/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 21 Quantitative noninvasive techniq... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Quantitative noninvasive techniques are needed for routinely assessing symptoms of peripheral neuropathies, such as carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). The article "A Gap Detection Tactility Test for Sensory Deficits Associated with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome" (Erganamics, 1995: 2588-2601) reported on a test that involved sensing a tiny gap in an otherwise smoosh surface by probing with a finger; this functionally resembles many work-related tactile activities, such as detecting scratches or surface defects. When finger probing was not allowed, the sample average gap detection threshold for \(m-8\) normal subjects was \(1.71 \mathrm{~mm}\), and the sample standard deviation was \(.53\); for \(n=10\) CTS subjects, the sample mean and sample standard deviation were \(2.53\) and \(.87\), respectively. Does this data suggest that the true average gap detection threshold for CIS subjects exceeds that for normal subjects? State and test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of .01

Short Answer

Expert verified
Yes, the data suggests that the average gap detection threshold for CTS subjects exceeds that for normal subjects at 0.01 significance level.

Step by step solution

01

State the Hypotheses

We start by defining our null and alternative hypotheses. The null hypothesis, \( H_0 \), is that the true average gap detection threshold for CTS subjects is less than or equal to that for normal subjects: \( \mu_{CTS} \leq \mu_{normal} \). The alternative hypothesis, \( H_a \), is that the true average gap detection threshold for CTS subjects exceeds that for normal subjects: \( \mu_{CTS} > \mu_{normal} \).
02

Set the Significance Level

The problem states that we use a significance level of \( \alpha = 0.01 \). This is the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true, and it is a measure of the risk we are willing to take to make a Type I error.
03

Calculate the Test Statistic

We will use a two-sample t-test to compare the means. The test statistic \( t \) can be calculated using the formula: \[ t = \frac{(\bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2) - 0}{\sqrt{\frac{s_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{s_2^2}{n_2}}} \]where \( \bar{x}_1 = 2.53 \), \( s_1 = 0.87 \), \( n_1 = 10 \) for the CTS group, and \( \bar{x}_2 = 1.71 \), \( s_2 = 0.53 \), \( n_2 = m-8 \) (we assume \( m = 8 \) here for normal subjects). Substitute the values into the formula.
04

Compute Pooled Standard Error

First, compute the pooled standard error:\[ SE = \sqrt{\frac{0.87^2}{10} + \frac{0.53^2}{8}} \]Calculate this to obtain the value used in the t-statistic calculation.
05

Calculate the Test Statistic Again

Insert the pooled standard error into the test statistic formula:\[ t = \frac{2.53 - 1.71}{SE} \]Calculate the value of \( t \).
06

Compare the Test Statistic to the Critical Value

Determine the degrees of freedom using the formula for unequal variances:\[ u \approx \frac{\left(\frac{s_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{s_2^2}{n_2}\right)^2}{\frac{\left( \frac{s_1^2}{n_1} \right)^2}{n_1-1} + \frac{\left( \frac{s_2^2}{n_2} \right)^2}{n_2-1}} \]Using the calculated \( u \), find the critical t-value for a one-tailed test with \( \alpha = 0.01 \). Compare this against the calculated test statistic from Step 5.
07

Decision and Conclusion

If the calculated t-value is greater than the critical t-value, reject the null hypothesis. Otherwise, fail to reject the null hypothesis. Draw a conclusion about whether there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the average gap detection threshold for CTS subjects exceeds that for normal subjects.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Two-sample t-test
The two-sample t-test is a statistical method used to determine if there is a significant difference between the means of two groups. This test is particularly useful when you want to compare the averages of two independent samples, such as the gap detection thresholds of CTS subjects versus normal subjects.

To perform a two-sample t-test, you'll need to collect data from both groups and calculate the sample mean and sample standard deviation for each. The formula for the test statistic (t) is:
  • \[t = \frac{(\bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2) - 0}{\sqrt{\frac{s_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{s_2^2}{n_2}}}\]
Here,
  • \( \bar{x}_1 \) and \( \bar{x}_2 \) are the sample means,
  • \( s_1 \) and \( s_2 \) are the standard deviations,
  • \( n_1 \) and \( n_2 \) are the sample sizes of the two groups.
This test provides a way to infer if the difference between the means is not due to random chance, thus helping you to draw conclusions about your hypothesis.
Significance Level
The significance level, often denoted by \( \alpha \), is a critical part of hypothesis testing. It represents the probability of making a Type I error, which occurs when you reject the null hypothesis even though it is true. Common significance levels are 0.05, 0.01, or 0.10, depending on how rigorous you want your test to be.

In this exercise, a significance level of 0.01 was chosen. This means you are willing to accept a 1% risk of incorrectly rejecting the null hypothesis. A lower significance level like this indicates a stricter criterion for proving a statistical difference exists, making it less likely to conclude there is a difference when there actually isn't.

Choosing the right significance level is crucial. It involves balancing the need to minimize false positives while being sensitive enough to detect an actual effect when it exists. For this example, the researchers wanted a high confidence in their findings, leading to the choice of 0.01.
Pooled Standard Error
The pooled standard error is used when you assume that two samples come from populations having the same variance but different means. It combines the variability of the two samples into a single measure and helps calculate the t-statistic.

