/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 6 The California State University ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The California State University (CSU) system consists of 23 campuses, from San Diego State in the south to Humboldt State near the Oregon border. A CSU administrator wishes to make an inference about the average distance between the hometowns of students and their campuses. Describe and discuss several different sampling methods that might be employed. Would this be an enumerative or an analytic study? Explain your reasoning.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Use stratified sampling and classify as an analytic study.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Problem

We need to determine suitable sampling methods for calculating the average distance between the hometowns of students and their campuses across the 23 CSU campuses. Additionally, we need to decide if this exercise involves an enumerative or analytic study.
02

Considering Simple Random Sampling

In simple random sampling, every student within the CSU system has an equal chance of being selected. This requires compiling a comprehensive list of all students from all campuses, then randomly selecting participants from this list. The method is straightforward but can be logistically challenging.
03

Analyzing Stratified Sampling

Stratified sampling involves dividing the entire student population into non-overlapping groups, or strata, based on criteria such as campus or geographical location. A random sample is then taken from each stratum, ensuring that all major segments of the CSU are represented in the final sample.
04

Exploring Cluster Sampling

In cluster sampling, instead of selecting individual students, entire clusters or groups, such as campuses or classrooms, are randomly chosen. All students from the selected clusters might then be included in the sample. This method can be more cost-effective but might increase sampling error if the clusters are not homogeneous.
05

Identifying Systematic Sampling

Systematic sampling requires selecting every k-th student from an ordered list, such as alphabetical or by student ID number. This is simpler than simple random sampling and can still give us a reasonable sample if the list order does not unintentionally introduce bias.
06

Determining Enumerative vs. Analytic Study

This exercise is an analytic study because it seeks to make general inferences or predictions about the average distance from students' hometowns to their campuses using sample data. The goal is to draw conclusions that extend beyond the sample to the entire population.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Simple Random Sampling
Simple Random Sampling is a method where every member of the population has an equal chance of being selected. Imagine you want to pick students from all the CSU campuses. You need a full list of all students and then choose randomly. This method gives each student an equal opportunity to be part of the sample.
  • Every student in the CSU system can be selected.
  • Requires a complete list, which can be lengthy and detailed.
  • Offers a neutral and unbiased selection process.
However, while straightforward, managing such a large sample size is challenging. It demands time and resources to ensure that each student is accounted for.
Stratified Sampling
Stratified Sampling involves dividing the overall population into subgroups or strata. These groups should be non-overlapping. For the CSU system, strata could be based on campus location or student year.
  • Groups represent different segments, like campuses or geographical areas.
  • Each segment provides a random sample to form the overall sample.
  • Ensures all significant subgroups are included.
By focusing on smaller sections, this method helps capture representation from various segments, especially if some groups are more populous than others. This can improve the accuracy of the results.
Cluster Sampling
Cluster Sampling selects whole groups instead of individual members. If applying this to CSU campuses, you could randomly choose a few campuses and survey all students there.
  • Involves selecting entire clusters, like campuses or schools, at once.
  • Reduces the penetration into individual records, simplifying logistics.
  • More cost-effective but could introduce bias if clusters are not similar.
This method opts for practicality, making large samples feasible. The tradeoff is ensuring that clusters genuinely reflect the broader population, to avoid skewing results.
Systematic Sampling
Systematic Sampling uses a fixed interval to select participants from an ordered list. For instance, after listing students alphabetically, you might choose every 50th student.
  • Begins with an organized list of the sample population.
  • By sticking to a consistent interval, it creates a pseudo-randomized sample.
  • Effective for ensuring spread across the list, assuming order doesn't introduce bias.
This method is efficient and easier to administer compared to purely random sampling. However, it's crucial to maintain an order-free bias in the initial list to ensure reliability in results.
Enumerative Study
An Enumerative Study aims for conclusions confined to the data set being analyzed, typically focusing on the current conditions or specifics. It would involve assessing the specific distances within the CSU system only. However, in this case, the goal stretches beyond mere enumeration.
  • Seeks to understand the data within a specific framework.
  • Does not typically extend beyond the data collection scope.
  • Not suitable here as we aim for broader inferences.
Although useful for capturing precise snapshots, enumerative studies limit inference-making to the observed period or set of conditions.
Analytic Study
Analytic Studies extend beyond current data, aiming to draw general conclusions or predict future trends. Here, CSU would analyze sample data to infer average distances for all students.
  • Enables making predictions and finding broader trends.
  • Looks beyond immediate data to impact larger sets or future events.
  • Vital in scenarios like the CSU case, requiring extrapolation.
In this study, predictions about travel distances for future student groups provide actionable insights, crucial for administrative planning or transportation policies.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Specimens of three different types of rope wire were selected, and the fatigue limit (MPa) was determined for each specimen, resulting in the accompanying data. \(\begin{array}{lllllllll}\text { Type 1 } & 350 & 350 & 350 & 358 & 370 & 370 & 370 & 371 \\ & 371 & 372 & 372 & 384 & 391 & 391 & 392 & \\ \text { Type 2 } & 350 & 354 & 359 & 363 & 365 & 368 & 369 & 371 \\ & 373 & 374 & 376 & 380 & 383 & 388 & 392 & \\ \text { Type 3 } & 350 & 361 & 362 & 364 & 364 & 365 & 366 & 371 \\ & 377 & 377 & 377 & 379 & 380 & 380 & 392 & \end{array}\) a. Construct a comparative boxplot, and comment on similarities and differences. b. Construct a comparative dotplot (a dotplot for each sample with a common scale). Comment on similarities and differences. c. Does the comparative boxplot of part (a) give an informative assessment of similarities and differences? Explain your reasoning.

