/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 19 Human visual inspection of solde... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Human visual inspection of solder joints on printed circuit boards can be very subjective. Part of the problem stems from the numerous types of solder defects (e.g., pad nonwetting, knee visibility, voids) and even the degree to which a joint possesses one or more of these defects. Consequently, even highly trained inspectors can disagree on the disposition of a particular joint. In one batch of 10,000 joints, inspector A found 724 that were judged defective, inspector B found 751 such joints, and 1159 of the joints were judged defective by at least one of the inspectors. Suppose that one of the 10,000 joints is randomly selected. a. What is the probability that the selected joint was judged to be defective by neither of the two inspectors? b. What is the probability that the selected joint was judged to be defective by inspector \(B\) but not by inspector A?

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. 0.8841 b. 0.0435

Step by step solution

01

Define the Sets

Let \( A \) be the set of defective joints found by inspector A, and \( B \) be the set of defective joints found by inspector B.\(|A| = 724\), \(|B| = 751\), and \(|A \cup B| = 1159\). This means that 1159 joints were judged defective by at least one of the inspectors.
02

Use the Formula for Union of Sets

We know the formula for the union of two sets: \(|A \cup B| = |A| + |B| - |A \cap B|\), where \(|A \cap B|\) represents the joints judged defective by both inspectors. Therefore, we can rearrange the equation to find \(|A \cap B|\):\[|A \cap B| = |A| + |B| - |A \cup B| = 724 + 751 - 1159 = 316.\]
03

Calculate Joints Judged Defective by Neither Inspector

The number of joints judged defective by neither inspector is given by the total number of joints minus those judged defective by at least one inspector: \[\text{Joints judged defective by neither} = 10000 - |A \cup B| = 10000 - 1159 = 8841.\]The probability is the ratio of these joints to the total number of joints: \[\frac{8841}{10000} = 0.8841.\]
04

Calculate Joints Judged Defective by Inspector B Only

The number of joints judged defective by inspector B only is given by \(|B| - |A \cap B|\):\[\text{Joints judged defective by only B} = |B| - |A \cap B| = 751 - 316 = 435.\]The probability of selecting such a joint is: \[\frac{435}{10000} = 0.0435.\]

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Visual Inspection
Inspecting solder joints through visual inspection is an essential task in quality control, especially for printed circuit boards (PCBs). During this process, inspectors visually examine the solder joints to determine whether they meet specific quality standards. However, there are challenges with this method. Subjectivity plays a significant role because inspectors might have varying opinions on what constitutes a defect. A solder joint may appear acceptable to one inspector and defective to another. This variability is why even trained inspectors can differ in judgment. Additionally, visual inspection heavily relies on the experience and sharpness of the inspector. Consistency in judgment can be hard to achieve among different inspectors, making objective analysis difficult. Modern techniques sometimes combine visual inspection with automated systems to try and minimize these inconsistencies.
Solder Defects
Solder defects refer to imperfections or problems in the soldering of electronic components on PCBs. A myriad of defects can occur, each affecting the functionality and reliability of the circuit. Some common solder defects include:
  • Pad Nonwetting: This occurs when the solder fails to adequately adhere to the connection pad, leading to weak joins.
  • Knee Visibility: An issue where the solder fillet does not optimally cover the component lead, indicating insufficient solder.
  • Voids: Pockets of air or unfilled spaces within the solder joint that reduce its mechanical strength.
These defects are critical because they can compromise the electrical connections in circuits, resulting in product failures. Identifying and rectifying these defects is crucial in ensuring the durability and reliability of electronic products.
Printed Circuit Boards
Printed circuit boards (PCBs) are the backbone of many electronic devices. They consist of thin boards made from insulating materials with conductive pathways etched onto them. These pathways facilitate electrical connections between different components mounted on the board. The intricate design of PCBs allows for the miniaturization of electronic systems, making them essential in the production of modern electronic devices. However, PCBs are susceptible to defects, especially during the assembly process, where various solder joints need to be checked for integrity. The complexity of PCBs requires thorough inspections to avoid issues that might affect performance, with quality checks being essential at all stages.
Set Theory
Set theory is a fundamental concept in mathematics that helps organize and understand groupings of objects. It's crucial in solving problems involving group interactions, like those involving visual inspection of solder defects.In our scenario, defining two sets helps identify and solve the problem efficiently:
  • Set A: Represents defective joints found by Inspector A.
  • Set B: Represents defective joints found by Inspector B.
Using set operations, one can determine various probabilities and intersections, like the total defects identified by both inspectors (\(|A \cap B|\)). Using the union operation (\(|A \cup B|\)), we can calculate total objects in either set, underpinning probability computations.
Joint Probabilities
Joint probabilities allow us to calculate the likelihood of conjunctions of events happening. In situations involving inspections by multiple inspectors, these probabilities are key. For solder defects on PCBs, it's about measuring the likelihood a joint is deemed defective by an inspector or combination thereof. Calculating joint probabilities involves knowing:
  • The probability of one inspector finding defects in a joint.
  • The union probability where at least one inspector finds it defective.
  • The overlap probability where both find it defective.
By performing these calculations using set theory, you understand both independent and combined events. In this exercise, such calculations help assess the overall quality assurance in inspection processes.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The proportions of blood phenotypes in the U.S. population are as follows: \(\begin{array}{lccc}\mathrm{A} & \mathrm{B} & \mathrm{AB} & \mathrm{O} \\ .40 & .11 & .04 & .45\end{array}\) Assuming that the phenotypes of two randomly selected individuals are independent of one another, what is the probability that both phenotypes are O? What is the probability that the phenotypes of two randomly selected individuals match?