For the exercise at hand, calculate the pooled standard error as follows:
  • \[SE = \sqrt{\frac{0.87^2}{10} + \frac{0.53^2}{8}}\]
This value reflects the average amount by which the sample mean differs from the true population mean. By using the pooled standard error, the calculation accounts for the sample sizes and variances of both groups, providing a robust basis for the t-statistic.

In the context of the problem, the pooled standard error is critical in determining whether the observed difference in gap detection thresholds is statistically significant.
Degrees of Freedom Calculation
Degrees of freedom (df) in the context of a two-sample t-test indicate the number of values in the final calculation of a statistic that are free to vary. It's a complex topic but crucial for accurately determining the critical value of the t-distribution.

When calculating degrees of freedom for a two-sample t-test with unequal variances, you can use the following formula:
  • \[u \approx \frac{\left(\frac{s_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{s_2^2}{n_2}\right)^2}{\frac{\left( \frac{s_1^2}{n_1} \right)^2}{n_1-1} + \frac{\left( \frac{s_2^2}{n_2} \right)^2}{n_2-1}}\]
This is known as the Welch-Satterthwaite equation. It approximates the degrees of freedom and is particularly useful when the variances of the groups are not equal, as is often the case in real-world data.

Accurate degrees of freedom ensure that the critical t-value is correct, which is fundamental in making your hypothesis testing decision robust and reliable.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Cushing's disease is characterized by muscular weakness due to adrenal or pituitary dysfunction. To provide effective treatment, it is important to detect childhood Cushing's disease as early as possible. Age at onset of syraptorns and age at diag. nosis for 15 children suftering froen the disease were given in the article "Treatment of Cushing"s Disease in Childhood and Adolescence by Transphenoidal Microadenomectomy" (New Engl. J. of Med., 1984- 889). Here are the values of the differences between age at onset of symptoms and age at diagnosis: \(\begin{array}{rrrrrrrr}-24 & -12 & -55 & -15 & -30 & 60 & 14 & 21 \\ -48 & -12 & -25 & -53 & -61 & -69 & -80 & \end{array}\) a. Does the accompanying normal probability plot cast strong doubt on the approximate normality of the population distribution of differences? b. Calculate a lower \(95 \%\) confidence bound for the popula. tion mean difference, and interpret the resulting bound. c. Suppose the (age at diagnosis) - (age at onset) differences had been calculated. What would be a \(95 \%\) upper confidence bound for the corresponding population mean difference?

In a study of copper deficiency in catlie, the copper values ( \(\mu \mathrm{g} \mathrm{Cu} / 100 \mathrm{~mL}\) blood) were determined both for cattle grazing in an area known to have well-defined molybdenum ancenalies (metal values in excess of the normal range of regional variation) and for cattle grazing in a nonanomalous area ("An Imestigation into Copper Deficiency in Cattie in the Southem Pennines, /. Agriculfural Soc Cambridge, 1972 : \(157-163)\), resulting in \(x_{1}-21.5(m-48)\) for the anomalour condition and \(x_{2}=19.45(n=45)\) for the nonanomalous con cition. Test for the equality versus inequality of population

An experiment was performed to compare the fracture toughness of high-purity \(18 \mathrm{Ni}\) maraging steel with commercial-purity steel of the same type (Corrosion Science, 1971: 723-736). For \(m=32\) specimens, the sample average loughness was \(\bar{x}=65.6\) for the high-purity steel, whereas for \(n=38\) specimens of commercial steel \(\bar{y}-59.8\). Because the high purity steel is more expensive, its use for a certain application can be justified only if its fracture toughness exceeds that of commercial-purity steel by more than 5. Suppose that both toughness distributions are normal. a. Assuming that \(\sigma_{1}=1.2\) and \(\sigma_{2}=1.1\), test the relevant hypotheses using \(\alpha=.001\). b. Compute \(\beta\) for the test conducted in part (a) when \(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}-6\)

It has been estimated that between 1945 and 1971 , as many as 2 million children were born to mothers treated with diethylstilbestrol (DES), a nonsteroidal estrogen recormended for pregnancy maintenance. The FDA banned this drug in 1971 becanse research indicated a link with the incidence of cervical cancer. The article "Effects of Prenatal Exposure to Diethylstilbestrol (DES) on Hemispheric Laterality and Spatial Ability in Human Males" (Hormemes and Behavior, 1992: 62-75) dixcussed a study in which 10 males exposed to DES and their unexposed brothers underwent various tests. This is the summary data on the results of a spatial ability test: \(\bar{x}=12.6\) (expowed), \(\bar{y}=13.7\), and standard error of mean difference \(=.5\). Test at level \(0.05\) to see whether exposure is associated with reduced spatial ability by obtaining the \(P_{\text {-value. }}\)

Let \(\mu_{1}\) denote true average tread life for a premium brand of P205/65R15 radial tire and let \(\mu_{2}\) denote the true average tread life for an economy brand of the same size. Test \(H_{0}\) : \(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}=5000\) versus \(H_{\Delta}: \mu_{1}-\mu_{2}>5000\) at level \(.01\) using the following data: \(m-45, \bar{x}-42,500, s_{i}=2200\), \(n=45, \bar{y}=36,800\), and \(s_{2}=1500\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.