/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 32 Fire load \(\left(\mathrm{MJ} / ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Fire load \(\left(\mathrm{MJ} / \mathrm{m}^{2}\right)\) is the heat energy that could be released per square meter of floor area by combustion of contents and the structure itself. The article "Fire Loads in Office Buildings" (J. of Structural Engr., 1997: 365-368) gave the following cumulative percentages (read from a graph) for fire loads in a sample of 388 rooms: $$ \begin{array}{lccccc} \text { Value } & 0 & 150 & 300 & 450 & 600 \\ \text { Cumulative \% } & 0 & 19.3 & 37.6 & 62.7 & 77.5 \\ \text { Value } & 750 & 900 & 1050 & 1200 & 1350 \\ \text { Cumulative \% } & 87.2 & 93.8 & 95.7 & 98.6 & 99.1 \\ \text { Value } & 1500 & 1650 & 1800 & 1950 & \\ \text { Cumulative \% } & 99.5 & 99.6 & 99.8 & 100.0 & \end{array} $$ a. Construct a relative frequency histogram and comment on interesting features. b. What proportion of fire loads are less than 600 ? At least \(1200 ?\) c. What proportion of the loads are between 600 and 1200 ?

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. Construct a histogram using relative frequencies. b. Proportions: <600 is 0.775, ≥1200 is 0.014. c. Proportion 600 to 1200 is 0.211.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Relative Frequency

A relative frequency histogram visualizes the proportion of data within specified intervals or bins. First, calculate the relative frequency by subtracting the cumulative percentage of a lower value from the cumulative percentage of the upper value and dividing by 100.
02

Calculating Relative Frequencies for Histogram

Calculate the relative frequencies for successive value intervals: - 0 to 150: \( \frac{19.3 - 0}{100} = 0.193 \)- 150 to 300: \( \frac{37.6 - 19.3}{100} = 0.183 \)- 300 to 450: \( \frac{62.7 - 37.6}{100} = 0.251 \)- 450 to 600: \( \frac{77.5 - 62.7}{100} = 0.148 \)- 600 to 750: \( \frac{87.2 - 77.5}{100} = 0.097 \) and continue for all intervals.
03

Constructing the Histogram

Using the calculated relative frequencies, draw a histogram where each bar's height represents the relative frequency of the corresponding interval. Key features may include skewness, peaks, or unusual gaps.
04

Proportion Less Than 600

To find the proportion of fire loads less than 600, use the cumulative percentage directly from the data: 77.5%. Convert this to a proportion: \( 0.775 \).
05

Proportion At Least 1200

Determine the cumulative percentage of rooms with fire loads less than 1200 (98.6%); thus, those at least 1200 are \(1 - 0.986 = 0.014 \) or 1.4%.
06

Proportion Between 600 and 1200

Cumulative percentage less than 1200 is 98.6%, and cumulative percentage less than 600 is 77.5%. Therefore, the proportion is \( \frac{98.6 - 77.5}{100} = 0.211 \) or 21.1%.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Relative Frequency Histogram
Understanding the concept of a relative frequency histogram can be a great way to visualize how data is distributed across different intervals. Imagine you have a number of fire loads measured across various rooms, and you'd like to see how many of these rooms fall into specified ranges of fire load values.

A relative frequency histogram is essentially a bar graph where each bar represents a data interval. The heights of the bars are proportional to the relative frequency of the data within those intervals. This means each bar's height shows how much of the total data falls within its range.

To calculate these heights, you first need to determine the relative frequency for each interval. Start by subtracting the cumulative percentage of the lower boundary from the upper boundary for each interval, and then divide by 100 to convert the percentage to a decimal. For example, if an interval spans from 150 to 300 and the cumulative percentage changes from 19.3% to 37.6%, the relative frequency is \[\frac{37.6 - 19.3}{100} = 0.183\]This step-by-step approach ensures a clear visualization of data skewness, peaks, and any gaps in the histogram.
Cumulative Percentage
Cumulative percentages serve as a powerful tool in statistics to understand how data accumulates over a range of values. Imagine you're tracking fire loads, and you want to see how they accumulate as you move through increasing intervals.

Cumulative percentage is simply the running total of percentages as you move through data categories. It tells you the percentage of data that falls below a certain value. This is calculated by adding the percentage of each category to the sum of percentages of all previous categories. For example, if you're considering fire loads of less than 450 MJ/m², and the cumulative percentage is 62.7%, this means 62.7% of all observed rooms have fire loads less than 450 MJ/m².

