/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 16 The degenerative disease osteoar... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The degenerative disease osteoarthritis most frequently affects weight-bearing joints such as the knee. The article 'Evidence of Mechanical Load Redistribution at the Knee Joint in the Elderly When Ascending Stairs and Ramps" (Annals of Biomed. Engr." 2008: 467-476) presented the following summary data on stance duration (ms) for samples of both older and younger adults. $$ \begin{array}{lccc} \text { Age } & \text { Sample Size } & \text { Sample Mean } & \text { Sample SD } \\ \hline \text { Older } & 28 & 801 & 117 \\ \text { Younger } & 16 & 780 & 72 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Assume that both stance duration distributions are normal. a. Calculate and interpret a \(99 \% \mathrm{CI}\) for true average stance duration among elderly individuals. b. Carry out a test of hypotheses at significance level \(.05\) to decide whether true average stance duration is larger among elderly individuals than among younger individuals.

Short Answer

Expert verified
(739.81, 862.19) for CI; no significant difference in hypothesis test.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the standard error for the older group

The standard error (SE) for older adults is calculated using the formula for standard deviation: \( SE_{older} = \frac{SD_{older}}{\sqrt{n}} \), where \( SD_{older} \) is the sample standard deviation (117) and \( n \) is the sample size (28). Compute \( SE_{older} = \frac{117}{\sqrt{28}} \approx 22.09 \).
02

Determine the critical t-value for a 99% confidence interval

For a 99% confidence interval and 27 degrees of freedom (\( n-1 = 28-1 \)), use the t-distribution table to find the critical t-value. Looking up a 99% confidence interval, we find \( t^* = 2.771 \).
03

Calculate the 99% confidence interval for the older group

The confidence interval for the true average is given by \( \bar{x} \pm t^* \times SE \). For older adults, use \( 801 \pm 2.771 \times 22.09 \), giving CI \( 801 \pm 61.19 \), which results in the interval (739.81, 862.19).
04

Set up the hypothesis test

Identify the null and alternative hypotheses. Null hypothesis \( H_0: \mu_{older} = \mu_{younger} \) and alternative hypothesis \( H_a: \mu_{older} > \mu_{younger} \). We want to determine if the stance duration is significantly larger among older than younger individuals.
05

Calculate the standard error for the difference in means

The standard error for the difference in means is \( SE_{diff} = \sqrt{\frac{SD_{older}^2}{n_{older}} + \frac{SD_{younger}^2}{n_{younger}}} \), which is \( \sqrt{\frac{117^2}{28} + \frac{72^2}{16}} \approx 24.81 \).
06

Calculate the test statistic

Use the test statistic formula for comparing two means: \( t = \frac{\bar{x}_{older} - \bar{x}_{younger}}{SE_{diff}} = \frac{801 - 780}{24.81} \approx 0.846 \).
07

Determine the decision for the hypothesis test

Find the critical t-value from the t-distribution table for \( 42 \) degrees of freedom at \( \alpha = 0.05 \). With a critical value of \( t^* = 1.684 \), compare it with the calculated t (0.846). Since 0.846 < 1.684, we fail to reject \( H_0 \).
08

