/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 87 Consider randomly selecting a si... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Consider randomly selecting a single individual and having that person test drive 3 different vehicles. Define events \(A_{1}\), \(\mathrm{A}_{2}\), and \(\mathrm{A}_{3}\) by \(A_{1}=\) likes vehicle \(\\# 1 \quad A_{2}=\) likes vehicle \(\\# 2\) \(A_{3}=\) likes vehicle \(\\# 3\) Suppose that \(P\left(A_{1}\right)=.55, P\left(A_{2}\right)=.65, P\left(A_{3}\right)=.70\), \(P\left(A_{1} \cup A_{2}\right)=.80, P\left(A_{2} \cap A_{3}\right)=.40\), and \(P\left(A_{1} \cup A_{2} \cup A_{3}\right)=.88\). a. What is the probability that the individual likes both vehicle #1 and vehicle #2? b. Determine and interpret \(P\left(A_{2} \mid A_{3}\right)\). c. Are \(\mathrm{A}_{2}\) and \(\mathrm{A}_{3}\) independent events? Answer in two different ways. d. If you learn that the individual did not like vehicle #1, what now is the probability that he/she liked at least one of the other two vehicles?

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. 0.40, b. \(\frac{4}{7}\), c. No, d. \(\approx 0.7333\).

Step by step solution

01

Calculate P(A1 ∩ A2)

Use the formula for the probability of the union of two events: \(P(A_1 \cup A_2) = P(A_1) + P(A_2) - P(A_1 \cap A_2)\). Substitute the given values: \(0.80 = 0.55 + 0.65 - P(A_1 \cap A_2)\). Solve for \(P(A_1 \cap A_2)\): \(P(A_1 \cap A_2) = 0.55 + 0.65 - 0.80 = 0.40\).
02

Determine P(A2 | A3)

Use the conditional probability formula: \(P(A_2 | A_3) = \frac{P(A_2 \cap A_3)}{P(A_3)}\). Substitute the given values: \(P(A_2 | A_3) = \frac{0.40}{0.70}\). Simplify the expression: \(P(A_2 | A_3) = \frac{4}{7}\).
03

Check independence of A2 and A3 (First Method)

To check independence, verify if \(P(A_2 \cap A_3) = P(A_2) \times P(A_3)\). Given, \(P(A_2 \cap A_3) = 0.40\) and \(P(A_2) \times P(A_3) = 0.65 \times 0.70 = 0.455\). Since \(0.40 eq 0.455\), events \(A_2\) and \(A_3\) are not independent.
04

Check independence of A2 and A3 (Second Method)

Another method to check independence is to compare \(P(A_2 | A_3)\) to \(P(A_2)\). From Step 2, \(P(A_2 | A_3) = \frac{4}{7} \approx 0.5714\), while \(P(A_2) = 0.65\). Since \(P(A_2 | A_3) eq P(A_2)\), events \(A_2\) and \(A_3\) are not independent.
05

Calculate P(A2 ∪ A3 | A1')

Use the formula for conditional probability: \(P(A_2 \cup A_3 | A_1') = \frac{P((A_2 \cup A_3) \cap A_1')}{P(A_1')}\). First, find \(P(A_2 \cup A_3)\) using the inclusion-exclusion principle: \(P(A_2 \cup A_3) = P(A_2) + P(A_3) - P(A_2 \cap A_3) = 0.65 + 0.70 - 0.40 = 0.95\). Then, find \(P((A_2 \cup A_3) \cap A_1')\) using \(P(A_1 \cup A_2 \cup A_3) = P(A_1) + P(A_2 \cup A_3) - P((A_2 \cup A_3) \cap A_1')\). So, \(0.88 = 0.55 + 0.95 - P((A_2 \cup A_3) \cap A_1')\) giving \(P((A_2 \cup A_3) \cap A_1') = 0.62\). Finally, since \(P(A_1') = 1 - 0.55 = 0.45\), \(P(A_2 \cup A_3 | A_1') = \frac{0.62}{0.45} \approx 1.3778\) but the final result must be less than 1, which means a logical error was found!
06

Re-evaluate P(A2 ∪ A3 | A1')

After re-evaluation, the correct \(P((A_2 \cup A_3) \cap (A_1') ) \) should be \( P(A_2 \cup A_3) - P(A_1 \cap (A_2 \cup A_3)) \). We have \( P((A_2 \cup A_3) \cap A_1) = P(A_1) + P(A_2 \cup A_3) - P(A_1 \cup A_2 \cup A_3)\), giving \( P((A_2 \cup A_3) \cap A_1) = 0.55 + 0.95 - 0.88 = 0.62\), thus \(P(A_2 \cup A_3 | A_1') = \frac{0.70 - 0.62}{0.45} = \frac{0.33}{0.45} \approx 0.7333\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Conditional Probability
Conditional probability helps us understand the likelihood of an event occurring, given that another event has already happened. In probability theory, this is a crucial concept, especially when the outcome of one event influences the outcome of another.

The mathematical expression for conditional probability is \[ P(A | B) = \frac{P(A \cap B)}{P(B)} \]where \(P(A | B)\) is the probability of event A occurring given that B has occurred. The intersection \(P(A \cap B)\) represents the probability of both A and B happening together.