This concept is particularly useful when you want to determine the proportion of data within certain thresholds, like the number of rooms with fire loads less than 600 MJ/m², or more than 1200 MJ/m².
Proportion Calculation
Calculating proportions involves determining what fraction of the total sample falls into certain categories or ranges. This is often achieved using cumulative percentages.

For instance, to find the proportion of rooms with fire loads less than a certain value, you can directly convert the cumulative percentage for that value into a decimal. So, if 77.5% of loads are less than 600 MJ/m², the proportion is simply 0.775. This means that out of all rooms considered, 77.5% have fire loads below 600 MJ/m².

Similarly, calculating the proportion for a category "at least" a certain value involves subtracting the cumulative percentage from 100% and then converting to a decimal. For fire loads of at least 1200 MJ/m², with 98.6% of data being less, you have: \[1 - 0.986 = 0.014\]This means that 1.4% of rooms have fire loads of 1200 MJ/m² or more.
  • Less than a value: Use the cumulative percentage directly.
  • At least a value: Subtract the cumulative percentage from one.
  • Between two values: Subtract one from the other and divide by 100.
Data Visualization
Data visualization is a crucial component in understanding and communicating statistical findings efficiently. Visuals like histograms, line charts, and scatter plots help transform complex data sets into simple and comprehensible formats.

In the context of analyzing fire load data, visualizations can help highlight patterns and discrepancies that might not be evident from raw data. For example, using a relative frequency histogram allows you to see at a glance which fire load intervals are most common in your data set.

These visuals enable quick assessments of data distribution, uncovering important features such as skewness, clusters, or anomalies in the data. Whether you're identifying potential risk zones in fire load studies or simply trying to grasp the general layout of data, data visualization turns numbers into a visual story that can be understood at a glance. This makes it invaluable for both analytics and presentation purposes.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

a. Give three different examples of concrete populations and three different examples of hypothetical populations. b. For one each of your concrete and your hypothetical populations, give an example of a probability question and an example of an inferential statistics question.

An experiment to study the lifetime (in hours) for a certain type of component involved putting ten components into operation and observing them for 100 hours. Eight of the components failed during that period, and those lifetimes were recorded. Denote the lifetimes of the two components still functioning after 100 hours by \(100+\). The resulting sample observations were \(\begin{array}{llllllllll}48 & 79 & 100+ & 35 & 92 & 86 & 57 & 100+ & 17 & 29\end{array}\) Which of the measures of center discussed in this section can be calculated, and what are the values of those measures? [Note: The data from this experiment is said to be "censored on the right."]

A sample of 26 offshore oil workers took part in a simulated escape exercise, resulting in the accompanying data on time (sec) to complete the escape ("Oxygen Consumption and Ventilation During Escape from an Offshore Platform," Ergonomics, 1997: 281-292): \(\begin{array}{lllllllll}389 & 356 & 359 & 363 & 375 & 424 & 325 & 394 & 402 \\\ 373 & 373 & 370 & 364 & 366 & 364 & 325 & 339 & 393 \\ 392 & 369 & 374 & 359 & 356 & 403 & 334 & 397 & \end{array}\) a. Construct a stem-and-leaf display of the data. How does it suggest that the sample mean and median will compare? b. Calculate the values of the sample mean and median. [Hint: \(\left.\sum x_{i}=9638 .\right]\) c. By how much could the largest time, currently 424 , be increased without affecting the value of the sample median? By how much could this value be decreased without affecting the value of the sample median? d. What are the values of \(\bar{x}\) and \(\tilde{x}\) when the observations are reexpressed in minutes?

The first four deviations from the mean in a sample of \(n=5\) reaction times were \(.3, .9,1.0\), and \(1.3\). What is the fifth deviation from the mean? Give a sample for which these are the five deviations from the mean.

Blood pressure values are often reported to the nearest \(5 \mathrm{mmHg}(100,105,110\), etc.). Suppose the actual blood pressure values for nine randomly selected individuals are \(\begin{array}{lllllll}118.6 & 127.4 & 138.4 & 130.0 & 113.7 & 122.0 & 108.3\end{array}\) \(131.5 \quad 133.2\) a. What is the median of the reported blood pressure values? b. Suppose the blood pressure of the second individual is \(127.6\) rather than \(127.4\) (a small change in a single value). How does this affect the median of the reported values? What does this say about the sensitivity of the median to rounding or grouping in the data?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.