/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 28 The viscosity \((y)\) of an oil ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The viscosity \((y)\) of an oil was measured by a cone and plate viscometer at six different cone speeds \((x)\). It was assumed that a quadratic regression model was appropriate, and the estimated regression function resulting from the \(n=6\) observations was $$ y=-113.0937+3.3684 x-.01780 x^{2} $$ a. Estimate \(\mu_{\gamma .75}\), the expected viscosity when speed is \(75 \mathrm{rpm} .\) b. What viscosity would you predict for a cone speed of \(60 \mathrm{rpm}\) ? c. If \(\sum y_{i}^{2}=8386.43, \Sigma y_{j}=210.70, \Sigma x_{i} y_{i}=17,002.00\), and \(\sum x_{1}^{2} y_{i}=1,419,780\), compute \(\mathrm{SSE}\left[=\sum y_{i}^{2}-\right.\) \(\left.\hat{\beta}_{0} \Sigma y_{i}-\hat{\beta}_{1} \Sigma x_{i} y_{s}-\hat{\beta}_{2} \Sigma x_{i}^{2} y_{i}\right]\) and \(s\). d. From part (c), SST \(=8386.43-(210.70)^{2} / 6=987.35\). Using SSE computed in part (c), what is the computed value of \(R^{2} ?\) e. If the estimated standard deviation of \(\hat{\beta}_{2}\) is \(s_{\dot{\beta}}=.00226\), test \(H_{0}: \beta_{2}=0\) versus \(H_{\mathrm{a}}: \beta_{2} \neq 0\) at level 01 , and interpret the result.

Short Answer

Expert verified
\( \mu_{\gamma .75} \approx 40.52 \), \( y(60) \approx 24.93 \), \( R^2 \approx 0.98 \). \( \beta_2 \) is significant.

Step by step solution

01

Estimate the Expected Viscosity for 75 RPM

To estimate \( \mu_{\gamma .75} \), substitute \( x = 75 \) into the regression function: \( y = -113.0937 + 3.3684 \times 75 - 0.01780 \times 75^2 \). Calculate \( y = -113.0937 + 253.63 - 100.0125 = 40.5238 \).So, the expected viscosity when the speed is 75 RPM is approximately 40.52.
02

Predict the Viscosity for 60 RPM

Substitute \( x = 60 \) into the regression function to predict viscosity: \[ y = -113.0937 + 3.3684 \times 60 - 0.01780 \times 60^2 \]. \( y = -113.0937 + 202.104 - 64.08 = 24.9303 \).Thus, the predicted viscosity at 60 RPM is approximately 24.93.
03

Compute SSE (Sum of Squares for Error)

Use the formula for SSE: \( \text{SSE} = \sum y_{i}^{2} - \hat{\beta}_{0} \Sigma y_{i} - \hat{\beta}_{1} \Sigma x_{i} y_{i} - \hat{\beta}_{2} \Sigma x_{i}^{2} y_{i} \).Plug in the given values: \[ \text{SSE} = 8386.43 - (-113.0937 \times 210.70) - (3.3684 \times 17002) - (-0.01780 \times 1419780) \]. Calculate to get SSE = 19.38.
04

Calculate s (Standard Error of the Estimate)

The standard error \( s \) is calculated as \( s = \sqrt{\frac{\text{SSE}}{n-p}} \), where \( n = 6 \) (the number of observations) and \( p = 3 \) (the number of parameters in the model). Thus, \( s = \sqrt{\frac{19.38}{6-3}} = \sqrt{6.46} = 2.54 \).The value of \( s \) is approximately 2.54.
05

Compute R² (Coefficient of Determination)

To compute \( R^2 \), use the formula \( R^2 = 1 - \frac{\text{SSE}}{\text{SST}} \).Given \( \text{SST} = 987.35 \), and \( \text{SSE} = 19.38 \), \( R^2 = 1 - \frac{19.38}{987.35} \).Calculate \( R^2 = 1 - 0.01963 = 0.98037 \).So, \( R^2 \approx 0.98 \), meaning the model explains 98% of the variance.
06

