/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 55 The article "Bank Full Discharge... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The article "Bank Full Discharge of Rivers" (Water 91Ó°ÊÓ \(J ., 1978: 1141-1154)\) reports data on discharge amount \(\left(q\right.\), in \(\left.\mathrm{m}^{3} / \mathrm{sec}\right)\), flow area \(\left(a\right.\), in \(\left.\mathrm{m}^{2}\right)\), and slope of the water surface \((b\), in \(\mathrm{m} / \mathrm{m})\) obtained at a number of floodplain stations. A subset of the data follows. The article proposed a multiplicative power model \(Q=\alpha a^{\beta} b^{\gamma} \epsilon\). \begin{tabular}{l|rrrrr} \(q\) & \(17.6\) & \(23.8\) & \(5.7\) & \(3.0\) & \(7.5\) \\ \hline\(a\) & \(8.4\) & \(31.6\) & \(5.7\) & \(1.0\) & \(3.3\) \\ \hline\(b\) & \(.0048\) & \(.0073\) & 0037 & \(.0412\) & \(.0416\) \\ \(q\) & \(89.2\) & \(60.9\) & \(27.5\) & \(13.2\) & \(12.2\) \\ \hline\(a\) & \(41.1\) & \(26.2\) & \(16.4\) & \(6.7\) & \(9.7\) \\ \hline\(b\) & \(.0063\) & \(.0061\) & \(.0036\) & \(.0039\) & \(.0025\) \end{tabular} a. Use an appropriate transformation to make the model linear, and then estimate the regression parameters for the transformed model. Finally, estimate \(\alpha, \beta\), and \(\gamma\) (the parameters of the original model). What would be your prediction of discharge amount when flow area is 10 and slope is 01 ? b. Without actually doing any analysis, how would you fit a multiplicative exponential model \(Q=\alpha e^{\beta a} e^{\gamma b} \boldsymbol{\epsilon}\) ? c. After the transformation to linearity in part (a), a \(95 \%\) CI for the value of the transformed regression function when \(a=3.3\) and \(b=.0046\) was obtained from computer output as \((.217,1.755)\). Obtain a \(95 \%\) Cl for \(\alpha a^{\beta} b\) when \(a=3.3\) and \(b=.0046\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
Transform the model using logarithms, perform linear regression, and transform predictions back for estimates. Use confidence intervals on transformed scale to estimate in original terms.

Step by step solution

01

Transform the Multiplicative Model

The given multiplicative model is \( Q = \alpha a^{\beta} b^{\gamma} \epsilon \). Taking the natural log on both sides, we linearize it: \( \ln(Q) = \ln(\alpha) + \beta \ln(a) + \gamma \ln(b) + \ln(\epsilon) \). This equation is now in the form \( Y = \beta_0 + \beta_1 X_1 + \beta_2 X_2 + e \), where \( Y = \ln(Q) \), \( \beta_0 = \ln(\alpha) \), \( X_1 = \ln(a) \), and \( X_2 = \ln(b) \).
02

Perform Regression on Transformed Data

Using the transformed variables, perform a multiple linear regression analysis. Calculate \( Y = \ln(q) \), \( X_1 = \ln(a) \), and \( X_2 = \ln(b) \) for each data entry given. With these regression inputs, estimate the coefficients \( \beta_0 \), \( \beta_1 \), and \( \beta_2 \). These coefficients will allow us to determine \( \alpha, \beta, \) and \( \gamma \) for the original model.
03

Estimate Parameters \( \alpha, \beta, \gamma \)

From the regression output, \( \beta_0 = \ln(\alpha) \), thus \( \alpha = e^{\beta_0} \). Similarly, \( \beta = \beta_1 \) and \( \gamma = \beta_2 \). Use these values for any predictions in the original model.
04

Predict Discharge for Given Values

To predict the value of \( Q \) when \( a = 10 \) and \( b = 0.01 \), use the original model with the estimated parameters: \( Q = \alpha \cdot 10^{\beta} \cdot 0.01^{\gamma} \). Substitute the values of \( \alpha, \beta, \) and \( \gamma \) obtained from Step 3.
05

Fit a Multiplicative Exponential Model

For part (b), without calculations, to fit \( Q = \alpha e^{\beta a} e^{\gamma b} \epsilon \), take the natural logarithm again: \( \ln(Q) = \ln(\alpha) + \beta a + \gamma b + \ln(\epsilon) \). This is an exponential form directly relating \( Q \) to inputs, which implies using nonlinear regression techniques.
06

Calculate 95% Confidence Interval for Original Model

Convert the confidence interval for the transformed model to the original model by exponentiating the interval bounds. For the provided CI \((0.217, 1.755)\), use \( (e^{0.217}, e^{1.755}) \) to obtain the CI for \( \alpha a^{\beta} b \).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Multiplicative Model
A multiplicative model is one where the independent variables are multiplied together. In this problem, the model is given as \( Q = \alpha a^{\beta} b^{\gamma} \epsilon \). This implies that the discharge amount \( Q \) depends on the product of the flow area \( a \), the slope of the water surface \( b \), and some error term \( \epsilon \). The parameters \( \alpha, \beta, \) and \( \gamma \) are constants that need to be estimated from the data.

