/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 35 The article "'Evaluating Variabi... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The article "'Evaluating Variability in Filling Operations" (Food Tech., 1984: 51-55) describes two different filling operations used in a ground-beef packing plant. Both filling operations were set to fill packages with \(1400 \mathrm{~g}\) of ground beef. In a random sample of size 30 taken from each filling operation, the resulting means and standard deviations were \(1402.24 \mathrm{~g}\) and \(10.97 \mathrm{~g}\) for operation 1 and \(1419.63 \mathrm{~g}\) and \(9.96 \mathrm{~g}\) for operation 2 . a. Using a \(.05\) significance level, is there sufficient evidence to indicate that the true mean weight of the packages differs for the two operations? b. Does the data from operation 1 suggest that the true mean weight of packages produced by operation 1 is higher than \(1400 \mathrm{~g}\) ? Use a \(.05\) significance level.

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) The true mean weights differ. (b) The mean for operation 1 is higher than 1400 g.

Step by step solution

01

Define Hypotheses for Part (a)

We want to test if there is a difference in the true mean weights of the packages between the two operations. - Null Hypothesis (H_0): \( \mu_1 = \mu_2 \) (The mean weights are equal).- Alternative Hypothesis (H_a): \( \mu_1 eq \mu_2 \) (The mean weights are different).
02

Collect Given Data for Part (a)

We have the following statistics for the two operations:- Operation 1: \( \bar{x}_1 = 1402.24 \), \( s_1 = 10.97 \), \( n_1 = 30 \).- Operation 2: \( \bar{x}_2 = 1419.63 \), \( s_2 = 9.96 \), \( n_2 = 30 \).
03

Compute the Test Statistic for Part (a)

Use the two-sample t-test for equality of means:\[t = \frac{\bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2}{\sqrt{\frac{s_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{s_2^2}{n_2}}} = \frac{1402.24 - 1419.63}{\sqrt{\frac{10.97^2}{30} + \frac{9.96^2}{30}}}\]Calculate this value to determine the test statistic.
04

Compute Degrees of Freedom for Part (a)

The degrees of freedom for the t-test can be calculated using the formula:\[v = \frac{\left(\frac{s_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{s_2^2}{n_2}\right)^2}{\frac{\left(\frac{s_1^2}{n_1}\right)^2}{n_1-1} + \frac{\left(\frac{s_2^2}{n_2}\right)^2}{n_2-1}}\]Perform this calculation to find the correct degrees of freedom.
05

Decision Rule for Part (a)

Determine the critical t-value from the t-distribution table at \( \alpha = 0.05\) with calculated degrees of freedom. Compare the computed test statistic from Step 3 with the critical value.
06

Conclusion for Part (a)

If the test statistic is beyond the critical t-value, reject the null hypothesis. Otherwise, do not reject it. - Conclusion: There is enough evidence to conclude that the true mean weights of packages from the two operations differ, or not.
07

Define Hypotheses for Part (b)

We will test if the mean weight for operation 1 is greater than 1400 grams.- Null Hypothesis (H_0): \( \mu_1 = 1400 \)- Alternative Hypothesis (H_a): \( \mu_1 > 1400 \)
08

Compute the Test Statistic for Part (b)

Use the one-sample t-test for operation 1:\[t = \frac{\bar{x}_1 - 1400}{\frac{s_1}{\sqrt{n_1}}} = \frac{1402.24 - 1400}{\frac{10.97}{\sqrt{30}}}\]Calculate this to get the test statistic.
09

Decision Rule for Part (b)

Find the critical t-value for a one-tailed test at the 0.05 significance level with 29 degrees of freedom. Compare this value with the calculated test statistic from Step 8.
10

Conclusion for Part (b)

If the test statistic exceeds the critical value, reject the null hypothesis. Otherwise, do not reject it. - Conclusion: There is enough evidence to suggest that the true mean weight for operation 1 is greater than 1400 grams, or not.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

t-test
A t-test is a statistical test used to evaluate hypotheses about means. It compares the sample means to determine whether there is a significant difference between them. The t-test is especially useful when dealing with small sample sizes, typically below 30, and assumes that the data follows a normal distribution.

There are different types of t-tests, but the two most common ones are:
  • Independent two-sample t-test: It is used to compare the means of two independent groups, as in the case of different filling operations in our example. It tests if the difference between the sample means is significant.
  • One-sample t-test: It compares the mean of a single sample to a known value or theoretical expectation. In our context, it checks if the mean of operation 1 exceeds 1400 grams.
The formula to calculate the t-statistic is \[t = \frac{\bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2}{\sqrt{\frac{s_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{s_2^2}{n_2}}}\]This result tells you "how far" your sample mean is from the null hypothesis mean—in standard error units. A larger absolute value of t suggests a significant difference.
significance level
The significance level, often denoted by the Greek letter \(\alpha\), is a threshold set by the researcher to determine the threshold for rejecting the null hypothesis. It represents the probability of making a Type I error, which means rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true. Commonly, a significance level of 0.05 is used, implying a 5% risk of concluding that a difference exists when there is none.

