/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 14 A manufacturer has developed a n... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A manufacturer has developed a new fishing line, which he claims has a mean breaking strength of 15 kilograms with a standard deviation of 0.5 kilogram. To test the hypothesis that \(\mu=15\) kilograms against the alternative that \(p<15\) kilograms, a random sample of 50 lines will be tested. The critical region is defined to be \(x<14.9\) (a) Find the probability of committing a type 1 error when \(H_{0}\) is true (b) Evaluate \(\beta\) for the alternatives \(p-14.8\) and \(\mu=\) 14.9 kilograms.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The solution will have a short answer which will essentially be the calculated values of the probability of a Type 1 error made in part (a), and the evaluated \(\beta\) values for the alternatives \(p=14.8\) and \(\mu=14.9\) in part (b).

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Type 1 Error

Type 1 error occurs when we reject the null hypothesis, \(H_{0}\), when it is actually true. In this case, the null hypothesis is that the mean breaking strength of the fishing line is 15 kg. Therefore, the probability of a Type 1 error is the probability that the sample mean is less than 14.9 kg when the true population mean is 15 kg. To find this probability, you need to find the value of the z-score for 14.9 kg and then look this value up in the standard normal distribution table.
02

Calculate Z-score and Find Probability of Type 1 Error

The Z-score formula is \(z=\frac{x-\mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}\) where \(x\) is the value for which you want to find the z-score, \(\mu\) is the population mean, \(\sigma\) is the standard deviation and \(n\) is the sample size. In this case, \(x=14.9, \mu=15, \sigma=0.5,\) and \(n=50\). Substituting these values into the z-score formula will give you the z-score. Then, use the z-table (normal distribution table) to find the probability that corresponds to this z-value.
03

Evaluate Beta

\(\beta\) is the probability of making a Type II error, i.e., accepting \(\mu=15\) when it is false. To find \(\beta\) when \(p=14.8\) and \(\mu=14.9\), calculate the z-score at these points and find the corresponding probabilities from the normal distribution table.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Type 1 error in hypothesis testing
Understanding the Type 1 error in the context of hypothesis testing is crucial for statistical analysis. A Type 1 error, also known as a 'false positive', occurs when the null hypothesis, which is a statement of no effect or no difference, is incorrectly rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis. Let's take, for example, a manufacturer claiming their new fishing line has a breaking strength of 15 kilograms. In this scenario, the null hypothesis (\(H_0\)) posits that the true mean breaking strength \(\mu = 15\) kg. A Type 1 error would be rejecting this claim when in fact the fishing line does indeed have a mean breaking strength of 15 kg. The seriousness of a Type 1 error can vary depending on the context of the research or testing situation. In industries such as pharmaceuticals, committing a Type 1 error by approving an ineffective drug can have severe implications.

The probability of committing a Type 1 error is denoted by \(\alpha\), and it is often set prior to conducting a test, commonly at levels like 0.05 or 0.01, which represent a 5% or 1% risk of wrongly rejecting the true null hypothesis, respectively. This \(\alpha\) level also defines the critical region of the test, which is the set of values that if the test statistic falls within, leads to rejection of the null hypothesis. In our fishing line example, the critical region is defined as any average breaking strength below 14.9 kg.
Calculating Z-score
The Z-score is a statistical measure that describes a value's relationship to the mean of a group of values, measured in terms of standard deviations from the mean. It is a dimensionless quantity that is helpful in comparing different data points from different normal distributions or comparing a single data point to a normal distribution.

To calculate the Z-score of a sample, you can use the formula \(z = \frac{x - \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}\), where \(x\) is the sample mean, \(\mu\) is the population mean, \(\sigma\) is the standard deviation, and \(n\) is the sample size. In hypothesis testing, this Z-score helps in determining how many standard deviations an element is from the population mean. For instance, for the fishing line with a sample mean of 14.9 kg, population mean of 15 kg, standard deviation of 0.5 kg, and a sample size of 50, one would insert these values into the formula to find the Z-score. This score is then used to assess the hypothesis by comparing it to critical values from a normal distribution table.
Type II error probability

Understanding Beta

While a Type 1 error is concerned with wrongly rejecting the null hypothesis, a Type II error (\(\beta\)) is about failing to reject a null hypothesis that is actually false. In other words, it's the error that occurs when the research fails to detect an effect or difference that is actually present. In the context of our scenario with the fishing line, a Type II error would happen if we conclude that the mean breaking strength is 15 kg (when the null hypothesis is accepted), while the actual strength is less than 15 kg, such as 14.8 kg or 14.9 kg. This type of error is also related to the test's power, which is 1 - \(\beta\), describing the ability of the test to correctly reject a false null hypothesis.