An insurance company offers four different deductible levels-none, low, medium, and high-for its homeowner's policyholders and three different levels- low, medium, and high-for its automobile policyholders. The accompanying table gives proportions for the various categories of policyholders who have both types of insurance. For example, the proportion of individuals with both low homeowner's deductible and low auto deductible is .06 (6\% of all such individuals). $$ \begin{array}{lcccc} & {}{}{\text { Homeowner's }} \\ { } \text { Auto } & \mathbf{N} & \mathbf{L} & \mathbf{M} & \mathbf{H} \\ \hline \mathbf{L} & .04 & .06 & .05 & .03 \\ \mathbf{M} & .07 & .10 & .20 & .10 \\ \mathbf{H} & .02 & .03 & .15 & .15 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Suppose an individual having both types of policies is randomly selected. a. What is the probability that the individual has a medium auto deductible and a high homeowner's deductible? b. What is the probability that the individual has a low auto deductible? A low homeowner's deductible? c. What is the probability that the individual is in the same category for both auto and homeowner's deductibles? d. Based on your answer in part (c), what is the probability that the two categories are different? e. What is the probability that the individual has at least one low deductible level? f. Using the answer in part (e), what is the probability that neither deductible level is low?

Fifteen telephones have just been received at an authorized service center. Five of these telephones are cellular, five are cordless, and the other five are corded phones. Suppose that these components are randomly allocated the numbers \(1,2, \ldots, 15\) to establish the order in which they will be serviced. a. What is the probability that all the cordless phones are among the first ten to be serviced? b. What is the probability that after servicing ten of these phones, phones of only two of the three types remain to be serviced? c. What is the probability that two phones of each type are among the first six serviced?

A computer consulting firm presently has bids out on three projects. Let \(A_{i}=\\{\) awarded project \(i\\}\), for \(i=1,2,3\), and suppose that \(P\left(A_{1}\right)=.22, P\left(A_{2}\right)=.25, P\left(A_{3}\right)=.28\), \(P\left(A_{1} \cap A_{2}\right)=.11, P\left(A_{1} \cap A_{3}\right)=.05, P\left(A_{2} \cap A_{3}\right)=.07\), \(P\left(A_{1} \cap A_{2} \cap A_{3}\right)=.01\). Express in words each of the following events, and compute the probability of each event: a. \(A_{1} \cup A_{2}\) b. \(A_{1}^{\prime} \cap A_{2}^{\prime}\left[\right.\) Hint: \(\left.\left(A_{1} \cup A_{2}\right)^{\prime}=A_{1}^{\prime} \cap A_{2}^{\prime}\right]\) c. \(A_{1} \cup A_{2} \cup A_{3}\) d. \(A_{1}^{\prime} \cap A_{2}^{\prime} \cap A_{3}^{\prime}\) e. \(A_{1}^{\prime} \cap A_{2}^{\prime} \cap A_{3}\) f. \(\left(A_{1}^{\prime} \cap A_{2}^{\prime}\right) \cup A_{3}\)

Each of a sample of four home mortgages is classified as fixed rate \((F)\) or variable rate \((V)\). a. What are the 16 outcomes in \(\mathcal{S}\) ? b. Which outcomes are in the event that exactly three of the selected mortgages are fixed rate? c. Which outcomes are in the event that all four mortgages are of the same type? d. Which outcomes are in the event that at most one of the four is a variable- rate mortgage? e. What is the union of the events in parts (c) and (d), and what is the intersection of these two events? f. What are the union and intersection of the two events in parts (b) and (c)?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.