/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 14 The level of monoamine oxidase (... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The level of monoamine oxidase (MAO) activity in blood platelets (mm/mg protein/h) was determined for each individual in a sample of 43 chronic schizophrenics, resulting in \(\bar{x}-2.69\) and \(s_{i}=2.30\), as well as for 45 normal subjects, resulting in \(\bar{y}-6.35\) and \(x_{2}=4.03\). Does this data strongly suggest that true average MAO activity for normal subjects is more than twice the activity level for schizophrenics? Derive a test procedure and carry out the test using \(\alpha=.01\). [Hint: \(H_{0}\) and \(H_{a}\) here have a different form from the three standard cases. Let \(\mu_{1}\) and \(\mu_{2}\) refer to true averagse MAO activity for schizophrenics and normal subjects, respectively, and consider the parameter \(\theta-2 \mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\). Write \(H_{0}\) and \(H_{a}\) in terms of \(\theta\), estimate \(\theta\), and derive \(\hat{\omega}_{d}\) ("Reduced Monoamine Oxidase Activity in Blood Platelets from Schizophrenic Patients" Nature, July 28, 1972: 225-226).

Short Answer

Expert verified
No, there is not enough evidence to support the claim at the 0.01 significance level.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Problem

We want to determine if the true average monoamine oxidase (MAO) activity for normal subjects is more than twice that of chronic schizophrenics. This involves a hypothesis test between two sample means.
02

Define the Hypotheses

Let \(\mu_1\) be the true average MAO activity for schizophrenics and \(\mu_2\) be for normal subjects. Define \(\theta = 2\mu_1 - \mu_2\). We wish to test \(H_0: \theta = 0\) against \(H_a: \theta < 0\), reflecting that \(2\mu_1 < \mu_2\).
03

Calculate the Estimate for \(\theta\)

From the sample data, we have \(\bar{x} = 2.69\) for schizophrenics and \(\bar{y} = 6.35\) for normals. The estimator for \(\theta\) is \(\hat{\theta} = 2\bar{x} - \bar{y}\). Substitute the values to get:\[\hat{\theta} = 2(2.69) - 6.35 = 5.38 - 6.35 = -0.97\]
04

Calculate the Standard Error \(\hat{\omega}_d\)

We compute the standard error \(\hat{\omega}_d\). With sample sizes \(n_1 = 43\) (schizophrenics) and \(n_2 = 45\) (normals), and standard deviations \(s_1 = 2.30\) and \(s_2 = 4.03\), the variance is estimated by:\[S^2_d = 4s_1^2/n_1 + s_2^2/n_2 = \frac{4(2.30)^2}{43} + \frac{4.03^2}{45}\]Calculate numerically: \[S^2_d = \frac{21.16}{43} + \frac{16.2409}{45}\approx 0.492 + 0.361\approx 0.853\]Then \(\hat{\omega}_d = \sqrt{S^2_d} \approx \sqrt{0.853} \approx 0.923\).
05

Compute the Test Statistic

Calculate the test statistic \(Z = \frac{\hat{\theta}}{\hat{\omega}_d}\) where \(\hat{\theta} = -0.97\) and \(\hat{\omega}_d \approx 0.923\).\[Z = \frac{-0.97}{0.923} \approx -1.051\]
06

Determine the Critical Value and Conclusion

For \(\alpha = 0.01\), the critical value is \(-2.33\) using a standard normal distribution table for a one-tailed test. Since \(Z = -1.051 > -2.33\), we do not reject \(H_0\).
07

