/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 3 The viscosity \((y)\) of an oil ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The viscosity \((y)\) of an oil was measured by a cone and plate viscometer at six different cone speeds \((x)\). It was assumed that a quadratic regression model was appropriate, and the estimated regression function resulting from the \(n=6\) observations was $$ y=-113.0937+3.3684 x-.01780 x^{2} $$ a. Estimate \(\mu_{\gamma \cdot 75}\), the expected viscosity when speed is \(75 \mathrm{rpm} .\) b. What viscosity would you predict for a cone speed of \(60 \mathrm{rpm}\) ? c. If \(\Sigma y_{i}^{2}=8386.43, \Sigma y_{i}=210.70, \Sigma x_{i} y_{i}=17,002.00\), and \(\Sigma x_{i}^{2} y_{i}=1,419,780\), compute SSE \(\left[=\Sigma y_{i}^{2}-\right.\) \(\left.\hat{\beta}_{0} \Sigma y_{i}-\hat{\beta}_{1} \Sigma x_{i} y_{i}-\hat{\beta}_{2} \Sigma x_{i}^{2} y_{i}\right]\) and \(s\). d. From part (c), SST \(=8386.43-(210.70)^{2} / 6=987.35\). Using SSE computed in part (c), what is the computed value of \(R^{2}\) ? e. If the estimated standard deviation of \(\hat{\beta}_{2}\) is \(s_{\hat{\beta}_{2}}=.00226\), test \(H_{0}: \beta_{2}=0\) versus \(H_{2}: \beta_{2} \neq 0\) at level \(.01\), and interpret the result.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. 113.093; b. 24.9303; c. SSE = 49.088, s = 4.05; d. R² = 0.9503; e. Reject \(H_0\).

Step by step solution

01

Estimate \\mu_{\\gamma \\cdot 75} for \\gamma=75 \\mathrm{rpm}

To estimate \( \mu_{\gamma \cdot 75} \), substitute \( x = 75 \) into the quadratic regression equation: \[ y = -113.0937 + 3.3684 \times 75 - 0.01780 \times 75^2 \]. This computes to \( y = 113.093 \).
02

Predict viscosity for speed 60 \\mathrm{rpm}

Use the quadratic regression equation with \( x = 60 \): \[ y = -113.0937 + 3.3684 \times 60 - 0.01780 \times 60^2 \]. Solve to predict \( y = -113.0937 + 202.104 - 64.08 = 24.9303 \).
03

Compute SSE

Find SSE using: \[ \text{SSE} = \Sigma y_{i}^{2} - \hat{\beta}_{0} \Sigma y_{i} - \hat{\beta}_{1} \Sigma x_{i} y_{i} - \hat{\beta}_{2} \Sigma x_{i}^{2} y_{i} \]. Plugging in the values: \[ \text{SSE} = 8386.43 - (-113.0937 \times 210.70) - (3.3684 \times 17002.00) - (-0.01780 \times 1419780) \]. Compute the values to find \( \text{SSE} = 49.088 \).
04

Compute standard error s

The standard error \( s \) is given by \( s = \sqrt{\frac{\text{SSE}}{n-3}} \). With \( \text{SSE} = 49.088 \) and \( n = 6 \), compute \( s = \sqrt{\frac{49.088}{3}} \). This results in \( s = 4.05 \).
05

Calculate R-squared value

The R-squared formula is \( R^2 = 1 - \frac{\text{SSE}}{\text{SST}} \). With \( \text{SSE} = 49.088 \) and \( \text{SST} = 987.35 \), calculate \( R^2 = 1 - \frac{49.088}{987.35} = 0.9503 \).
06

Test hypothesis for \\beta_{2}

Compute \( t \)-statistic for \( \beta_{2} \): \( t = \frac{\hat{\beta}_{2}}{s_{\hat{\beta}_{2}}} \) with \( \hat{\beta}_{2} = -0.01780 \) and \( s_{\hat{\beta}_{2}} = 0.00226 \). Calculate \( t = \frac{-0.01780}{0.00226} = -7.876 \). Compare with critical \( t \) value from \( t \)-table for \( df = 3 \) at \( 0.01 \) significance to find \( |t| \) exceeds critical value, indicating rejection of \( H_0 \).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Simple Linear Regression
Simple linear regression is a statistical method used to examine the relationship between two continuous variables. In its simplest form, it models the dependent variable (often denoted as \(y\)) as a function of an independent variable (\(x\)), typically taking the form \( y = \beta_0 + \beta_1x \), where \( \beta_0 \) is the y-intercept and \( \beta_1 \) is the slope.

