/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 1 No tortilla chip aficionado like... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

No tortilla chip aficionado likes soggy chips, so it is important to find characteristics of the production process that produce chips with an appealing texture. The following data on \(x=\) frying time \((\mathrm{sec})\) and \(y=\) moisture content \((\%)\) appeared in the article "* Thermal and Physical Properties of Tortilla Chips as a Function of Frying Time" \(U\). of Food Processing and Preservation, 1995: 175-189). $$ \begin{array}{c|cccccccc} x & 5 & 10 & 15 & 20 & 25 & 30 & 45 & 60 \\ \hline y & 16.3 & 9.7 & 8.1 & 4.2 & 3.4 & 2.9 & 1.9 & 1.3 \end{array} $$ a. Construct a scatterplot of \(y\) versus \(x\) and comment. b. Construct a scatterplot of the \((\ln (x), \ln (y))\) pairs and comment. c. What probabilistic relationship between \(x\) and \(y\) is suggested by the linear pattern in the plot of part (b)? d. Predict the value of moisture content when frying time is 20 , in a way that conveys information about reliability and precision. e. Analyze the residuals from fitting the simple linear regression model to the transformed data and comment.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The moisture content decreases exponentially with frying time. At 20 seconds, the predicted moisture content is approximately 4.2%, with a reliable linear transformation model.

Step by step solution

01

Construct Scatterplot of y vs. x

To construct a scatterplot of the moisture content ( y %) against frying time ( x seconds), plot each pair of values on a graph. Each point on the graph corresponds to the frying time on the x-axis and the moisture content on the y-axis.
02

Observation for Scatterplot of y vs. x

Inspect the scatterplot. You should observe a generally decreasing trend, indicating that as frying time increases, moisture content tends to decrease. This suggests an inverse relationship between frying time and moisture content.
03

Construct Scatterplot of ln(x) vs. ln(y)

Calculate the natural logarithm for each x and y value. Then, plot these log-transformed x and y values. The new plot is constructed with \(\ln(x)\) on the x-axis and \(\ln(y)\) on the y-axis.
04

Observation for Scatterplot of ln(x) vs. ln(y)

Examine the scatterplot of transformed data points. Look for a linear pattern, which would imply a potential logarithmic relationship between the original x and y values. This linear trend indicates that as frying time increases exponentially, the moisture content decreases exponentially.
05

Probabilistic Relationship from Linear Plot

The linear pattern in the scatterplot of \(\ln(x)\) versus \(\ln(y)\) suggests a power-law relationship of the form \( y = ax^b \), where \( a \) and \( b \) are constants. This implies that the moisture content is a power function of frying time.
06

Predict Moisture Content at x=20

Use the linear regression equation derived from the \((\ln(x), \ln(y))\) plot to predict moisture content at 20 seconds. Transform the prediction back to the original scale by exponentiating the result. Compute prediction intervals to convey precision and reliability.
07

