/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 18 In a national survey, 1500 rando... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

In a national survey, 1500 randomly selected adults will be asked if they favor or oppose a ban on texting while driving and if they have personally texted while driving during the previous month. Write null and alternative hypotheses about the relationship between the two variables in this situation. Make your hypotheses specific to this situation.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The null hypothesis states there is no relationship; the alternative hypothesis states there is a relationship.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Scenario

In this scenario, we are examining the relationship between two variables for a group of randomly selected adults: whether they favor or oppose a ban on texting while driving, and whether they have personally texted while driving in the past month.
02

Identify the Variables

The two variables in this scenario are: 1) opinion on the ban (favor/oppose) and 2) texting behavior while driving (texted/did not text). We want to determine if there's a statistical relationship between these variables.
03

Formulate the Null Hypothesis

The null hypothesis, denoted as \( H_0 \), suggests that there is no association between the two variables. In this context, it can be stated as: "There is no relationship between opinions on a ban on texting while driving and whether an individual has texted while driving in the past month."
04

Formulate the Alternative Hypothesis

The alternative hypothesis, denoted as \( H_a \), indicates the presence of an association between the two variables. Specifically, we propose: "There is a relationship between opinions on a ban on texting while driving and whether an individual has texted while driving in the past month."
05

Expressing the Hypotheses

Mathematically, the hypotheses can be expressed as:- Null Hypothesis \( H_0 \): Opinion on the ban is independent of texting behavior.- Alternative Hypothesis \( H_a \): Opinion on the ban is not independent of texting behavior.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Statistical Relationship
When discussing a statistical relationship, we're interested in examining how two or more variables interact with each other. In our exercise, the focus is on understanding whether there exists a connection between individuals' opinions on a texting ban while driving and their personal texting behavior.

Determining the statistical relationship involves analyzing data collected through surveys or experiments to see if changes in one variable are associated with changes in another. If such a connection is found, we may conclude that a statistical relationship exists.

For instance, in the survey example provided, if more people who favor the ban have abstained from texting while driving, or if more people who oppose the ban have texted while driving, it indicates a possible statistical relationship between these variables. Identifying these relationships helps us understand behavior patterns and their broader societal impacts.

The main methods to examine such relationships are correlation studies and hypothesis testing, which can provide insights into the strength and direction of relationships, helping policymakers make better-informed decisions.
Variables in Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a statistical method used to determine whether there is enough evidence to support a particular belief or hypothesis about a dataset. In our context, we have defined two primary variables for hypothesis testing:
  • Opinion on the ban: Whether an individual favors or opposes the ban on texting while driving.
  • Texting behavior: Whether an individual has texted while driving in the past month.
To perform hypothesis testing, you begin with a null hypothesis ( H_0 ), which assumes no relationship between the variables. Conversely, the alternative hypothesis ( H_a ) posits that a relationship does exist between them.

It's crucial to design clear and specific hypotheses related to the variables being tested, as they guide the whole testing process. The goal is to collect sufficient data, analyze it, and determine whether the null hypothesis can be rejected in favor of the alternative.

Properly identifying and defining the variables ensures that the testing process is accurate and meaningful, helping to validate or refute hypothesized relationships within the data.
Survey Analysis
Survey analysis is a powerful tool employed to understand public opinion, behaviors, and trends by collecting and analyzing self-reported data from a sample population. In the given scenario, a national survey of 1500 adults is tasked with collecting responses on whether they favor or oppose a texting ban while driving and their own texting habits.

Conducting a survey involves a few critical steps:
  • Designing the Survey: Questions must be clear and unbiased to elicit honest responses. For example, the questions must neutrally address both the favor and oppose options regarding the texting ban.
  • Collecting Responses: It is key to ensure that the sample is representative of the larger population to make generalizable conclusions.
  • Analyzing Data: Once collected, the data must be examined for patterns or statistical relationships. This can be done through various statistical techniques like chi-square tests or logistic regression, which help determine if the responses show a significant relationship between the variables.
Survey analysis provides valuable insights by quantifying opinions and behaviors, which can lead to more informed policy-making and changes that better reflect public needs. By correctly analyzing the survey results, we can determine if people's attitudes toward the texting ban have a notable connection with their own texting behaviors.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

If there is a relationship between two variables in a population, which is more likely to result in a statistically significant relationship in a sample from that population \(-\) a small sample, a large sample, or are they equivalent? Explain.

Are null and alternative hypotheses statements about samples, about populations, or does it depend on the situation? Explain.

For each of the following possible conclusions, state whether it would follow when the \(p\) -value is greater than 0.05 (assuming a level of 0.05 is desired for the test). a. Reject the null hypothesis. b. Reject the alternative hypothesis. c. Accept the null hypothesis. d. Accept the alternative hypothesis. e. The relationship is not statistically significant. f. The relationship is statistically significant. g. We do not have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis.

This is a continuation of Exercise 27 in Chapter 12 . Kohler \((1994, p .427)\) reported data on the approval rates and ethnicity for mortgage applicants in Los Angeles in \(1990 .\) Of the 4096 African American applicants, 3117 were approved. Of the 84,947 white applicants, 71,950 were approved. The chi-square statistic for these data is about \(220,\) so the difference observed in the approval rates is clearly statistically significant. Now suppose that a random sample of 890 applicants had been examined, a sample size 100 times smaller than the one reported. Further, suppose the pattern of results had been almost identical, resulting in 40 African American applicants with 30 approved, and 850 white applicants with 720 approved. a. Construct a contingency table for these numbers. b. Compute the chi-square statistic for the table. c. Make a conclusion based on your result in part (b), and compare it with the conclusion that would have been made using the full data set. Explain any discrepancies, and discuss their implications for this type of problem.

If a relationship has practical significance, does it guarantee that statistical significance will be achieved in every study that examines it? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.