/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 46 Pairs of \(P\)-values and signif... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Pairs of \(P\)-values and significance levels, \(\alpha\), are given. For each pair, state whether the observed \(P\)-value would lead to rejection of \(H_{0}\) at the given significance level. a. \(P\)-value \(=.084, \alpha=.05\) b. \(P\)-value \(=.003, \alpha=.001\) c. \(P\)-value \(=.498, \alpha=.05\) d. \(P\)-value \(-.084, \alpha-.10\) e. \(P\)-value \(=.039, \alpha=.01\) f. \(P\)-value \(=.218, \alpha=.10\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
In all scenarios, we do not reject \( H_0 \) because all p-values are greater than their respective \( \alpha \) levels.

Step by step solution

01

Understand Hypothesis Testing

In hypothesis testing, we compare the p-value to the significance level \( \alpha \). If the p-value is less than \( \alpha \), we reject the null hypothesis \( H_0 \). If not, we fail to reject \( H_0 \).
02

Analyze Scenario A

For scenario a, the p-value is \( 0.084 \) and the significance level \( \alpha \) is \( 0.05 \). Since \( 0.084 > 0.05 \), we do not reject \( H_0 \).
03

Analyze Scenario B

For scenario b, the p-value is \( 0.003 \) and the significance level \( \alpha \) is \( 0.001 \). Since \( 0.003 > 0.001 \), we do not reject \( H_0 \).
04

Analyze Scenario C

For scenario c, the p-value is \( 0.498 \) and the significance level \( \alpha \) is \( 0.05 \). Since \( 0.498 > 0.05 \), we do not reject \( H_0 \).
05

Handle a Negative P-value (Scenario D)

In scenario d, the p-value is given as \( -0.084 \) which is unusual since p-values are always between 0 and 1. Assuming it should be positive, then \( 0.084 > 0.10 \) means we do not reject \( H_0 \). If the p-value is mistakenly presented as negative, it should be corrected as positive before comparison.
06

Analyze Scenario E

For scenario e, the p-value is \( 0.039 \) and the significance level \( \alpha \) is \( 0.01 \). Since \( 0.039 > 0.01 \), we do not reject \( H_0 \).
07

Analyze Scenario F

For scenario f, the p-value is \( 0.218 \) and the significance level \( \alpha \) is \( 0.10 \). Since \( 0.218 > 0.10 \), we do not reject \( H_0 \).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding P-value
The P-value is a fundamental aspect of hypothesis testing that helps us make decisions about the null hypothesis. It represents the probability of obtaining test results at least as extreme as the ones observed during the test, assuming the null hypothesis is true. In simpler terms, the P-value answers the question: "What's the likelihood that my observed results are simply due to chance?" If the P-value is very low, it indicates that the observed outcome is rare under the assumption that the null hypothesis is true. P-values are calculated for a wide range of statistical tests and are key indicators of significance.
  • A low P-value (typically ≤ 0.05) suggests that the observed results are unlikely under the null hypothesis, leading to its rejection.
  • A high P-value (> 0.05) implies that observations are consistent with the null hypothesis being true.
The choice of 0.05 as a commonly used threshold isn't magical; it's a convention. Interpret P-values cautiously and consider the context of your study.
Significance Level (Alpha)
The significance level, denoted as α (alpha), is a pre-determined threshold set by the researcher before conducting a hypothesis test. It represents the level of risk we are willing to take of incorrectly rejecting the true null hypothesis (Type I error). In standard practice, common significance levels are 0.05, 0.01, and 0.10. Setting α involves a balancing act—an α that is too high increases the risk of Type I errors, while an α that is too low can lead to missing true effects (Type II errors).
  • If the calculated P-value is less than alpha, we reject the null hypothesis, suggesting evidence in favor of the alternative hypothesis.
  • If the P-value is greater than alpha, we do not reject the null hypothesis, implying insufficient evidence to favor the alternative.
Selecting the right α depends on the context and consequences of potential errors in your study.
Null Hypothesis (H0)
The null hypothesis denoted \( H_0 \) serves as a starting point for statistical testing. It represents a statement of no effect or no difference and is assumed to be true until evidence suggests otherwise. In simplest terms, it's a baseline or a default position that any observed effect is due to chance.For instance, if you are testing a new drug, \( H_0 \) might state that the drug has no effect on patients compared to not using the drug. Researchers test the null hypothesis to see whether they can provide enough evidence in favor of an alternative hypothesis.
  • Rejecting \( H_0 \) means we have found sufficient evidence to suggest that there is an effect or a difference.
  • Failing to reject \( H_0 \) means that our data do not provide strong enough evidence against it.
Remember, not rejecting the null doesn't prove it true; it just indicates a lack of evidence against it.
Statistical Decision Making
Statistical decision making in the context of hypothesis testing involves determining whether to reject or not reject the null hypothesis based on the comparison between the P-value and the significance level (α). It's about making informed judgments rooted in statistical evidence.This process involves:
  • Calculating or obtaining a P-value from data analysis.
  • Comparing this P-value to a pre-set significance level (α).
  • Deciding to reject \( H_0 \) if \( ext{P-value} \leq ext{α} \), suggesting the result is statistically significant.
  • If \( ext{P-value} > ext{α} \), we do not reject \( H_0 \), indicating insufficient evidence against \( H_0 \).
Moreover, sound decision-making in statistics also considers factors beyond just numerical values, such as theoretical considerations and the potential impact of errors.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