Analyze Residuals of Transformed Data

Fit a simple linear regression model to the \((\ln(x), \ln(y))\) data and calculate residuals, which are the differences between observed and predicted \(\ln(y)\). Plot these residuals to check for patterns. Assuming no discernible pattern and constant variability supports a good model fit.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Scatterplot Analysis
When conducting a scatterplot analysis, we are essentially creating a visual representation of the relationship between two variables. In this exercise, the variables are frying time, denoted by \( x \), and moisture content, denoted by \( y \). By plotting these as pairs on a graph, we can observe any potential relationship at a glance. In this specific study, the points in the scatterplot of moisture content versus frying time reveal a decreasing trend. This means that as the frying time increases, the moisture content tends to decrease, suggesting an inverse relationship. Such scatterplot analyses help in identifying patterns or deviations which might need further exploration. Key observations from scatterplot analysis:
  • The slope of the points indicates the nature of the relationship: negative, positive, or neutral.
  • It allows quick detection of outliers or anomalies in the data.
  • Serving as a preliminary step, it guides further detailed analyses like regression or transformation.
Logarithmic Transformation
The concept of logarithmic transformation involves applying a mathematical operation—the logarithm—to data, especially useful for data that follow exponential relationships. In the context of the chips study, transforming both the frying time and moisture content using natural logarithms (\( \ln(x) \) and \( \ln(y) \)) can reveal hidden linear trends in the data.Transforming the data by taking the natural log can change a multiplicative relationship into an additive one, often simplifying the analysis. When our transformed data results in a scatterplot with a clear linear trend, it indicates the presence of a power-law relationship in the original data, which wasn't initially obvious.Advantages of using Logarithmic Transformation:
  • It stabilizes the variance in data, making it more uniform throughout.
  • Converts non-linear relationships into linear ones, allowing us to use linear regression techniques effectively.
  • Can help manage non-normality and heteroscedasticity, common issues in raw data.
Residual Analysis
Residual analysis is a key step following a regression analysis, where we check the differences between observed and predicted values. In essence, a residual is the error made by the regression model.After constructing a regression model using the transformed data, like the \( (\ln(x), \ln(y)) \) pairs in our exercise, we analyze residuals to validate the model's effectiveness. By plotting residuals, we can check for patterns which may indicate problems in the model fitting.Key aspects of Residual Analysis:
  • If the model is appropriate, residuals should show no systematic pattern—they should appear random.
  • A clear non-random pattern may suggest model inadequacies, like non-linearity or incorrect transformation.
  • Constant variance in residuals (homoscedasticity) supports the validity of the model.
Residual analysis helps in refining the model, ensuring it captures the underlying relationship accurately without bias.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The viscosity \((y)\) of an oil was measured by a cone and plate viscometer at six different cone speeds \((x)\). It was assumed that a quadratic regression model was appropriate, and the estimated regression function resulting from the \(n=6\) observations was $$ y=-113.0937+3.3684 x-.01780 x^{2} $$ a. Estimate \(\mu_{\gamma \cdot 75}\), the expected viscosity when speed is \(75 \mathrm{rpm} .\) b. What viscosity would you predict for a cone speed of \(60 \mathrm{rpm}\) ? c. If \(\Sigma y_{i}^{2}=8386.43, \Sigma y_{i}=210.70, \Sigma x_{i} y_{i}=17,002.00\), and \(\Sigma x_{i}^{2} y_{i}=1,419,780\), compute SSE \(\left[=\Sigma y_{i}^{2}-\right.\) \(\left.\hat{\beta}_{0} \Sigma y_{i}-\hat{\beta}_{1} \Sigma x_{i} y_{i}-\hat{\beta}_{2} \Sigma x_{i}^{2} y_{i}\right]\) and \(s\). d. From part (c), SST \(=8386.43-(210.70)^{2} / 6=987.35\). Using SSE computed in part (c), what is the computed value of \(R^{2}\) ? e. If the estimated standard deviation of \(\hat{\beta}_{2}\) is \(s_{\hat{\beta}_{2}}=.00226\), test \(H_{0}: \beta_{2}=0\) versus \(H_{2}: \beta_{2} \neq 0\) at level \(.01\), and interpret the result.

Cardiorespiratory fitness is widely recognized as a major component of overall physical well-being. Direct measurement of maximal oxygen uptake (VO \(\mathrm{VO}_{2}\) max \()\) is the single best measure of such fitness, but direct measurement is time-consuming and expensive. It is therefore desirable to have a prediction equation for \(\mathrm{VO}_{2} \max\) in terms of easily obtained quantities. Consider the variables $$ \begin{aligned} &y=\mathrm{VO}_{2} \max (\mathrm{L} / \mathrm{min}) \quad x_{1}=\text { weight }(\mathrm{kg}) \\ &x_{2}=\text { age }(\mathrm{yr}) \\ &x_{3}=\text { time necessary to walk } 1 \text { mile (min) } \\ &x_{4}=\text { heart rate at the end of the walk (beats/min) } \\ &\text { Here is one possible model, for male students, consistent } \\ &\text { with the information given in the article "Validation of } \\ &\text { the Rockport Fitness Walking Test in College Males } \\ &\text { and Females" (Research Quarterly for Exercise and } \\ &\text { Sport, } 1994: 152-158): \\ &Y=5.0+.01 x_{1}-.05 x_{2}-.13 x_{3}-.01 x_{4}+\epsilon \\ &\sigma=.4 \end{aligned} $$ a. Interpret \(\beta_{1}\) and \(\beta_{3}\). b. What is the expected value of \(\mathrm{VO}_{2} \max\) when weight is \(76 \mathrm{~kg}\), age is 20 yr, walk time is \(12 \mathrm{~min}\), and heart rate is \(140 \mathrm{~b} / \mathrm{m}\) ? c. What is the probability that \(\mathrm{VO}_{2} \max\) will be between \(1.00\) and \(2.60\) for a single observation made when the values of the predictors are as stated in part (b)?