Test the Hypothesis for β2

To test \( H_0: \beta_2 = 0 \) versus \( H_a: \beta_2 eq 0 \), calculate the test statistic: \( t = \frac{\hat{\beta}_{2} - 0}{s_{\hat{\beta}_{2}}} = \frac{-0.01780}{0.00226} = -7.876 \).With degrees of freedom \( n-p = 3 \), check the t-distribution at 0.01 level for significance.Since \( |t| \) is greater than the critical value, we reject \( H_0 \). The result suggests that \( \beta_2 \) is significantly different from 0.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Expected Viscosity Calculation
To determine the expected viscosity at a specific speed, you need to substitute the given speed value into the regression model equation. For example, if you're asked to find the expected viscosity at 75 RPM, you would plug 75 in place of \( x \) in the equation: \( y = -113.0937 + 3.3684 \times 75 - 0.01780 \times 75^2 \).
This will yield a result which, in this case, is approximately 40.52. This value represents the estimated viscosity the oil would have at 75 RPM. It is important when performing these calculations to follow the order of operations (PEMDAS/BODMAS) to ensure accuracy.
This method helps predict and understand how viscosity changes with varying speeds, an essential part of Quadratic Regression Analysis.
SSE (Sum of Squares for Error)
Sum of Squares for Error (SSE) is a crucial component in determining how well a regression model fits the data. It is calculated by subtracting the sum of the squares of the differences between each observed value and the value predicted by the model.
SSE essentially measures the variance in the data that cannot be explained by the model. In our example, the formula for SSE is given by \( \text{SSE} = \sum y_{i}^{2} - \hat{\beta}_{0} \Sigma y_{i} - \hat{\beta}_{1} \Sigma x_{i} y_{i} - \hat{\beta}_{2} \Sigma x_{i}^{2} y_{i} \). By substituting known values into this formula, we get an SSE of 19.38.
A smaller SSE value indicates a better fit of the regression model. It shows that the differences between the observed and predicted viscosities are minimal.
Coefficient of Determination (R²)
The Coefficient of Determination, represented as \( R^2 \), is a key metric used to assess the explanatory power of a regression model. The \( R^2 \) value indicates the proportion of the variance in the dependent variable that is predictable from the independent variable(s).
In our case, the \( R^2 \) is calculated using \( R^2 = 1 - \frac{\text{SSE}}{\text{SST}} \). Given values of \( \text{SSE} = 19.38 \) and \( \text{SST} = 987.35 \), \( R^2 = 1 - 0.01963 = 0.98037 \).
Thus, an \( R^2 \) of approximately 0.98 implies that the quadratic regression model explains 98% of the variability in the viscosity data. This high value suggests that the model is a very good fit.
Hypothesis Testing for Regression Coefficients
Hypothesis testing in the context of regression coefficients involves testing whether these coefficients are significantly different from zero. By testing \( \beta_2 \), we determine if there is a significant quadratic effect on viscosity.
The process starts with the null hypothesis \( H_0 \): \( \beta_2 = 0 \) and the alternative hypothesis \( H_a \): \( \beta_2 eq 0 \). For this test, the formula to compute the test statistic \( t \) is \( t = \frac{\hat{\beta}_{2} - 0}{s_{\hat{\beta}_{2}}} \), which is calculated as \( t = \frac{-0.01780}{0.00226} = -7.876 \).
This test statistic is then compared against a critical value from the t-distribution at the chosen significance level (0.01 here). Given that \(|t|\) is greater than this critical value, we conclude that there is significant evidence to reject the null hypothesis. Thus, \( \beta_2 \) is statistically significant, indicating a meaningful quadratic relationship in the viscosity-speed data.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Given that \(R^{2}=.723\) for the model containing predictors \(x_{1}, x_{4}, x_{5}\), and \(x_{8}\) and \(R^{2}=.689\) for the model with predictors \(x_{1}, x_{3}, x_{3}\), and \(x_{6}\), what can you say about \(R^{2}\) for the model containing predictors a. \(x_{1}, x_{3}, x_{4}, x_{3}, x_{6}\), and \(x_{8}\) ? Explain. b. \(x_{1}\) and \(x_{4}\) ? Explain.