For the following pairs of assertions, indicate which do not comply with our rules for setting up hypotheses and why (the subscripts 1 and 2 differentiate between quantities for two different populations or samples): a. \(H_{0}: \mu=100, H_{\mathrm{a}}: \mu>100\) b. \(H_{0}: \sigma=20, H_{\mathrm{a}}: \sigma \leq 20\) c. \(H_{0}: p \neq .25, H_{\mathrm{a}}: p=.25\) d. \(H_{0}: \mu_{1}-\mu_{2}=25, H_{\mathrm{a}}: \mu_{1}-\mu_{2}>100\) e. \(H_{0}: S_{1}^{2}=S_{2}^{2}, H_{\mathrm{a}}: S_{1}^{2} \neq S_{2}^{2}\) f. \(H_{0}: \mu=120, H_{\mathrm{a}}: \mu=150\) g. \(H_{0}: \sigma_{1} / \sigma_{2}=1, H_{\mathrm{a}}: \sigma_{1} / \sigma_{2} \neq 1\) h. \(H_{0}: p_{1}-p_{2}=-.1, H_{\mathrm{a}}: p_{1}-p_{2}<-.1\)

A sample of 12 radon detectors of a certain type was selected, and each was exposed to \(100 \mathrm{pCi} / \mathrm{L}\) of radon. The resulting readings were as follows: $$ \begin{array}{rrrrrr} 105.6 & 90.9 & 91.2 & 96.9 & 96.5 & 91.3 \\ 100.1 & 105.0 & 99.6 & 107.7 & 103.3 & 92.4 \end{array} $$ a. Does this data suggest that the population mean reading under these conditions differs from 100 ? State and test the appropriate hypotheses using \(\alpha=.05\). b. Suppose that prior to the experiment, a value of \(\sigma=7.5\) had been assumed. How many determinations would then have been appropriate to obtain \(\beta=.10\) for the alternative \(\mu=95\) ?

Before agreeing to purchase a large order of polyethylene sheaths for a particular type of high-pressure oil-filled submarine power cable, a company wants to see conclusive evidence that the true standard deviation of sheath thickness is less than \(.05 \mathrm{~mm}\). What hypotheses should be tested, and why? In this context, what are the type I and type II errors?

Two different companies have applied to provide cable television service in a certain region. Let \(p\) denote the proportion of all potential subscribers who favor the first company over the second. Consider testing \(H_{0}: p=.5\) versus \(H_{\mathrm{a}}: p \neq .5\) based on a random sample of 25 individuals. Let \(X\) denote the number in the sample who favor the first company and \(x\) represent the observed value of \(X\). a. Which of the following rejection regions is most appropriate and why? $$ \begin{aligned} &R_{1}=\\{x: x \leq 7 \text { or } x \geq 18\\}, R_{2}=\\{x: x \leq 8\\}, \\ &R_{3}=\\{x: x \geq 17\\} \end{aligned} $$ b. In the context of this problem situation, describe what type I and type II errors are. c. What is the probability distribution of the test statistic \(X\) when \(H_{0}\) is true? Use it to compute the probability of a type I error. d. Compute the probability of a type II error for the selected region when \(p=.3\), again when \(p=.4\), and also for both \(p=.6\) and \(p=.7\). e. Using the selected region, what would you conclude if 6 of the 25 queried favored company 1 ?

The times of first sprinkler activation for a series of tests with fire prevention sprinkler systems using an aqueous film-forming foam were (in sec) \(\begin{array}{lllllllllllll}27 & 41 & 22 & 27 & 23 & 35 & 30 & 33 & 24 & 27 & 28 & 22 & 24\end{array}\) (see "Use of AFFF in Sprinkler Systems," Fire Technology, 1976: 5). The system has been designed so that true average activation time is at most \(25 \mathrm{sec}\) under such conditions. Does the data strongly contradict the validity of this design specification? Test the relevant hypotheses at significance level \(.05\) using the \(P\)-value approach.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.