/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 2 For each of the following hypoth... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

For each of the following hypothetical populations, give a plausible sample of size 4 : a. All distances that might result when you throw a football b. Page lengths of books published 5 years from now c. All possible earthquake-strength measurements (Richter scale) that might be recorded in California during the next year d. All possible yields (in grams) from a certain chemical reaction carried out in a laboratory

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. 10, 35, 55, 70 meters; b. 150, 300, 500, 750 pages; c. 2.5, 4.0, 5.8, 7.1; d. 5, 50, 150, 300 grams.

Step by step solution

01

Analyze the Population

For each hypothetical population, identify the range or characteristic of possibilities. This will help in selecting a plausible sample. - a. Distances when throwing a football range from a few meters to over 80 meters. - b. Page lengths of future books typically range from short pamphlets (20 pages) to lengthy volumes (1,000 pages). - c. Earthquake strengths on the Richter scale in California can vary from minor (<3) to major (>7). - d. Yields from a chemical reaction can vary based on conditions from negligible (0 grams) to optimal high yield (hundreds of grams).
02

Generate Sample for Football Distance

Select four plausible distances representing the possible outcomes when a football is thrown, considering different skill levels and strengths. Example sample: 10 meters, 35 meters, 55 meters, 70 meters
03

Generate Sample for Book Page Length

Select four plausible page lengths for books to be published in five years, including a variety of types such as fiction, manuals, and encyclopedias. Example sample: 150 pages, 300 pages, 500 pages, 750 pages
04

Generate Sample for Earthquake Strength

Select four plausible earthquake strengths on the Richter scale, covering potential mild to moderate earthquakes in California. Example sample: 2.5, 4.0, 5.8, 7.1
05

Generate Sample for Chemical Reaction Yield

Select four plausible yields under different experimental conditions for a chemical reaction conducted in a laboratory. Example sample: 5 grams, 50 grams, 150 grams, 300 grams

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Sample Generation
Sample generation is the process of selecting a subset of data or observations from a larger set, known as the population. It's crucial in statistical sampling, where representative samples are needed to make predictions or inferences about a larger group. In practice, generating samples requires careful thought on how wide-ranging or representative the sample should be.

For instance, when considering the distances a football can be thrown, factors such as an athlete's strength and weather conditions play a role. A plausible sample could include distances like 10 meters for a modest throw and up to 70 meters for a more powerful one. This variety ensures that the sample reflects different possible real-world scenarios.

In summary, generating a sample means thoughtfully selecting specific examples that would accurately reflect the actual variability and possibilities within a population.
Population Analysis
Population analysis involves examining the entire set of possible data points or observations in a given scenario. This step is essential because it helps to understand the underlying characteristics and range of possible outcomes within the population. Through this analysis, one can predict likely outcomes or behaviors.

Take the example of future book page lengths. By analyzing past trends and publishing patterns, we might see that most books have been between 200 and 300 pages, with outliers ranging significantly higher or lower. This analysis helps us to anticipate a plausible range for books that will be published 5 years from now, enabling the selection of sample page lengths like 150, 300, 500, and 750 pages.

Ultimately, effective population analysis helps narrow down the broad spectrum of possibilities to a reasonable and manageable set for further study or sampling.
Hypothetical Populations
Hypothetical populations refer to the imagined set of all possible outcomes or observations within a particular context that cannot be directly observed. These populations are constructed based on theoretical or predictive analysis rather than direct measurement.

For example, considering all earthquake strengths that might occur in California next year involves creating a hypothetical population. While we cannot predict each earthquake, analysis of historical data gives insights. Most earthquakes might be small (between 2 and 3 on the Richter scale), but larger events (over 7) aren't impossible. A sample reflecting this might include values like 2.5, 4.0, 5.8, and 7.1.

Understanding and defining a hypothetical population allows researchers and analysts to better model, predict, and prepare for various potential outcomes.
Plausible Samples
Plausible samples are selections from a population that realistically represent the range and diversity of that population. Given any hypothetical scenario, a plausible sample should include a variety of elements that make sense within that context, capturing the possible range of outcomes.

Consider the chemical yields from a laboratory reaction; a plausible sample might include values like 5 grams when conditions are less favorable and up to 300 grams when conditions are optimal. Such a sample mirrors real-world variations in reaction yields, thereby making it useful for predictions or further analysis.

Thus, forming plausible samples ensures that the conclusions or predictions drawn from statistical studies are actually applicable to the true nature of the population in question.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Automated electron backscattered diffraction is now being used in the study of fracture phenomena. The following information on misorientation angle (degrees) was extracted from the article "Hbservations on the Faceted Initiation Site in the Dwell-Fatigue Tested Ti-6242 Alloy: Crystallographic Orientation and Size Effects" (Metallurgical and Materials Trans., 2006: 1507-1518). \(\begin{array}{lcccc}\text { Class: } & 0-<5 & 5-<10 & 10-<15 & 15-<20 \\\ \text { Rel freq: } & .177 & .166 & .175 & .136 \\ \text { Class: } & 20-<30 & 30-<40 & 40-<60 & 60-<90 \\ \text { Rel freq: } & .194 & .078 & .044 & .030\end{array}\) a. Is it true that more than \(50 \%\) of the sampled angles are smaller than \(15^{\circ}\), as asserted in the paper? b. What proportion of the sampled angles are at least \(30^{\circ} ?\) c. Roughly what proportion of angles are between \(10^{\circ}\) and \(25^{\circ} ?\) d. Construct a histogram and comment on any interesting features.