Interpret the results

The 99% confidence interval for older individuals’ stance duration is (739.81, 862.19), indicating the range where the true average likely lies. The hypothesis test suggests no significant difference at the 0.05 level in average stance duration between older and younger individuals.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Confidence Intervals
When estimating a population parameter like the true average stance duration among older adults, confidence intervals provide a range of plausible values. A confidence interval quantifies the uncertainty around the sample mean by considering variability within the sample data.
In our exercise, we determined a 99% confidence interval for the older group's average stance duration. This interval tells us that, with 99% confidence, the true average lies between 739.81 ms and 862.19 ms.
The confidence level indicates how sure we are that the interval includes the true mean. A 99% confidence level offers more certainty compared to, say, a 95% confidence level, but it results in a wider range.
  • A higher confidence level means a wider interval, implying more uncertainty but greater assurance that the interval covers the true parameter.
  • Reducing the confidence level narrows the interval, which means less assurance about capturing the true parameter.
Interpreting confidence intervals requires understanding these trade-offs between precision and certainty.
Standard Error
The standard error (SE) reflects sampling variability and is crucial for building confidence intervals and hypothesis testing. It estimates the standard deviation of the sample mean distribution.
For the older group, the standard error was calculated using the formula: \[ SE = \frac{SD}{\sqrt{n}} \]
where SD is the sample standard deviation and n is the sample size. For older individuals, the SE calculated is approximately 22.09 ms.
The standard error gives us an idea of how much the sample mean is expected to vary from the actual population mean. A smaller SE indicates less variance, suggesting our sample mean is close to the true mean.
  • A large sample size typically results in a smaller SE, increasing precision.
  • Smaller SD also reduces SE, enhancing the reliability of the sample mean.
Thus, the standard error is a pivotal component in statistical analysis, allowing accurate interpretation of sample data.
T-Distribution
The T-distribution is a crucial concept when dealing with small sample sizes or unknown population standard deviations. It resembles the normal distribution but has heavier tails, allowing for variability in small datasets.
In hypothesis testing and confidence interval estimation, we often rely on the T-distribution rather than the normal distribution to account for uncertainties in smaller samples.
For our exercise, the critical t-value for a 99% confidence interval with 27 degrees of freedom (n-1 for the older group) was found using this distribution, yielding a t-value of 2.771.
The T-distribution becomes nearly identical to the normal distribution as sample size increases. Therefore:
  • With smaller samples (n < 30), the T-distribution is preferred for its ability to manage uncertainty effectively.
  • As the sample size grows, using a normal distribution becomes more appropriate due to the central limit theorem.
Understanding the T-distribution enhances the robustness of statistical analyses across varied data conditions.
Sample Mean
The sample mean is at the heart of statistical estimates, providing a basis for constructing confidence intervals and conducting hypothesis tests.
In this exercise, the sample mean for the older group was 801 ms, serving as a point estimate of the population mean.
The sample mean summarizes the central tendency of a dataset and, when combined with measures like standard error, helps in drawing conclusions about the population.
When comparing two groups, like in our hypothesis test, the difference in sample means indicates potential variations in population parameters. In this example:
  • The difference between older and younger groups' means (801 ms and 780 ms) helps pose or test hypotheses about demographic differences.
  • The comparison of sample means, coupled with standard errors, guides us to understand if the observed differences are statistically significant.
Thus, the sample mean is fundamental in our journey from data analysis to meaningful interpretation.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The article "'Evaluating Variability in Filling Operations" (Food Tech., 1984: 51-55) describes two different filling operations used in a ground-beef packing plant. Both filling operations were set to fill packages with \(1400 \mathrm{~g}\) of ground beef. In a random sample of size 30 taken from each filling operation, the resulting means and standard deviations were \(1402.24 \mathrm{~g}\) and \(10.97 \mathrm{~g}\) for operation 1 and \(1419.63 \mathrm{~g}\) and \(9.96 \mathrm{~g}\) for operation 2 . a. Using a \(.05\) significance level, is there sufficient evidence to indicate that the true mean weight of the packages differs for the two operations? b. Does the data from operation 1 suggest that the true mean weight of packages produced by operation 1 is higher than \(1400 \mathrm{~g}\) ? Use a \(.05\) significance level.

Adding computerized medical images to a database promises to provide great resources for physicians. However, there are other methods of obtaining such information, so the issue of efficiency of access needs to be investigated. The article "The Comparative Effectiveness of Conventional and Digital Image Libraries" \((J\). of Audiovisual Media in Medicine, 2001: 8-15) reported on an experiment in which 13 computerproficient medical professionals were timed both while retrieving an image from a library of slides and while retrieving the same image from a computer database with a Web front end. \(\begin{array}{lrrrrrrr}\text { Subject } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7 \\\ \text { Slide } & 30 & 35 & 40 & 25 & 20 & 30 & 35 \\ \text { Digital } & 25 & 16 & 15 & 15 & 10 & 20 & 7 \\ \text { Difference } & 5 & 19 & 25 & 10 & 10 & 10 & 28 \\ \text { Subject } & 8 & 9 & 10 & 11 & 12 & 13 & \\ \text { Slide } & 62 & 40 & 51 & 25 & 42 & 33 & \\ \text { Digital } & 16 & 15 & 13 & 11 & 19 & 19 & \\ \text { Difference } & 46 & 25 & 38 & 14 & 23 & 14 & \end{array}\) a. Construct a comparative boxplot of times for the two types of retrieval, and comment on any interesting features. b. Estimate the difference between true average times for the two types of retrieval in a way that conveys information about precision and reliability. Be sure to check the plausibility of any assumptions needed in your analysis. Does it appear plausible that the true average times for the two types of retrieval are identical? Why or why not?