A sample of \(n=10\) automobiles was selected, and each was subjected to a \(5-m p h\) crash test. Denoting a car with no visible damage by \(\mathbf{S}\) (for success) and a car with such damage by \(\mathrm{F}\), results were as follows: S S FSS S FF S S a. What is the value of the sample proportion of successes \(x / n\) ? b. Replace each \(S\) with a 1 and each \(F\) with a 0 . Then calculate \(\bar{x}\) for this numerically coded sample. How does \(\bar{x}\) compare to \(x / n\) ? c. Suppose it is decided to include 15 more cars in the experiment. How many of these would have to be \(S\) 's to give \(x / n=.80\) for the entire sample of 25 cars?

A Consumer Reports article on peanut butter (Sept. 1990) reported the following scores for various brands: \(\begin{array}{lllllllllll}\text { Creamy } & 56 & 44 & 62 & 36 & 39 & 53 & 50 & 65 & 45 & 40 \\ & 56 & 68 & 41 & 30 & 40 & 50 & 56 & 30 & 22 & \\ \text { Crunchy } & 62 & 53 & 75 & 42 & 47 & 40 & 34 & 62 & 52 & \\ & 50 & 34 & 42 & 36 & 75 & 80 & 47 & 56 & 62 & \end{array}\) Construct a comparative stem-and-leaf display by listing stems in the middle of your page and then displaying the creamy leaves out to the right and the crunchy leaves out to the left. Describe similarities and differences for the two types.

The propagation of fatigue cracks in various aircraft parts has been the subject of extensive study in recent years. The accompanying data consists of propagation lives (flight hours \(/ 10^{4}\) ) to reach a given crack size in fastener holes intended for use in military aircraft ("Statistical Crack Propagation in Fastener Holes under Spectrum Loading," J. Aircraft, 1983: 1028-1032): \(\begin{array}{rrrrrrrr}.736 & .863 & .865 & .913 & .915 & .937 & .983 & 1.007 \\\ 1.011 & 1.064 & 1.109 & 1.132 & 1.140 & 1.153 & 1.253 & 1.394\end{array}\) a. Compute and compare the values of the sample mean and median. b. By how much could the largest sample observation be decreased without affecting the value of the median?

Many universities and colleges have instituted supplemental instruction (SI) programs, in which a student facilitator meets regularly with a small group of students enrolled in the course to promote discussion of course material and enhance subject mastery. Suppose that students in a large statistics course (what else?) are randomly divided into a control group that will not participate in SI and a treatment group that will participate. At the end of the term, each student's total score in the course is determined. a. Are the scores from the SI group a sample from an existing population? If so, what is it? If not, what is the relevant conceptual population? b. What do you think is the advantage of randomly dividing the students into the two groups rather than letting each student choose which group to join? c. Why didn't the investigators put all students in the treatment group? Note: The article "Supplemental Instruction: An Effective Component of Student Affairs Programming" (J. of College Student Devel., 1997: 577-586) discusses the analysis of data from several SI programs.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.