/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 85 A coin is thrown until a head oc... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A coin is thrown until a head occurs and the number \(X\) of tosses recorded. After repeating the experiment 256 times, we obtained the following results: $$\begin{array}{c|cccccccc}x & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7 & 8 \\\\\hline \boldsymbol{f} & 136 & 60 & 34 & 12 & 9 & 1 & 3 & 1\end{array}$$

Short Answer

Expert verified
The solution to this task involves the analysis of the data given in the frequency chart and the computation of both the experimental and theoretical probabilities which are compared to see the observed deviation in outcomes. The probabilities are calculated using the respective frequencies and the known theoretical probability formula.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Frequencies

Look at the frequencies \(f\) of each number of tosses \(x\). These frequencies represent the number of times out of 256 that it took exactly \(x\) number of tosses to get a head.
02

Compute the experimental probabilities

Calculate the experimental probabilities for each number of tosses \(x\). This can be done by dividing each frequency \(f\) by the total number of experiments, which is 256. This would give us the experimental probability \(P(X=x)\) for each x, which represents the observed likelihood of needing exactly \(x\) tosses to get a head.
03

Calculate the theoretical probabilities

Compute the theoretical probabilities for each number of tosses \(x\). The theoretical probability of needing exactly \(x\) tosses to get a head can be obtained with formula \((1/2)^x\). Calculate this for each \(x\) from 1 to 8.
04

Compare experimental and theoretical probabilities

Lastly, with both experimental and theoretical probabilities calculated, analyze the difference in these probabilities to see the deviation of observed results from the theoretically expected outcomes.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Experimental Probability
Experimental probability is determined by conducting an experiment and recording the outcomes. Unlike theoretical probability, which relies on predictable outcomes, experimental probability depends on real-world data. The core idea is to observe what actually happens when an experiment is conducted multiple times. For example, in our case, tossing a coin until a head appears was done 256 times. The frequency of each result (how many tosses before a head occurred) was recorded. These frequencies, when divided by the total number of experiments, provide the experimental probability for each outcome. The formula to find experimental probability is:\[ P(X = x) = \frac{\text{Frequency of } x}{\text{Total number of trials}} \]Using this formula helps you understand the likelihood of an event occurring based on actual results. It shows how probabilities play out in practice.
Theoretical Probability
Theoretical probability is based on what is mathematically expected to happen in an ideal scenario. It assumes each outcome is equally likely and stems from the basic principles of probability. In scenarios involving a fair coin, for instance, the chance of getting a head or a tail on any single toss is known to be 1/2. When extended to our problem's context—calculating the likelihood of getting the first "head" on a particular toss number—the theoretical probability for needing exactly \(x\) tosses is calculated as:\[ P(X = x) = \left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^x \]This formula derives from multiplying the probability of getting tails until the last toss and then a head on the \(x\)-th toss. It gives a clear picture of what is expected in a perfect, controlled setting.
Frequency Distribution
Frequency distribution is a way to organize the outcomes of an experiment. It allows you to see how often different results occur within a set of trials. This informative summary helps identify patterns or trends that provide deeper insights into the data. In the exercise, frequency distribution is observed through the table of tosses, showing how frequently each number of tosses was needed before getting a head. Each number of tosses has a corresponding frequency, which reflects how common or rare that outcome was during the trials. By arranging data, frequency distributions make it easier to compute probabilities, visualize data through graphs, and measure experimental probabilities against their theoretical counterparts.
Probability Theory
Probability theory forms the backbone of analyzing situations involving uncertainty, like the coin-toss experiment. It provides a framework and set of rules for calculating the likelihood of various outcomes. The key principle is that probabilities range from 0 to 1, where 0 indicates impossibility and 1 represents certainty. For independent events, such as multiple coin tosses, the probabilities are multiplied. This principle is applied in the theoretical probability for our experiment. Probability theory helps to educate us on how to model and predict real-world random events, guiding us in making informed decisions based on likelihoods rather than guesses. It is an essential part of analyzing processes, like this coin toss scenario, by predicting outcomes and validating experimental results.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Past expericnce indicates that the time required for high school seniors to complete a standardized test is a normal random variable with a standard deviation of 6 minutes. Test the hypothesis that \(0=0\) against the alternative that \(1 \mathrm{~T}<6\) if a random sample of 20 high school seniors has a standard deviations \(s=4.51 .\) Use a 0.05 level of significance.

10.36 \text { A large automobile manufacturing company is } trying to decide whether to purchase brand \(A\) or brand \(B\) tires for its new models. To help arrive at a decision, an experiment is conducted using 12 of each brand. The tires are run until they wear out. The results are $$\begin{aligned}\text { Brand } A: & x_{1}=37,900 \text { kilometers, } \\ & s_{1}=5,100 \text { kilometers. } \\\\\text { Brand B: } \quad x_{1} &=39,800 \text { kilometers, } \\\& s_{2}=5,900 \text { kilometers. }\end{aligned}$$ Test the hypothesis that there is no difference in the average wear of 2 brands of tires. Assume the populations to be approximately normally distributed with equal variances. Use a P-value.

The proportion of adults living in a small town who are college graduates is estimated to be \(\mathrm{p}=0.6\). To test this hypothesis, a random sample of 15 adults is selected. If the number of college graduates in our sample is anywhere from 6 to \(12,\) we shall not reject the null hypothesis that \(p=0.6 ;\) otherwise, we shall conclude that \(p \neq 0.6\) (a) Evaluate \(\alpha\) assuming that \(p=0.6\). Use the binomial distribution. (b) Evaluate \(\beta\) for the alternatives \(p=0.5\) and \(p-0.7\). (c) Is this a good test procedure?

According to the published reports, practice under fatigued conditions distorts mechanisms which govern performance. An experiment was conducted using 15 college males who were trained to make a continuous horizontal right- to-left arm movement from a microswitch to a barrier, knocking over the barrier coincident with the arrival of a clock sweephand to the 6 o'clock position. The absolute value of the difference between the time, in milliseconds, that it took to knock over the barrier and the time for the sweephand to reach the 6 o'clock position \((500 \mathrm{msec})\) was recorded Each participant performed the task five times under prefatigue and postfatigue conditions, and the sums of the absolute differences for the five performances were recorded as follows: An increase in the mean absolute time differences when the task is performed under postfatigue conditions would support the claim that practice under fatigued conditions distorts mechanisms that govern performance. Assuming the populations to be normally distributed, test this claim.

10.20 A random sample of 64 bags of white Cheddar popcorn weighed, on average, 5.23 ounces with a standard deviation of 0.24 ounces. Test the hypothesis that \(p=5.5\) ounces against the alternative hypothesis, \(\mu<5.5\) ounces at the 0.05 level of significance

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.