The sample data \(x_{1}, x_{2}, \ldots, x_{n}\) sometimes represents a time series, where \(x_{t}=\) the observed value of a response variable \(x\) at time \(t\). Often the observed series shows a great deal of random variation, which makes it difficult to study longer-term behavior. In such situations, it is desirable to produce a smoothed version of the series. One technique for doing so involves exponential smoothing. The value of a smoothing constant \(\alpha\) is chosen \((0<\alpha<1)\). Then with \(\bar{x}_{2}=\) smoothed value at time \(t\), we set \(\bar{x}_{1}=x_{1}\), and for \(t=2,3, \ldots, n, \bar{x}_{t}=\alpha x_{t}+(1-\alpha) \bar{x}_{t-1}\). a. Consider the following time series in which \(x_{t}=\) temperature \(\left({ }^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\right)\) of effluent at a sewage treatment plant on day \(t: 47,54,53,50,46,46,47,50\), \(51,50,46,52,50,50\). Plot each \(x_{r}\) against \(t\) on a two-dimensional coordinate system (a time-series plot). Does there appear to be any pattern? b. Calculate the \(\bar{x}_{t} s\) using \(\alpha=.1\). Repeat using \(\alpha=.5\). c. Substitute \(\bar{x}_{r-1}=\alpha x_{r-1}+(1-\alpha) \bar{x}_{r-2}\) on the righthand side of the expression for \(\bar{x}_{l}\), then substitute \(\bar{x}_{x-2}\) in terms of \(x_{t-2}\) and \(\bar{x}_{t-3}\), and so on. On how many of the values \(x_{r} x_{t-1}, \ldots, x_{1}\) does \(\bar{x}_{t}\) depend? What happens to the coefficient on \(x_{t-k}\) as \(k\) increases? d. Refer to part (c). If \(t\) is large, how sensitive is \(\bar{x}_{1}\) to the initialization \(\bar{x}_{1}=x_{1}\) ? Explain. [Note: A relevant reference is the article "Simple Statistics for Interpreting Environmental Data," Water Pollution Control Fed. J., 1981: 167-175.]

A study carried out to investigate the distribution of total braking time (reaction time plus accelerator-to-brake movement time, in ms) during real driving conditions at \(60 \mathrm{~km} /\) hr gave the following summary information on the distribution of times ("A Field Study on Braking Responses During Driving," Ergonomics, 1995: 1903–1910): mean \(=535\) median \(=500 \quad\) mode \(=500\) \(\mathrm{sd}=96 \quad\) minimum \(=220 \quad\) maximum \(=925\) 5 th percentile \(=400 \quad 10\) th percentile \(=430\) 90 th percentile \(=640 \quad 95\) th percentile \(=720\) What can you conclude about the shape of a histogram of this data? Explain your reasoning.

Exercise 34 presented the following data on endotoxin concentration in settled dust both for a sample of urban homes and for a sample of farm homes: \(\begin{array}{llrrrrrrrrrr}\mathrm{U}: & 6.0 & 5.0 & 11.0 & 33.0 & 4.0 & 5.0 & 80.0 & 18.0 & 35.0 & 17.0 & 23.0 \\ \mathrm{~F}: & 4.0 & 14.0 & 11.0 & 9.0 & 9.0 & 8.0 & 4.0 & 20.0 & 5.0 & 8.9 & 21.0 \\ & 9.2 & 3.0 & 2.0 & 0.3 & & & & & & & \end{array}\) a. Determine the value of the sample standard deviation for each sample, interpret these values, and then contrast variability in the two samples. [Hint: \(\Sigma x_{i}=237.0\) for the urban sample and \(=128.4\) for the farm sample, and \(\Sigma x_{i}^{2}=10,079\) for the urban sample and \(1617.94\) for the farm sample.] b. Compute the fourth spread for each sample and compare. Do the fourth spreads convey the same message about variability that the standard deviations do? Explain. c. The authors of the cited article also provided endotoxin concentrations in dust bag dust: U: \(34.049 .0 \quad 13.0 \quad 33.024 .024 .035 .0 \quad 104.034 .040 .0 \quad 38.0 \quad 1.0\) F: \(\quad 2.064 .0 \quad 6.0 \quad 17.0 \quad 35.011 .0 \quad 17.0 \quad 13.0 \quad 5.0 \quad 27.0 \quad 23.0\) \(28.0 \quad 10.0 \quad 13.0 \quad 0.2\) Construct a comparative boxplot (as did the cited paper) and compare and contrast the four samples.

The accompanying summary data on \(\mathrm{CeO}_{2}\) particle sizes \((\mathrm{nm}\) ) under certain experimental conditions was read from a graph in the article "NanoceriaEnergetics of Surfaces, Interfaces and Water Adsorption" (J. of the Amer. Ceramic Soc., 2011: 3992-3999): \(\begin{array}{ccccc}3.0-<3.5 & 3.5-<4.0 & 4.0-<4.5 & 4.5-<5.0 & 5.0-5.5 \\ 5 & 15 & 27 & 34 & 22\end{array}\) \(\begin{array}{ccccc}5.5-<6.0 & 6.0-<6.5 & 6.5-<7.0 & 7.0-<7.5 & 7.5-<8.0 \\\ 14 & 7 & 2 & 4 & 1\end{array}\) a. What proportion of the observations are less than 5 ? b. What proportion of the observations are at least 6 ? c. Construct a histogram with relative frequency on the vertical axis and comment on interesting features. In particular, does the distribution of particle sizes appear to be reasonably symmetric or somewhat skewed? [Note: The investigators fit a lognormal distribution to the data; this is discussed in Chapter 4.] d. Construct a histogram with density on the vertical axis and compare to the histogram in (c).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.