When you perform a t-test:
  • The significance level helps you decide if your test statistic is extreme enough to reject the null hypothesis.
  • If your calculated p-value is less than \(\alpha\), it indicates strong enough evidence against the null hypothesis, prompting you to reject it.
  • A significance level of 0.05 was used in the given problem, meaning the risk of error should stay below 5%.
This risk level is intentionally kept low as a standard to ensure that decisions made based on the test results are reliable, accounting for minor random differences in sample versus population data.
degrees of freedom
Degrees of freedom are a vital concept in statistics that impact the shape of the t-distribution used in hypothesis testing. Essentially, degrees of freedom (often abbreviated as df) refer to the number of independent values or quantities that can vary in an analysis without breaking any mathematical constraints.

In the context of a t-test:
  • For a two-sample t-test like in our example, degrees of freedom are calculated using the formula: \[v = \frac{\left(\frac{s_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{s_2^2}{n_2}\right)^2}{\frac{\left(\frac{s_1^2}{n_1}\right)^2}{n_1-1} + \frac{\left(\frac{s_2^2}{n_2}\right)^2}{n_2-1}}\]which considers both samples' variances and sizes.
  • For simple one-sample tests, degrees of freedom are \(n - 1\), where \(n\) is the sample size.
Understanding the degrees of freedom helps control the "spread" of the t-distribution; more degrees typically mean a more narrow and precise distribution. This precision impacts the critical values used for deciding whether to reject the null hypothesis.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

An experiment to compare the tension bond strength of polymer latex modified mortar (Portland cement mortar to which polymer latex emulsions have been added during mixing) to that of unmodified mortar resulted in \(\bar{x}=18.12 \mathrm{kgf} / \mathrm{cm}^{2}\) for the modified mortar \((m=40)\) and \(\bar{y}=16.87 \mathrm{kgf} / \mathrm{cm}^{2}\) for the unmodified mortar \((n=32)\). Let \(\mu_{1}\) and \(\mu_{2}\) be the true average tension bond strengths for the modified and unmodified mortars, respectively. Assume that the bond strength distributions are both normal. a. Assuming that \(\sigma_{1}=1.6\) and \(\sigma_{2}=1.4\), test \(H_{0}\) : \(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}=0\) versus \(H_{a}: \mu_{1}-\mu_{2}>0\) at level 01 . b. Compute the probability of a type II error for the test of part (a) when \(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}=1\). c. Suppose the investigator decided to use a level 05 test and wished \(\beta=.10\) when \(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}=1\). If \(m=40\), what value of \(n\) is necessary? d. How would the analysis and conclusion of part (a) change if \(\sigma_{1}\) and \(\sigma_{2}\) were unknown but \(s_{1}=1.6\) and \(s_{2}=1.4 ?\)

Quantitative noninvasive techniques are needed for routinely assessing symptoms of peripheral neuropathies, such as carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). The article "A Gap Detection Tactility Test for Sensory Deficits Associated with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome" (Ergonomics, 1995: 2588-2601) reported on a test that involved sensing a tiny gap in an otherwise smooth surface by probing with a finger; this functionally resembles many work-related tactile activities, such as detecting scratches or surface defects. When finger probing was not allowed, the sample average gap detection threshold for \(m=8\) normal subjects was \(1.71 \mathrm{~mm}\), and the sample standard deviation was \(.53\); for \(n=10\) CTS subjects, the sample mean and sample standard deviation were \(2.53\) and \(.87\), respectively. Does this data suggest that the true average gap detection threshold for CTS subjects exceeds that for normal subjects? State and test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of .01.

The article "Lrban Battery Litter" cited in Example \(8.14\) gave the following summary data on zinc mass \((\mathrm{g})\) for two different brands of size D batteries: \begin{tabular}{lccc} Brand & Sample Size & Sample Mean & Sample SD \\ \hline Duracell & 15 & \(138.52\) & \(7.76\) \\ Energizer & 20 & \(149.07\) & \(1.52\) \\ \hline \end{tabular} Assuming that both zinc mass distributions are at least approximately normal, carry out a test at significance level \(.05\) to decide whether true average zinc mass is different for the two types of batteries.

Two different types of alloy, \(A\) and \(B\), have been used to manufacture experimental specimens of a small tension link to be used in a certain engineering application. The ultimate strength (ksi) of each specimen was determined, and the results are summarized in the accompanying frequency distribution. $$ \begin{array}{rrc} & \mathbf{A} & \mathbf{B} \\ \hline 26-<30 & 6 & 4 \\ 30-<34 & 12 & 9 \\ 34-<38 & 15 & 19 \\ 38-<42 & 7 & 10 \\ & m=40 & m=42 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Compute a \(95 \%\) CI for the difference between the true proportions of all specimens of alloys \(\mathrm{A}\) and \(\mathrm{B}\) that have an ultimate strength of at least \(34 \mathrm{ksi}\).

A mechanical engineer wishes to compare strength properties of steel beams with similar beams made with a particular alloy. The same number of beams, \(n\), of each type will be tested. Each beam will be set in a horizontal position with a support on each end, a force of \(2500 \mathrm{lb}\) will be applied at the center, and the deflection will be measured. From past experience with such beams, the engineer is willing to assume that the true standard deviation of deflection for both types of beam is .05 in. Because the alloy is more expensive, the engineer wishes to test at level .01 whether it has smaller average deflection than the steel beam. What value of \(n\) is appropriate if the desired type II error probability is \(.05\) when the difference in true average deflection favors the alloy by \(.04\) in.?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.