The goal is to find the slope \( \beta_1 \) and the intercept \( \beta_0 \) that minimize the sum of the square differences between the observed values and those predicted by the line. This method is different from quadratic regression, which includes higher powers of the independent variable, allowing for curvature in the relationship rather than a straight line.

While simple linear regression can be very effective for linear relationships, if data show a curvilinear trend, like in the quadratic regression case described in the original exercise, simple linear regression may not be suitable. Instead, we use quadratic regression to accommodate the curvature.
Standard Error
The standard error (SE) is a measure of the accuracy of predictions made by a regression model. It indicates how much a set of observations varies around the regression line. Specifically, it helps us to estimate the average distance of the observed values from the estimated value predicted by the regression line.

In the context of the given exercise, we calculated the standard error of the estimate using the formula \( s = \sqrt{\frac{\text{SSE}}{n-3}} \), where SSE is the sum of squared errors, and \( n \) is the number of data points. In this case, we found that \( s = 4.05 \).

A smaller standard error suggests that the model's predictions are closer to the actual data points. Conversely, a larger standard error means there is more variability and less reliability in the model's predictions.
T-test
A t-test is a type of statistical test used to compare the means of two groups and can also be used to determine if a specific coefficient in a regression model is statistically significant. In the context of this exercise, we use a t-test to evaluate the hypothesis about the coefficient \( \beta_{2} \).

The calculation involves determining the \( t \)-statistic through the formula \( t = \frac{\hat{\beta}_{2}}{s_{\hat{\beta}_{2}}} \), where \( \hat{\beta}_{2} \) is the estimated coefficient, and \( s_{\hat{\beta}_{2}} \) is the standard error of that coefficient. We obtained \( t = -7.876 \) for our case.

By comparing the calculated \( t \)-statistic to a critical value from the t-distribution table, we can decide whether or not to reject the null hypothesis. In this exercise, the high value of the t-statistic indicates that \( \beta_{2} \) is significantly different from zero.
Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a statistical method that allows us to make decisions about a population based on sample data. The process involves formulating two statements, the null hypothesis (\( H_0 \)) and the alternative hypothesis (\( H_a \)), and using statistical evidence to make inferences about which hypothesis is more plausible.

In the quadratic regression context of this exercise, we tested the null hypothesis \( H_0: \beta_{2} = 0 \) against the alternative hypothesis \( H_a: \beta_{2} eq 0 \). Essentially, this test asks whether the quadratic term contributes significantly to the model.

After computing the t-statistic and referencing critical values in the t-distribution table at the 0.01 significance level, we found that the calculated \( t \)-statistic exceeded the critical value, leading to rejecting the null hypothesis. This result suggests that there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the quadratic term is indeed a significant part of the model.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Cardiorespiratory fitness is widely recognized as a major component of overall physical well-being. Direct measurement of maximal oxygen uptake (VO \(\mathrm{VO}_{2}\) max \()\) is the single best measure of such fitness, but direct measurement is time-consuming and expensive. It is therefore desirable to have a prediction equation for \(\mathrm{VO}_{2} \max\) in terms of easily obtained quantities. Consider the variables $$ \begin{aligned} &y=\mathrm{VO}_{2} \max (\mathrm{L} / \mathrm{min}) \quad x_{1}=\text { weight }(\mathrm{kg}) \\ &x_{2}=\text { age }(\mathrm{yr}) \\ &x_{3}=\text { time necessary to walk } 1 \text { mile (min) } \\ &x_{4}=\text { heart rate at the end of the walk (beats/min) } \\ &\text { Here is one possible model, for male students, consistent } \\ &\text { with the information given in the article "Validation of } \\ &\text { the Rockport Fitness Walking Test in College Males } \\ &\text { and Females" (Research Quarterly for Exercise and } \\ &\text { Sport, } 1994: 152-158): \\ &Y=5.0+.01 x_{1}-.05 x_{2}-.13 x_{3}-.01 x_{4}+\epsilon \\ &\sigma=.4 \end{aligned} $$ a. Interpret \(\beta_{1}\) and \(\beta_{3}\). b. What is the expected value of \(\mathrm{VO}_{2} \max\) when weight is \(76 \mathrm{~kg}\), age is 20 yr, walk time is \(12 \mathrm{~min}\), and heart rate is \(140 \mathrm{~b} / \mathrm{m}\) ? c. What is the probability that \(\mathrm{VO}_{2} \max\) will be between \(1.00\) and \(2.60\) for a single observation made when the values of the predictors are as stated in part (b)?

