/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 6 According to the article "Modeli... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

According to the article "Modeling and Predicting the Effects of Submerged Arc Weldment Process Parameters on Weldment Characteristics and Shape Profiles" ( \(J\). of Engr. Manuf., 2012: 1230-1240), the submerged arc welding (SAW) process is commonly used for joining thick plates and pipes. The heat affected zone (HAZ), a band created within the base metal during welding, was of particular interest to the investigators. Here are observations on depth (mm) of the HAZ both when the current setting was high and when it was lower. \(\begin{array}{llllll}\text { Non-high } & 1.04 & 1.15 & 1.23 & 1.69 & 1.92 \\\ & 1.98 & 2.36 & 2.49 & 2.72 & \\ & 1.37 & 1.43 & 1.57 & 1.71 & 1.94 \\ & 2.06 & 2.55 & 2.64 & 2.82 & \\ \text { High } & 1.55 & 2.02 & 2.02 & 2.05 & 2.35 \\ & 2.57 & 2.93 & 2.94 & 2.97 & \end{array}\) a. Construct a comparative boxplot and comment on interesting features. b. Is it reasonable to use the two-sample \(t\) test to test hypotheses about the difference between true average HAZ depths for the two conditions? c. Does it appear that true average HAZ depth is larger for the higher current condition than for the lower condition? Carry out a test of appropriate hypotheses using a significance level of .01.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Use a t-test to compare the means: if p < 0.01, average depth is larger for high current.

Step by step solution

01

Organize the Data

First, we organize the given data into two groups: Non-high current setting and High current setting. For the Non-high setting, list the depths: 1.04, 1.15, 1.23, 1.69, 1.92, 1.98, 2.36, 2.49, 2.72, 1.37, 1.43, 1.57, 1.71, 1.94, 2.06, 2.55, 2.64, 2.82. For the High setting, list the depths: 1.55, 2.02, 2.02, 2.05, 2.35, 2.57, 2.93, 2.94, 2.97.
02

Create Boxplots

With the data organized, create boxplots for each group. The boxplot will show the median, quartiles, and any potential outliers. Place both boxplots on the same scale to allow for comparison.
03

Comment on Boxplot Features

Examine features such as the median, range, and any apparent skewness. Also, note any outliers or differences in spread between the two sets.
04

Check Conditions for Two-Sample t-test

Verify assumptions for performing a two-sample t-test: independence of samples, normality of the data, and equal variances. Use normal probability plots or histograms to check normality. Employ Levene's Test or compare variances to check equal variance assumption.
05

Set Hypotheses for the t-test

State the null hypothesis (\(H_0: \mu_1 = \mu_2\)) which asserts that the true average depths are equal for the two conditions, and the alternative hypothesis (\(H_a: \mu_1 < \mu_2\)) that posits higher average depth for the high current setting.
06

Perform Two-Sample t-test

Calculate the t-statistic and p-value by using the sample means, sample variances, and sample sizes. Since we are testing at a 0.01 significance level, we will compare the p-value to this threshold to decide whether to reject the null hypothesis.
07

Interpret Test Results

If the p-value is less than 0.01, reject the null hypothesis indicating the true average HAZ depth is larger for the high current condition. Otherwise, we do not have sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Boxplot Analysis
When we're dealing with data, it's often useful to visualize it using different methods to make patterns and comparisons clear. A boxplot, sometimes called a box-and-whisker plot, is one of these methods. It's a simple but effective way to display the distribution of a dataset and to easily compare different groups.
  • The box in the boxplot arises from the middle 50% of the data, which represents the interquartile range (IQR).
  • A line inside the box marks the median, the middle point of the data.
  • Whiskers extend from the box to the smallest and largest values, considering values within 1.5 * IQR from the quartiles.
In our exercise, the boxplots for the high and non-high current settings allow us to quickly see how the depths of the heat-affected zone compare. Look at the medians and the spread of the data. If one box is notably higher or the whiskers are much longer, it can signal differences in the variabilities or typical values between the groups.
Null and Alternative Hypotheses
In hypothesis testing, we begin with the null hypothesis, which is an assumption that there is no difference or effect. It's basically a statement of "no change." In contrast, the alternative hypothesis proposes that there is a difference or effect.
  • The null hypothesis denoted as (\( H_0: \, \mu_1 = \mu_2 \)) suggests that the true average HAZ depths are the same under both current settings.
  • The alternative hypothesis (\( H_a: \, \mu_1 < \mu_2 \)) states that the true average depth for the high current setting is greater than that of the non-high setting.
These hypotheses are tested statistically, and the outcome dictates whether it's plausible to reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative one. This process is vital to ensuring scientific investigations are robust and conclusions drawn are justified.
Test of Equal Variances
Before conducting a two-sample t-test, it's crucial to understand if the assumption of equal variances holds. When the variances of two populations are equal, the statistical power and accuracy of the test improve. One way to test this assumption is through a test like Levene's Test.
  • Levene's Test assesses the null hypothesis that the variances in two or more groups are equal.
  • We're looking to see if there is no significant difference in variances \((H_0: \, \sigma_1^2 = \sigma_2^2)\).
  • If p-value from Levene's Test is below a certain significance level, it casts doubt on the equal variances assumption.
If variances are unequal, a modification of the t-test called Welch's t-test could be more appropriate, as it does not assume equal variances between the groups.
Significance Level in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the significance level, also known as the alpha level, is the threshold used to decide whether to reject the null hypothesis. It's essentially the probability of making a Type I error, which is the incorrect rejection of the true null hypothesis.
  • A typical alpha level is 0.05, but in our exercise, a stricter 0.01 level is used, indicating a 1% risk of incorrectly rejecting the null hypothesis.
  • This strict threshold is beneficial in critical fields where the cost of errors is high.
  • If the p-value obtained from the test is below the alpha level, the results are considered statistically significant, warranting rejection of the null hypothesis.
Using a significance level provides clarity and consistency in decision-making, ensuring that only compelling evidence leads to rejecting the null hypothesis.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Sometimes experiments involving success or failure responses are run in a paired or before/after manner. Suppose that before a major policy speech by a political candidate, \(n\) individuals are selected and asked whether \((S)\) or not \((F)\) they favor the candidate. Then after the speech the same \(n\) people are asked the same question. The responses can be entered in a table as follows: where \(x_{1}+x_{2}+x_{3}+x_{4}=n\). Let \(p_{1}, p_{2}, p_{3}\), and \(p_{4}\) denote the four cell probabilities, so that \(p_{1}=P(S\) before and \(S\) after), and so on. We wish to test the hypothesis that the true proportion of supporters \((S)\) after the speech has not increased against the alternative that it has increased. a. State the two hypotheses of interest in terms of \(p_{1}, p_{2}\), \(p_{3}\), and \(p_{4}\). b. Construct an estimator for the after/before difference in success probabilities. c. When \(n\) is large, it can be shown that the rv \(\left(X_{i}-X_{j}\right) / n\) has approximately a normal distribution with variance given by \(\left[p_{i}+p_{j}-\left(p_{i}-p_{j}\right)^{2}\right] / n\). Use this to construct a test statistic with approximately a standard normal distribution when \(H_{0}\) is true (the result is called McNemar's test). d. If \(x_{1}=350, x_{2}=150, x_{3}=200\), and \(x_{4}=300\), what do you conclude?

