/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 75 The sample average unrestrained ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

The sample average unrestrained compressive strength for 45 specimens of a particular type of brick was computed to be \(3107 \mathrm{psi}\), and the sample standard deviation was 188 . The distribution of unrestrained compressive strength may be somewhat skewed. Does the data strongly indicate that the true average unrestrained compressive strength is less than the design value of 3200 ? Test using \(\alpha=.001\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
The data strongly indicates that the true average strength is less than 3200 psi.

Step by step solution

01

Set Up Hypotheses

The null hypothesis (H鈧) is that the true average unrestrained compressive strength of the bricks is equal to the design value, 3200 psi: \[ H_0: \mu = 3200 \text{ psi} \]The alternative hypothesis (H鈧) is that the true average strength is less than the design value: \[ H_1: \mu < 3200 \text{ psi} \]
02

Determine the Test Statistic

Given that the sample size is 45, which is greater than 30, we can use a z-test to find the test statistic. The formula for the z-test statistic is: \[ z = \frac{\bar{x} - \mu_0}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}} \]Where \( \bar{x} = 3107 \text{ psi} \) is the sample mean, \( \mu_0 = 3200 \text{ psi} \) is the hypothesized mean, \( s = 188 \text{ psi} \) is the sample standard deviation, and \( n = 45 \) is the number of specimens.
03

Compute the Test Statistic

Substitute the provided values into the formula:\[ z = \frac{3107 - 3200}{\frac{188}{\sqrt{45}}} \]Calculate this step-by-step:1. Find the difference: \( 3107 - 3200 = -93 \)2. Calculate the standard error: \( \frac{188}{\sqrt{45}} \approx 28.067 \)3. Compute the z-value: \( z = \frac{-93}{28.067} \approx -3.313 \)
04

Determine the Critical Value

Using a significance level \( \alpha = 0.001 \) and a left-tailed test, find the critical z-value from a standard normal distribution table. The critical z-value is approximately -3.090.
05

Make a Decision

Compare the calculated z-value to the critical z-value: - Calculated z-value: -3.313 - Critical z-value: -3.090 Since -3.313 is less than -3.090, we reject the null hypothesis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Z-Test
A Z-test is a type of statistical test that helps to determine whether there is a significant difference between the sample mean and the hypothesized population mean. It is ideal for use when the sample size is large, typically over 30, which allows the Central Limit Theorem to apply. This means the sampling distribution of the sample mean will be approximately normal.

In a Z-test, one computes a Z-statistic, which follows a standard normal distribution. The formula for the Z-statistic is given by:
  • \( z = \frac{\bar{x} - \mu_0}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}} \)
Where
  • \(\bar{x}\) is the sample mean,
  • \(\mu_0\) is the hypothesized population mean,
  • \(s\) is the sample standard deviation,
  • and \(n\) is the sample size.

This test evaluates the hypothesis by comparing the test statistic to a critical value derived from the standard normal distribution to decide if a difference exists.
Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis, often denoted as \(H_0\), is the initial claim made about a population parameter, which the test seeks to challenge. It usually represents a statement of no effect or no difference.

In hypothesis testing, the null hypothesis is a critical starting point. Its simplicity and default nature mean that more profound evidence is needed to reject it. In the example exercise, the null hypothesis suggests that the true average unrestrained compressive strength of the bricks is equal to 3200 psi.

The null hypothesis is conceptually important because, when performing Z-tests or any statistical test, we are assessing the likelihood that the observed data could have occurred if the null hypothesis were true. If this likelihood, expressed with a test statistic, is sufficiently low, we consider rejecting the null hypothesis.
Alternative Hypothesis
Contrary to the null hypothesis, the alternative hypothesis, denoted as \(H_1\) or \(H_a\), is what you would consider true if the null hypothesis is rejected. This hypothesis suggests the presence of an effect or difference.

In our case, the alternative hypothesis states that the true average compressive strength is less than the specified design value of 3200 psi. Symbolically, it is represented as \(H_1: \mu < 3200 \text{ psi}\).

