/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 40 Construct a Plackett-Burman desi... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Construct a Plackett-Burman design for 10 variables containing 24 experimental runs.

Short Answer

Expert verified
A Plackett-Burman design for 10 variables in 24 runs can be created by setting up a design matrix and filling it out using the cycle rule or a generator, like \(G = I_{4} + I_{6} + I_{8} + I_{10} + I_{12} + I_{14} + I_{17} + I_{19}+ I_{21} + I_{23}\).

Step by step solution

01

Set Up a Basic Design Matrix

A basic design matrix must be set up for a Plackett-Burman design. The matrix has 24 rows, representing the experimental runs, and 10 columns, representing the variables. Each element of the matrix is either +1 or -1, depending on whether the variable should be high (+1) or low (-1) for the corresponding experimental run.
02

Construct a Generetor

For a Plackett-Burman design with 24 trials, a common generator is \(G = I_{4} + I_{6} + I_{8} + I_{10} + I_{12} + I_{14} + I_{17} + I_{19}+ I_{21} + I_{23}\). Where \(I\) is the identity matrix. Using this generator, the additional trials can be constructed.
03

Complete the Design

Proceed to fill out the rest of the rows in the design matrix using of this generator. The elements of each column are generated by cyclically shifting the elements of the previous column down by one position. After completing these steps, a Plackett-Burman design for 10 variables containing 24 experimental runs is constructed.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Experimental Design
In the realm of research, an experimental design is a structured plan used to determine the effects of variables on a response. It is essentially a blueprint for conducting an experiment. The goal is to discover relationships between factors and their potential impacts on the outcomes of interest. Experimental designs provide a systematic approach to testing hypotheses by manipulating one or more factors while controlling others.

A Plackett-Burman design, as in our exercise, is a type of experimental design particularly used when it is impractical to test all possible combinations of the variables, due to time or cost constraints. It is a type of screening design which allows you to identify the most important factors early on in a series of experiments. This is done with a relatively small number of runs, which in your case is 24, for 10 different variables.
Design Matrix
The design matrix plays a pivotal role in any experimental design. It is a matrix or a table layout where the rows represent different trials or runs of the experiment and the columns represent the factors or variables being tested. Each cell in the matrix corresponds to the level at which the factor should be set for that run. Factors at high levels are typically marked with +1, and factors at low levels are marked with -1.

In the solution provided, the initial step was creating a basic design matrix for the Plackett-Burman design which dictates the settings for each variable in each run. This matrix gives a clear visual representation of the experimental setup, and serves as the foundation for collecting and analyzing data. For the specified 24 experiments and 10 variables, the matrix would be a structure measuring 24 rows by 10 columns in size.
Factorial Experiments
When it comes to factorial experiments, these are a class of experimental design that involve two or more factors, each with discrete possible values or 'levels'. The simplest form of a factorial experiment is the 2-level factorial design, where each factor is observed at two levels. Factorial experiments are powerful tools for studying the effects of multiple factors simultaneously.

Plackett-Burman designs can be considered as a special case of fractional factorial designs because they look at a fraction of the full factorial design. They do not provide as much information as a full factorial design but are more efficient in terms of the number of experiments needed. In factorial design terminology, the 'generator' you referred to is an expression used to construct the design matrix efficiently, particularly in fractional factorial experiments where not all possible combinations of factors are tested.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

An experiment is revealed in Myers and Montgomery (2002) in which optimum conditions are sought storing bovine semen to obtain maximum survival. The variables are percent sodium citrate, percent glycerol, and equilibration time in hours. The response is percent survival of the motile spermatozoa. The natural levels are found in the above reference. Below are the data with coded levels for the factorial portion of the design and the center runs. $$ \begin{array}{cccc} \begin{array}{c} x_{1}, \text { Percent } \\ \text { Sodium } \\ \text { Citrate } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} x_{2} \\ \text { Percent Equilibration } \\ \text { Glycerol } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} x_{3} \\ \text { Time } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \% \\ \text { Survival } \end{array} \\ \hline-1 & -1 & -1 & 57 \\ 1 & -1 & -1 & 40 \\ -1 & 1 & 1 & 19 \\ 1 & 1 & 1 & 40 \\ -1 & -1 & -1 & 54 \\ 1 & -1 & -1 & 41 \\ -1 & 1 & 1 & 21 \\ 1 & 1 & 1 & 43 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 63 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 61 \end{array} $$ (a) Fit a linear regression model to the data and determine which linear and interaction terms are significant. Assume that the \(x_{1} x_{2} x_{3}\) interaction is negligible. (b) Test for quadratic lack of fit and comment.

A large petroleum company in the Southwest regularly conducts experiments to test additives to drilling fluids. Plastic viscosity is a rheological measure reflecting the thickness of the fluid. Various polymers are added to the fluid to increase viscosity. The following is a data set in which two polymers are used at two levels each and the viscosity measured. The concentration of the polymers is indicated as "low" and "high." Conduct an analysis of the \(2^{2}\) factorial experiment. Test for effects for the two polymers and interaction. $$ \begin{array}{crrrr} & {\text { Polymer } 1} \\ \hline { 2 - 5 } \text { Poly mer } 2 & \ {\text { Low }} && \ {\text { High }} \\ \hline \text { Low } & 3 & 3.5 & 11.3 & 12.0 \\ \text { High } & 11.7 & 12.0 & 21.7 & 22.4 \end{array} $$

Construct a design that contains nine design points, is orthogonal, contains 12 total runs, 3 degrees of freedom for replication error, and allows for a lack of fit test for pure quadratic curvature.

An experiment is conducted so that an engineer can gain insight into the influence of sealing temperature \(A\), cooling bar temperature \(B,\) percent polyethylene additive \(C,\) and pressure \(D\) on the seal strength (in grams per inch) of a. bread-wrapper Stock. A \(\frac{1}{2}\) fraction of a \(2^{\prime 1}\) factorial experiment is used with the defining contrast being \(A B C D .\) The data are: presented here. Perform an analysis of variance on main effects, and two-factor interactions, assuming that all three-factor and higher interactions are negligible. Use \(a=0.05\). $$ \begin{array}{rrrrr} A & B & C & D & \text { Response } \\ \hline-1 & -1^{*} & -1 & -1 & 6.6 \\ 1 & -1 & -1 & 1 & 6.9 \\ -1 & 1 & -1 & 1 & 7.9 \\ 1 & 1 & -1 & -1 & 6.1 \\ -1 & -1 & 1 & 1 & 9.2 \\ 1 & -1 & 1 & -1 & 6.8 \\ -1 & 1 & 1 & -1 & 10.4 \\ 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 7.3 \end{array} $$

15.50 Consider a design which is a \(2_{I I I}^{3-1}\) w4th 2 center runs. Consider \(y_{f}\) as the average response at the design parameter and \(\bar{y}_{0}\) as the average response at the design center. Suppose the true regression model is $$ \begin{aligned} E(y)=00+& \beta_{1} x_{1}+\beta_{2} x_{2}+\beta_{3} x_{3} \\ &+\beta_{11} x_{1}^{2}+\beta_{22} x_{2}^{2}+\beta_{33} x_{3}^{2} \end{aligned} $$ (a) Give (and verify) \(E\left(\bar{y}_{f}-\bar{y}_{0}\right)\). (b) Explain what you have learned from the result in (a).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.