/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 5 As the air temperature drops, ri... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

As the air temperature drops, river water becomes supercooled and ice crystals form. Such ice can significantly affect the hydraulics of a river. The article "Laboratory Study of Anchor Ice Growth" \((J\). of Cold Regions Engr., 2001: 60-66) described an experiment in which ice thickness (mm) was studied as a function of elapsed time (hr) under specified conditions. The following data was read from a graph in the article: \(n=33\); \(x=.17, .33, .50, .67, \ldots, 5.50 ; y=.50,1.25,1.50,2.75\), \(3.50,4.75,5.75,5.60,7.00,8.00,8.25,9.50,10.50\) \(11.00,10.75,12.50,12.25,13.25,15.50,15.00,15.25\), \(16.25,17.25,18.00,18.25,18.15,20.25,19.50,20.00\), \(20.50,20.60,20.50,19.80\) Plot the residuals against elapsed time. What does the plot suggest?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The plot may suggest whether a linear model is appropriate or if a nonlinear model is needed. Random residuals imply a good fit; patterns suggest otherwise.

Step by step solution

01

Organize the Data

First, gather and organize the given data for the ice thickness and elapsed time. We have 33 pairs of data points. Time values are given by \( x \) and ice thickness values by \( y \). Start listing them as ordered pairs \((x, y)\) for simplicity.
02

Calculate the Linear Regression Line

To assess the trend in the data, calculate the linear regression line. This involves finding the slope \( m \) and y-intercept \( b \) using formulas \( m = \frac{n(\sum xy) - (\sum x)(\sum y)}{n(\sum x^2) - (\sum x)^2} \) and \( b = \frac{(\sum y) - m(\sum x)}{n} \). Given \( n=33 \), compute these using the data points.
03

Calculate Residuals

For each data point \((x_i, y_i)\), calculate the predicted \( y \) value (\( y_{predicted} = mx_i + b \)) using the regression equation. Then compute the residual for each point as \( e_i = y_i - y_{predicted} \).
04

Plot the Residuals Against Elapsed Time

Create a plot with elapsed time \( x \) as the x-axis and the residuals \( e_i \) as the y-axis. This involves plotting a point for each \( (x_i, e_i) \) to visualize any potential patterns.
05

Analyze the Residual Plot

Assess the residual plot for any non-random patterns. If the residuals appear randomly scattered, it suggests a good fit for the linear model. Any visible pattern, such as curvature or systematic deviation, suggests a poor fit, indicating a need for a non-linear model.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Residual Plot
A residual plot is a fundamental tool in analyzing linear regression models. It involves plotting each data point's residual, which is the difference between the observed value and the predicted value from the regression line. The x-axis represents the independent variable, or time in this case, while the y-axis represents the residuals.

The primary purpose of a residual plot is to check the appropriateness of a linear model. When creating a residual plot, you're essentially looking for randomness. If the residuals are randomly scattered around the horizontal axis, this suggests a good fit for the linear model.
  • No apparent pattern: This indicates a good linear fit.
  • Curved pattern: Suggests the presence of non-linearity.
  • Clusters or outliers: May suggest problems with data or a need for a different model.
Thus, the residual plot acts as a visual diagnostic tool that can guide further model adjustment or selection strategies.
Data Visualization
Data visualization is the graphical representation of data aimed at helping people understand complex data sets at a glance. In the context of linear regression, creating a scatter plot of the data can be highly beneficial. It allows us to observe the relationship between independent and dependent variables.

For the exercise in question, a scatter plot helps show how ice thickness changes over time. Here’s why this visualization is critical:
  • Pattern recognition: Spots trends and correlations.
  • Helps identify outliers: Deviation points become apparent.
  • Easy interpretation: Offers an intuitive understanding than raw numbers.
When dealing with vast amounts of data, as with our 33 data points, visualization simplifies analysis. The scatter plot lays the groundwork for more complex analyses, such as calculating the regression line.
Regression Line Calculation
The regression line is pivotal in statistical modeling as it summarizes the trend in the data. Calculating this involves determining the best-fitting line through the data points, described by the equation: \[y = mx + b\]Where:
  • \( m \) is the slope, indicating the change in the dependent variable for each unit change in the independent variable.
  • \( b \) is the y-intercept, showing the value of the dependent variable when the independent variable is zero.
Using formulas \( m = \frac{n(\sum xy) - (\sum x)(\sum y)}{n(\sum x^2) - (\sum x)^2}\) and \( b = \frac{(\sum y) - m(\sum x)}{n}\), you can compute \( m \) and \( b \) from the organized data.