The direction of the alternative hypothesis ("less than" in this case) defines whether a one-tailed or two-tailed test will be employed. Here, a left-tailed test is used because we are only interested in detecting a decrease in the average strength. This affects how we determine our critical value and evaluate the test statistic.
Critical Value
The critical value is a threshold in hypothesis testing, beyond which the null hypothesis is rejected. It relates directly to the significance level, denoted as \(\alpha\), chosen by the researcher to indicate the risk level they are willing to accept for rejecting a true null hypothesis.

In a Z-test, the critical value corresponds to a point on the standard normal distribution. For this example, with a significance level set at \(\alpha = 0.001\), the critical value for a left-tailed test can be found using a Z-table.

Here, the critical Z-value is approximately -3.090, implying that any Z-statistic less than this value will lead to rejection of the null hypothesis. By comparing the computed Z-statistic to this critical value, a decision is made based on whether the observed data is significantly different from what the null hypothesis predicts.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The times of first sprinkler activation for a series of tests with fire prevention sprinkler systems using an aqueous film-forming foam were (in sec) \(\begin{array}{lllllllllllll}27 & 41 & 22 & 27 & 23 & 35 & 30 & 33 & 24 & 27 & 28 & 22 & 24\end{array}\) (see "Use of AFFF in Sprinkler Systems," Fire Technology, 1976: 5). The system has been designed so that true average activation time is at most \(25 \mathrm{sec}\) under such conditions. Does the data strongly contradict the validity of this design specification? Test the relevant hypotheses at significance level \(.05\) using the \(P\)-value approach.

State DMV records indicate that of all vehicles undergoing emissions testing during the previous year, \(70 \%\) passed on the first try. A random sample of 200 cars tested in a particular county during the current year yields 124 that passed on the initial test. Does this suggest that the true proportion for this county during the current year differs from the previous statewide proportion? Test the relevant hypotheses using \(\alpha=.05\).

Scientists think that robots will play a crucial role in factories in the next several decades. Suppose that in an experiment to determine whether the use of robots to weave computer cables is feasible, a robot was used to assemble 500 cables. The cables were examined and there were 15 defectives. If human assemblers have a defect rate of .035 (3.5\%), does this data support the hypothesis that the proportion of defectives is lower for robots than humans? Use a .01 significance level.

A random sample of soil specimens was obtained, and the amount of organic matter \((\%)\) in the soil was determined for each specimen, resulting in the accompanying data (from "Engineering Properties of Soil," Soil Science, 1998: 93-102). $$ \begin{array}{llllllll} 1.10 & 5.09 & 0.97 & 1.59 & 4.60 & 0.32 & 0.55 & 1.45 \\ 0.14 & 4.47 & 1.20 & 3.50 & 5.02 & 4.67 & 5.22 & 2.69 \\ 3.98 & 3.17 & 3.03 & 2.21 & 0.69 & 4.47 & 3.31 & 1.17 \\ 0.76 & 1.17 & 1.57 & 2.62 & 1.66 & 2.05 & & \end{array} $$ The values of the sample mean, sample standard deviation, and (estimated) standard error of the mean are \(2.481,1.616\), and \(.295\), respectively. Does this data suggest that the true average percentage of organic matter in such soil is something other than \(3 \%\) ? Carry out a test of the appropriate hypotheses at significance level \(.10\) by first determining the \(P\)-value. Would your conclusion be different if \(\alpha=.05 \mathrm{had}\) been used? [Note: A normal probability plot of the data shows an acceptable pattern in light of the reasonably large sample size.]

A hot-tub manufacturer advertises that with its heating equipment, a temperature of \(100^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\) can be achieved in at most 15 min. A random sample of 32 tubs is selected, and the time necessary to achieve a \(100^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\) temperature is determined for each tub. The sample average time and sample standard deviation are \(17.5\) min and \(2.2 \mathrm{~min}\), respectively. Does this data cast doubt on the company's claim? Compute the \(P\)-value and use it to reach a conclusion at level .05 (assume that the heating-time distribution is approximately normal).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.