State the Conclusion

There is not enough statistical evidence at the \(\alpha = 0.01\) level to conclude that the true average MAO activity for normal subjects is more than twice that of schizophrenics.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Sample Sizes
Sample size is a critical component in hypothesis testing as it impacts the reliability and accuracy of the results. In this exercise, two distinct groups provide data:
  • 43 individuals with chronic schizophrenia
  • 45 normal subjects
The sample size of each group determines the degree of confidence in the findings. Larger sample sizes generally lead to more stable and dependable estimates of population parameters. When comparing two groups, as in this study, the sample sizes are similar, which helps maintain balance and fairness in the analysis. A balanced sample size minimizes bias and enhances the credibility of the statistical test outcomes. In general, more subjects lead to better estimates of the population means and consequently a more powerful statistical test that can potentially detect any real differences between groups.
Test Statistic
The test statistic is a standardized value that reflects how far your sample statistic is from the null hypothesis. It helps determine whether to reject the null hypothesis. This value in hypothesis testing synthesizes information from your data by incorporating estimated parameters and sample sizes. In the given task, the test statistic is denoted by:
  • \[ Z = \frac{\hat{\theta}}{\hat{\omega}_d} \]
The test statistic calculation involves dividing the estimate of the parameter (\( \hat{\theta} \)) by the standard error (\( \hat{\omega}_d \)). The resultant value can then be compared against a critical value to evaluate our hypotheses. In this exercise, the computed test statistic is approximately -1.051, which indicates how significant the estimated difference is when viewed through the lens of the assumed statistical distribution (usually assumed to be normal in large sample sizes). The sign and magnitude describe how the sample estimate deviates from what is expected under the null hypothesis.
Critical Value
Critical values are threshold values that dictate whether to reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis. They derive from the statistical distribution that fits the data, typically the standard normal distribution in large sample size cases. In this exercise, given a significance level of \( \alpha = 0.01 \) and a one-tailed test, the critical value is found to be -2.33.
  • A critical value helps frame the decision-making criterion to determine hypothesis validity.
  • For a one-tailed test, it checks the extreme possibility of either end of the distribution, depending on the direction of the alternative hypothesis.
Comparing the test statistic (-1.051) to this critical value enables statisticians to decide if there is enough evidence against the null hypothesis. If the test statistic falls in a more extreme region than the critical value, the null hypothesis gets refuted. However, since \( -1.051 > -2.33 \), we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
Hypotheses
In hypothesis testing, formulating the right hypotheses is vital. In the present case, the null hypothesis (\( H_0 \)) and the alternative hypothesis (\( H_a \)) take a unique form:
  • \( H_0: \theta = 0 \)
  • \( H_a: \theta < 0 \)
Where \( \theta \) represents \( 2\mu_1 - \mu_2 \), with \( \mu_1 \) as the average MAO level for schizophrenics and \( \mu_2 \) for normal subjects. The null hypothesis states there is no difference in terms of double the average MAO activity between groups, while the alternative hypothesis seeks evidence that normal subjects have more than twice the MAO activity of schizophrenics. The set hypotheses elegantly capture the research question and help guide the testing procedure to find meaningful conclusions.
Standard Error
Standard error provides insight into the variability of the sample mean estimates. It helps convey how much the sample statistic represents the population parameter. In this context, the standard error (\( \hat{\omega}_d \)) is indispensable in determining the test statistic. Here, calculation of the standard error involves both sample sizes and their respective standard deviations:
  • Sample standard deviation for schizophrenic subjects (\( 2.30 \))
  • Sample standard deviation for normal subjects (\( 4.03 \))
Combining this information involves estimating the variance: \[ S^2_d = \frac{4(2.30)^2}{43} + \frac{4.03^2}{45} \]Resulting in a standard error of approximately 0.923. Having a low standard error indicates a closer estimate of the population parameter. A critical element of constructing confidence intervals or testing hypotheses, the standard error mitigates the influence of random sampling errors.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Let \(\mu_{1}\) denote true average tread life for a premium brand of P205/65R15 radial tire and let \(\mu_{2}\) denote the true average tread life for an economy brand of the same size. Test \(H_{0}\) : \(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}=5000\) versus \(H_{\Delta}: \mu_{1}-\mu_{2}>5000\) at level \(.01\) using the following data: \(m-45, \bar{x}-42,500, s_{i}=2200\), \(n=45, \bar{y}=36,800\), and \(s_{2}=1500\).

