/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 109 For how many integers between 1 ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

For how many integers between 1 and 20 can you approximate natural logarithms, given the values \(\ln 2 \approx 0.6931, \ln 3 \approx 1.0986,\) and \(\ln 5 \approx 1.6094 ?\) Approximate these logarithms (do not use a calculator )

Short Answer

Expert verified
We can approximate the natural logarithms of 13 integers between 1 and 20.

Step by step solution

01

Identify which integers can be expressed as a product of 2, 3 and/or 5

The first step is to determine the integers between 1 and 20 that can be expressed as a product or power of the numbers 2, 3, and/or 5. These numbers are 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 15, 16, 18 and 20.
02

Calculate the natural logarithms of the identified integers

Next, use the properties of logarithms to calculate the natural logarithms of these integers. For example, \(\ln 4 = 2\ln 2 \approx 2*0.6931 = 1.3862\) and \(\ln 6 = \ln 2 + \ln 3 \approx 0.6931 + 1.0986 = 1.7917\). Repeat this process for all the identified integers.
03

Count the number of integers we can approximate

Finally, count the number of integers for which we can approximate the natural logarithms. These will be the integers identified in step 1.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Logarithmic Properties
Understanding the properties of logarithms is crucial when working with logarithmic calculations, especially when a calculator isn't at hand. Logarithms have several properties that make it easier to perform mental calculations. Let's consider two essential properties that make approximating natural logarithms simpler.

Product Rule

One of the properties is the product rule, which states that the logarithm of a product is the sum of the logarithms of the individual factors. In mathematical terms, this is expressed as \( \ln(ab) = \ln a + \ln b \). So, if you need to compute something like \( \ln(2 \times 3) \), you can simply add \( \ln 2 \) and \( \ln 3 \) together.

Power Rule

Another property is the power rule, stating that the logarithm of a power is the exponent times the logarithm of the base, which is written as \( \ln(a^n) = n\ln a \). This property is handy when dealing with squares or cubes of a number; for example, \( \ln(2^2) = 2 \ln 2 \). These properties allow us to navigate logarithmic calculations with ease and provide a means to approximate natural logarithms for a set of integers without the need for complex computation or electronic aids.
Mental Math Logarithms
When calculating logarithms in your head or on paper, breaking down complex problems into simpler parts by using known logarithms is an effective strategy. For instance, if we consider the logarithms provided in the textbook exercise – \(\ln 2, \ln 3,\) and \(\ln 5\) – we can mentally calculate the natural logarithms of other numbers by utilizing the mentioned properties.

It’s also helpful to memorize a few key logarithm values. Much like knowing your times tables in multiplication, these logarithmic 'anchors' provide a reference point for estimating others. For numbers not directly related to our 'anchor' logarithms, we can find close multiples or factors, and then adjust our estimate accordingly. For example, for a number like 7 which doesn't directly relate to 2, 3, or 5, we might get a rough estimate by recognizing that it's just a bit more than twice 3, hence \( \ln 7 \) is slightly more than \(\ln 2 + \ln 3\).
Logarithmic Calculation Without Calculator
Performing logarithmic calculations without a calculator is a test of one's grasp of logarithmic rules and mental arithmetic. When dealing with natural logarithm approximations, it is often enough to have a basic understanding of how to handle logarithms of small primes, such as 2, 3, and 5, as we have seen in the textbook exercise.

To approximate the natural logarithm of a number without a calculator, break the number down into its prime factors, apply logarithmic properties to reduce the complexity, and then rely on known values or estimates of natural logarithms for those primes. Specific techniques can involve rounding or leveraging relationships between numbers to arrive at a reasonable estimate. For instance, if you can remember that \(\ln 10 \approx 2.303\), you can deduce that \(\ln 20\) is \(\ln (2 \times 10)\), and hence approximately \(0.6931 + 2.303 = 2.9961\). Developing these skills takes practice, but once mastered, they enhance one's ability to work with logarithms in any setting, providing valuable insight into the ways in which logarithmic relationships underpin many areas of mathematics.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

You are investing \(P\) dollars at an annual interest rate of \(r,\) compounded continuously, for \(t\) years. Which of the following would result in the highest value of the investment? Explain your reasoning. (a) Double the amount you invest. (b) Double your interest rate. (c) Double the number of years.

Data Analysis The table shows the time \(t\) (in seconds) required for a car to attain a speed of \(s\) miles per hour from a standing start. $$\begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \text { Speed, S } & \text { Time, t } \\ \hline 30 & 3.4 \\ 40 & 5.0 \\ 50 & 7.0 \\ 60 & 9.3 \\ 70 & 12.0 \\ 80 & 15.8 \\ 90 & 20.0 \\ \hline \end{array}$$ Two models for these data are as follows. \(t_{1}=40.757+0.556 s-15.817 \ln s\) \(t_{2}=1.2259+0.0023 s^{2}\) (a) Use the regression feature of a graphing utility to find a linear model \(t_{3}\) and an exponential model \(t_{4}\) for the data. (b) Use the graphing utility to graph the data and each model in the same viewing window. (c) Create a table comparing the data with estimates obtained from each model. (d) Use the results of part (c) to find the sum of the absolute values of the differences between the data and the estimated values given by each model. Based on the four sums, which model do you think best fits the data? Explain.

Write the logarithmic equation in exponential form. $$\ln \frac{1}{2}=-0.693 \ldots$4

Use a graphing utility to graph and solve the equation. Approximate the result to three decimal places. Verify your result algebraically. $$2 \ln (x+3)=3$$

Write the logarithmic equation in exponential form. $$\ln 7=1.945 \ldots$$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.