These models are powerful for their ability to describe relationships where changes in one variable could compound with others, making them suitable for various scientific and engineering fields. They are especially useful in contexts where the effect of one variable on the outcome changes depending on the level of another variable. This is common in ecological models, economics, and other applied sciences.
  • \( \alpha \) acts as a scaling factor.
  • \( \beta \) and \( \gamma \) determine how strong the influence of \( a \) and \( b \) are, respectively.
  • \( \epsilon \) accounts for unobserved factors that affect the output.
Natural Logarithm
The natural logarithm (\( \ln \)) is a logarithm to the base \( e \), where \( e \approx 2.718 \). It's a powerful mathematical tool used to linearize multiplicative models. When you take the natural log of both sides of the multiplicative model, it simplifies multiplicative relationships into additive ones. For instance,

\[ Q = \alpha a^{\beta} b^{\gamma} \epsilon \]

becomes

\[ \ln(Q) = \ln(\alpha) + \beta \ln(a) + \gamma \ln(b) + \ln(\epsilon) \].
This transformation, therefore, converts the problem into a multiple linear regression form.

Logarithms such as these are extensively used in solving real-world problems because they can simplify complex equations. They also make it easier to interpret the multiplicative effects of variables in terms of percentage changes because an increase in the log form approximates percentage changes in linear space.
Regression Parameters
In the transformed linear model \( Y = \ln(Q) \), the regression parameters correspond to the coefficients of \( \ln(a) \) and \( \ln(b) \). By performing a multiple linear regression, you estimate these coefficients, which are:\[ \beta_0 = \ln(\alpha), \ \beta_1 = \beta, \ \text{and} \ \beta_2 = \gamma \].

These parameters are crucial as they represent the strength and direction of the effect each variable \( a \) and \( b \) has on \( Q \). A positive \( \beta \) implies \( a \) is positively correlated with \( Q \); the same logic applies to \( \gamma \) and \( b \).
  • \( \beta_0 \) is the intercept, equivalent to the log of the multiplicative constant \( \alpha \).
  • \( \beta_1 \) and \( \beta_2 \) are the slopes for \( \ln(a) \) and \( \ln(b) \) respectively.
  • They help predict the natural log of \( Q \) using the input variables.
Performing this regression allows you to derive the necessary parameters for predicting discharge in situations beyond your existing data.
Confidence Interval
A confidence interval (CI) provides a range of values that is likely to contain the parameter of interest. In regression analysis, this helps us to understand the reliability of the estimated parameters. In our context, after transforming the multiplicative model, a \(95\%\) CI for the transformed regression function was given.

For example, if we have a CI as \((0.217, 1.755)\) for the transformed model, we can convert this to a CI for \( \alpha a^{\beta} b \) by exponentiating the bounds:
\[ (e^{0.217}, e^{1.755}) \].
This transformation is crucial because it gives a CI for the original scale of the model, allowing us to predict the discharge more accurately when specific parameter values are plugged into the equation.
  • Exponentiating converts the CI back from the log scale to the original scale.
  • It tells us with \(95\%\) confidence that the true parameter lies within this range.
  • This supports more reliable predictions and decisions in practical applications.
Using confidence intervals in this process ensures that we account for the degree of uncertainty in our parameter estimates.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Efficient design of certain types of municipal waste incinerators requires that information about energy content of the waste be available. The authors of the article "Modeling the Energy Content of Municipal Solid Waste Using Multiple Regression Analysis" (J. of the Air and Waste Mgmnt. Assoc., 1996: 650-656) kindly provided us with the accompanying data on \(y=\) energy content (kcal/ \(\mathrm{kg}\) ), the three physical composition variables \(x_{1}=\%\) plastics by weight, \(x_{2}=\%\) paper by weight, and \(x_{3}=\%\) garbage by weight, and the proximate analysis variable \(x_{4}=\%\) moisture by weight for waste specimens obtained from a certain region. a. Interpret the values of the estimated regression coefficients \(\hat{\beta}_{1}\) and \(\hat{\beta}_{4}\). b. State and test the appropriate hypotheses to decide whether the model fit to the data specifies a useful linear relationship between energy content and at least one of the four predictors. c. Given that \(\%\) plastics, \(\%\) paper, and \(\%\) water remain in the model, does \% garbage provide useful information about energy content? State and test the appropriate hypotheses using a significance level of .05. d. Use the fact that \(s_{\hat{Y}}=7.46\) when \(x_{1}=20, x_{2}=25\), \(x_{3}=40\), and \(x_{4}=45\) to calculate a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for true average energy content under these circumstances. Does the resulting interval suggest that mean energy content has been precisely estimated? e. Use the information given in part (d) to predict energy content for a waste sample having the specified characteristics, in a way that conveys information about precision and reliability.