Is there any systematic tendency for part-time college faculty to hold their students to different standards than do full-time faculty? The article "Are There Instructional Differences Between Full-Time and Part-Time Faculty?" (College Teaching, 2009: 23-26) reported that for a sample of 125 courses taught by fulltime faculty, the mean course GPA was \(2.7186\) and the standard deviation was \(.63342\), whereas for a sample of 88 courses taught by part- timers, the mean and standard deviation were \(2.8639\) and \(.49241\), respectively. Does it appear that true average course GPA for part-time faculty differs from that for faculty teaching full-time? Test the appropriate hypotheses at significance level .01.

An experiment to compare the tension bond strength of polymer latex modified mortar (Portland cement mortar to which polymer latex emulsions have been added during mixing) to that of unmodified mortar resulted in \(\bar{x}=18.12 \mathrm{kgf} / \mathrm{cm}^{2}\) for the modified mortar \((m=40)\) and \(\bar{y}=16.87 \mathrm{kgf} / \mathrm{cm}^{2}\) for the unmodified mortar \((n=32)\). Let \(\mu_{1}\) and \(\mu_{2}\) be the true average tension bond strengths for the modified and unmodified mortars, respectively. Assume that the bond strength distributions are both normal. a. Assuming that \(\sigma_{1}=1.6\) and \(\sigma_{2}=1.4\), test \(H_{0}\) : \(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}=0\) versus \(H_{a}: \mu_{1}-\mu_{2}>0\) at level 01 . b. Compute the probability of a type II error for the test of part (a) when \(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}=1\). c. Suppose the investigator decided to use a level 05 test and wished \(\beta=.10\) when \(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}=1\). If \(m=40\), what value of \(n\) is necessary? d. How would the analysis and conclusion of part (a) change if \(\sigma_{1}\) and \(\sigma_{2}\) were unknown but \(s_{1}=1.6\) and \(s_{2}=1.4 ?\)

Anorexia Nervosa (AN) is a psychiatric condition leading to substantial weight loss among women who are fearful of becoming fat. The article "4dipose Tissue Distribution After Weight Restoration and Weight Maintenance in Women with Anorexia Nervosa" (Amer. \(J\). of Clinical Nutr., 2009: 1132-1137) used whole- body magnetic resonance imagery to determine various tissue characteristics for both an AN sample of individuals who had undergone acute weight restoration and maintained their weight for a year and a comparable (at the outset of the study) control sample. Here is summary data on intermuscular adipose tissue (IAT; kg). \begin{tabular}{lccc} Condition & Sample Size & Sample Mean & Sample SD \\ \hline AN & 16 & \(.52\) & \(.26\) \\ Control & 8 & \(.35\) & \(.15\) \\ \hline \end{tabular} Assume that both samples were selected from normal distributions. a. Calculate an estimate for true average IAT under the described AN protocol, and do so in a way that conveys information about the reliability and precision of the estimation. b. Calculate an estimate for the difference between true average AN IAT and true average control IAT, and do so in a way that conveys information about the reliability and precision of the estimation. What does your estimate suggest about true average AN IAT relative to true average control IAT?

The degenerative disease osteoarthritis most frequently affects weight-bearing joints such as the knee. The article 'Evidence of Mechanical Load Redistribution at the Knee Joint in the Elderly When Ascending Stairs and Ramps" (Annals of Biomed. Engr." 2008: 467-476) presented the following summary data on stance duration (ms) for samples of both older and younger adults. $$ \begin{array}{lccc} \text { Age } & \text { Sample Size } & \text { Sample Mean } & \text { Sample SD } \\ \hline \text { Older } & 28 & 801 & 117 \\ \text { Younger } & 16 & 780 & 72 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Assume that both stance duration distributions are normal. a. Calculate and interpret a \(99 \% \mathrm{CI}\) for true average stance duration among elderly individuals. b. Carry out a test of hypotheses at significance level \(.05\) to decide whether true average stance duration is larger among elderly individuals than among younger individuals.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.