To evaluate the probability of a Type II error, one would calculate the Z-score for the actual mean (under the alternative hypothesis) and then use the normal distribution table to find the corresponding probability. Therefore, instead of computing the likelihood of observing more extreme results assuming the null hypothesis is true (as done with a Type 1 error), we're now interested in the likelihood of observing results that are not extreme enough to reject the null hypothesis when, in fact, the null hypothesis is false.
Normal distribution table
The normal distribution table, commonly referred to as the Z-table, is a mathematical table that allows researchers to find the probability associated with a Z-score in a standard normal distribution. The standard normal distribution, or the Z-distribution, is a special case of the normal distribution where the mean is 0 and the standard deviation is 1.

When conducting hypothesis testing, once the Z-score is calculated, this table is used to determine the probability of obtaining a test statistic as extreme or more extreme than the observed value. Typically, the table provides the cumulative probability from the left end of the distribution up to a given Z-score. To use the table, you locate the row corresponding to the first two digits of the Z-score and the column corresponding to the second decimal place. The value where this row and column intersect gives the cumulative probability.

For example, if the Z-score calculated for our sample mean is -2.00, you would look up this value in the Z-table to find the probability of observing such a mean or a lower mean if the null hypothesis is true (for a Type 1 error), or alternatively when the null hypothesis is not true (for evaluating a Type II error probability). This process is fundamental for making decisions about hypothesis rejection based on the selected significance level; it's at the core of hypothesis testing.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

It is believed that at least \(60 \%\) of the residents in a certain area favor an annexation suit by a neighboring city. What conclusion would you draw if only 110 in a sample of 200 voters favor the suit? Use a 0.05 level of significance.

A fabric manufacturer believes that the proportion of orders for raw material arriving late is \(p=0.6\) If a random sample of 10 orders shows that 3 or fewer arrived late, the hypothesis that \(p=0.6\) should be rejected in favor of the alternative \(p<0.6\). Use the binomial distribution. (a) Find the probability of committing a type 1 error if the true proportion is \(p=0.6\) (b) Find the probability of committing a type II error for the alternatives \(p=0.3, p-0.4,\) and \(p=0.5\)

A study at the University of Colorado at Boul. der shows that running increases the percent resting metabolic rate (RMR) in older women. The average RMR of 30 elderly women runners was \(34.0 \%\) higher than the average RMR of 30 sedentary elderly women and the standard deviations were reported to be \(10.5 \%\) and \(10.2 \%\), respectively. Was there a significant increase in RMR of the women runners over the sedentary women? Assume the populations to be approximately normally distributed with equal variances. Use a P-value in your conclusions.

The proportion of adults living in a small town who are college graduates is estimated to be \(\mathrm{p}=0.6\). To test this hypothesis, a random sample of 15 adults is selected. If the number of college graduates in our sample is anywhere from 6 to \(12,\) we shall not reject the null hypothesis that \(p=0.6 ;\) otherwise, we shall conclude that \(p \neq 0.6\) (a) Evaluate \(\alpha\) assuming that \(p=0.6\). Use the binomial distribution. (b) Evaluate \(\beta\) for the alternatives \(p=0.5\) and \(p-0.7\). (c) Is this a good test procedure?

Test the hypothesis that the average content of containers of a particular lubricant is 10 liters if the contents of a random sample of 10 containers are 10.2 \(9.7,10.1,10.3,10.1,9.8,9.9,10.4,10.3,\) and 9.8 liters Use a 0.01 level of significance and assume that the distribution of contents is normal

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.