No tortilla chip aficionado likes soggy chips, so it is important to find characteristics of the production process that produce chips with an appealing texture. The following data on \(x=\) frying time \((\mathrm{sec})\) and \(y=\) moisture content \((\%)\) appeared in the article "* Thermal and Physical Properties of Tortilla Chips as a Function of Frying Time" \(U\). of Food Processing and Preservation, 1995: 175-189). $$ \begin{array}{c|cccccccc} x & 5 & 10 & 15 & 20 & 25 & 30 & 45 & 60 \\ \hline y & 16.3 & 9.7 & 8.1 & 4.2 & 3.4 & 2.9 & 1.9 & 1.3 \end{array} $$ a. Construct a scatterplot of \(y\) versus \(x\) and comment. b. Construct a scatterplot of the \((\ln (x), \ln (y))\) pairs and comment. c. What probabilistic relationship between \(x\) and \(y\) is suggested by the linear pattern in the plot of part (b)? d. Predict the value of moisture content when frying time is 20 , in a way that conveys information about reliability and precision. e. Analyze the residuals from fitting the simple linear regression model to the transformed data and comment.

Continuous recording of heart rate can be used to obtain information about the level of exercise intensity or physical strain during sports participation, work, or other daily activities. The article "The Relationship Between Heart Rate and Oxygen Uptake During Non-Steady State Exercise" (Ergonomics, 2000: 1578-1592) reported on a study to investigate using heart rate response \((x\), as a percentage of the maximum rate) to predict oxygen uptake ( \(y\), as a percentage of maximum uptake) during exercise. The accompanying data was read from a graph in the article. $$ \begin{array}{l|llllllll} \mathrm{HR} & 43.5 & 44.0 & 44.0 & 44.5 & 44.0 & 45.0 & 48.0 & 49.0 \\ \hline \mathrm{VO}_{2} & 22.0 & 21.0 & 22.0 & 21.5 & 25.5 & 24.5 & 30.0 & 28.0 \\\ \mathrm{HR} & 49.5 & 51.0 & 54.5 & 57.5 & 57.7 & 61.0 & 63.0 & 72.0 \\ \hline \mathrm{VO}_{2} & 32.0 & 29.0 & 38.5 & 30.5 & 57.0 & 40.0 & 58.0 & 72.0 \end{array} $$ Use a statistical software package to perform a simple linear regression analysis, paying particular attention to the presence of any unusual or influential observations.

a. Show that \(\sum_{i=1}^{n} e_{i}=0\) when the \(e_{i}\) 's are the residuals from a simple linear regression. b. Are the residuals from a simple linear regression independent of one another, positively correlated, or negatively correlated? Explain. c. Show that \(\sum_{i=1}^{n} x_{i} e_{i}=0\) for the residuals from a simple linear regression. (This result along with part (a) shows that there are two linear restrictions on the \(e_{i}^{\text {'s, resulting }}\) in a loss of 2 df when the squared residuals are used to estimate \(\sigma^{2}\).) d. Is it true that \(\Sigma_{i=1}^{n} e_{i}^{*}=0\) ? Give a proof or a counter example.

46\. A regression analysis carried out to relate \(y=\) repair time for a water filtration system (hr) to \(x_{1}=\) elapsed time since the previous service (months) and \(x_{2}=\) type of repair ( 1 if electrical and 0 if mechanical) yielded the following model based on \(n=12\) observations: \(y=.950+.400 x_{1}+1.250 x_{2}\). In addition, SST \(=12.72\), \(\mathrm{SSE}=2.09\), and \(s_{\hat{\beta}_{2}}=.312\). a. Does there appear to be a useful linear relationship between repair time and the two model predictors? Carry out a test of the appropriate hypotheses using a significance level of \(.05\). b. Given that elapsed time since the last service remains in the model, does type of repair provide useful information about repair time? State and test the appropriate hypotheses using a significance level of .01. c. Calculate and interpret a \(95 \% \mathrm{CI}\) for \(\beta_{2}\). d. The estimated standard deviation of a prediction for repair time when elapsed time is 6 months and the repair is electrical is \(.192\). Predict repair time under these circumstances by calculating a \(99 \%\) prediction interval. Does the interval suggest that the estimated model will give an accurate prediction? Why or why not?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.