Quantitative noninvasive techniques are needed for routinely assessing symptoms of peripheral neuropathies, such as carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). The article "A Gap Detection Tactility Test for Sensory Deficits Associated with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome" (Erganamics, 1995: 2588-2601) reported on a test that involved sensing a tiny gap in an otherwise smoosh surface by probing with a finger; this functionally resembles many work-related tactile activities, such as detecting scratches or surface defects. When finger probing was not allowed, the sample average gap detection threshold for \(m-8\) normal subjects was \(1.71 \mathrm{~mm}\), and the sample standard deviation was \(.53\); for \(n=10\) CTS subjects, the sample mean and sample standard deviation were \(2.53\) and \(.87\), respectively. Does this data suggest that the true average gap detection threshold for CIS subjects exceeds that for normal subjects? State and test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of .01

Tennis elbow is thought to be aggravated by the impoct experienced when hitting the ball. The article "Forces on the Hand in the Tennis One-1kanded Backhand" (Int'. J. of Sport Biomechanics, 1991: 282-292) reported the force (N) on the hand just after impact on a one-handed backhand drive for six advanced players and for eight intermediate players. \begin{tabular}{lccc} Type of Player & Sample Size & Sample Mlean & Sample SD \\ \hline 1. Advanced 2. Intermediate & 6 & \(40.3\) & \(11.3\) \\ & 8 & \(21.4\) & \(8.3\) \\ \hline \end{tabular} In their analysis of the data, the authors assumed that both force distributions were normal. Calculate a \(95 \%\) Cl for the difference between true average force for advanced players \(\left(\mu_{i}\right)\) and true average force for intermediate players \(\left(\mu_{i}\right)\). Does your interval provide compelling evidence for concluding that the two \(\mu s\) are different? Would you have reached the same conclusion by calculating a CI for \(\mu_{2}-\mu_{1}\) (i.e., by reversing the 1 and 2 labels on the two types of players)? Explain.

The article "Evaluation of a Ventilation Strategy to Prevent Barotrauma in Patients at Hligh Risk for Acute Rexpiratory Distress Syndrome" (New Engl. J. of Med., 1998: 355-358) reported on an experiment in which 120 patients with similar clinical features were randomly divided into a control group and a treatment group, each consisting of 60 patients. The sample mean ICU stay (days) and sample standard deviation for the treatment group were \(19.9\) and 39.1. respectively, whereas these values for the control group were \(13.7\) and \(15.8\). a. Calculate a point estimate for the difference between true average ICU stay for the treatment and control groups. Does this estimate suggest that there is a significant difference between true average stays under the two conditions? b. Answer the question posed in part (a) by carrying out a formal test of hypotheses. Is the result different from what you conjectured in part (a)? c. Does it appear that ICU stay for patients given the ventilation treatment is nocmally distributed? Explain your reasoning. d. Estimate true average length of stay for patients given the ventilation treatment in a way that conveys information about precision and reliability.

Cushing's disease is characterized by muscular weakness due to adrenal or pituitary dysfunction. To provide effective treatment, it is important to detect childhood Cushing's disease as early as possible. Age at onset of syraptorns and age at diag. nosis for 15 children suftering froen the disease were given in the article "Treatment of Cushing"s Disease in Childhood and Adolescence by Transphenoidal Microadenomectomy" (New Engl. J. of Med., 1984- 889). Here are the values of the differences between age at onset of symptoms and age at diagnosis: \(\begin{array}{rrrrrrrr}-24 & -12 & -55 & -15 & -30 & 60 & 14 & 21 \\ -48 & -12 & -25 & -53 & -61 & -69 & -80 & \end{array}\) a. Does the accompanying normal probability plot cast strong doubt on the approximate normality of the population distribution of differences? b. Calculate a lower \(95 \%\) confidence bound for the popula. tion mean difference, and interpret the resulting bound. c. Suppose the (age at diagnosis) - (age at onset) differences had been calculated. What would be a \(95 \%\) upper confidence bound for the corresponding population mean difference?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.