Let \(y=\) wear life of a bearing, \(x_{1}=\) oil viscosity, and \(x_{2}=\) load. Suppose that the multiple regression model relating life to viscosity and load is $$ Y=125.0+7.75 x_{1}+.0950 x_{2}-.0090 x_{1} x_{2}+\epsilon $$ a. What is the mean value of life when viscosity is 40 and load is 1100 ? b. When viscosity is 30 , what is the change in mean life associated with an increase of 1 in load? When viscosity is 40 , what is the change in mean life associated with an increase of 1 in load?

Utilization of sucrose as a carbon source for the production of chemicals is uneconomical. Beet molasses is a readily available and low-priced substitute. The article "Optimization of the Production of \(\beta\)-Carotene from Molasses by Blakeslea Trispora (J. of Chem. Tech. and Biotech. 2002: 933-943) carried out a multiple regression analysis to relate the dependent variable \(y=\) amount of \(\beta\)-carotene \(\left(\mathrm{g} / \mathrm{dm}^{3}\right)\) to the three predictors amount of lineolic acid, amount of kerosene, and amount of antioxidant (all g/dm \({ }^{3}\) ). b. For \(x_{1}=x_{2}=30, x_{3}=10\), a statistical software package reported that \(\hat{y}=.66573, s_{\hat{y}}=.01785\), based on the complete second-order model. Predict the amount of \(\beta\)-carotene that would result from a single experimental run with the designated values of the independent variables, and do so in a way that conveys information about precision and reliability.

a. Could a linear regression result in residuals \(23,-27,5\), \(17,-8,9\), and 15 ? Why or why not? b. Could a linear regression result in residuals \(23,-27,5\), \(17,-8,-12\), and 2 corresponding to \(x\) values \(3,-4,8\), \(12,-14,-20\), and 25 ? Why or why not? [Hint: See Exercise 10.]

Efficient design of certain types of municipal waste incinerators requires that information about energy content of the waste be available. The authors of the article "Modeling the Energy Content of Municipal Solid Waste Using Multiple Regression Analysis" (J. of the Air and Waste Mgmnt. Assoc., 1996: 650-656) kindly provided us with the accompanying data on \(y=\) energy content (kcal/ \(\mathrm{kg}\) ), the three physical composition variables \(x_{1}=\%\) plastics by weight, \(x_{2}=\%\) paper by weight, and \(x_{3}=\%\) garbage by weight, and the proximate analysis variable \(x_{4}=\%\) moisture by weight for waste specimens obtained from a certain region. a. Interpret the values of the estimated regression coefficients \(\hat{\beta}_{1}\) and \(\hat{\beta}_{4}\). b. State and test the appropriate hypotheses to decide whether the model fit to the data specifies a useful linear relationship between energy content and at least one of the four predictors. c. Given that \(\%\) plastics, \(\%\) paper, and \(\%\) water remain in the model, does \% garbage provide useful information about energy content? State and test the appropriate hypotheses using a significance level of .05. d. Use the fact that \(s_{\hat{Y}}=7.46\) when \(x_{1}=20, x_{2}=25\), \(x_{3}=40\), and \(x_{4}=45\) to calculate a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for true average energy content under these circumstances. Does the resulting interval suggest that mean energy content has been precisely estimated? e. Use the information given in part (d) to predict energy content for a waste sample having the specified characteristics, in a way that conveys information about precision and reliability.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.