The regression line is essential because it provides a predictive model and helps understand the relationship strength between variables.
Statistical Model Evaluation
Statistical model evaluation is crucial in understanding how well a model represents the data. In linear regression, this often involves assessing model fit using residual analysis and other statistics like \( R^2 \), the coefficient of determination.

An excellent place to start is by examining the residual plot. Randomly distributed residuals suggest the model is well-fitted. Look for systematic patterns to diagnose issues:
  • Pattern-free residuals: Indicative of a suitable model.
  • Systematic patterns: May indicate the need for a different model type.
Additionally, the \( R^2 \) value quantifies how much of the variability in the dependent variable is explained by the model. An \( R^2 \) close to 1 indicates a strong fit, while below 0.5 may signal reconsideration of the model.

Together, residual analysis and \( R^2 \) function as powerful tools for evaluating the fit and performance of the regression model. This evaluation not only aids in improving the model but also enhances its predictive accuracy.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The accompanying data on \(x=\) frequency \((\mathrm{MHz})\) and \(y=\) output power (W) for a certain laser configuration was read from a graph in the article "Frequency Dependence in RF Discharge Excited Waveguide \(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\) Lasers" (IEEE J. of Quantum Electronics, 1984: 509-514). \begin{tabular}{r|rrrrrrrr} \(x\) & 60 & 63 & 77 & 100 & 125 & 157 & 186 & 222 \\ \hline\(y\) & 16 & 17 & 19 & 21 & 22 & 20 & 15 & 5 \end{tabular} A computer analysis yielded the following information for a quadratic regression model: \(\hat{\beta}_{0}=-1.5127\), \(\hat{\beta}_{1}=.391901, \quad \hat{\beta}_{2}=-.00163141, \quad s_{\hat{\beta}_{2}}=.00003391\), \(\mathrm{SSE}=.29, \mathrm{SST}=202.88\), and \(s_{\dot{Y}}=.1141\) when \(x=100\). a. Does the quadratic model appear to be suitable for explaining observed variation in output power by relating it to frequency? b. Would the simple linear regression model be nearly as satisfactory as the quadratic model? c. Do you think it would be worth considering a cubic model? d. Compute a \(95 \%\) CI for expected power output when frequency is 100 . e. Use a \(95 \%\) PI to predict the power from a single experimental run when frequency is 100 .

No tortilla chip aficionado likes soggy chips, so it is important to find characteristics of the production process that produce chips with an appealing texture. The following data on \(x=\) frying time \((\mathrm{sec})\) and \(y=\) moisture content \((\%)\) appeared in the article "* Thermal and Physical Properties of Tortilla Chips as a Function of Frying Time" \(U\). of Food Processing and Preservation, 1995: 175-189). $$ \begin{array}{c|cccccccc} x & 5 & 10 & 15 & 20 & 25 & 30 & 45 & 60 \\ \hline y & 16.3 & 9.7 & 8.1 & 4.2 & 3.4 & 2.9 & 1.9 & 1.3 \end{array} $$ a. Construct a scatterplot of \(y\) versus \(x\) and comment. b. Construct a scatterplot of the \((\ln (x), \ln (y))\) pairs and comment. c. What probabilistic relationship between \(x\) and \(y\) is suggested by the linear pattern in the plot of part (b)? d. Predict the value of moisture content when frying time is 20 , in a way that conveys information about reliability and precision. e. Analyze the residuals from fitting the simple linear regression model to the transformed data and comment.