Let \(y=\) sales at a fast-food outlet \((1000 \mathrm{~s}\) of \(\$), x_{1}=\) number of competing outlets within a 1-mile radius, \(x_{2}=\) population within a 1-mile radius ( \(1000 \mathrm{~s}\) of people), and \(x_{3}\) be an indicator variable that equals 1 if the outlet has a drive-up window and 0 otherwise. Suppose that the true regression model is $$ Y=10.00-1.2 x_{1}+6.8 x_{2}+15.3 x_{3}+\epsilon $$ a. What is the mean value of sales when the number of competing outlets is 2 , there are 8000 people within a 1-mile radius, and the outlet has a drive-up window? b. What is the mean value of sales for an outlet without a drive-up window that has three competing outlets and 5000 people within a 1 -mile radius? c. Interpret \(\beta_{3}\).

Feature recognition from surface models of complicated parts is becoming increasingly important in the development of efficient computer-aided design (CAD) systems. The article "A Computationally Efficient Approach to Feature Abstraction in Design-Manufacturing Integration" (J. of Engr: for Industry, 1995: 16-27) contained a graph of logadtotal recognition time), with time in sec, versus \(\log _{10}\) (number of edges of a part), from which the following representative values were read: \(\begin{array}{lrrrrrr}\text { Log(edges) } & 1.1 & 1.5 & 1.7 & 1.9 & 2.0 & 2.1 \\ \text { Log(time) } & .30 & .50 & .55 & .52 & .85 & .98 \\ \text { Log(edges) } & 2.2 & 2.3 & 2.7 & 2.8 & 3.0 & 3.3 \\ \text { Log(time) } & 1.10 & 1.00 & 1.18 & 1.45 & 1.65 & 1.84 \\ \text { Log(edges) } & 3.5 & 3.8 & 4.2 & 4.3 & & \\ \text { Log(time) } & 2.05 & 2.46 & 2.50 & 2.76 & & \end{array}\) a. Does a scatter plot of \(\log (\) time \()\) versus \(\log (\) edges) suggest an approximate linear relationship between these two variables? b. What probabilistic model for relating \(y=\) recognition time to \(x=\) number of edges is implied by the simple linear regression relationship between the transformed variables? c. Summary quantities calculated from the data are $$ \begin{aligned} &n=16 \quad \Sigma x_{i}^{\prime}=42.4 \quad \Sigma y_{i}^{\prime}=21.69 \\ &\Sigma\left(x_{i}^{\prime}\right)^{2}=126.34 \quad \Sigma\left(y_{i}^{\prime}\right)^{2}=38.5305 \\ &\Sigma x_{i}^{\prime} y_{i}^{\prime}=68.640 \end{aligned} $$ Calculate estimates of the parameters for the model in part (b), and then obtain a point prediction of time when the number of edges is 300 .

Let \(y=\) wear life of a bearing, \(x_{1}=\) oil viscosity, and \(x_{2}=\) load. Suppose that the multiple regression model relating life to viscosity and load is $$ Y=125.0+7.75 x_{1}+.0950 x_{2}-.0090 x_{1} x_{2}+\epsilon $$ a. What is the mean value of life when viscosity is 40 and load is 1100 ? b. When viscosity is 30 , what is the change in mean life associated with an increase of 1 in load? When viscosity is 40 , what is the change in mean life associated with an increase of 1 in load?

Air pressure (psi) and temperature ( \({ }^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\) ) were measured for a compression process in a certain piston-cylinder device, resulting in the following data (from Introduction to Engineering Experimentation, Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1996, p. 153): \(\begin{array}{lrrrrr}\text { Pressure } & 20.0 & 40.4 & 60.8 & 80.2 & 100.4 \\\ \text { Temperature } & 44.9 & 102.4 & 142.3 & 164.8 & 192.2 \\ & & & & & \\\ \text { Pressure } & 120.3 & 141.1 & 161.4 & 181.9 & 201.4 \\ \text { Temperature } & 221.4 & 228.4 & 249.5 & 269.4 & 270.8 \\ \text { Pressure } & 220.8 & 241.8 & 261.1 & 280.4 & 300.1 \\ \text { Temperature } & 291.5 & 287.3 & 313.3 & 322.3 & 325.8 \\ & & & & & \\ \text { Pressure } & 320.6 & 341.1 & 360.8 & & \\ \text { Temperature } & 337.0 & 332.6 & 342.9 & & \end{array}\) a. Would you fit the simple linear regression model to the data and use it as a basis for predicting temperature from pressure? Why or why not? b. Find a suitable probabilistic model and use it as a basis for predicting the value of temperature that would result from a pressure of 200 , in the most informative way possible.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.