Let \(y=\) wear life of a bearing, \(x_{1}=\) oil viscosity, and \(x_{2}=\) load. Suppose that the multiple regression model relating life to viscosity and load is $$ Y=125.0+7.75 x_{1}+.0950 x_{2}-.0090 x_{1} x_{2}+\epsilon $$ a. What is the mean value of life when viscosity is 40 and load is 1100 ? b. When viscosity is 30 , what is the change in mean life associated with an increase of 1 in load? When viscosity is 40 , what is the change in mean life associated with an increase of 1 in load?

Does exposure to air pollution result in decreased life expectancy? This question was examined in the article "Does Air Pollution Shorten Lives?" (Statistics and Public Policy, Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley, 1977). Data on $$ \begin{aligned} y &=\text { total mortality rate }(\text { deaths per } 10,000) \\ x_{1} &=\text { mean suspended particle reading }\left(\mu \mathrm{g} / \mathrm{m}^{3}\right) \\ x_{2} &=\text { smallest sulfate reading }\left(\left[\mu \mathrm{g} / \mathrm{m}^{3}\right] \times 10\right) \\ x_{3} &=\text { population density }\left(\text { people } / \mathrm{mi}^{2}\right) \\ x_{4} &=\text { (percent nonwhite) } \times 10 \\ x_{5} &=\text { (percent over } 65) \times 10 \end{aligned} $$ for the year 1960 was recorded for \(n=117\) randomly selected standard metropolitan statistical areas. The estimated regression equation was $$ \begin{aligned} y=& 19.607+.041 x_{1}+.071 x_{2} \\ &+.001 x_{3}+.041 x_{4}+.687 x_{5} \end{aligned} $$ a. For this model, \(R^{2}=.827\). Using a \(.05\) significance level, perform a model utility test. b. The estimated standard deviation of \(\hat{\beta}_{1}\) was 016 . Calculate and interpret a \(90 \%\) CI for \(\beta_{1}\). c. Given that the estimated standard deviation of \(\hat{\beta}_{4}\) is \(.007\), determine whether percent nonwhite is an important variable in the model. Use a .01 significance level. d. In 1960 , the values of \(x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3}, x_{4}\), and \(x_{5}\) for Pittsburgh were \(166,60,788,68\), and 95 , respectively. Use the given regression equation to predict Pittsburgh's mortality rate. How does your prediction compare with the actual 1960 value of 103 deaths per 10,000 ?

A trucking company considered a multiple regression model for relating the dependent variable \(y=\) total daily travel time for one of its drivers (hours) to the predictors \(x_{1}=\) distance traveled (miles) and \(x_{2}=\) the number of deliveries made. Suppose that the model equation is $$ Y=-.800+.060 x_{1}+.900 x_{2}+\epsilon $$ a. What is the mean value of travel time when distance traveled is 50 miles and three deliveries are made? b. How would you interpret \(\beta_{1}=.060\), the coefficient of the predictor \(x_{1}\) ? What is the interpretation of \(\beta_{2}=.900 ?\) c. If \(\sigma=.5\) hour, what is the probability that travel time will be at most 6 hours when three deliveries are made and the distance traveled is 50 miles?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.