Continuous recording of heart rate can be used to obtain information about the level of exercise intensity or physical strain during sports participation, work, or other daily activities. The article "The Relationship Between Heart Rate and Oxygen Uptake During Non-Steady State Exercise" (Ergonomics, 2000: 1578-1592) reported on a study to investigate using heart rate response \((x\), as a percentage of the maximum rate) to predict oxygen uptake ( \(y\), as a percentage of maximum uptake) during exercise. The accompanying data was read from a graph in the article. $$ \begin{array}{l|llllllll} \mathrm{HR} & 43.5 & 44.0 & 44.0 & 44.5 & 44.0 & 45.0 & 48.0 & 49.0 \\ \hline \mathrm{VO}_{2} & 22.0 & 21.0 & 22.0 & 21.5 & 25.5 & 24.5 & 30.0 & 28.0 \\\ \mathrm{HR} & 49.5 & 51.0 & 54.5 & 57.5 & 57.7 & 61.0 & 63.0 & 72.0 \\ \hline \mathrm{VO}_{2} & 32.0 & 29.0 & 38.5 & 30.5 & 57.0 & 40.0 & 58.0 & 72.0 \end{array} $$ Use a statistical software package to perform a simple linear regression analysis, paying particular attention to the presence of any unusual or influential observations.

Cardiorespiratory fitness is widely recognized as a major component of overall physical well-being. Direct measurement of maximal oxygen uptake (VO \(\mathrm{VO}_{2}\) max \()\) is the single best measure of such fitness, but direct measurement is time-consuming and expensive. It is therefore desirable to have a prediction equation for \(\mathrm{VO}_{2} \max\) in terms of easily obtained quantities. Consider the variables $$ \begin{aligned} &y=\mathrm{VO}_{2} \max (\mathrm{L} / \mathrm{min}) \quad x_{1}=\text { weight }(\mathrm{kg}) \\ &x_{2}=\text { age }(\mathrm{yr}) \\ &x_{3}=\text { time necessary to walk } 1 \text { mile (min) } \\ &x_{4}=\text { heart rate at the end of the walk (beats/min) } \\ &\text { Here is one possible model, for male students, consistent } \\ &\text { with the information given in the article "Validation of } \\ &\text { the Rockport Fitness Walking Test in College Males } \\ &\text { and Females" (Research Quarterly for Exercise and } \\ &\text { Sport, } 1994: 152-158): \\ &Y=5.0+.01 x_{1}-.05 x_{2}-.13 x_{3}-.01 x_{4}+\epsilon \\ &\sigma=.4 \end{aligned} $$ a. Interpret \(\beta_{1}\) and \(\beta_{3}\). b. What is the expected value of \(\mathrm{VO}_{2} \max\) when weight is \(76 \mathrm{~kg}\), age is 20 yr, walk time is \(12 \mathrm{~min}\), and heart rate is \(140 \mathrm{~b} / \mathrm{m}\) ? c. What is the probability that \(\mathrm{VO}_{2} \max\) will be between \(1.00\) and \(2.60\) for a single observation made when the values of the predictors are as stated in part (b)?

The article cited in Exercise 49 of Chapter 7 gave summary information on a regression in which the dependent variable was power output \((\mathrm{W})\) in a simulated 200 -m race and the predictors were \(x_{1}=\) arm girth \((\mathrm{cm}), x_{2}=\) excess post-exercise oxygen consumption \((\mathrm{ml} / \mathrm{kg})\), and \(x_{3}=\) immediate posttest lactate (mmol/L). The estimated regression equation was reported as $$ \begin{aligned} &y=-408.20+14.06 x_{1}+.76 x_{2}-3.64 x_{3} \\ &\left(n=11, R^{2}=.91\right) \end{aligned} $$ a. Carry out the model utility test using a significance level of .01. [Note: All three predictors were judged to be important.] b. Interpret the estimate \(14.06\). c. Predict power output when arm girth is \(36 \mathrm{~cm}\), excess oxygen consumption is \(120 \mathrm{ml} / \mathrm{kg}\), and lactate is \(10.0\). d. Calculate a point estimate for true average power output when values of the predictors are as given in (c). e. Obtain a point estimate for the true average change in power output associated with a \(1 \mathrm{mmol} / \mathrm{L}\) increase in lactate while arm girth and oxygen consumption remain fixed.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.