Consider the following two questions designed to assess quantitative literacy: a. What is \(15 \%\) of 1000 ? b. A store is offering a \(15 \%\) off sale on all TVs. The most popular television is normally priced at \(\$ 1000\). How much money would a customer save on the television during this sale? Suppose the first question is asked of 200 randomly selected college students, with 164 answering correctly; the second one is asked of a different random sample of 200 college students, resulting in 140 correct responses (the sample percentages agree with those given in the article "Using the Right Yardstick: Assessing Financial Literacy Measures by Way of Financial Well-Being," J. of Consumer Affairs, 2013: 243-262; the investigators found that those who answered such questions correctly, particularly questions with context, were significantly more successful in their investment decisions than those who did not answer correctly). Carry out a test of hypotheses at significance level . 05 to decide if the true proportion of correct responses to the question without context exceeds that for the one with context.

Olestra is a fat substitute approved by the FDA for use in snack foods. Because there have been anecdotal reports of gastrointestinal problems associated with olestra consumption, a randomized, double-blind, placebo- controlled experiment was carried out to compare olestra potato chips to regular potato chips with respect to GI symptoms ("Gastrointestinal Symptoms Following Consumption of Olestra or Regular Triglyceride Potato Chips," \(J\). of the Amer: Med. Assoc., 1998: 150-152). Among 529 individuals in the TG control group, \(17.6 \%\) experienced an adverse GI event, whereas among the 563 individuals in the olestra treatment group, \(15.8 \%\) experienced such an event. a. Carry out a test of hypotheses at the \(5 \%\) significance level to decide whether the incidence rate of GI problems for those who consume olestra chips according to the experimental regimen differs from the incidence rate for the \(\mathrm{TG}\) control treatment. b. If the true percentages for the two treatments were \(15 \%\) and \(20 \%\), respectively, what sample sizes \((m=n)\) would be necessary to detect such a difference with probability 90 ?

Fusible interlinings are being used with increasing frequency to support outer fabrics and improve the shape and drape of various pieces of clothing. The article "Compatibility of Outer and Fusible Interlining Fabrics in Tailored Garments" (Textile Res. J., 1997: \(137-142\) ) gave the accompanying data on extensibility (\%) at \(100 \mathrm{gm} / \mathrm{cm}\) for both high-quality (H) fabric and poor-quality (P) fabric specimens. \(\begin{array}{rrrrrrrrrr}\mathrm{H} & 1.2 & .9 & .7 & 1.0 & 1.7 & 1.7 & 1.1 & .9 & 1.7 \\ & 1.9 & 1.3 & 2.1 & 1.6 & 1.8 & 1.4 & 1.3 & 1.9 & 1.6 \\ & .8 & 2.0 & 1.7 & 1.6 & 2.3 & 2.0 & & & \\ \mathrm{P} & 1.6 & 1.5 & 1.1 & 2.1 & 1.5 & 1.3 & 1.0 & 2.6 & \end{array}\) a. Construct normal probability plots to verify the plausibility of both samples having been selected from normal population distributions. b. Construct a comparative boxplot. Does it suggest that there is a difference between true average extensibility for high-quality fabric specimens and that for poor-quality specimens? c. The sample mean and standard deviation for the highquality sample are \(1.508\) and \(.444\), respectively, and those for the poor-quality sample are \(1.588\) and \(.530\). Use the two-sample \(t\) test to decide whether true average extensibility differs for the two types of fabric.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.