/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 1 Recall that there are two interp... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Recall that there are two interpretations of probability: relative frequency and personal probability. a. Which interpretation applies to this statement: "The probability that I will get the flu this winter is \(30 \%^{\prime \prime} ?\) Explain. b. Which interpretation applies to this statement: "The probability that a randomly selected adult in America will get the flu this winter is \(30 \%^{\prime \prime} ?\) Explain. (Assume it is known that the proportion of adults who get the flu each winter remains at about \(30 \% .)\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. Personal probability; it's subjective. b. Relative frequency; it's based on statistical data.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Problem

We need to identify which interpretation of probability applies to each of the given statements. The two main interpretations are 'relative frequency' and 'personal probability'. 'Relative frequency' is based on long-term frequency of an event's occurrence, while 'personal probability' is subjective and based on personal belief or opinion about the likelihood of an event.
02

Analyzing Statement A

The statement is: 'The probability that I will get the flu this winter is 30%'. This is a subjective statement since it is based on personal belief about getting the flu. There is no direct long-term data about this particular individual, so this uses personal probability.
03

Analyzing Statement B

The statement is: 'The probability that a randomly selected adult in America will get the flu this winter is 30%'. Here, the probability is derived from known data about the proportion of adults getting the flu each winter, making it a relative frequency as it relies on historical or statistical data about a population.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Relative Frequency
Relative frequency is one of the interpretations of probability that relies heavily on statistical data and historical trends. It assesses the likelihood of an event occurring based on how often it has happened before over numerous trials or observations. This approach is especially useful when the probability of an event has been documented across a large number of similar instances.

For example, if we say that the probability of a randomly selected adult in America getting the flu each winter is 30%, this statement is rooted in relative frequency. This means that, historically, out of a large number of adults, approximately 30% have gotten the flu during past winters. The long-term data validates this probability estimate, making it reliable for predicting future occurrences based on past experiences.

In summary, relative frequency provides an objective measure based on concrete data, which can be tested and confirmed over time. It is largely used in cases where ample data is available for analysis.
Personal Probability
Personal probability represents a subjective interpretation of the likelihood of an event occurring. Unlike relative frequency, it is based on an individual's own belief, opinion, or personal judgment rather than concrete statistical evidence. This can vary widely from one person to another as it is influenced by personal experiences, intuition, and specific circumstances.

Consider the statement: "The probability that I will get the flu this winter is 30%." This is an example of personal probability. Here, the person bases their estimate on personal insight or personal factors, such as their health condition, lifestyle, past experiences, or even their own hunch. No comprehensive data supports this specific probability since it applies to an individual and not a population.

In conclusion, personal probability is inherently subjective and doesn't require historical data. It serves as a personal gauge of likelihood, useful for individual decision-making, but may not be reliable for making predictions about a larger group.
Subjective Probability
Subjective probability is closely related to personal probability, as it similarly derives from personal judgment or belief. It forms the basis for estimates regarding situations where statistical data may be scarce or unavailable. It is a measure of how probable an individual thinks an event is based on whatever information is available to them at the time.

Subjective probability becomes particularly useful in scenarios requiring quick decisions, or those that involve factors unique to an individual or their immediate environment. For instance, while deciding on taking an umbrella, one might say there's a 70% chance it will rain today, based solely on looking at the sky, rather than consulting weather reports or data.

Subjective probability identifies those areas where probability intersects with human intuition and perspective, acknowledging that not all estimates require large data sets to be valuable.
Statistical Data Analysis
Statistical data analysis is at the heart of determining reliable probabilities, especially under the framework of relative frequency. This involves the collection, interpretation, and presentation of data to discover patterns and trends which can inform probability assessments.

By using tools such as graphs, charts, and statistical tests, analysts identify how often events occur under a variety of conditions and use this information to predict future occurrences. For instance, tracking flu trends over time can help public health officials estimate the probability of future flu outbreaks in a population. This type of analysis requires rigorous data collection often spanning multiple years or even decades.

Understanding statistical data analysis is essential for anyone who looks to derive meaningful insights from data. Through proper analysis, probabilities can be aligned more closely with reality, guiding decisions in fields ranging from healthcare to market research. It ensures that predictions are grounded in reality, rather than mere speculation.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Example 14.3 states that "the probability that a piece of checked luggage will be lost, delayed, damaged, or pilfered on a flight with a U.S. airline is \(3 / 1000\)." Interpret that statement, using the appropriate interpretation of probability.

Lyme disease is a disease carried by ticks, which can be transmitted to humans by tick bites. Suppose the probability of contracting the disease is \(1 / 100\) for each tick bite. a. What is the probability that you will not get the disease when bitten once? b. What is the probability that you will not get the disease from your first tick bite and will get it from your second tick bite?

A classic study by Kahneman and Tversky (1982, p. 496) asked people the following question: "Linda is 31 years old, single, outspoken, and very bright. She majored in philosophy. As a student, she was deeply concerned with issues of discrimination and social justice, and also participated in antinuclear demonstrations. Please check off the most likely alternative: A. Linda is a bank teller. B. Linda is a bank teller and is active in the feminist movement." Nearly \(90 \%\) of the 86 respondents chose alternative \(\mathrm{B}\). Explain why alternative \(\mathrm{B}\) cannot have a higher probability than alternative A.

According to Krantz (1992, p. 161), the probability of being injured by lightning in any given year is \(1 / 685,000 .\) Assume that the probability remains the same from year to year and that avoiding a strike in one year doesn't change your probability in the next year. a. What is the probability that someone who lives 80 years will never be struck by lightning? You do not need to compute the answer, but write down how it would be computed. b. According to Krantz, the probability of being injured by lightning over the average lifetime is \(1 / 9100 .\) Show how that probability should relate to your answer in part (a), assuming that average lifetime is about 80 years. c. Do the probabilities given in this exercise apply specifically to you? Explain. d. Over 300 million people live in the United States. In a typical year, assuming Krantz's figure is accurate, about how many people out of 300 million would be expected to be struck by lightning?

Suppose you routinely check coin-return slots in vending machines to see if they have any money in them. You have found that about \(10 \%\) of the time you find money. a. What is the probability that you do not find money the next time you check? b. What is the probability that the next time you will find money is on the third try? c. What is the probability that you will have found money by the third try?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.