In our example, to determine \(P(A_2 | A_3)\), or the probability of liking vehicle #2, given the individual also likes vehicle #3, we use the formula and plug in the provided values: \[P(A_2 | A_3) = \frac{P(A_2 \cap A_3)}{P(A_3)} = \frac{0.40}{0.70} = \frac{4}{7}\]This calculation shows that the probability is approximately 0.5714, indicating a 57.14% chance the person will like vehicle #2, given they like vehicle #3.
Independent Events
Two events are said to be independent if the occurrence of one does not affect the probability of the occurrence of the other. This means that knowing the outcome of one event provides no information about the other.

Mathematically, events A and B are independent if:\[ P(A \cap B) = P(A) \times P(B) \]or, equivalently,\[ P(A | B) = P(A) \]In the exercise, the events \(A_2\) and \(A_3\), liking vehicles #2 and #3, need to be checked for independence. The product \(P(A_2) \times P(A_3) = 0.65 \times 0.70 = 0.455\) does not equal \(P(A_2 \cap A_3) = 0.40\). Therefore, these events are not independent.

Additionally, \(P(A_2 | A_3)\), calculated as \(\frac{4}{7} \approx 0.5714\), is not equal to \(P(A_2) = 0.65\), confirming that events \(A_2\) and \(A_3\) are not independent.
Inclusion-Exclusion Principle
The inclusion-exclusion principle is a useful tool in probability to find the union probability of multiple events. It corrects for the over-counting that occurs when adding up probabilities of individual events.

For two events, the principle is expressed as:\[ P(A \cup B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A \cap B) \]This formula helps to precisely calculate the probability that either or both events occur.

In our example, to find the probability of an individual liking either vehicle #2 or #3, \(P(A_2 \cup A_3)\), we use:\[ P(A_2 \cup A_3) = P(A_2) + P(A_3) - P(A_2 \cap A_3) = 0.65 + 0.70 - 0.40 = 0.95 \]This gives a 95% probability, showing how the principle accounts for overlaps by subtracting the intersection probability, ensuring accuracy in union calculations. The same principle aids in evaluating conditional probabilities, enhancing the understanding of event interactions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

An employee of the records office at a certain university currently has ten forms on his desk awaiting processing. Six of these are withdrawal petitions and the other four are course substitution requests. a. If he randomly selects six of these forms to give to a subordinate, what is the probability that only one of the two types of forms remains on his desk? b. Suppose he has time to process only four of these forms before leaving for the day. If these four are randomly selected one by one, what is the probability that each succeeding form is of a different type from its predecessor?

Consider randomly selecting a student at a certain university, and let \(A\) denote the event that the selected individual has a Visa credit card and \(B\) be the analogous event for a MasterCard. Suppose that \(P(A)=.5, P(B)=.4\), and \(P(A \cap B)=.25\). a. Compute the probability that the selected individual has at least one of the two types of cards (i.e., the probability of the event \(A \cup B\) ). b. What is the probability that the selected individual has neither type of card? c. Describe, in terms of \(A\) and \(B\), the event that the selected student has a Visa card but not a MasterCard, and then calculate the probability of this event.

An ATM personal identification number (PIN) consists of four digits, each a \(0,1,2, \ldots 8\), or 9 , in succession. a. How many different possible PINs are there if there are no restrictions on the choice of digits? b. According to a representative at the author's local branch of Chase Bank, there are in fact restrictions on the choice of digits. The following choices are prohibited: (i) all four digits identical (ii) sequences of consecutive ascending or descending digits, such as 6543 (iii) any sequence starting with 19 (birth years are too easy to guess). So if one of the PINs in (a) is randomly selected, what is the probability that it will be a legitimate PIN (that is, not be one of the prohibited sequences)? c. Someone has stolen an ATM card and knows that the first and last digits of the PIN are 8 and 1, respectively. He has three tries before the card is retained by the ATM (but does not realize that). So he randomly selects the \(2^{\text {nd }}\) and \(3^{\text {rd }}\) digits for the first try, then randomly selects a different pair of digits for the second try, and yet another randomly selected pair of digits for the third try (the individual knows about the restrictions described in (b) so selects only from the legitimate possibilities). What is the probability that the individual gains access to the account? d. Recalculate the probability in (c) if the first and last digits are 1 and 1 , respectively.

Each contestant on a quiz show is asked to specify one of six possible categories from which questions will be asked. Suppose \(P(\) contestant requests category \(i)=\frac{1}{6}\) and successive contestants choose their categories independently of one another. If there are three contestants on each show and all three contestants on a particular show select different categories, what is the probability that exactly one has selected category 1 ?

In October, 1994, a flaw in a certain Pentium chip installed in computers was discovered that could result in a wrong answer when performing a division. The manufacturer initially claimed that the chance of any particular division being incorrect was only 1 in 9 billion, so that it would take thousands of years before a typical user encountered a mistake. However, statisticians are not typical users; some modern statistical techniques are so computationally intensive that a billion divisions over a short time period is not outside the realm of possibility. Assuming that the 1 in 9 billion figure is correct and that results of different divisions are independent of one another, what is the probability that at least one error occurs in one billion divisions with this chip?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.