compute the answer, but write down how it would be computed. b. According to Krantz, the probability of being injured by lightning over the average lifetime is \(1 / 9100 .\) Show how that probability should relate to your answer in part (a), assuming that average lifetime is about 80 years. c. Do the probabilities given in this exercise apply specifically to you? Explain. d. Over 300 million people live in the United States. In a typical year, assuming Krantz's figure is accurate, about how many people out of 300 million would be expected to be struck by lightning?

Use your own particular expertise to assign a personal probability to something, such as the probability that a certain sports team will win next week. Now assign a personal probability to another related event. Explain how you determined each probability, and explain how your assignments are coherent.

Find out your yearly car insurance cost. If you don't have a car, find out the yearly cost for a friend or relative. Now assume you will either have an accident or not, and if you do, it will cost the insurance company \(\$ 5000\) more than the premium you pay. Calculate what yearly accident probability would result in a "break-even" expected value for you and the insurance company. Comment on whether you think your answer is an accurate representation of your yearly probability of having an accident.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.